Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

TV LICENCE INSPECTOR???

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,681 ✭✭✭green123


    mauzo! wrote: »
    Did you just look up her previous posts to find something she's spent money on that she could have used to pay the TV licence? :mad:

    whats wrong with that ?

    some people need to be told.

    people are constantly complaining about not being able to pay bills and loans but i bet if we seen a full breakdown of most peoples spending, we would see a huge amount of money wasted on stuff that is not necessary.

    people who dont have much money should pay their bills and loans first before they waste money on non essentials


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭IrishEyes19


    Pay for it like everyone else. If you dont pay for it, you are issued a court summons. Is the 160 euro really worth risking getting your name in the local paper over. seriously. If you have a tv, pay for it, like everyone else is expected to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,206 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    Pay for it like everyone else. If you dont pay for it, you are issued a court summons. Is the 160 euro really worth risking getting your name in the local paper over. seriously. If you have a tv, pay for it, like everyone else is expected to.


    Why should people pay it tho? I get the legal backlash, as you said .... But lets step put of the box for a second. Paying a fee for an electrical device you own. Thats mental. I mean what next? fee for using a microwave?


  • Registered Users Posts: 680 ✭✭✭AllthingsCP


    green123 wrote: »
    whats wrong with that ?

    some people need to be told.

    people are constantly complaining about not being able to pay bills and loans but i bet if we seen a full breakdown of most peoples spending, we would see a huge amount of money wasted on stuff that is not necessary.

    people who dont have much money should pay their bills and loans first before they waste money on non essentials

    back in 2007-08 i paid all my bill, loans, and road tax everything TV licence never missed a date, Even paid over due video's from rental stores. Fast forward today and i pay rent, shopping, heating, school for kids and sky. No other bill or out going finance is paid apart from the odd take away or if the kids want something nice. I drive and road tax is not a major priory for me. I told a guard to tell the big boys to take it out of the 30 k debt they have me in. And pay me back the rest when they have it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 680 ✭✭✭AllthingsCP


    Why should people pay it tho? I get the legal backlash, as you said .... But lets step put of the box for a second. Paying a fee for an electrical device you own. Thats mental. I mean what next? fee for using a microwave?



    Microwave and Toaster Inspector,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,188 ✭✭✭wil


    Microwave and Toaster Inspector,
    Well you can feck right off. My toaster is banjaxed and I reheat all my food on the crt TV


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 998 ✭✭✭dharma200


    green123 wrote: »
    whats wrong with that ?

    some people need to be told.

    people are constantly complaining about not being able to pay bills and loans but i bet if we seen a full breakdown of most peoples spending, we would see a huge amount of money wasted on stuff that is not necessary.

    people who dont have much money should pay their bills and loans first before they waste money on non essentials

    Is going through someone's historical posts and trawling them up not against any charter. If not it should be. Who are you to decide what is necessary in someone's life? I guess you would be the type to enjoy taxes such as the bedroom tax in Britain, or taxing people for having any type of contact with the outside world... People who don't have much money should pay their bills... Obviously my friend, you have yet to encounter the real world, and perhaps are sitting from the vantage point of privelidge where you have never had your services cut of because it was that or food. Sanctimonious much? What about people with ALOT of money! should they pay their loans and bills first too. You know, the likes of those who owe billions, who the people who have little or no money are paying for that aren't they, because of the threat of little jobs worthy calling around at 9pm threatening jail......
    Feel free to trawl through my previous posts to try to get some sort of profiling so you can tell me how promptly I should pay my bills, and which ones have more importance over the others, and how I am ever so wasteful, and how I should be grateful and pay my t ffs v licence before anything else seeing as I don't have much money.... The very people the licence enforcers choose, single mums, poor areas etc.... Oh we will put you in jail.... Nice. Oh you shouldn't have shoes on your feet, ah but sure didn't you have a holiday in 2005......

    Your post actually brought a bit of sick up in my mouth


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40 Oprahs_Vagina


    "Shure... shure isn't it deh law hey ?"

    OP unless they get your name, just ignore them and burn every letter. Don't be guilt tripped into this "leeching off the taxpayer nonsense".

    Some gimp being paid with taxpayer money and treated as a "civil servant" to nosey through people's windows and threaten them with legal action for acquiring a "licence" to watch their own property ? You're essentially paying for a luxury (entertainment) under the guise of the label "tax". It's laughable really. You'll notice most things charged as a dubious separate tax tend not to adhered to quite well, Property, Motor tax, TV licence.

    Subscription based has been suggested, but that still isn't good enough for the "I want it, so you pay as well brigade". Your paying for irrelevant crap and sub standard "entertainment" really. If it was such an integral service, it would be taken from the general purse which funds actual public services and infrastructure. Nope I'm happy enough just paying my UPC package thank you very much. :)

    Countries which have never had or abolished the TV licence :

    Australia
    Belgium (Flemish region)
    Cyprus
    Finland
    Gibraltar
    Hungary
    Iceland
    India
    Malaysia
    Malta
    Netherlands
    New Zealand
    Portugal
    Singapore
    Andorra
    Estonia
    Liechtenstein
    Luxembourg
    Spain
    Canada
    United States
    China
    Hong Kong
    Iran
    Vietnam
    Philippines

    Italy and Poland have severe evasion rates also (40% and 60%).

    Hope this broadcast tax fails spectacularly too. Where do you get the balls Mr. Rabbitte ??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 556 ✭✭✭sligoface


    After moving back from the States, I was at first relieved to live in a society where people cannot own guns. Until I heard about the TV license inspector. You wouldn't have many people signing up to do that job in Philadelphia, to be sure.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭WilyCoyote


    tacklemore wrote: »
    Got yet another letter in the post today. Nearly 3 1/2 years at this stage. Scraped my name off the labels on the bins, nothing left visible in the car with my name on it, blind firmly pulled down and curtains drawn, completely ignore door bell, and regular visitors have a secret knock. I'll purchase a licence when I purchase a house.
    As long as they can't trace my car reg or check the name on the household bills, its all good in the hood

    Yo, bro!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    sligoface wrote: »
    After moving back from the States, I was at first relieved to live in a society where people cannot own guns. Until I heard about the TV license inspector. You wouldn't have many people signing up to do that job in Philadelphia, to be sure.

    Reminds me of a joke that in south africa the fine for shooting a trespasser is half of that for not having a TV licence. I doubt its true but it would be funny if it was.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,576 ✭✭✭monkeysnapper


    If I were a TV licence inspector I'd dress up as robocop . The old one . And pull of the funny facial expressions when he was sitting in his chair getting really engry. .... I'd say things like..... Stay out of trouble...... If they didn't have licence I'd shoot them and say .... Your move creep. .oh I'd love it, id do the slow robotic moves an all


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,410 ✭✭✭bbam


    We've been 19 years without one.
    Inspector has never called and until he does or they enforce the charge on every house like the household charge we've no intension to get one.

    This is our third address and no knock at the door


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,324 ✭✭✭tallus


    Don't know if it has been mentioned already, but you,can pay for a tv licence by the month.
    Got my forst tv licence in about 8 years a few weeks back. That's the way I am paying for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,641 ✭✭✭Teyla Emmagan


    Get rid of the telly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,706 ✭✭✭120_Minutes


    Get rid of the telly.

    I'd prefer to get rid of RTE.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40 Oprahs_Vagina


    Get rid of the telly.

    Why ? It's their property :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,007 ✭✭✭SIX PACK


    I think everything boils down to this vital question.

    Could you live with the shame


  • Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭ezekel




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,520 ✭✭✭An Ri rua


    SIX PACK wrote: »
    I think everything boils down to this vital question

    Could you live with the shame ?

    Everything boils down to pernickety grammar police swoops


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭mikeym


    For entertainment purposes :D

    This video is so funny.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    last year i had a very nasty letter from an post. name incorrectly spelled. ditto address. threatening me with instant jail as i had no tv licence.

    i have no tv and actually they send me a free tv licence as i am a pensioner.

    they had not checked properly and i tripped them into admitting it was a tip off...eejit local nasty thought my digiweb dish was tv

    left an post feeling the worse for wear...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,883 ✭✭✭frozenfrozen


    It's amazing how people think they shouldn't pay the license while they still use the services. The funding from the tv license keeps a whole industry in ireland going, while still providing new, weather reports, the occasional good program on rte, TG4 for those so inclined, coverage of matches, and radio. The fee is seen as optional, but it shouldn't be, it's important that we have a national broadcaster..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,318 ✭✭✭✭Menas


    It's amazing how people think they shouldn't pay the license while they still use the services. The funding from the tv license keeps a whole industry in ireland going, while still providing new, weather reports, the occasional good program on rte, TG4 for those so inclined, coverage of matches, and radio. The fee is seen as optional, but it shouldn't be, it's important that we have a national broadcaster..

    Its important that we have a national broadcaster but the one we have is so ****.
    Too many tv channels. Just one would do for me.
    Little worth watching on there bar the news, election coverage and Love Hate.
    Over paid presenters.
    Chatshows that mostly interview other RTE 'stars'.
    2fm (no more needs saying).

    Give me just one tv channel that is well run and value for money and I would bet people would be a lot happier paying the tv licence.

    And don't get me started on the new broadcasting charge!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,883 ✭✭✭frozenfrozen


    Its important that we have a national broadcaster but the one we have is so ****.
    Too many tv channels. Just one would do for me.
    Little worth watching on there bar the news, election coverage and Love Hate.
    Over paid presenters.
    Chatshows that mostly interview other RTE 'stars'.
    2fm (no more needs saying).

    Give me just one tv channel that is well run and value for money and I would bet people would be a lot happier paying the tv licence.

    And don't get me started on the new broadcasting charge!

    Going to reply not directly to you, and just outline what I feel on the situation, so if I say you it's in the broader sense of the word!

    I agree I agree! As public broadcasters they have the obligation to create content for the public, I sometimes wonder exactly where my content is, but then again everyone once in a while there is something that I do want to watch, in amongst all the terrible stuff. Lots of mediocre presenters getting huge money, and interviewing Z listers.. and I can't listen to 2fm because the ****e they put on it.

    But, outside of rte, the sound and vision fund does make good content though, and it gets its funding from the tv license.

    Even though they p*ss away money in rte, a part from the presenters getting $$$$$$$$$, the rest is fairly well spent, being that there's some kind of content made for the different demographics..

    The new broadcasting charge is basically just tv license with no option of not paying, obviously thousands will still not pay it. Everyone is exposed to the media that the funding goes towards, and it's unfair that some people wouldn't pay this charge.. If they don't like some of the content that is made by rte, then it probably wasnt intended for them anyway, but there'll be something else for them as the broadcaster is obligated to entertain, inform, and educate the public. If they're not doing that then you can report RTE to the BAI and they'll review the situation to see if you're actually not being represented.

    Obviously that sound a bit romantic that they'd listen, but they do police rte fairly closely to make sure they're creating content for the people. If there's not a lot of content for say 18-24 year old males it's because they've realised that that age group don't watch daytime tv, or fridays from 8pm etc etc, and instead just make the midweek movie, or something, suitable for them to make sure they're getting their fair share of content.

    Whereas they have all that crap on during the day talking about menial things on panels, tabloid tv, because the demographic who watch tv during that time suit that content. Also it's cheap to make, each episode would be a matter of <10k, compared to the 100k they could spend per hour of documentary.

    It's a pity people compare RTE to their favourite satellite channel, where rte only has the news, weather, and occasional good program, but realistically there can't be a situation where rte has content you like all the time. Talking TV. The radio situation is fairly different.

    I've written all this and kind of want to delete it because someone will definitely nitpick something but it's all my understanding of how it works, and as things go it's a lot more efficient than where other money goes from taxes, in that content actually gets made and some of it suits me personally:
    And the reason the TV license (or broadcasting charge) has to be kept separate and not just hidden inside some other tax, is so that the government can't mess with it. The money is collected by the BAI, and given to RTE, the V&S, TG4, etc etc. RTE do with it what they want, and they just so happen to spend a lot of it on presenters, but the people running RTE would be spending the same amount of money either way. Yes it would be better to spend those millions on more good content, but good content for who? The way they have it worked out, those presenters are content for SOME demographic (finding me someone who will admit to liking some of those people would be difficult, but still). Either way RTE is run like a business and although it may seem mad from the outside to be paying people thousands of euros for what seems like little work, must make sense to them from a business point of view.


    Jesus this is getting a bit long winded

    TL;DR,
    RTE have an obligation to provide content for the different audiences of Ireland. A lot of content is crap because it wasn't made for you. A lot of the tv license charge DOESNT go to rte, and is spent on irish film, radio, orchestra, etc. They seem like they piss away money but compared to a lot of things in ireland, it's fairly efficient.


Advertisement