Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Priests: We won’t break seal of confession to report sex abuse

13

Comments

  • #102
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    ironingbored wrote: »
    I like this part of the article:

    Sean Brady:

    Isn't this the same guy who got children to remain silent about abuse by the notorious Brendan Smyth?

    The irony is sickening.

    Sean Brady did invent the seal of confession and can't change it. Its not just a teaching of the Catholic church, its a teaching of many Church's who claim apostolic succession.

    Confession is supposed to be about making amends and not sinning again. A person who has been convicted of a crime/ Served the sentence can go to Confession.

    Simple reality is. If the Church were to say that all crimes spoken in confession would be reported (Irish legislation its not just limited to child abuse) If crimes were to be reported.. they simply would not be confessed.

    Its human nature... Seal of Confession is a Religious sacrament that has always afforded total secrecy. Its not about covering update crimes.


  • #103
    BraveInca
    Registered Users Posts: 59 ✭✭BraveInca


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Simple reality is. If the Church were to say that all crimes spoken in confession would be reported (Irish legislation its not just limited to child abuse) If crimes were to be reported.. they simply would not be confessed.

    So a criminal could not seek religious absolution without also facing up to the legal consequences of his or her crime? Sounds good to me.

    Other than that I see no public good in providing criminals with an outlet to get things off their chests with no real-world consequences.


  • #104
    Michael Weston
    Registered Users Posts: 979 ✭✭✭Michael Weston


    So if a child abuser is caught and convicted and during the course of the trial admits he/she confessed to a priest will said priest be arrested for trial too?
    I hope they are, the catholic church has zero accountabilty in this country.
    For a law to be passed and a priest to just say " I wont be adhering to that" is just typical of the carry on of the church in Ireland for decades.


  • #105
    robindch
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Sean Brady did invent the seal of confession and can't change it.
    Brady's opinion on the matter is irrelevant. After the church showed in the most horrendous way possible that it cannot be trusted, the state is now asserting its authority over church tradition in order to protect the state's citizens.
    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    If crimes were to be reported.. they simply would not be confessed.
    What's wrong with that?

    If the priests actually believed what they preached, and were to fear an eternity in hell for the mortal (is it?) sin of abusing children, then perhaps then they mightn't commit the crimes in the first place.


  • #106
    magicbastarder
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,175 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Sean Brady did invent the seal of confession and can't change it. Its not just a teaching of the Catholic church, its a teaching of many Church's who claim apostolic succession.

    Confession is supposed to be about making amends and not sinning again. A person who has been convicted of a crime/ Served the sentence can go to Confession.

    Simple reality is. If the Church were to say that all crimes spoken in confession would be reported (Irish legislation its not just limited to child abuse) If crimes were to be reported.. they simply would not be confessed.

    Its human nature... Seal of Confession is a Religious sacrament that has always afforded total secrecy. Its not about covering update crimes.
    the 'everyone else does it' defence is a well worn and near useless excuse. it is an observation, not a reason.

    as regards people being worried about the catholic church bringng information about child abuse learned in the confessional to the authorities - there's no worry there. the CC seem to be the safest set of hands as regards not telling anyone about child abuse anyway, as history has shown.

    also, as regards the crimes being reported in confession resulting in them simply not being confessed - so ****ing what? that's not a justification for the catholic church learning about them but sitting on the information.
    if i confessed to a friend i was abusing kids, and they decided to keep quiet about it but tried to convince me of the error of my ways, the law and public opinion would not smile on them. but this is what we are expected to allow the catholic church to do because of their own internal rules.

    i have heard an argument drawing a parallel between the confessional and journalists protecting their sources - but this is facile, as journalists protect their sources because they actually do something with the information.


  • #107
    RussellTuring
    Registered Users Posts: 866 ✭✭✭RussellTuring


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Anyway think about the logic.. If you knew the priest would report you would you bother to confess..

    So point the figure elsewhere. Once somebody opens up in confession there are many means of helping them.. Outting them in confession is not one of them. On this the church can't do anything. They can't change the seal of confession

    So then confession is useful only as a way for sinners to stop feeling guilty.
    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    The Church is extremely focused on never allowing abuse to return, Every suspicion is reported to the gards. Every Bishop knows full well they can't cover abuse up morally or lawfully... But confession has nothing to do with covering abuse, is part of our faith, its sealed, it goes beyond Catholic church/Rome/Pope, its emphatic and absolute.

    So why are they so determined now when they actively covered it up in the past? Because they were found out?

    "O my God, I am heartily sorry for having offended you and I detest all my sins, because I dread the loss of heaven and the pains of hell. But most of all because I have offended you, my God, who are all good and deserving of all my love. I firmly resolve with the help of your grace, to confess my sins, to do penance and to amend my life."

    Funny how the emphasis is on how bad it is to offend God, with wanting to avoid punishment being a runner-up. Not much about empathy or doing the right thing for its own sake.
    koth wrote: »
    I wouldn't think so as I don't think you can receive absolution for future sins.

    Which is something that confuses me as to why if some confesses to a future crime that the priest can't report him/her to the authorities. No sin has been comitted so it wouldn't be a breach of the seal of confession.

    You also couldn't arrest them for a crime they have yet to commit (conspiracy doesn't count since the conspiracy itself is the crime).


  • #108
    oldrnwisr
    Registered Users Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭oldrnwisr


    RussellTuring wrote: »
    You also couldn't arrest them for a crime they have yet to commit.

    Really?

    precrime_stone_logo_sm_01.jpg


  • #109
    RussellTuring
    Registered Users Posts: 866 ✭✭✭RussellTuring


    oldrnwisr wrote: »
    Really?

    precrime_stone_logo_sm_01.jpg

    I was secretly hoping someone would reference Philip K Dick.


  • #110
    marienbad
    Registered Users Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭marienbad


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Sean Brady did invent the seal of confession and can't change it. Its not just a teaching of the Catholic church, its a teaching of many Church's who claim apostolic succession.

    Confession is supposed to be about making amends and not sinning again. A person who has been convicted of a crime/ Served the sentence can go to Confession.

    Simple reality is. If the Church were to say that all crimes spoken in confession would be reported (Irish legislation its not just limited to child abuse) If crimes were to be reported.. they simply would not be confessed.

    Its human nature... Seal of Confession is a Religious sacrament that has always afforded total secrecy. Its not about covering update crimes.

    But this has been the case in other Irish legislation for years, why make a fuss about it now ? And why not diffuse the situation by recommending that priests hearing confession include as part of the penance that the penitent seek help from the relevant authorities as a condition of absolution.

    In cases of theft making restitution was always part of the penance was it not ? what is different about child abuse ?


  • #111
    Ellis Dee
    Registered Users Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭Ellis Dee


    marienbad wrote: »

    In cases of theft making restitution was always part of the penance was it not ? what is different about child abuse ?

    What if the priest has his own axe to grind?

    Confession.bmp


  • Advertisement
  • #112
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    magicbastarder wrote: »
    also, as regards the crimes being reported in confession resulting in them simply not being confessed - so ****ing what? that's not a justification for the catholic church learning about them but sitting on the information.

    What has the catholic church got to do with not revealing seal of confession?

    The Catholic Church does not know what is said in confession.. Priests can't report anything!. So certainly not the Church that is hiding what is said in Confession. And as I said.. is the same in the Orthodox Church, Coptic Church, Armenian Orthodox Church.. All the church's that have nothing to do with Rome or Vatican...

    Seal of confession is fundamental to many church's. Its part of our faith,,, and last I heard Freedom of Religion was a fundamental human right.

    Why is this thread linking Sealed Confession only to the Catholic Church?


  • #113
    magicbastarder
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,175 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    The Catholic Church does not know what is said in confession.. Priests can't report anything!
    the priests of the catholic church hear what is said in confession. i'm not sure if what you're trying to say is that what is said in confession is said to god?

    this thread is linking sealed confession with the catholic church precisely because the church has a history of sheltering paedophiles within their midst, and not passing on relevant information to the authorities.
    if the greek orthodox church had a history of doing this in ireland, you can be damn sure we'd be talking about them in the same way.

    as regards freedom of religion being violated by such a law; is it a violation of the mormon religion that a man cannot take several wives in ireland? are you arguing that we should change the law to allow them?


  • #114
    marienbad
    Registered Users Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭marienbad


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    What has the catholic church got to do with not revealing seal of confession?

    The Catholic Church does not know what is said in confession.. Priests can't report anything!. So certainly not the Church that is hiding what is said in Confession. And as I said.. is the same in the Orthodox Church, Coptic Church, Armenian Orthodox Church.. All the church's that have nothing to do with Rome or Vatican...

    Seal of confession is fundamental to many church's. Its part of our faith,,, and last I heard Freedom of Religion was a fundamental human right.

    Why is this thread linking Sealed Confession only to the Catholic Church?

    Because the association of catholic priests brought it up - no ??


  • #115
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Seal of confession is fundamental to many church's. Its part of our faith,,, and last I heard Freedom of Religion was a fundamental human right.

    You're free to practice your religion, you're not free to hide behind it when you rape a child or you've heard the confession of someone who's raped a child.


  • #116
    Sonics2k
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,253 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    What has the catholic church got to do with not revealing seal of confession?

    The Catholic Church does not know what is said in confession.. Priests can't report anything!. So certainly not the Church that is hiding what is said in Confession. And as I said.. is the same in the Orthodox Church, Coptic Church, Armenian Orthodox Church.. All the church's that have nothing to do with Rome or Vatican...

    Seal of confession is fundamental to many church's. Its part of our faith,,, and last I heard Freedom of Religion was a fundamental human right.

    Why is this thread linking Sealed Confession only to the Catholic Church?

    Because it's the RCC who's kicking up the biggest fuss about it, nearly everyone else is fine with it.


  • #117
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    Sonics2k wrote: »
    Because it's the RCC who's kicking up the biggest fuss about it, nearly everyone else is fine with it.

    So the Orthodox priests are fine with it? Who is everyone else?

    The seal of confession is part of our faith and that of other churches. It can't be broken and it can't be changed.


  • #118
    marienbad
    Registered Users Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭marienbad


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    So the Orthodox priests are fine with it? Who is everyone else?

    The seal of confession is part of our faith and that of other churches. It can't be broken and it can't be changed.


    Nothing has changed either in the church or the law So why make a fuss about it now then ?

    Bye the way how many Orthodox priests are up in arms in Ireland about it ?


  • #119
    Ghost Buster
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,172 ✭✭✭Ghost Buster


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    So the Orthodox priests are fine with it? Who is everyone else?

    The seal of confession is part of our faith and that of other churches. It can't be broken and it can't be changed.
    Under the eyes of the law your faith should count as much as kids crossing their fingers behind their backs when promising not to steal the biscuits.


  • #120
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    This whole thread is self defeating.. common sense will tell you that nobody is going to incriminate themselves intentionally. If they were the would just hand themselves over. At least with confession there is some possibility of reaching out to people who are abusing and trying to get them treated or convicted.. For arguments sack if confession was unsealed then obviously people will keep their mouth shut..

    There are many people who will talk to a priest in confession specifically because its sealed, even when it has nothing to do with a crime or abuse. I have heard people who won't call the Samaritans because its not 100% confidential but are ok talking to a priest.

    So, should for arguments sack, the church turn around tomorrow saying that the seal of confession is no longer respected for crimes confessed... Then.. People won't confess them and that avenue of help that could be afforded to them is cut off.. People simply won't incriminate themselves.

    While the law being passed is important and all church's should follow it. The whole argument around unsealing a confession is self defeating.


  • Advertisement
  • #121
    Sonics2k
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,253 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    So the Orthodox priests are fine with it? Who is everyone else?

    The seal of confession is part of our faith and that of other churches. It can't be broken and it can't be changed.

    What part of my post said the Orthodox Priests are okay with it.

    I very very very clearly said "The RCC are kicking up the biggest fuss about it."

    I'm sure their are quite a few religious orders who are unhappy about it, but the Law, morals and society's ethics are far far far more important than any Religious traditions.


  • #122
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    Sonics2k wrote: »
    What part of my post said the Orthodox Priests are okay with it.

    I very very very clearly said "The RCC are kicking up the biggest fuss about it."

    I'm sure their are quite a few religious orders who are unhappy about it, but the Law, morals and society's ethics are far far far more important than any Religious traditions.


    Actually its the Media kicking up the fuss.. The Catholic Church said the the seal of confession remains.. The Media ran with the sound bit.

    The orthodox Church weren't asked by the Irish Media.. But their stance is the exact same on confession.

    Anyway as I said in post 120 the argument is self defeating.


  • #123
    Sonics2k
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,253 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Actually its the Media kicking up the fuss.. The Catholic Church said the the seal of confession remains.. The Media ran with the sound bit.

    The orthodox Church weren't asked by the Irish Media.. But their stance is the exact same on confession.

    Anyway as I said in post 120 the argument is self defeating.

    Well, if there's no-one confessing to serious crimes in the Confession, what exactly is the problem? It's not as if they'll ever have to do it will they?

    Anyway, your last argument has already been defeated when you were linked to an article in which a Priest had been confessing in the confessional.

    And once again, this applies to everyone, not just the Church, so there is no witch-hunt going on here.


  • #124
    marienbad
    Registered Users Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭marienbad


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Actually its the Media kicking up the fuss.. The Catholic Church said the the seal of confession remains.. The Media ran with the sound bit.

    The orthodox Church weren't asked by the Irish Media.. But their stance is the exact same on confession.

    Anyway as I said in post 120 the argument is self defeating.

    The media is not not the message in this case my son- we are obbliged to The Association of Catholic Priests, David Quinn et al for the message.

    Why make a fuss now ? nothing has changed .


  • #125
    magicbastarder
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,175 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    why should catholic (or orthodox or whatever) priests be immune from the law the rest of us have to follow? should or should not the law be blind to religion? and if it should, where do we draw the line - and why?


  • #126
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    magicbastarder wrote: »
    why should catholic (or orthodox or whatever) priests be immune from the law the rest of us have to follow? should or should not the law be blind to religion? and if it should, where do we draw the line - and why?


    Because this attacks the freedom of religion when the Seal of Confession is fundamental part of it.

    We either have freedom to practice our faith or we don't ..


    Anyway its not the first country that has come out attacking faith.


    But there is not talking logic in this thread. as I said in post 120 the argument is self defeating.


  • Advertisement
  • #127
    efb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    How many of these priests allegations were brought in the confessional box? Its a smoke screen. If they report the matter, its better than what they used do.


  • #128
    franciebellew
    Site Banned Posts: 148 ✭✭franciebellew


    Seriously how much longer are we going to tolerate these guys?

    They should be arrested and brought to justice, every last one of them.

    Perverts


  • #129
    doctoremma
    Registered Users Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭doctoremma


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    We either have freedom to practice our faith or we don't.
    If your faith allows/condones/fights for its right for people to be endangered or harmed, then sorry, but I don't think you have the freedom the practice it.


  • #130
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Because this attacks the freedom of religion when the Seal of Confession is fundamental part of it.

    We either have freedom to practice our faith or we don't ..


    Anyway its not the first country that has come out attacking faith.


    But there is not talking logic in this thread. as I said in post 120 the argument is self defeating.
    You're stretching the meaning of freedom of religion to suit yourself. Freedom of religion doesn't grant you the right to stone your wife to death if she cheats on you, or to kill someone who worships other gods. Likewise it doesn't give you the right to protect child abusers.

    The fact that you would actually be in favour of a priest NOT reporting a child abuser who makes a confession is absolutely disgusting tbh.

    ''it takes religion to make good people do bad things''


  • #131
    Sonics2k
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,253 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Because this attacks the freedom of religion when the Seal of Confession is fundamental part of it.

    We either have freedom to practice our faith or we don't ..


    Anyway its not the first country that has come out attacking faith.


    But there is not talking logic in this thread. as I said in post 120 the argument is self defeating.

    Freedom of Religion, when it suits you, you mean.


  • Advertisement
  • #132
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    MagicMarker wrote: »
    You're stretching the meaning of freedom of religion to suit yourself. Freedom of religion doesn't grant you the right to stone your wife to death if she cheats on you, or to kill someone who worships other gods. Likewise it doesn't give you the right to protect child abusers.

    The fact that you would actually be in favour of a priest NOT reporting a child abuser who makes a confession is absolutely disgusting tbh.

    ''it takes religion to make good people do bad things''

    As I said in Post 120... If the church said that abuse from confession would be reported... do you think anyone is going to incriminate themselves?

    No I am not in favour of not Reporting Child abuse. It should be reported.. But today if you are a Catholic you know that your confession is sealed.. If the Church decides it may not be always sealed.. then people simply won't confess crimes..

    Is there not logic in the argument... Also I am a catholic.. And I think it was Christ who stopped the stoning.. As regards to other faiths that still stone which they are other faiths.. not mine. Freedom of religion does not mean the right to murder or abuse or protect abusers.. But the seal of confession covers all that is said in confession, if it didn't then what is NOT covered in the seal would NOT be said and we would NOT be having this discussion.


  • #133
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    MagicMarker wrote: »
    ''it takes religion to make good people do bad things''

    I can think of a lot of people without relgion who did bad things..

    I would say. It takes a man to do bad things.. without man there would be no evil. .....


  • #134
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    As I said in Post 120... If the church said that abuse from confession would be reported... do you think anyone is going to incriminate themselves?

    We're talking hypotheticals, so this doesn't make a blind bit of difference to me.
    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    No I am not in favour of not Reporting Child abuse. It should be reported.. But today if you are a Catholic you know that your confession is sealed.. If the Church decides it may not be always sealed.. then people simply won't confess crimes..

    IF child abuse, or something just as heinous, were confessed to a priest, do you think he should break the seal of confession? Yes or no.


  • #135
    franciebellew
    Site Banned Posts: 148 ✭✭franciebellew


    Kegs


  • #136
    King Mob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    As I said in Post 120... If the church said that abuse from confession would be reported... do you think anyone is going to incriminate themselves?

    No I am not in favour of not Reporting Child abuse. It should be reported.. But today if you are a Catholic you know that your confession is sealed.. If the Church decides it may not be always sealed.. then people simply won't confess crimes..

    Is there not logic in the argument... Also I am a catholic.. And I think it was Christ who stopped the stoning.. As regards to other faiths that still stone which they are other faiths.. not mine. Freedom of religion does not mean the right to murder or abuse or protect abusers.. But the seal of confession covers all that is said in confession, if it didn't then what is NOT covered in the seal would NOT be said and we would NOT be having this discussion.
    But this line of logic does not make sense.
    So what if people won't confess to things after the seal is broken? It's about confessions that have already been made. The church already has that information but it is withholding it.
    And you've stated that it is not justifiable or moral to withhold the information or to protect abusers.

    This applies to all other professions and cases like child abuse are cases where stuff like doctor-patient confidentiality and attorney–client privilege don't count and people can be punished for failing to report such information in those circumstances.
    Arguing that somehow the clergy or religious are a special case is just the same as arguing that you are allowed to stone someone because your religion demands it.

    Furthermore, the entire idea of confession seems to be rather pointless if there's no consequences. If you were really sorry about something then you shouldn't avoid the punishment, so the fact that the confession might land you in trouble should not deter people.


  • #137
    El Inho
    Registered Users Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    ironingbored wrote: »
    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/priests-we-wont-break-seal-of-confession-to-report-sex-abuse-3092495.html

    What an heinous organisation the Catholic Church is.

    Also, I found this phrase particularly disturbing and potentially bordering on the antisemitic:

    well...

    I'm lapsed Catholic pretty much. Don't go to mass. Have my doubts about religion and god, and also believe the Catholic church needs to do a damn lot more.

    But if the seal of confession is broken for this. Then it will be broken for murder, and for every other crime on the planet. Now this isnt a problem until it comes down to the confession being broken you smaller things.

    while i dont believe the church has much trust left amongst the people...i do think this is understandable from the church to insist upon this being abided by.


  • #138
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    eldwaro wrote: »
    well...

    I'm lapsed Catholic pretty much. Don't go to mass. Have my doubts about religion and god, and also believe the Catholic church needs to do a damn lot more.

    But if the seal of confession is broken for this. Then it will be broken for murder, and for every other crime on the planet. Now this isnt a problem until it comes down to the confession being broken you smaller things.

    while i dont believe the church has much trust left amongst the people...i do think this is understandable from the church to insist upon this being abided by.

    Church's plural. Its not just one church that teaches that confession is sealed.


  • #139
    El Inho
    Registered Users Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Church's plural. Its not just one church that teaches that confession is sealed.

    well whatever about the technicallity, my overall opinion applies too all places people trust someone to keep what they say secret.


  • #140
    robindch
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    This whole thread is self defeating [...]
    Not self-defeating, just "going in circles" because you've stuck your fingers in your ears and simply repeated your belief that changing tradition is impossible.
    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Church's plural.
    The plural of "church" is "churches".


  • #141
    magicbastarder
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,175 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Because this attacks the freedom of religion when the Seal of Confession is fundamental part of it.
    so religion trumps rule of law and protection of vulnerable parts of society from being abused by those in position of power. quelle surprise.


  • Advertisement
  • #142
    MrPudding
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    As I said in Post 120... If the church said that abuse from confession would be reported... do you think anyone is going to incriminate themselves?
    So the choice is a person will, go to confession confess a crime, get absolution, maybe get jailed for a period of time on earth but avoid spending eternity in a lake of fire or; don't go to confession, hope they don't get caught some other way, perhaps spend some time in a jail on earth but definitely spend eternity in a lake of fire...?

    Seems like a no brainer to me. To quote Lord Vader "I find your lack of faith disturbing." It is almost as if you don't think people beleive in the doctrine of your precious despicable church.
    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    No I am not in favour of not Reporting Child abuse. It should be reported.. But today if you are a Catholic you know that your confession is sealed.. If the Church decides it may not be always sealed.. then people simply won't confess crimes..
    And then they spend eternity burning in a lake of fire? Wow, that has to be the ultimate cutting off your nose to spite your face. Given that 84% of Ireland professes to be catholic, and given that somewhere in the region of 100% of priests would be catholic, would you not say that the majority of people in Ireland would still go to confession, given that their faith would tell them that if they don't they will spend eternity (which is quite a bit longer than any sentence they are likely to get in an Irish court irrespective of the crime) burning in a lake of fire?
    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    Is there not logic in the argument... Also I am a catholic.. And I think it was Christ who stopped the stoning.. As regards to other faiths that still stone which they are other faiths.. not mine. Freedom of religion does not mean the right to murder or abuse or protect abusers.. But the seal of confession covers all that is said in confession, if it didn't then what is NOT covered in the seal would NOT be said and we would NOT be having this discussion.
    You have a right to hold particular religious beliefs. This right is protected in Irish and European law. I don't know so much about the Irish law, but this right under European law is qualified. The courts in Europe, and indeed the states themselves as well as their courts and other organs can restrict that right when it is "necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others"

    That said, confession is not neccesarily connected to your right to hold a particular religious belief, it is more the content of your belief. The courts in the UK, and hopefully soon in Europe, have shown that they are will to protect a person's right to hold a belief, but not particular acts that flow form that belief, particularly when they impinge on someone else's rights, the christian hotel owners or the christian Relate counsellor for example.

    I would suggest that your concern about people not confessing, if there was a risk of the seal being broken, is only really valid if we assume that people don't actually believe what the church teaches about confession.

    MrP


  • #143
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    robindch wrote: »
    Not self-defeating, just "going in circles" because you've stuck your fingers in your ears and simply repeated your belief that changing tradition is impossible.

    Ok.. Change tradition. Say that X Y Z are not covered by the seal of confession. Then see how many of those crimes get reported.

    I'm not sticking my figures in my ears, far from it. Its your camp that's doing that. You won't accept human nature for what it is. Criminals don't incriminate themselves unless they want to. Today we can't say on the one hand we have seal of confession and on the other hand report what is said,, we have to be upfront first about what is confidential and what is not.

    Look we are both on the same page that Crimes of abuse should be reported and those suspected of abuse should be investigate by civil authorities. And the Catholic Church has every intention of doing this. But Changing the seal of Confession is not going to solve anything.. The first priest to break it and report a case just means others won't confess their unless unless they are going to incriminate themselves.

    A Priest I know gets is visited by hundreds of people each year looking for help.. many are not even practising Catholics.. But they will go because they want to talk about a problem in complete confidence.

    While if you call the Samaritans while they say the call is confidential its not really because a court order may unseal the data. And so people won't call for certain issues.


    I have counciled for years.. Unless you get people to open up you have no way of helping them or their victims. Alteast in a confidential forum you can start a process of reform that may lead to a conviction. Without the seal of confession you have no possibility at all of reaching some people unless civil authorities are able to catch them.

    So its not sticking my fingers in my ears.. Human nature is what it is.

    Its like journalism.. if one journalist were to out their source do you think journalists in the same paper would be trusted to keep information confidential.

    I know people think that ... well the priest Might know about abuse and does nothing about it. but the reality is that without the seal of confession nobody will know anything. Atleast once you have a person who has opened up in confession you have some possibility of getting them convicted.. with the seal you have nothing.

    Anyway lets not fool our selves thinking that paedophiles run to confession every week... They don't care about their victims, their consciences are so corrupted confession is not on their list of priorities. And IF they do confess.. they are not running to their local parish priest who knows them,, even if it is sealed.


  • #144
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    MagicMarker wrote: »
    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    No I am not in favour of not Reporting Child abuse. It should be reported.. But today if you are a Catholic you know that your confession is sealed.. If the Church decides it may not be always sealed.. then people simply won't confess crimes..

    IF child abuse, or something just as heinous, were confessed to a priest, do you think he should break the seal of confession? Yes or no.

    Just in case you missed it the first time qrrgprgua....


  • #145
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    MagicMarker wrote: »
    Just in case you missed it the first time qrrgprgua....
    IF child abuse, or something just as heinous, were confessed to a priest, do you think he should break the seal of confession? Yes or no.

    Yes. The moral thing would be to report it. In my mind.

    If I were a priest and I did report it... Then it would be the last time it would be confessed.. So while I did the right think by my conscience saving a potential victim .. Their could be hundreds of others who will never trust a priest and who will never have the possibility of being helped by anyone.

    Me speaking for me.. If I were a priest I probably would hang up my collar and report the abuser.. But I'm not so its hypothetical.


  • #146
    El Inho
    Registered Users Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    Here is a situation worth thinking of! And while I'm against the breaking of confession...

    Young Joe goes to Fr. Dave for confession. Tells Fr. Dave he is going to lie to the whole parish, his parents everyone, telling them that Fr. Dave has sexually abused him.

    Fr. Dave tries to talk him out of it, but young Joe leaves.

    What does the priest do.


  • #147
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    eldwaro wrote: »
    Here is a situation worth thinking of! And while I'm against the breaking of confession...

    Young Joe goes to Fr. Dave for confession. Tells Fr. Dave he is going to lie to the whole parish, his parents everyone, telling them that Fr. Dave has sexually abused him.

    Fr. Dave tries to talk him out of it, but young Joe leaves.

    What does the priest do.

    That's not a confession... Its usually called blackmail.


  • #148
    El Inho
    Registered Users Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    That's not a confession... Its usually called blackmail.

    its not really.

    the kid didn't ask for anything.

    and im pretty sure 'thau shall not covet your neighbours wife' involved no action, except a thought.

    in this event, the kid is saying he is going to do something, and seeks forgiveness before carrying it out.

    it is an unlikely, yet plausible situation, testing the strength of the priests respect for the seal of confession.


  • #149
    qrrgprgua
    Registered Users Posts: 786 ✭✭✭qrrgprgua


    eldwaro wrote: »
    its not really.

    the kid didn't ask for anything.

    and im pretty sure 'thau shall not covet your neighbours wife' involved no action, except a thought.

    in this event, the kid is saying he is going to do something, and seeks forgiveness before carrying it out.

    it is an unlikely, yet plausible situation, testing the strength of the priests respect for the seal of confession.

    Its not confession.. I could be going to kill someone tomorrow... intentionally committing a sin knowing its wrong and confessing to it prior to the act does not a confession make.

    The boy could say... Father I am going to kill you tomorrow... That does not stop the Priest leaving town to avoid the person.

    Confession is about making amends and not sinning again in the future. If you are intentionally not going to abide by this then you have not made a valid confession.


    To the same note, if an abuser confessed but said he can't help himself and he will abuse again and tells the priest who he is going to abuse...there is noting stopping the priest calling guards to say x person is in danger.. Anonymous Tip off as it were. You have to make a valid confession for it to be sealed.. and by valid meaning that you firmly intend not to sin again and receiving absolution.


  • #150
    doctoremma
    Registered Users Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭doctoremma


    qrrgprgua wrote: »
    If I were a priest and I did report it... Then it would be the last time it would be confessed.. So while I did the right think by my conscience saving a potential victim .. Their could be hundreds of others who will never trust a priest and who will never have the possibility of being helped by anyone.
    Right, so a child abuser thinks twice about confessing to a priest because he fears he will go to jail?

    If the seal of confession is maintained and he confesses in safety, what does the priest do to help him? How is that perceived as "appropriate punishment" for those outside of the faith? I want child abusers locked up, I couldn't give a rat's bottom who they've told in the interim. If this law stops 1 or 10 or 100 child abusers confessing, I don't care, because that confession is meaningless in my world.


  • Advertisement
  • #151
    equivariant
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 966 ✭✭✭equivariant


    When you get professional counselling, the counsellor will tell you at the start that everything is confidential unless the counsellor believes that there is a risk to someone's immediate physical wellbeing (especially if a child is at risk). Counsellors are professionally obliged to report it to the authorities if they believe that a child's well being is at risk. There is no reason why priests in confessionals should be any different. They are bound by the rules and laws of society just like everyone else.


Advertisement