Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Newsroom [HBO - Spoilers]

11415171920

Comments

  • Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think that 6 episodes may really benefit the show, hopefully it'll result in less pointless soap opera melodramatics and a bit of a more serious take on how the news is packaged and broadcast.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭squonk


    Yeah Darko I hear you and I hope that as well. There is a great show in there if they only concentrated on what they need to. In theory the short season should be tight and very directed, aimed at moving the characters on or showing that they can really rise above the adversities so far. Sadly I've a feeling at least one episode will be about Maggie or Mac whinging about their current dating status. :(.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,958 ✭✭✭_Whimsical_


    I feel like they never get their teeth properly into serious issues. It seems like they will, it's all going very well and then it just ends abruptly.Like last years Operation Genoa. It was a great storyline but it felt like they never properly brought it home. There were too many loose ends just alluded to rather than tied up.

    Actually the whole thing feels a bit like it's written by someone who has never made tv before and is still stumbling in the dark as to how a story ark should play out over individual episodes and over a series.

    I'll still watch it though and like it...and still be frustrated by it. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 537 ✭✭✭colmufc


    teaser ran last night after the last true blood , no actual footage just handwritten notes by sorkin ,it's due to air in November in the states , presumably the first week so that it's wrapped up on the schedule by Xmas


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 789 ✭✭✭mafaa




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 789 ✭✭✭mafaa




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 789 ✭✭✭mafaa




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭squonk


    At this point I honestly can say I don't really care. The show feels like it ended at Season 2. I'll probably watch it for that unique experience of watching a dead duck show. One I know is on it's last legs but which I know will be alright in spots but woeful in others and don't really care either way. I think they've well outstayed their welcome. They should have been pulled after S2.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭Rucking_Fetard




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭gavmcg92


    Oh here we go... reddit and /r/findthebostonbomber is going to make an appearance.

    Looking forward to the leaks story though. Interesting to see where they go with it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭Rucking_Fetard


    gavmcg92 wrote: »
    Looking forward to the leaks story though. Interesting to see where they go with it.
    Traitor probably...


  • Registered Users Posts: 690 ✭✭✭Gingervitis


    Speaking as someone fairly critical of the Newsroom, the 3rd season started off quite well. I enjoy when they keep the dreadful relationship stuff well to the side and focus on plausible behind the scenes work of major news events. In the past, they've been more Captain Hindsight, but this was more nuanced.

    I have a strong feeling that Edward Snowden will be a major theme of this season. Pity it's only a 6 episode run.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    That was pretty good.

    I'm sure the people of reddit absolutely loved their portrayal. :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭FlyingIrishMan


    I still really enjoy the Newsroom despite it's flaws, the opening theme is probably one of my favourite theme melodies ever.

    Third season started off pretty well, I'm hopeful for it, Sorkin acknowledged a lot of his mistakes after season 2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭steve_r


    Was a bit mixed on the new episode. I like that the legacy of Genoa is still there and isn't being brushed over.
      The scene with Maggie reporting the news was a bit contrived and a bit ott. They could have made that a bit more grounded.
      The takeover thing looks dubious. The son is obsessed by the financial performance and hasn't seen that the share price is high even though they are down in the ratings?
      I do like the leaks story. Saw a comment on avclub that said that Neal might as well be on his own show.


    • Advertisement
    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,641 ✭✭✭Teyla Emmagan


      Didn't realise this was back! Yahoo!


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭gavmcg92


      Have mixed feelings over episode one if I'm honest. I lost interest in some parts of the show abd felt like it was dragging on a little. Very solid finish though. Looking forward to how Sorkin brings it all to a close.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭fisgon


      For all its flaws, the Newsroom is always worth watching. It is smart, (though maybe not as smart as it thinks it is), funny, (again, not as funny as...), and articulate. In fact, like all of Sorkin's work, it doesn't patronize its audience, it assumes that if you are watching you are clued in and educated. That is a good thing.

      And it has Olivia Munn. God damn, that is one good-looking woman. And Sloane is getting more air time now, she is a great character. Almost makes up for Emily Mortimer's constant, irritating impersonation of Bambi.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭squonk


      I think they've fixed a lot of what was wrong with this show by now. Unfortunately it's too late. It's still a bit smug though. I'd still prefer it if they concentrated on fictitious news stories. It struck me that I felt sorry for the families of some of the victims while watching. It's a year and a half on and I'm sure if anyone connected to a victim watched this episode it would have brought everything back. I really think concentrating on real stories was the biggest mistake Sorkin made. That being said, I'm enjoying Maggie now. I still want to slap the group collectively during production meetings but it's vastly improved. Neil's stupidity finally got him into trouble but at least he's not gormless and annoying anymore. Maggie is being given something useful to do now. I like how her story has started. Sloane as always is just fantastic. Her arc was the highlight of the episode. Mac is still annoying. Delighted not to be seeming much more of her. At this point the best thing I could say is that I wish she just got them out on screen. Her rack is the best part of the character and It's being criminally ignored! I think if Sorkin had started like this day 1 the show would be facing into a full third season. The real problem is that the opening is wonderfully grave and important and it's only now that the peopel on screen are starting to match the premise set by the intro!


    • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭IvaBigWun


      Great to have this back.


    • Advertisement
    • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭IvaBigWun


      Great to have her back

      :pac:

      Olivia-Munn-Hot2.jpeg


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭FlyingIrishMan


      That was a brilliant episode, absolutely no faults with it. I'm gonna miss this show.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,317 ✭✭✭gavmcg92


      Much better episode this week. I starting to think that this is going to feel like a very unfinished end to Newsroom. Series can be based and run for 5 series on what we just saw in E02. Very interested to see how this continues.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭fisgon


      Random Law professor on the train: "You're giving a monologue".
      Maggie: "Everyone does where I work."

      This struck me as a little in-joke by Sorkin, at his own expense, he is obviously not ignoring his characters' tendencies to speechify.

      Ep was very enjoyable, varied, deep, curious, intelligent. More please.


    • Hosted Moderators Posts: 8,140 ✭✭✭fitz


      The Don/Sloan scenes are gold.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,718 ✭✭✭squonk


      That was a genuinely great episode. I've been very critical of this show in the past because it failed to live up to what I knew it could produce. The episode this week was the type of quality and show I was expecting from early on. I knew they woulnd't get there immediately but after half the first season had passed I was exepcting thing sto settle down to last night's level of quality.

      Don/Sloane were great this week. I loved how their whole situation was handeled. The train thing was OK but wasn't annoying in the way it could have been. I thought Neil was a bit of an idiot running the story, or wanting the story to be run. It certainly creates drama as does the buyout plot.

      I have to admit I'll be sad to see the show end now if it continues in it's current form. It's a pity Sorkin didn't get it right sooner. It's now a show that deserves to stick around and that we deserve to see more of.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭steve_r


      I did think it was a good episode but I think a strong ending had a lot to do with that. The stakes are high with the investigation team in so it was a strong finish.

      That said, I thought the train scene was ridiculous. I just don't think that would ever happen in real life. At least Maggie was more grounded than usual but it was still the Sorkin idealism that makes the show a little hard to swallow at times.

      I did like the tweet subplot, wasn't overdone. I'd rather see Don & Sloane do some real newswork but that's just me. The takeover still strikes me as overly simplistic, and a but of a handy way to cram in some speeches about the importance of news.

      I really like the leaks storyline and I think it builds well on the legacy of Genoa. The fact that these characters have been burnt by something like this before makes them more hesitant and aware of consequences, and I think that does wonders to make them more believable and relateable.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,616 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


      My only question, if Leona owns 45 percent, and the twins own 45 percent, then only 10 percent is publicly traded. For one company to easily buy 60 percent of the publicly trades shares seems a bit ludicrous.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭evilivor


      errlloyd wrote: »
      My only question, if Leona owns 45 percent, and the twins own 45 percent, then only 10 percent is publicly traded. For one company to easily buy 60 percent of the publicly trades shares seems a bit ludicrous.

      They bought a 6% stake - enough to give them a controlling interest.


    • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭IvaBigWun


      Im very surprised that only about 10 of us seem to be watching this. It deserves a much bigger audience.

      Im rewatching the earlier seasons at the moment and it has reminded me how much Sorkin recycles lines and storylines.



      The Sports Night stuff getting reused I can understand as very few people saw that show. But recycling West Wing lines into the Newsroom smacks of laziness and even arrogance.

      That aside, if you're not already watching this show you should immediately.


      And lads, there's this too

      olivia-munn-3.jpg


    • Advertisement
    • Registered Users Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭PhiloCypher


      errlloyd wrote: »
      My only question, if Leona owns 45 percent, and the twins own 45 percent, then only 10 percent is publicly traded. For one company to easily buy 60 percent of the publicly trades shares seems a bit ludicrous.

      The twins don't own 45%(collectively) until they turn 25 which isn't for another few days in show time. So there was in fact 55% in play when Savanna started buying up its 6%.


    • Registered Users Posts: 1,387 ✭✭✭h2005


      The twins don't own 45%(collectively) until they turn 25 which isn't for another few days in show time. So there was in fact 55% in play when Savanna started buying up its 6%.
      No there wasn't/isn't their 45% would be held in trust until they turn 25 so couldnt be bought or sold.


    • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,517 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


      Just caught up with 3.01. Seemed a bit more restrained than what the show has done before. A pity we haven't had that since that pilot. Less focus on the personal craporama that plagued previous episodes. I don't understand Sloan's computer, either. The old flash drive in the sock routine for Neal...


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,616 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


      The twins don't own 45%(collectively) until they turn 25 which isn't for another few days in show time. So there was in fact 55% in play when Savanna started buying up its 6%.

      Yeah as another poster said, it can't work that way. 45% is in a trust, Leona has 45% and presumably 10% is in play. I'm nit picking, but I think it is lazy writing. Plus, if I was Leona and there were 10% public traded shares, I'd have been trying to get them for years.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


      errlloyd wrote: »
      Yeah as another poster said, it can't work that way. 45% is in a trust, Leona has 45% and presumably 10% is in play. I'm nit picking, but I think it is lazy writing. Plus, if I was Leona and there were 10% public traded shares, I'd have been trying to get them for years.

      For a publicly traded company its unusual for one party to be in possession of 45% and not have to make a bid, even stranger for two separate entities to have 90% between them.

      Also, Leona said the company was worth £60 billion, her 45% would be worth $27 billion, with that amount of stock as collateral, I don't see the big deal in raising 4 bills from the market.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,616 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd



      Also, Leona said the company was worth £60 billion, her 45% would be worth $27 billion, with that amount of stock as collateral, I don't see the big deal in raising 4 bills from the market.

      See this confused the hell out of me. She seemed to imply she was buying all of their shares. Indeed why would they go for anything else? Whatever firm is buying their portion is obviously buying all of them to get controlling stake.

      So if their share is worth 3 Billion presumably so is hers, so where she got her valuation I am unsure.


    • Registered Users Posts: 2,700 ✭✭✭thesultan


      I thought the third season opener was very good


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,255 ✭✭✭tommy2bad


      Isn't the idea that if someone gets the 10% then a controlling interest is impossible for either of the 45% owners, thus giving the casting vote to the 10%.
      Effectively it gives control to the minority share holder.


    • Registered Users Posts: 531 ✭✭✭den87


      I have season one on DVD at home, is it worth a watch? Another message board I read does nothing but slate every episode


    • Advertisement
    • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,517 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


      Good second episode. Structure and execution. Basically, everyone getting on with the key competencies of their posts whilst still sometimes stumbling.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭FlyingIrishMan


      den87 wrote: »
      I have season one on DVD at home, is it worth a watch? Another message board I read does nothing but slate every episode

      If you like Sorkin's other stuff, odds are you'll probably like this too. It's preachy like a lot of his stuff, but when it's good, it's really good.


    • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


      Just watched episode 3.02. Have to say I'm liking this season so far, shame there's only 4 episodes remaining before it finishes for good.

      The 1st and 2nd seasons definitely weren't without their faults, but overall I really like this show and would far rather it continued for another season or 2 than end.

      Oh, and poor Neal. With the show ending in 4 episodes and him just going on the run at the end of the last episode, is there enough time left to see Neal get free from the crosshairs of the F.B.I.? I.M.O., no there isn't. I fear that Neal is about to get (West Wing spoiler)
      Tobied
      and the show will end with either Neal still on the run or in prison, either way his future will be bleak and uncertain.

      Speaking of
      Toby
      , it was great to see his namesake from The U.S. Office show up on the train with Maggie in this episode. That guy plays unfortunate, downtrodden characters so well!


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,808 ✭✭✭lertsnim


      I gave up on this show due to its incredulously boring love angle in the previous seasons. Is there any hint of that this season?


    • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,517 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


      There's relationship stuff, wedding plans, etc, but if you mean in the fingernails vs. blackboard sense, then no. It's not front and centre.


    • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭IvaBigWun


      lertsnim wrote: »
      I gave up on this show due to its incredulously boring love angle in the previous seasons. Is there any hint of that this season?

      It wouldnt be a Sorkin show without relationships to be fair. But this year's are less head wrecking as there's no "will they, wont they?" with the main characters.


    • Advertisement
    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,808 ✭✭✭lertsnim


      I'll leave it so.


    • Registered Users Posts: 1,368 ✭✭✭Prop Joe


      The first two episodes have been brill...Love to see how the Neal stuff will play out.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,308 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


      So it's only 6 episodes for this season?

      I thought these 2 have been really good and even though I wasn't as critical of the earlier seasons as others were, I can see it has vastly improved. Would be like if they had managed to make the sketches in Studio 60 funny as that was the main complaint I had about that series (the only other Sorkin series I've watched)


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,061 ✭✭✭leggo


      Every year people hated on The Newsroom because that was the thing to do (didn't it invent - or at least make mainstream - the term 'hate-watching'?), but kept watching and eventually came around by the end of each series.

      Now that there's only a few left, I think people are starting to realise that they'll actually miss it.

      I've been in from the start (and this thread will back me up on that - I'm not just going full hipster here). The show has had its flaws during its run but did well to set out its stall early, establish characters that you may not recognise immediately but still connected with, and build decent, news-based storylines that gripped you in spite of itself while always remembering to stay light. It's been idealistic, it's been loud, it's been utopian, it's been preachy at times, but it's human and has something charming about it. Not in spite of the above points, but because of the above points. Here we have a guy (Sorkin) making the show he wants to make regardless of its spot on the pop culture charts. We've had actors who are all-in with the project and bringing something unique and unflinching to each role. And we've had interesting, if arguable, takes on popular news stories and the media coverage surrounding them along the way.

      Personally, I don't need a TV show to reflect my views on the world to enjoy it. I'm confident enough to watch a show that clearly has a one-sided agenda and decipher the rights and wrongs of the points its raising myself. I don't watch TV shows for validation, I watch it to be stimulated. To be challenged. And yes The Newsroom has been challenging to watch at times, but is that a bad thing? I lose interest in a show if I feel it's trying to win me over with populist views. Calling out the Internet and coming down on the side of cable TV as a bastion for integrity in journalism certainly isn't the latter in 2014. His points are debatable, and what's the problem with having that debate afterwards as long as the core material is entertaining?

      Instead people pushed away from The Newsroom because Sorkin didn't say what they wanted him to say about the world, when that should've never been the point to begin with. Now he's in full 'eff you mode' with this series and no doubt out to show the world how good it could've been before walking away from it all. We didn't understand The Newsroom, or judge it for what it was (instead judging for what we wanted it to be), while it was here. And in a few weeks it'll be gone and we can have no complaints. If we didn't like it all this time anyway, what's the problem? Only, turns out, we did. We didn't deserve The Newsroom.


    • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,616 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


      leggo wrote: »
      We didn't deserve The Newsroom.

      Is that you Aaron Sorkin?


    • Advertisement
    Advertisement