Farrell wrote: » Is it still 30 ewe flock to join?
Siamsa Sessions wrote: » Don't think so - or at least our advisor never mentioned this anyway.
rangler1 wrote: » You must have at least 30 breeding ewes over one year old on 2015 ewe census or over 100 non breeding sheep also based on 2015 ewe census. You also have to do a farm plan with your advisor and a health plan with a dept nominated vet........ they're hoping that your own vet will register for that. Vets have to do a training course, I was at athenry last night and there was a lot of aggro over that task
Green farmer wrote: » Only really looked at it in last day or two , but I'm sticking my name down. They seem to have simplified it. More box ticking and on line filling in for advisors, but don't have to go buy Rams and reseed pastures etc. Seems more aimed at animal health such as lameness etc and take actions that improves flock. Need to involve a vet for report ( advisor thinks straight forward for sheep ) but that seems to be only real cost, so should clear more then previous scheme. I enjoy going to the meetings. What do others think ?
Green farmer wrote: » I'm in bord bia scheme here for sheep, in fairness I find it ok. Some additional paperwork filling, biggest thing is medicine records and withdrawal periods, along with knackery receipts, and keeping proper track of animal movements. I'm told the sheep one is more straight forward then the dairy. sheep only here so know absolutely nothing about cattle.
For each year of the programme, the reimbursement shall be €750 per participant in respect of his/her primary sector where all the Terms & Conditions of the Knowledge Transfer Sheep Programme have been met and without prejudice to Appendix 5 in relation to reimbursement.
For each year of the programme, the facilitator payment in respect of primary sector participation in the Knowledge Transfer Sheep Programme shall be €500 per participant where all the Terms & Conditions of the Programme have been met and without prejudice to Appendix 5 in relation to Penalties.
E-Profit Monitor: E-Profit Monitor must be completed in year 1 of the Knowledge Transfer Sheep Programme and updated on an annual basis thereafter. Participants/nominees must complete a Teagasc E-Profit Monitor for the previous production year relating to the participants own farm, as verified by the facilitator (Refer to paragraph 27.6).
Username John wrote: » Just reading the T&Cs there...http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/farmingschemesandpayments/knowledgetransfer/KnowledgeTransferTCSheep180516.pdf So we get paid 750, and we pay the facilitator 500 ? Edit : Not aginst the facilitator getting paid, nor am I suggesting we should eb in this for the money, as that isn't where the true value is. Just the weighting is not what I expected is all... (there doesn't seem to be a paragraph 27.6 in the document) Am wondering what if you aren't a Teagasc member - how does that affect the Profit Monitor requirement?
rangler1 wrote: » The dept. pays the facilitator, farmer only has to pay the vet for the health plan
rangler1 wrote: » Username John wrote: » Just reading the T&Cs there...http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/farmingschemesandpayments/knowledgetransfer/KnowledgeTransferTCSheep180516.pdf[/ So we get paid 750, and we pay the facilitator 500 ? Edit : Not aginst the facilitator getting paid, nor am I suggesting we should eb in this for the money, as that isn't where the true value is. Just the weighting is not what I expected is all... (there doesn't seem to be a paragraph 27.6 in the document) Am wondering what if you aren't a Teagasc member - how does that affect the Profit Monitor requirement? The dept. pays the facilitator, farmer only has to pay the vet for the health plan
Username John wrote: » Just reading the T&Cs there...http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/farmingschemesandpayments/knowledgetransfer/KnowledgeTransferTCSheep180516.pdf[/ So we get paid 750, and we pay the facilitator 500 ? Edit : Not aginst the facilitator getting paid, nor am I suggesting we should eb in this for the money, as that isn't where the true value is. Just the weighting is not what I expected is all... (there doesn't seem to be a paragraph 27.6 in the document) Am wondering what if you aren't a Teagasc member - how does that affect the Profit Monitor requirement?
Bleating Lamb wrote: » Hope your right on that one Rangler:)
Username John wrote: » Ah... Is that a change from the last time around? As I thought the farmers payed the facilitator the last time?
rangler1 wrote: » Bleating Lamb wrote: » Hope your right on that one Rangler:) Wouldn't be much good if you had to give the facilitator 500 out of your 750 and pay the vet as well
Bleating Lamb wrote: » Have you got that info from a dept or Teagasc source?