3D Glasses

TeddyTedson · 02-12-2010 2:09am #1

3D glasses, are you for or against them?
I'm against them because there is better technology!
Maybe I should make a poll...?

AnonoBoy · 02-12-2010 2:10am

Well at the moment 3D technology is pretty useless without them.

Black Swan · 02-12-2010 2:11am

Real 3D?

Kimono-Girl · 02-12-2010 2:12am

they make me feel so geeky!!

me & glasses =

alwaysadub · 02-12-2010 2:12am

Be a bit of a waste of money going to see a 3D Film without them.

javaboy · 02-12-2010 2:12am

They really do seem to polarise opinion. :cool:

KeithM89_old · 02-12-2010 2:12am

I dont mind but iv often forgotten to take them off and went around town with them on...

WindSock · 02-12-2010 2:12am

Against. They are mighty uncomfortable to wear over regular glasses. I hate all glasses. 'cept sunglasses.

Scuid Mhór · 02-12-2010 2:13am

They're annoying for the first few minutes but from then on, it's plain sailing. If 3-D glasses are in the name of the greater good, I have no objections.

krudler · 02-12-2010 2:14am

AnonoBoy wrote: »

Well at the moment 3D technology is pretty useless without them.

not true, the new Nintendo 3DS doesnt use them and early reports say the depth of field is amazing

Nemanja91 · 02-12-2010 2:15am

3D contact lenses is were it's at!

MistyCheese · 02-12-2010 2:15am

3D technology in real life. Otherwise referred to as; real life.

AnneElizabeth · 02-12-2010 2:30am

Someone told me they make your eyes cross-eyed in order to see the 3-Dness. IDK if it's true or not but it's kinda scared me from using them..

Smokin_Aces · 02-12-2010 2:44am

Designers are getting in on the act now.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/nov/28/entertainment/la-ca-3dglasses-20101128

CrazyRabbit · 02-12-2010 2:45am

There is 3D TV's now that don't require the glasses. Though the viewing angle is a bit crap currently.

Captain Chaos · 02-12-2010 2:47am

Don't like them because I can't see through both eyes at the same time even though both are open. Major left eye dominant issue.

smk89 · 02-12-2010 3:06am

I haven't seen a 3d movie yet so I don't know

Sticky_Fingers · 02-12-2010 3:09am

smk89 wrote: »

I haven't seen a 3d movie yet so I don't know

I'll let the good Doctor explain what you are missing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08FK7WghHSc

kowloon · 02-12-2010 3:09am

I've lost most of the sight in my right eye so I'm also very left eye dominant.
Went to see avatar and it still looked nice and three dimensional.
Not sure I could see myself putting on 3d glasses to watch the news though.

jimmycrackcorm · 02-12-2010 3:10am

All for them if they make boobies bigger.

For now I'll stick to beer that makes ugly women look like models.

Trevor451 · 02-12-2010 3:15am

Bit annoying having to wear another pair of glasses over another :mad:

smk89 · 02-12-2010 3:17am

Sticky_Fingers wrote: »

I'll let the good Doctor explain what you are missing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08FK7WghHSc

Aah I see, wake me up when they create the matrix.

citizen_p · 02-12-2010 3:34am

Blue_Lagoon wrote: »

Real 3D?

yea i heard about that, its a new thing being developed in hollywood. i think they're gonna be called "plays"

kowloon · 02-12-2010 3:38am

Mousey- wrote: »

yea i heard about that, its a new thing being developed in hollywood. i think they're gonna be called "plays"

Can't see that catching on.

FruitLover · 02-12-2010 3:40am

AnneElizabeth wrote: »

Someone told me they make your eyes cross-eyed in order to see the 3-Dness. IDK if it's true or not but it's kinda scared me from using them..

It's true. Also, the earth is flat and these 'moving pictures' are actually demons trapped inside a thin screen.

'Tis the devil's work! :eek:

:rolleyes:

Son Of A Vidic · 02-12-2010 4:12am

No interest in them, sure isn't HD more than enough really.This 3D rubbish is the usually marketing bullsh1t landed on all of us. Suddenly our HD TV's are no longer good enough, oh ya have to buy a 3D TV now! - fcuk off. Off course 3 - 4 years
into owning a 3D TV, the industry will start shoving holographic TV's down our throats and restart the whole cycle again.

Minstrel27 · 02-12-2010 9:05am

It is a phase that Hollywood goes through every now and again. 3D has been and gone many times previously. It is far too expensive to have 3D in your home, especially if there is a family.

Blazer · 02-12-2010 9:29am

Went to see Avatar in 3d...I wear glasses myself and I was even freaked out walking into the cinema and seeing everyone wearing glasses...:eek:

Tellox · 02-12-2010 9:48am

Don't think the glasses phase is going to last - but the new tech sony are showing off (holographic-esque without the glasses) is definitely something to keep an eye on. I can see the 3DS pushing 3DTV sales in a massive way, too. Hopefully some decent non-glasses TVs will be making a decent push into the market around this time too.. can't stand how stupid people look with those glasses on. A pub in waterford always shows sky sports 3D matches. Looks ridiculous, walking in and everyone's wearing dark shades. It's like a pervert convention.

gravityisalie · 02-12-2010 10:34am

Captain Chaos wrote: »

Don't like them because I can't see through both eyes at the same time even though both are open. Major left eye dominant issue.

same here !

down with 3D!

02-12-2010 11:13am

medicman2009 wrote: »

No interest in them, sure isn't HD more than enough really.This 3D rubbish is the usually marketing bullsh1t landed on all of us. Suddenly our HD TV's are no longer good enough, oh ya have to buy a 3D TV now! - fcuk off. Off course 3 - 4 years
into owning a 3D TV, the industry will start shoving holographic TV's down our throats and restart the whole cycle again.

Its called progress, Sure weren't people perfectly pleased when they had radio's the size of washing machines and "sure what do we want with them televisions there only trying to get more money out of me, (which they are but if the product is getting better there has to be a price)". Like it or not if everybody had this mentality we would never be where we are.

Penn · 02-12-2010 11:17am

My main problem is, I already wear glasses. So if I have to wear 3d glasses, I have to wear them over my normal glasses. This means my normal glasses have to be closer to my eyes to accommodate the 3G glasses, giving me a major ****ing headache.

And no, I will not wear contact lenses. I wear glasses. I spent lots of money on glasses and will wear them. Why can't they make a lighter frame (or cardboard) set of 3d glasses for people who have glasses

listermint · 02-12-2010 11:30am

paddyirishman85 wrote: »

My main problem is, I already wear glasses. So if I have to wear 3d glasses, I have to wear them over my normal glasses. This means my normal glasses have to be closer to my eyes to accommodate the 3G glasses, giving me a major ****ing headache.

And no, I will not wear contact lenses. I wear glasses. I spent lots of money on glasses and will wear them. Why can't they make a lighter frame (or cardboard) set of 3d glasses for people who have glasses

They do, buy them online if your that pissed about it...

FatherLen · 02-12-2010 12:14pm

these are the glasses i got with my laptop
they are cool enough.
http://idhp.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Acer-Aspire-5738DZG-3D-15.6in-notebook-idhp-2.jpg
the ones on the left are clip on glasses that go onto normal spectacles

Run_to_da_hills · 02-12-2010 12:17pm

3D Contacts are the way foreward.

http://www.3dtvblog.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/3d-contact-lenses.jpg

Greyfox · 02-12-2010 12:32pm

Absolutely f**king hate them, wearing them is a massive pain in the hole.

In the cinema it's just a handy excuse to fleece more money from customers, yes Avatar was a little better in 3D and watching football in 3d was ok but nothing revolutionary

I don't mind if 3D tvs etc are the future just as long as they get rid of having to wear stupid f**king 3d glasses asap

Run_to_da_hills · 02-12-2010 1:14pm

Greyfox wrote: »

In the cinema it's just a handy excuse to fleece more money from customers,

Hardly, they are only e1 a pair at IMC Dunlaoghaire and you can re use them.

3D Glasses

Comments