sligolad1 wrote: » In Ireland, what would be the worst case emergency scenario and how would we deal with it? Would we be able to?
AlekSmart wrote: » How would this be coded then......I's suggest that,that for the Shop Staff this was as Red as they would want...however it would be interesting to see how the "System" would grade it ?http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/exclusive-watch-shocking-scenes-as-violent-group-attempt-to-kick-in-shop-door-after-theft-of-kit-kats-30187602.html
Little CuChulainn wrote: » A nuclear or biological attack would be pretty devastating simply because it would be so unexpected. But I reckon a large scale storm on the scale of Katrina would be worse. I don't think we have the capability to recover from something like that alone.
cabledude wrote: » A storm would be worse that a Nuclear or Biological attack? Are you nuts? Storms would damage roads, bridges, telephone cables, buildings etc. But, they could be fixed. Nuclear attack would incinerate the place. Nothing left but a burnt field. And anyone within 10 miles dead or dying of radiation infection. Nuclear = storm x100
Little CuChulainn wrote: » I did say on the scale of Katrina. A hurricane releases the power of something like 25 nukes per hour. It cannot be contained or quarantined. It cannot be prevented. It does not end quickly. It could cross the country in hours. In contrast a nuke has a limited radius (20 miles squared?). A biological agent would not be as effective with our rural landscape.
cabledude wrote: » A nuke or bio weapon in Dublin, Cork or any of the other urban areas? I'd take the storm anyday.
kub wrote: » And to think of those N.E.T bulk fertiliser trains that used to run up from Cobh through Cork city then up through Dublin and onto somewhere else.....Arklow if memory serves me correctly. We do recall what else fertilizer is used for, other than agriculture.
the most complex and challenging nuclear site in Europe.
Joe Doe wrote: » Most of the risks listed here are in a word quite simply 'stupid'. Volcanoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, meteor strikes and the like have a close to non-existent occurrence risk, due to location, climate and tectonic plate structure etc. The only 'present, significant, continuing and escalating risk' is regards to Sellafield. They themselves recently confirmed it as: main facts/factors: 1 million cubic meters of nuclear waste from all over the UK has been buried for the past 55 years. Declared a potential source of contamination – due to natural coastal erosion and rising sea levels. The 110 hectare site is located just one hundred yards from the coast, on an elevation of between 5 and 25 meters above sea level. "It's highly probable the coast will naturally erode and the waste will be disrupted,” says the EA. article 1article 2
sdeire wrote: » Zombie apocolypse (to which, rather alarmingly, an entire boards forum is dedicated) hasn't even been mentioned yet. Talk about fail to prepare. On a mildly more serious note, any attack on sellafield would have a high likelihood of a SW wind and any fallout being blown in that direction. More's the pity for Newcastle, Sunderland and Edinburgh. Northeasterlies are rare enough. :rolleyes: