There's a widely held misconception amongst far right thinkers that all money is owned by someone that "worked hard" or "earned it" and thus the peasants don't deserve anything except starvation, incarceration and death for disobeying the rules of law which the wealthy themselves have no problem circumventing.
Isn't it strange central banks can magically find money to buy high-tech weapons and invade other nations overseas but can't find money to help their own people?
Look at some recent examples of this in the below article and ask yourselves why a bunch of sanctimonious crooked politicians would care about the welfare of peasants in some far away desert when they can't even be bothered to look after people in their own country.
MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: The Money Continues to Flow Like Wine: Defense Dept. Contracts for May 29, 2012
These contracts run into billions of dollars and illustrate cogently the ineptitude of those arguing for austerity through cuts to education and health and other infrastructure.
The US government cites lack of money for closing down the schools in some US states but ...funnily enough, there's plenty for weapons and of course private banks that can borrow at 0% and buy a treasury bond with 2.5% return.
I've been arguing before that central banks are privately owned by extremely wealthy people, It aggravates me to see people believe central banks are owned by the people when the people can't even get a loan for 0% from the central bank.
Is it not obvious to everyone these central banks are privately owned?