Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"Knowledge of" vs "proficiency in" certain technology when doing CV

  • 24-03-2015 9:07am
    #1
    mrcheez
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,861 ✭✭✭✭


    I'm working on my CV at the moment and curious to know if, when listing skills, you separate them by proficiency or just lump them all together?

    For example I have a KEY SKILLS section where I currently list out all the technology I'm familiar with.

    I am self-taught in some technologies but haven't yet had the chance to develop a project with them yet. In other words I could understand such a project if I saw one but not experienced enough to do one from scratch.

    My idea is to break down the KEY SKILLS section into two parts: "Proficiency in" (for everything I can work on straight away) and "Knowledge of" (to denote technologies I'm familiar with but would need a few days, perhaps weeks, first-hand experience to really get up to speed)

    Is this how others do it? I'd prefer not for the potential interviewer to assume I'm fluent in the latter technology only for them to interview me for a role that is based purely on it. I'd prefer them to know I'm familiar with the technology should the need arise down the line.


Comments

  • #2
    Aswerty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Aswerty


    Somewhat similar to what I do. I would have a 'Currently Using' list and a 'Previously Used' list. I prefer this over the 'Proficient' and 'Knowledge Of' lists because most of the time proficiency is dependant on how long it has been since I used the technology. If I wasn't proficient in a technology and no longer use it I won't put it down unless it is very relevant to the job I'm applying for.

    I'm not saying my approach is better; it's just what I ended up doing after considering the different approaches.


  • #3
    mrcheez
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,861 ✭✭✭✭mrcheez


    Interesting, might look at that, cheers


Advertisement