meeeeh wrote: » That's just not true. In quite a few cases the defence is that rapist was drunk and made stupid decision or mistake. People who might behave themselves otherwise often become violent and get into the fights or commit other assaults when drunk. So telling them not to drink might be a better option.
LexieOnRale wrote: » It does not matter if a woman is passed out on the street, wearing absolutely nothing, there is NO DEFENCE at all for raping her. She is not responsible for anyone else's actions. When she drinks, it doesn't mean she's fair game to be raped. When she dresses provocatively she is not inviting men to rape her. If a man has sex with a woman without her consent then he is 100% a rapist and should be treated as such. If at any time after consenting she tells him to stop and he doesn't, he is a rapist.
bubblypop wrote: » So being drunk increases the risk of being raped?? The risk of being drunk is increased by men somehow thinking OK to rape a female who is out of her mind drunk. It totally takes away blame from the rapist. Basically your point is, don't get drunk because men just can't help themselves raping girls that can't defend themselves. It doesn't matter how drunk someone is, its never their fault that they were raped . Never Not getting hammered is just good advice. Health wise, mental health wise etc
darkpagandeath wrote: » I have no idea how this thread has gone from good advice of looking after yourself in public to ... Your blaming the victim. I have another bit of good advice Don't leave your drink unattended in a bar or club either.
bubblypop wrote: » I think the gardai will sympathize with you, it's not your fault some scumbag decides to steal your stuff. Victim is in no way to blame & quite entitled to have the door open
We have a long way to go when it comes to adequate sentencing; there is no doubt she is the victim, and rape — under any circumstance — is inexcusable. But the role of alcohol was unmentionable.
ou said, Being drunk I just couldn’t make the best decisions and neither could she. Alcohol is not an excuse. Is it a factor? Yes. But alcohol was not the one who stripped me, fingered me, had my head dragging against the ground, with me almost fully naked. Having too much to drink was an amateur mistake that I admit to, but it is not criminal. Everyone in this room has had a night where they have regretted drinking too much, or knows someone close to them who has had a night where they have regretted drinking too much. Regretting drinking is not the same as regretting sexual assault. We were both drunk, the difference is I did not take off your pants and underwear, touch you inappropriately, and run away. That’s the difference. You said, you are in the process of establishing a program for high school and college students in which you speak about your experience to “speak out against the college campus drinking culture and the sexual promiscuity that goes along with that.” Campus drinking culture. That’s what we’re speaking out against? You think that’s what I’ve spent the past year fighting for? Not awareness about campus sexual assault, or rape, or learning to recognize consent. Campus drinking culture. Down with Jack Daniels. Down with Skyy Vodka. If you want talk to people about drinking go to an AA meeting. You realize, having a drinking problem is different than drinking and then forcefully trying to have sex with someone? Show men how to respect women, not how to drink less. Drinking culture and the sexual promiscuity that goes along with that. Goes along with that, like a side effect, like fries on the side of your order. Where does promiscuity even come into play? I don’t see headlines that read, Brock Turner, Guilty of drinking too much and the sexual promiscuity that goes along with that. Campus Sexual Assault. There’s your first powerpoint slide. Rest assured, if you fail to fix the topic of your talk, I will follow you to every school you go to and give a follow up presentation.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » In practice, there are hundreds of complicating factors, such as proving lack of consent. But that's common to every non-violent rape, where there's alcohol or not. I'm saying that once sexual intercourse and lack of consent (due to intoxication) is proven, you're effectively dealing with a rape If a man turns around and says "She didn't say no, and I was to drunk to know she was too drunk to consent) he has no defence. He is expected to never get too drunk in case he won't be able to see that another person is too drunk. A woman can knowingly go out and get as drunk as she wishes, and (quite rightly) will not be held liable to any extent in law. We're not talking about violence here. We're talking about men effectively having to assume responsibility for two drunk people, himself and 'his woman'. I actually find that a bit paternalistic. I'm not sure what the better solution is, maybe this is the best of a bad lot. I'm just pointing out an anomalous situation, contrary to what another poster suggested.
darkpagandeath wrote: » There is that word..... You maybe but still did not stop your stuff getting stolen did it. If it's was me I would feel very foolish and mad that I let it happen.
bubblypop wrote: » I wouldn't feel foolish at all for having a door open in my own home. I would feel anger towards the scrote that walked in and stole my stuff.I wouldn't feel to blame in anyway at all, because, well I'm not!It's his fault.
darkpagandeath wrote: » You insurance will not pay out for a start they will blame you for not securing the premises. The Garda may well have sympathy but will also remind you to lock your doors and windows. And also inform you most such crimes are of opportunity and the open door gave them that opportunity.
One eyed Jack wrote: » The accused is innocent until proven guilty for starters, and even then they have the defence of reasonable belief, and even then...
bubblypop wrote: » My insurance will pay out, if I'm in the house & my door or window is open, some scrote gets in the window or door, I an assure you I will get insurance money. Would be different if you went away & left the doors open
darkpagandeath wrote: » I'm sure you can provide a link to any policy that states that.
bubblypop wrote: » I have seen it happen. Many many times
bubblypop wrote: » I like to go hill walking. I like to go alone, mostly listening to something on headphones. If something were to happen to me on one of these walks, if I were to get raped or murdered, how many people would say I was somehow to blame? I bet a lot on this thread. That's what's wrong with society ? It appears like the victims have all done something wrong, that's why the poor helpless rapist/murderer couldn't help himself.
ceadaoin. wrote: » Sure, we'll just put all the onus on women to "protect themselves" from being raped. We'll never talk about what causes some men to think they are entitled to a persons body if they dress or behave a certain way, and even if they don't. Nope, that's not the real issue at all.
scream wrote: » Why can't we do both? What is wrong with encouraging women to protect themselves?
darkpagandeath wrote: » You will forgive me if I don't just take your word for it yes ? I know of people that stopped at lights with the car window open and had stuff robed no pay out.
Jayop wrote: » There should be three threads of conversation on this subject imo. I'll list them in order of importance. 1) The level of punishment for a rapist is laughable. Life in prison, the same as a murder sentence. Crimes against the person are dealt with far to leniently in Ireland. Also, make alchohol/drugs consumption banned from being used as an extenuating circumstance. This will protect future victims and will also put off quite a few first time victims. 2) Prevention in the first place. I feel that point 1 is the most important thing as these guys are massive wimps who do this for power. Putting the fear of a long prison sentence in front of them may well prevent them from doing it. Any other ideas that can help like consent classes are no harm too. 3) Advise for potential victims on how to protect themselves, both self defense and situation avoidance. This one is unpalatable for some, but in conjunction with the others it just makes good sense.
bubblypop wrote: » Completely different scenarios & insurances.
bubblypop wrote: » Title of this thread Women need to face facts about the link between drinking and rape. Thats what this thread is about. There is no link between rape & drinking. Rape occurs everyday. To sober people, by sober people etc etc To suggest to women that they are somehow causing their own rapes by being drunk is disgraceful.
darkpagandeath wrote: » Admit ones mistake and move on. Or present policy's that state this.
One eyed Jack wrote: » What do you say to the person who took all your advice and "encouragement", and they are still raped? What advice would you give to men to protect themselves from being raped?
darkpagandeath wrote: » Circular argument. What do you say to murder victims family when all their precautions failed ?
darkpagandeath wrote: » Don't leave your drink untended good or bad advice ? Don't get to messy may lead you into a situation that could have been prevented good or bad advice ?