Baza210 wrote: » http://innealtoir.com/baza210/1e6_defs.zip
TheAmateur wrote: » WTH?!? RTE have a computer?!?
Baza210 wrote: » Y'all see the article on the Six One news?http://dynamic.rte.ie/av/230-2544206-320-180.smil
devinejay wrote: » Enlightenment please. Also wtf is a .smil?
Baza210 wrote: » You're only trying to find the energy used at that time. The car's not accelerating, so the kinetic energy is constant which means it's not using any of the energy developed by the engine.
devinejay wrote: » notes from Dr. O Dywer, where did I put them.....? Oh now I remember, that man put me to sleep so much it was like I had note-taking triggered narcolepsy, that's that then!
devinejay wrote: » Did we maybe do this in a lecture, haven't a clue how to do it.
Baza210 wrote: » Bwahahaha, got 31 out. Kinetic energy is constant. Potential is increasing. 100 km/hr * 5/18 = 27.8 m/s 27.8 sin 7 = 3.39 - car is rising at 3.39 m/s increase Ep/s = mgh = 2000 * 9.81 * 3.39 /s = 66.5 kW Engine at 65% efficiency 66.5/0.65 = 102kW, answer B.
Baza210 wrote: » Why is google calculator saying sin 7 = 0.657