Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Carphone Warehouse lifeline

Options
  • 28-08-2014 8:19pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 73,390 ✭✭✭✭


    Just realised I've been paying €13.75 a month for the last 6 or 7 years for insurance on a phone I got rid of 5 or 6 years ago.
    I know this is epically stupid, but where do I stand here, is the insurance term infinite and do I have any chance of a refund?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Just realised I've been paying €13.75 a month for the last 6 or 7 years for insurance on a phone I got rid of 5 or 6 years ago.
    I know this is epically stupid, but where do I stand here, is the insurance term infinite and do I have any chance of a refund?

    For a start cancel your policy. I'm not sure you've any comeback. It's up to you to know what you're paying.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    I think you would find it hard to prove you did not have possession of the phone all that time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,390 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Just wondering if the insurance is generally set to renew every month and not for a finite time and not transferred from one phone to the next.


    FWIW I think the phone was an LG Chocolate :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,183 ✭✭✭UnknownSpecies


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Just wondering if the insurance is generally set to renew every month and not for a finite time and not transferred from one phone to the next.


    FWIW I think the phone was an LG Chocolate :)

    I used to work for Carphone so can weigh in here. Yes the insurance will continue infinitely as long as you don't cancel it. The insurance has no fixed term, you could have cancelled it whenever you felt like it. If you bought a new phone with Carphone, you could have transferred it over to the new phone but not if you bought it anywhere else. The contract you signed when you originally took out the policy will pretty much prevent you from getting any money back since it states all that I've already mentioned. There's no way you can prove you were ripped off, although I understand your frustration myself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,035 ✭✭✭✭Esel


    Never bought phone insurance. Never lost/borked/robbed of a phone either.

    Have probably bled a good few bob on similar open-ended bills though...

    Not your ornery onager



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    you could try arguign the original Term & Conditions were not fair, as in a phone insurnace policy should be allowed infitely roll over without intervention.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭Rubberchikken


    if it were me, i'd just cancel the insurance and forget the whole thing. lesson learnt.


  • Registered Users Posts: 860 ✭✭✭boardzz


    You could obviously well afford it if you didn't notice the money been taken every month


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,227 ✭✭✭Sam Mac


    boardzz wrote: »
    You could obviously well afford it if you didn't notice the money been taken every month

    +1 - you seriously did not notice the transaction even once within the *six year* period?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭Bepolite


    Is the phone lost - why not make a claim ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,787 ✭✭✭slimjimmc


    @Bepolite: You know full well that making a false insurance claim is fraudulent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭Bepolite


    slimjimmc wrote: »
    @Bepolite: You know full well that making a false insurance claim is fraudulent.

    I wasnt for one second suggesting the OP do that. If the insurance covers loss and it's lost - claim. Don;t clim it's stolen, don't chuck it down the stairs but at €12.75 I'd assume it's pretty comprehensive cover and covers simple loss. I'm also assuming the OP hasn;t sold the phone on, becuase that would indeed be fraud.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,787 ✭✭✭slimjimmc


    "on a phone I got rid of 5 or 6 years ago" is pretty clear..


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,222 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Just realised I've been paying €13.75 a month for the last 6 or 7 years for insurance on a phone I got rid of 5 or 6 years ago.
    I know this is epically stupid, but where do I stand here, is the insurance term infinite and do I have any chance of a refund?

    Same happened to me, got most of the money back.

    Ring them


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,035 ✭✭✭✭Esel


    Yeah, a friend I mentioned this to said that your provider should be able to verify that you have not been using that phone for the last x years. They are not an expert in this area, though...

    Not your ornery onager



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭djdunny


    OP I would go to store, get the guys in store to check your transaction history, if you got another phoen with them then you can say that the policy wasnt transferred. They may not refund 5 years work but they would def refund a year (i used to work there and have experience with cases like this). If you didnt get your phone with them you could ask very nicely if you can provide proof that you got a phone else where would they offer a refund. Def worth a shot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    djdunny wrote: »
    OP I would go to store, get the guys in store to check your transaction history, if you got another phoen with them then you can say that the policy wasnt transferred. They may not refund 5 years work but they would def refund a year (i used to work there and have experience with cases like this). If you didnt get your phone with them you could ask very nicely if you can provide proof that you got a phone else where would they offer a refund. Def worth a shot.

    Like earlier suggestions, that is wrong on many fronts but principally moral ones. It is wrong to suggest lieing that somebody messed up in their job. No refund is due. The OP took his eye off the ball. Indeed he didn't even know the ball was in play for years. His error. His loss. His lesson learned.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,879 ✭✭✭D3PO


    Esel wrote: »
    your provider should be able to verify that you have not been using that phone for the last x years.

    Why would that have any relevence ? If I can prove my car is off the road should my car insurance company repay my previum .....

    Weather you use the phone or not is irrelevent. The fact is the phone was insured, how or if it was in use is none of the insurance providers concern.

    If you leave your policy in place and you dont need it your at fault end of story no refund due.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭JimsAlterEgo


    D3PO wrote: »
    Why would that have any relevence ? If I can prove my car is off the road should my car insurance company repay my previum .....

    Weather you use the phone or not is irrelevent. The fact is the phone was insured, how or if it was in use is none of the insurance providers concern.

    If you leave your policy in place and you dont need it your at fault end of story no refund due.

    Insurance companies send reneewals every year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,879 ✭✭✭D3PO


    Insurance companies send reneewals every year.

    There is no legal obligation for them to do so. Insurance companies send renewals when a term policy is due to expire.

    In a rolling contract as phone insurance is there is no renewal as there is no term.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,787 ✭✭✭slimjimmc


    @djdunny : Do not suggest making false claims that are likely to be fraudulent.
    Posters - lawful suggestions only please.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭djdunny


    slimjimmc wrote: »
    @djdunny : Do not suggest making false claims that are likely to be fraudulent.
    Posters - lawful suggestions only please.

    Hi can you tell me what part of my post suggested making a fraudulent claim?? Maybe you have mistaken what I had written. Basically when I worked in CPW we dealt with this kind of issue all the time. People would have a policy taken out with CPW but then buy a phone a year later in a network store. They then return to cpw a few months later realising they have been paying a premium for a phone that was no longer in use and thus looking for a refund. which we would then request from the lifeline dept.

    Maybe i have explained it a bit clearer this time. Let me know if it needs further clarification.


    Regards
    Dunny


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,101 ✭✭✭brianblaze


    Used to work there.

    Get proof of when you upgraded and stopped using that phone from your network, they should then reimburse you. That's the way it used to work years ago.

    That much cash though.... They'll make it difficult. (13.75 x 12 x 6 = 990)

    The onus was on you to inform them etc. if you bought a phone since in Carphone though, the onus was on them!)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,101 ✭✭✭brianblaze


    Like earlier suggestions, that is wrong on many fronts but principally moral ones. It is wrong to suggest lieing that somebody messed up in their job.

    Incorrect. The system used in Carphone (PIE) will try transfer the insurance to a new handset and would have to be manually over-ridden by the sales rep to prevent it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,787 ✭✭✭slimjimmc


    Apologies Dunny, I did indeed mistake your post.


  • Registered Users Posts: 73,390 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Quick update on this. Gave proof of upgrade, got full refund. Happy days.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,183 ✭✭✭UnknownSpecies


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Quick update on this. Gave proof of upgrade, got full refund. Happy days.

    Sound enough of em! Always worth asking.


Advertisement