Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

OK, do we need a "real" currency?

Options
  • 09-12-2011 1:26pm
    #1
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,521 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    This is controversial, but with everything else apparently on the table, why not:D

    Do we need a real currency, or with the size of the state, and both of the big banks effectively in state ownership, are we at the point where an electronic currency would be a viable option.

    Many transactions are now electronic, what would the effect be if they were all electronic, and cash as such was no longer used.

    Tourists would need to have electronic cards, but as the vast majority have a card of some form already, that's manageable.

    As for the rest of us, what would it mean?

    The end to bank raids, we would no longer need bank counters as such, and most of the bank branches would be less important. Is that such a bad thing? Maybe not, the state would lose the money on bank profits, but given the size of their recent losses, I do wonder about the nett value, and if the overall cost of doing business was reduced, that has to be a plus in harsh competitive times.

    The end to cash in transit raids, for the same reason.

    Kidnapping bank officials etc would be pretty pointless. Mugging pub landlords at 3 am would become a waste of time.

    There would be no cash dispensers to drag out of bank walls with JCB's

    No more queuing to get cash in or out of banks.

    Drug dealing would be pretty much impossible, the dealers would have no way to recycle their payment.

    The Black economy would be in big trouble, if there's no cash, there's no way to hide it, and things like parts for repairs still have to be bought.

    Money laundering would be hard to do

    Brown envelopes to politicians (or others) would be pretty pointless, there'd be nothing to put in them.

    OK, barter might become possible, but it would be goods for goods. That might not be such a bad thing, at least there would be real value involved.

    if it was also then made difficult to lodge "foreign" currency above a certain value unless a business was registered to the holder, the whole aspect of tax avoidance and the like becomes a lot simpler.

    Social welfare fraud becomes much easier to detect.

    Fraud or other dishonest operation within companies becomes easier to detect.

    Things like diesel laundering should be much simpler to track down and stop, someone buying large quantities of agri diesel has to have a business to use it or sell it, and the money trail is a lot simpler to trace.

    If all imports of parcels have to have a recipient ID on them, illegal or dangerous drugs and the like from questionable sources are stopped.

    What are the downsides? Big brother would have to be kept in his cage, to prevent inappropriate access to personal information.

    Politicians would have to be controlled as to the level of access they can get to patterns of spending.

    We'd need a very much better broadband network to cover the country so that all businesses could have a reliable electronic transaction processing service, but that might not be such a bad thing.

    Most crime would become pretty pointless, if the things stolen can't be sold, even for a fraction of their value, without the transaction being processed, that has to be a useful deterrent.

    Cowboy traders would be much easier to track down. The "clean your gutters", and then charge €500 for a €50 job. Not much point if you can be tracked down electronically.

    Burying a bit of cash for the retirement fund would be no longer possible, which might upset some people. but if the PAYE sector could see that the self employed sector was (forced to be ) honest, maybe some of the complaints would stop.

    Right now, I can't see any serious disadvantages? Are there any that are showstoppers? I don't think so, and most of the above look like good things to me.

    I'll just go outside and see if I've got anything that can be used as armour plating.

    Steve

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭Finnbar01


    The type of system you propose, would lead to nothing short of a totalitarian state.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    May as well just tattoo a barcode on the wrists of everyone while you're at it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,707 ✭✭✭✭Tigger


    people would uise dollars or something for the underhand stuff


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,857 ✭✭✭professore


    The Black economy would be in big trouble, if there's no cash, there's no way to hide it, and things like parts for repairs still have to be bought.

    There's your problem - our country would have it's budget balanced and in surplus instantly with all the extra cash flooding into the country's coffers. You couldn't have that.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,521 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    May as well just tattoo a barcode on the wrists of everyone while you're at it.

    Harsh reality, we're not that far off being there now, if you look closely at how the existing systems work.

    Your mobile phone calls can all be tracked to who you called, when and where you were in the country at the time. The vast number of electronic transactions are all trackable now, without any changes, and there's only cash left to worry about.

    Everyone will have a PRSI card before long, and won't access state systems without it, banks actually would be happier without customers in branches, they'd be much happier if everything was done on line, and where would we be without the Internet, and tracking what we do, where we go, etc is already a lot simpler than a lot of people would be completely comfortable with if they really looked at it. CCTV, number plate trackers, M50 Tolls, all trackable now.

    All of that is without the sort of things that are done by places like CGHQ in the UK, and by the CIA, et al. How do you think some of the terrorist activities are tracked now.

    What no cash does is get rid of the "value" of undetectable activities, and given that there are massive numbers that are also illegal, would that be so bad?

    Steve

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,159 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    A cashless economy is a good idea.

    Much less crime.

    Much less tax evasion.

    Lower cash handling costs for banks and retailers.

    (NB: bank profits would not fall, IMO)

    Smaller shadow economy.

    Inbound tourism could be an issue.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,159 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Irish Steve,

    all good points, very comprehensive post. I agree.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭Fromthetrees


    1. NO PRIVACY.
    2. BANKS WILL BE VERY POWERFUL. (look what has happened already)
    3. IDENTIFICATION THEFT.

    4. If you lose your card it takes time to get a new one. (how do you live?)
    5. Impractical as it can break easily.
    6. Who actually controls societies money? Where does control of it stop? (is banning alcoholics from buying drink the next logical step?)
    7. Surcharge/interest charge on every single transaction of goods and services.
    8. Impractical if you move to overseas.
    9. Impractical for tourism.
    10. Cards become expired and then you have to buy/get a new one which can take time. (how do you live?)
    11. Might forget your pin.
    12. You might spend money that you need for something else without realising it.
    13. People spend more when they have a card compared to cash, http://www.livescience.com/2849-study-credit-cards-spending.html
    14. Without cash there would be no instant payments for goods and services.
    14. You lose having the liberty that cash gives a person.
    15. It's very easy to lose a card.
    16. Our government can't be trusted with running a piss up in a brewery let alone having complete control over everyone's money.
    Are there enough reasons here not to have a cashless society?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭Finnbar01


    1. NO PRIVACY.
    2. BANKS WILL BE VERY POWERFUL. (look what has happened already)
    3. IDENTIFICATION THEFT.

    4. If you lose your card it takes time to get a new one. (how do you live?)
    5. Impractical as it can break easily.
    6. Who actually controls societies money? Where does control of it stop? (is banning alcoholics from buying drink the next logical step?)
    7. Surcharge/interest charge on every single transaction of goods and services.
    8. Impractical if you move to overseas.
    9. Impractical for tourism.
    10. Cards become expired and then you have to buy/get a new one which can take time. (how do you live?)
    11. Might forget your pin.
    12. You might spend money that you need for something else without realising it.
    13. People spend more when they have a card compared to cash, http://www.livescience.com/2849-study-credit-cards-spending.html
    14. Without cash there would be no instant payments for goods and services.
    14. You lose having the liberty that cash gives a person.
    15. It's very easy to lose a card.
    16. Our government can't be trusted with running a piss up in a brewery let alone having complete control over everyone's money.
    Are there enough reasons here not to have a cashless society?

    Excellent post and may I add:

    17. The computer system to run this cashless society would be exposed to bugs, viruses and hackers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,158 ✭✭✭frag420


    What do you propose I use to snort my cocaine if there are no fiddy notes in circulation??

    frAg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,159 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    1. NO PRIVACY.
    2. BANKS WILL BE VERY POWERFUL. (look what has happened already)
    3. IDENTIFICATION THEFT.

    4. If you lose your card it takes time to get a new one. (how do you live?)
    5. Impractical as it can break easily.

    You would have one or more debit cards, as now.

    But you might also use stored-value disposable cards for small-value tx, with no PIN.

    Example: you buy a 20-50 euro card from an ATM, use it up, throw it away, or reload it.

    If lost/stolen, your loss is minimised.

    6. Who actually controls societies money? Where does control of it stop? (is banning alcoholics from buying drink the next logical step?)

    As now, the quantity of money is controlled / influenced by the CB.

    7. Surcharge/interest charge on every single transaction of goods and services.

    I pay no fees when I use my debit card.

    8. Impractical if you move to overseas.
    9. Impractical for tourism.

    Tourism is an issue, yes.

    10. Cards become expired and then you have to buy/get a new one which can take time. (how do you live?)
    11. Might forget your pin.
    12. You might spend money that you need for something else without realising it.
    13. People spend more when they have a card compared to cash, http://www.livescience.com/2849-study-credit-cards-spending.html

    Interesting point, good psychology. People need to be more disciplined. Would they learn to change behaviour?


    14. Without cash there would be no instant payments for goods and services.

    Payment systems can be made faster, paying shops overnight.

    14. You lose having the liberty that cash gives a person.
    15. It's very easy to lose a card.

    It's easy to lose cash.

    16. Our government can't be trusted with running a piss up in a brewery let alone having complete control over everyone's money.
    Are there enough reasons here not to have a cashless society?

    Thanks.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,521 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Interesting that most of the replies are finding possible issues, but not many showstoppers that would make it impossible.

    It would be a huge culture shock, so many aspects of crime would be stopped, and anything that reduces the control of the banking systems has to be so worth doing at this stage, seeing the mess they got us into.

    Unfotunately, I doubt that we'd be able to find a politician with the courage to take up this idea and run with it, it's been clear from recent weeks that there's a distinct lack of real courage in the political arena,

    It was worth a try,

    Steve

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,681 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    Finnbar01 wrote: »
    Excellent post and may I add:

    17. The computer system to run this cashless society would be exposed to bugs, viruses and hackers.

    I was completely against this closed society with its oversight over the small bit of cash that the government allows the "taxpayers" - till I noted point 17. IT types might very well prosper under that :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    frag420 wrote: »
    What do you propose I use to snort my cocaine if there are no fiddy notes in circulation??

    frAg

    ...you won't be able to buy any. And personally, I don't consider a reduction in crime (temporary, while counterfeiting is set up) to be worth the permanent loss of privacy.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,024 ✭✭✭shannon_tek


    im very sure the likes of paypal would grow in a society like this. after all they are preferred


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 788 ✭✭✭SupaNova


    Drug dealing would be pretty much impossible, the dealers would have no way to recycle their payment.

    The Black economy would be in big trouble, if there's no cash, there's no way to hide it, and things like parts for repairs still have to be bought.

    This is naive. And you completely gloss over why.
    OK, barter might become possible, but it would be goods for goods.

    Instead of a gang paying for drugs with cash, they can pay with guns, jewellary, gold, diamonds, collectibles, cars, electronics etc etc. If Hollywood movies are anything to go by, paying for guns with drugs or drugs with guns is common in our existing world of cash.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭grizzly


    I'm not too far off this myself now with online – Paypal etc and for small purchases I can put most on my laser card.

    Ten years from now I'm sure I'll be making the majority of purchases with a smartphone this things I'd currently need coins for, like Luas/newspaper/pints.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,798 ✭✭✭goose2005


    People would just use cigarettes or foreign currency.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 257 ✭✭Gonzor


    Just had a quick glance at whats being mentioned already so forgive any repeats.

    1) How do small buisnesses cope with this? Take the local corner shop. Or your local taxi driver? They now need to purchase hardware/computers or go out of business? How much is it going to cost the small business to get this setup.

    2) It causes a lot of problems with giving money to other people. Your teenage daughter is going to the cinema and needs 30euro.... if you know in advance then you can transfer money to her card/account but what about when she tells ya at the very last minute.

    3) It wont really stop criminals and people buying drugs. That 50euro I transferred to his account that day was because he washed my windows/sold me some playstation games etc.... And Im sure the bigger fish will similarly have their excuses lined up about poker games and donations and what have ya... though on the plus side we mightened be able to prove criminality but we could certainly look into taxing them.

    4) What happens when there is a powercut at your local spar. Or if the internet (presuming this is all done online) goes down.

    5) What happens when hackers start messing with the system.... no point in saying they wont even at least try. Because they will.

    And then to top it all off, I cant see the people of Ireland agreeing to this. Too many people would have to much too lose, the small shops, worried criminals, politicians trying to hide papertrails or anybody thats in the "brown envelope game" in any way, shape or form.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    What are the downsides? Big brother would have to be kept in his cage, to prevent inappropriate access to personal information.

    Banks, governments and corporations would love that type of access to your personal details.

    Also, an alternative hard currency would spring up very quickly imo.

    Someone would just see a business opportunity and make coins with precious metal content that could be traded for your virtual credits.

    If hard currency was outlawed it would just go underground.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,481 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Interestingly I've found new zealand far more towards your ideal than home. The eftpos cards are accepted everywhere and I have not carried cash in months because of it.

    Not near total removal of cash by any means I reckon, but a lot closer than ireland is.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,521 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Gonzor wrote: »
    Just had a quick glance at whats being mentioned already so forgive any repeats.

    1) How do small buisnesses cope with this? Take the local corner shop. Or your local taxi driver? They now need to purchase hardware/computers or go out of business? How much is it going to cost the small business to get this setup.

    A lot of small businesses already have electronic processing, and if this was to become a reality, there would be other methods, using things like one time cards, or similar,
    2) It causes a lot of problems with giving money to other people. Your teenage daughter is going to the cinema and needs 30euro.... if you know in advance then you can transfer money to her card/account but what about when she tells ya at the very last minute.
    the transfer is made there and then, using either the net, or a mobile phone, or a phone line transfer, the technology is already there and in use, just not always available 24/7 at the moment, but that's the supplier's choice right now.

    3) It wont really stop criminals and people buying drugs. That 50euro I transferred to his account that day was because he washed my windows/sold me some playstation games etc.... And Im sure the bigger fish will similarly have their excuses lined up about poker games and donations and what have ya... though on the plus side we mightened be able to prove criminality but we could certainly look into taxing them.
    Looks like a plus to me, and depending on the time of day, and the other aspects, etc, a much better trace of activity is available, so that all looks good in that respect.

    4) What happens when there is a powercut at your local spar. Or if the internet (presuming this is all done online) goes down.
    Exactly the same as happens now, the local spar etc is pretty much in trouble with bar code scanning tills and the like already, and there are cheap options to provide backup power to things like tills already.
    5) What happens when hackers start messing with the system.... no point in saying they wont even at least try. Because they will.
    Yes, but hopefully, most of it will be on Linux based boxes rather than Microsoft boxes, so hacking is harder to do, and the same issue applies, if the transaction is electronic, for it to happen, there has to be a trail, and even hackers don't like being traced.

    And then to top it all off, I cant see the people of Ireland agreeing to this. Too many people would have to much too lose, the small shops, worried criminals, politicians trying to hide papertrails or anybody thats in the "brown envelope game" in any way, shape or form.

    Shame :D Criminals and politicians inconvenienced by having to be honest, that will be a refreshing change indeed, who knows, after a few years, we might even be able to trust the politicians again.

    Things like Social Welfare fraud, along the lines of a couple that fly to Turkey every other month with 2 empty suitcases, use a relative's apartment for a few days, and come back with the 2 suitcases stuffed with things to sell, one case pays for the flights, the other is clear profit, yet they are on benefits, if they can't hide the cash like they do now, they can't fiddle the system in the way they do now.

    I reckon that's a good plus for all the rest of us.

    No cash would upset the travelling community as well, as they'd have less ability to hide their activities, Oh dear, pardon me if I don't shed too many tears about that change.

    Would also be interesting to see how many non Irish benefit claimants are actually resident here, or do they arrive on Ryanair the day before they are due to sign on, and return the same evening after they've signed?

    Disability benefit claimants who are suddenly found to have a significant income from "unknown" sources?

    Double jobbers, who are paid cash for the second job?

    Refugees who are on benefit and not supposed to be working, but are? There are apparently 15 taxi's operating out of the camp at Mosney.

    All of these are a part, maybe not a large part, but a part of why the social welfare bill is as high as it is, and if it came down, that's a step in the right direction of getting the cost of living in Ireland back down to manageable levels, which will help reduce the overall bill that everyone else is having to support right now.

    Yes, the banks and speculators, encouraged by naive or ignorant (I'm still not sure which) politicians caused a lot of it, but the other aspect is that even if the property bubble hadn't exploded in the way that it did, the total governement spend was too high, and had/has to be brought down to a level that all of us can afford.

    If taking cash out of the loop, especially if the Euro goes bang in the next while, will help get a better management of all aspects of the way Irish Society is operating, then maybe it should be being looked at in a more strutured manner.

    No, it won't be easy, none of what we're facing right now is easy, and that's part of the problem, too many people are looking at it and turning away from the issues because they are too hard.

    That's not going to solve the problem, and if we want to have an Irish nation that people can be proud of, and that will work properly for the children that are still being born on a day by day basis, then everything has to go into the melting pot to be tested by heat and fire, and if it's not viable, then it has to change, and the present social and economic structure of what's left of Ireland has to be a prime candidate, along with things like the church/state relationship, the future of the Irish Language and all things related to it, and if we really are honest, the whole structure and direction of the Republic.

    Republic 2 may not be so far away, or such a bad idea, if it means that the children being born now will have a future. At least it has the potential to be a bloodless revolution. Ireland is large enough, and paradoxically small enough to be able to withstand the pressures and problems of making such changes in ways and timescales that are just not an option for larger nations, and the end result could well be a much better place to live for the future generations.

    It's time to move on from cronyism, the brown envelope culture, and the divisions that have hindered progress for too long.

    Ireland is a different society now to what it was even 20 years ago, and as a result, the changes needed now are massive even compared to 20 years ago. If they are made, there is a future, if they are not, I fear there will not be a future that I would want to be part of or associated with.

    Yes, I've drifted away in some respects from the original subject of the thread, but that's because it's part of the overall picture, and the overall picture is what we have to deal with, and right now, we need any and all methods, however controversial, that will deal with the problems that are out there right now.

    Steve

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 788 ✭✭✭SupaNova


    Read this article today and thought of this thread.
    Tide.jpg
    As has been widely reported recently, an unlikely crime wave has rapidly spread throughout the United States and has taken local law-enforcement officials by surprise. The theft of Tide liquid laundry detergent is pandemic throughout cities in the United States. One individual alone stole $25,000 worth of Tide detergent during a 15-month crime spree, and large retailers are taking special security measures to protect their inventories of Tide. For example, CVS is locking down Tide alongside commonly stolen items like flu medications. Liquid Tide retails for $10–$20 per bottle and sells on the black market for $5–$10. Individual bottles of Tide bear no serial numbers, making them impossible to track. So some enterprising thieves operate as arbitrageurs buying at the black-market price and reselling to the stores, presumably at the wholesale price. Even more puzzling is the fact that no other brand of detergent has been targeted.


    What gives here? This is just another confirmation of Menger's insight that the market responds to the absence of sound money by monetizing highly salable commodities. It is clear that Tide has emerged as a subsidiary local currency for black-market, especially drug, transactions — but for legal transactions in low-income areas as well. Indeed police report that Tide is being exchanged for heroin and methamphetamine and that drug dealers possess inventories of the commodity that they are also willing to sell. But why is laundry detergent being employed as money, and why Tide in particular?

    :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    SupaNova wrote: »
    Read this article today and thought of this thread.

    :pac:

    You know, even though I'm opposed to the cashless society myself, I find that article too grindingly in my face to read even as far as the bits you quote:
    dragooned into the banking system...notoriously corrupt...government...hard-earned income...plundered by the state...Swedish central bank...gloated....fiscal and monetary apparatchiks, who themselves hate and fear transparency like vampires do sunlight...

    Reads like the work of an over-excited undergrad trying his hand for the first time at propaganda.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭patwicklow




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    patwicklow wrote: »

    Reading that one certainly makes the first one appear a lot less hysterical, anyway.

    amused,
    Scofflaw


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,370 Mod ✭✭✭✭andrew


    1. NO PRIVACY.

    Yeah, for this reason I think it's a terrible idea, but to play devil's advocate for a bit:
    2. BANKS WILL BE VERY POWERFUL. (look what has happened already)

    Given they're already incredibly powerful, it doesn't seem like this gives them that much more
    3. IDENTIFICATION THEFT.

    This can already happen under the status quo. And under the status quo, someone doesn't even have to go so far as to steal your identity to rob your money, all they have to do is steal your cash. This would make stealing money harder.
    4. If you lose your card it takes time to get a new one. (how do you live?)

    Have more than one card for the same account. Some people can't live without glasses, so they've two pairs, or their car, so they've two sets of keys. Also, I imagine it'd be technologically feasible to establish an express card replacement service.
    5. Impractical as it can break easily.

    Then make it so that it doesn't break easily? I don't have a credit card so I don't know, but do they suffer from frequent outages?
    6. Who actually controls societies money? Where does control of it stop? (is banning alcoholics from buying drink the next logical step?)

    Slippery slope

    7. Surcharge/interest charge on every single transaction of goods and services.

    Why does that necessarily follow? Perhaps it'd be the other way around, and if you wanted to use cash of some sort (assuming you could) there'd be a surcharge on that, because then the shop would have to process the cash.

    8. Impractical if you move to overseas.

    How? You'd still be able to go into a bank, and request X amount of foreign currency, in the same way you to today.
    9. Impractical for tourism.

    Local shops can already accept foreign laser/credit cards, right? Now, tourists would just be confined to using those cards.
    10. Cards become expired and then you have to buy/get a new one which can take time. (how do you live?)

    People would do the same thing they do regarding all the other things they need to live; they'd plan ahead. People rarely go hungry because they forgot to buy enough food.
    11. Might forget your pin.

    There are ways of retrieving your pin which exist today, and if you needed the pin to live you probably wouldn't forget it.
    12. You might spend money that you need for something else without realising it.

    With the advent of online banking, it's already pretty easy to keep track of expenditure. You'd still be able to get printed statements like you currently do.
    13. People spend more when they have a card compared to cash, http://www.livescience.com/2849-study-credit-cards-spending.html

    Maybe this effect won't be so pronounced when all they have to spend is card money. And anyway, more spending would be good for the economy ;)
    14. Without cash there would be no instant payments for goods and services.

    Cashless instant payments already exist. Online banking already makes it really easy to transfer money to someone's account too.
    14. You lose having the liberty that cash gives a person.

    If you mean the privacy point above, I take it. But assuming every shop takes card in this cashless economy, you wouldn't lose any liberty at all.
    15. It's very easy to lose a card.

    It's also easy to lose cash, and once it's lost, it's gone from you forever. At least if you lose a card, nobody else can spend that money, so it'd make it harder to lose money.
    16. Our government can't be trusted with running a piss up in a brewery let alone having complete control over everyone's money.

    Given credit card companies manage to run their services well, I imagine the government could subcontract the service to a company who knows what it's doing. Or it could be a mostly private initiative.
    Are there enough reasons here not to have a cashless society?

    As I said it think it's a terrible Idea, just not as terrible as people seem to think.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭Finnbar01


    andrew wrote: »
    As I said it think it's a terrible Idea, just not as terrible as people seem to think.

    It's far worse than you think.

    If we have a cashless society then government would be in total control of the money.

    One thing the government would do is to bring in an interest rate below zero. The reasoning behing this, is that people would spend their money and thus our economy would improve.

    What would more than likely happen, is that prices would rise and
    production would fall.

    Take into acount a loss of our privacy and an erosion of our liberty, this is an atrocious idea.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,454 ✭✭✭Icepick


    Finnbar01 wrote: »
    The type of system you propose, would lead to nothing short of a totalitarian state.
    real-life example (although non-existence of electronic banking made this possible in the first place)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,370 Mod ✭✭✭✭andrew


    Finnbar01 wrote: »
    andrew wrote: »
    As I said it think it's a terrible Idea, just not as terrible as people seem to think.

    It's far worse than you think.

    If we have a cashless society then government would be in total control of the money.

    One thing the government would do is to bring in an interest rate below zero. The reasoning behing this, is that people would spend their money and thus our economy would improve.

    What would more than likely happen, is that prices would rise and
    production would fall.

    Take into acount a loss of our privacy and an erosion of our liberty, this is an atrocious idea.

    The government don't and wouldn't control interest rates.


Advertisement