Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Firewall

  • 26-02-2003 7:54pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭


    Before I start I hope i'm posting in the right place...
    I need advice on what firewall program to choose for my 56k connection i'm already using Norton Antivirus 2002.

    Thanks in advance :p


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,414 ✭✭✭tom-thebox


    Nortan security is pretty sharp, plus you can make your own policys and a nice little ruleset.

    Blackice is pretty good along with Conseal firewall.

    Do a search on www.tucows.com for the trial versions to try them out.

    Anoter choice if you want to spend time at it snort www.snort.org.

    Regards


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 10,501 Mod ✭✭✭✭ecksor


    Bearing in mind that snort isn't a firewall of course.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,414 ✭✭✭tom-thebox


    Originally posted by ecksor
    Bearing in mind that snort isn't a firewall of course.

    No but its a hell of a packet sniffer with a good rule set just the thing for intrusion detection.

    :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,958 ✭✭✭Chad ghostal


    zonelabs do a good free firewall, simple easy to use etc etc..
    all youd need for a home connection. .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 915 ✭✭✭logistic


    The only thing with zone alarm is that is slows your connection, im not exactly to sure what kind off effect this will be on a 56 k.
    Is it realy worth it even if u have norton 2000?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 103 ✭✭drjolt


    If you want more power & control than zonealarm, take a look at Tiny Personal Firewall v4.5, which in addition to packet filtering seems to have added systrace-ish system call control functionality along with an IDS module which uses snort rulesets. Unfortunately it's no longer free for individual use, cost is $39. www.tinysoftware.com

    I may even fork out myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭^whitey^


    Thanks for the info lads. I think i'll go with zone alarm and let ye know what i think of it.:)

    Cheers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    Get a 486 and install something like IPCop linux.

    Simple, free, secure and you get a Unix box to play with for fun or profit.

    "Breeze drifting on by, you know how I feel.
    It's a new dawn it's a new day, it's a new life for me yeah".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 103 ✭✭drjolt


    Just once I'd like to see a discussion on firewalling at home where the proverbial old 486 doesn't get trotted out.

    BTW the old free tiny personal firewall 2.x seems to still exist, under the kerio brand http://www.kerio.com/us/kpf_overview.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭^whitey^


    Can someone tell me more or leave a url as to where i can learn about the 486 running linux does it act as a hardware firewall or wha?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 10,501 Mod ✭✭✭✭ecksor


    Um, not sure how to answer that question.

    Anyway, it would essentially be the gateway on your home lan, configured to dial up to your ISP and do packet filtering using iptables (or whatever Linux uses nowadays). Such a setup would typically be well hardened (the phrase you're looking for there is "bastion host") and configured to do NAT (or on linux they call it "Masquerading"). Can't refer you to an article, but searching for the above terms and phrases will probably dig some stuff up for you.

    If you are used to unix like operating systems, then OpenBSD is probably better suited to this job. A rough generalisation I would tend to make about such configurations is that the more user-friendly ones tend to take a lot more work to setup properly for this sort of thing unfortunately.

    For a standalone windows box I'd probably go with the solutions that DrJolt posted, unless you have spare hardware and feel like experimenting and aren't in a hurry.

    (If you do go down this route, feel free to post questions on this forum. A few threads about securing home setups wouldn't do any harm).


  • Registered Users Posts: 292 ✭✭ainiseoir


    The fun starts when your Norton Anti Virus and Zone Alarm cross swords over the protection of your e-mail.
    Both suggest turning off a vital feature of the other's software.
    As both are excellent programs, pity to have to mess with them.
    If you get a rush of blood and buy Zone Alarm Pro, bypass the bundle with Anonymizer added. they haven't got it right yet and it will do your head in.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    Just once I'd like to see a discussion on firewalling at home where the proverbial old 486 doesn't get trotted out.

    Personally, I use a 386dx with 16mb of ram and a 80mb hard disk, running Slackware 8.0, Linux 2.4.19 and iptables, but, for most people, that's just not feasable, much like the purchase of commercial software and running of the same on an inherintly insecure OS ™ like windows.

    Aside from that is the very valid point that most people can't afford or simply have better sense then to pay €500 on a hardware firewall solution when a free and better solution is available in Linux.

    I don't think it's tedious to point out an extremely secure low cost firewalling paradigm in Linux, as opposed to the insecure, bloatware paradigm in Microsoftopian software solution land.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 10,501 Mod ✭✭✭✭ecksor


    It is very tedious.


Advertisement