Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Wuthering Heights - Gate Theatre

Options
  • 19-11-2014 12:51pm
    #1
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭


    Hi, can 't find any reviews of this - is that a bad sign?
    Has anyone been to it - what are your impressions and would you recommend it ?


Comments

  • Options
    #2
    Squelchy
    Registered Users Posts: 443 ✭✭Squelchy


    Previews since the 13th so maybe a little odd that there are no reviews yet.
    I did see Anne-Marie Casey's adaptation of Little Women a few years ago; if it's as good as that I'd be happy enough.
    Either way I've already bought me mam tickets as a Christmas present, so I have to go!


  • Options
    #3
    The_Morrigan
    Moderators Posts: 9,368 ✭✭✭The_Morrigan


    http://www.irishtimes.com/culture/stage/wuthering-heights-there-comes-a-point-when-you-have-to-put-the-book-down-1.2001151

    First review this morning...It officially opened last night so there should be a few showing up in the next day or two.


  • Options
    #4
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    The_Morrigan wrote: »
    http://www.irishtimes.com/culture/stage/wuthering-heights-there-comes-a-point-when-you-have-to-put-the-book-down-1.2001151

    First review this morning...It officially opened last night so there should be a few showing up in the next day or two.

    I saw that but it's not actually a review


  • Options
    #5
    The_Morrigan
    Moderators Posts: 9,368 ✭✭✭The_Morrigan


    glasso wrote: »
    I saw that but it's not actually a review

    Apologies....that's what I get for scrolling too fast on the mobile site, missed the change in heading.


  • Options
    #6
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    review out now

    http://www.irishtimes.com/culture/stage/review-wuthering-heights-1.2007425

    3 stars (out of five I guess).


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Went last night - had the tickets bought in advance of reviews. First half of play very disjointed altogether. This is mainly due to the fact that the first half is trying to set-up the story for the second half but as a result it has to introduce the story, pick various parts of the book to try to set the scene etc. This means that the first half is a mess. I noted that a few people didn't return after the interval. The second half is much better as at least it is coherent but overall I'd say give it a skip. Probably just too much of an ask to bring this book to the stage. Some of the casting was a bit hit-and-miss also.


  • Options
    #8
    odonnellb33
    Registered Users Posts: 1 ✭odonnellb33


    Went last night and thought it was enjoyable but only because I was familiar with the text- indeed nostalgia for leaving cert times was clearly evident in the room! I wonder however how enjoyable it would be for those not familiar with the text....

    I was very disappointed with the whole thrushcross grange scenes- which should have provided a decadent contrast to the Moorish Wuthering heights ...indeed the lack of decadence in this scene leads to the disjointed aspect of Catherine's stay (for 6 weeks which wasnt reflected)and her return. On the plus heathcliff was superb and really well casted however I felt Catherine was quite one dimensional.
    While I appreciate that such a complex text can't all be portrayed in a play, I missed the 2nd generation and their contrasts with the main protagonists.


  • Options
    #9
    woodchuck
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,409 Mod ✭✭✭✭woodchuck


    I saw this earlier in the week and enjoyed it. I wasn't familiar with the story, never studied it in school, so I was a complete blank slate! I didn't find the story hard to follow at all though and it didn't feel disjointed to me. I really liked the visual effects in it. The acting was good, but I found Catherine a bit annoying (I wasn't sure if it was the actress or maybe just the character she plays!).


  • Options
    #10
    Hrududu
    Registered Users Posts: 1,711 ✭✭✭Hrududu


    I thought the first act was a bit rushed, but the performances were good. My big problem was that it was yet another adaptation that chose to cut out the 2nd half of the book.


  • Options
    #11
    Squelchy
    Registered Users Posts: 443 ✭✭Squelchy


    How long was this?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #12
    victorfeldman
    Registered Users Posts: 6 ✭victorfeldman


    i went to see this production as we had free tickets,,a gift,,,kate brennans acting as Cathy was school girl standard and her diction was abominable...i was 3 rows back from the stage and could hardly understand a word she was saying...great actors have finely tuned voices with pleasing tone....hers was similar to listening to a singer off key.....her acting was more akin to painting by numbers..........
    while the irish know a good game from a bad...irish theatre audiences dont seem to know weather a play is good ..bad or indifferent...
    as they will applaud anything....the bulk of this production was limp and energyless....in the first act i couldn't understand a word that heathcliff was uttering as he was grunting....so come on lets get real!!!!!!!!


  • Options
    #13
    woodchuck
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,409 Mod ✭✭✭✭woodchuck


    victorfeldman wrote: »
    i went to see this production as we had free tickets,,a gift,,,kate brennans acting as Cathy was school girl standard and her diction was abominable...i was 3 rows back from the stage and could hardly understand a word she was saying...great actors have finely tuned voices with pleasing tone....hers was similar to listening to a singer off key.....her acting was more akin to painting by numbers..........
    while the irish know a good game from a bad...irish theatre audiences dont seem to know weather a play is good ..bad or indifferent...
    as they will applaud anything....the bulk of this production was limp and energyless....in the first act i couldn't understand a word that heathcliff was uttering as he was grunting....so come on lets get real!!!!!!!!

    Well it would be rude not to applaud at all :rolleyes:

    The Catherine character/actress wasn't my favourite, but I didn't have any trouble understanding what she or any of the other actors were saying.


  • Options
    #14
    The_Morrigan
    Moderators Posts: 9,368 ✭✭✭The_Morrigan


    victorfeldman wrote: »
    i went to see this production as we had free tickets,,a gift,,,kate brennans acting as Cathy was school girl standard and her diction was abominable...i was 3 rows back from the stage and could hardly understand a word she was saying...great actors have finely tuned voices with pleasing tone....hers was similar to listening to a singer off key.....her acting was more akin to painting by numbers..........
    while the irish know a good game from a bad...irish theatre audiences dont seem to know weather a play is good ..bad or indifferent...
    as they will applaud anything....the bulk of this production was limp and energyless....in the first act i couldn't understand a word that heathcliff was uttering as he was grunting....so come on lets get real!!!!!!!!

    Actually I will not applaud if a production is bad nor will I join in with a standing ovation if it isn't warranted. Culture is a personal thing, what I enjoy you could hate and vice versa so from an entire audience you will have differing responses based on various factors.


  • Options
    #15
    victorfeldman
    Registered Users Posts: 6 ✭victorfeldman


    As an actor myself...i realise that a genuinely trained actor with a genuine talent will as a singer
    be trained to finely tune his/hers voice....the part of catherine in Wuthering hights demanded great vocal range
    which the given Catherine completely lacked...her diction was near non existent...and the grunting from heathcliff
    was totally incomprehensible in the first half..
    all the top uk companies have voice coaches...ie the Royal Shakespeare company and the British national theatre to mention a few...
    it appears that the GATE and the ABBEY dont give voice coaching great prominence....
    Start listening or viewing the Judy Denche's or the Kevin Branagh's to witness class....recently 3 independent experts were commissioned by the Arts council..to .assess the ABBEY THEATRE..They judged that 4 out of 12 plays at the ABBEY were deemed to be below professional standard
    and 4 others were deemed to be just okay...and 2 were deemed to be very good.....and audiences here also clapped these plays
    and the local critics praised them!!!!!!!
    Theres a big difference between PAVOROTTI and a BATHROOM SINGER!!! To the trained ear!!!


  • Options
    #16
    victorfeldman
    Registered Users Posts: 6 ✭victorfeldman


    glasso wrote: »
    Went last night - had the tickets bought in advance of reviews. First half of play very disjointed altogether. This is mainly due to the fact that the first half is trying to set-up the story for the second half but as a result it has to introduce the story, pick various parts of the book to try to set the scene etc. This means that the first half is a mess. I noted that a few people didn't return after the interval. The second half is much better as at least it is coherent but overall I'd say give it a skip. Probably just too much of an ask to bring this book to the stage. Some of the casting was a bit hit-and-miss also.
    the diction from the two leads was non existent..Kate Brennan was in need of a vocal coach..
    if i go to an opera i dont expect to hear tone deaf singers...this also should apply to the vocal range of actors...or maybe this english ear comes from another era...


  • Options
    #17
    victorfeldman
    Registered Users Posts: 6 ✭victorfeldman


    to the person whom asked me what i actually thought of this production....it was two hours
    misspent ...the less said the better...


  • Options
    #18
    The_Morrigan
    Moderators Posts: 9,368 ✭✭✭The_Morrigan


    MOD Note
    Ok Victor - we get the point you didn't like the production or the cast. One post would have been sufficient.

    Thanks


Advertisement