License to have Children

scudzilla · 14-06-2010 10:51pm #1

I think the Chinese have it spot on when they limit couple to 2 children (May even be 1)

We should do that over here, limit people to 1 child per person, Unless they could prove that they could support an extra child, and for each extra child they must prove that they can support said child.

I've just had enough of some of these scumbags just popping out kid after kid then claiming a fortune in benefits, never have to work a day in there life and the likes of myself, hard working tax payer, having to pay out just cos they can't keep there legs closed.

As for the young lads, Fine them and stop there dole or charge them 33% of there earnings for every child they father, that'll soon sort them out.

What does everyone else think?

Bobeagleburger · 14-06-2010 10:52pm

I have a Licence to kill.....children.

PeterIanStaker · 14-06-2010 10:55pm

While I cant stand the filth firing kids out for the benefit, its a bit drastic to do a China on it. Maybe paying them a lump sum to get sterilised?

Also it'd be hard to find the actual fathers sometimes.

AckwelFoley · 14-06-2010 10:56pm

im glad i dont live in "free" china

Overheal · 14-06-2010 10:56pm

License to parent a child: untenable.

Even requiring parents to take a class before receiving social service allowances for children is asking for deep trouble. Though I've suggested it before. In reality, these ideas just aren't that feasible. And good luck fighting the parent lobby.

Millicent · 14-06-2010 10:57pm

Was China really the best example you could muster? Cos child limits have worked so well there...

m5ex9oqjawdg2i · 14-06-2010 10:57pm

The chinese have a reason for it, which is over population. Who would make the decisions? The government? HSE? Lol... What you would have is a law which allows the rich to have children and the poor be punished. It's a basic human right and it should never be considered. The few who have made a balls of raising children will ruin it for everyone else...

TheZohanS · 14-06-2010 11:00pm

scudzilla wrote: »

License to have Children

Does that mean if you have a coloured child you must have a coloured licence?

Mike 1972 · 14-06-2010 11:00pm

scudzilla wrote: »

What does everyone else think?

Unworkable

AckwelFoley · 14-06-2010 11:02pm

TheZohan wrote: »

Does that mean if you have a coloured child you must have a coloured licence?

No, just an ordinary.. eh never mind

Peyton Manning · 14-06-2010 11:04pm

Compulsory abortions for chavs/scumbags ftw.

scudzilla · 14-06-2010 11:04pm

Not really unworkable.

If the mother refuses to put the name of father on Birth Cert then she gets all her benefits in food vouchers only, so the baby won't suffer.

14-06-2010 11:05pm

Millicent wrote: »

Was China really the best example you could muster? Cos child limits have worked so well there...

Haven't they?

ElaElaElano · 14-06-2010 11:06pm

scudzilla wrote: »

I've just had enough of some of these scumbags just popping out kid after kid then claiming a fortune in benefits, never have to work a day in there life and the likes of myself, hard working tax payer, having to pay out just cos they can't keep there legs closed.

...

pablomakaveli · 14-06-2010 11:08pm

Archimedes wrote: »

Compulsory abortions for chavs/scumbags ftw.

Miniature American flags for others.:pac:

questionmark? · 14-06-2010 11:11pm

Anybody that thinks tucking their tracksuits into their white socks is cool should be shot sterilized. That should help.

jd007 · 14-06-2010 11:13pm

questionmark? wrote: »

Anybody that thinks tucking their tracksuits into their white socks is cool should be shot sterilized. That should help.

I'd have stuck with shot there tbh. :P

Millicent · 14-06-2010 11:17pm

Deleted User wrote: »

Haven't they?

Can't tell if you're joking or not so if you're not, I'll just point out the huge numbers of infanticide cases in China, over-burdened orphanages and the unequal gender divide which now means there are a crazy amount of men for every woman in China.

ETA: This photo says it all.

ETA again: Photo is disturbing

My name is URL · 14-06-2010 11:22pm

Are you worried about the real prolem of overpopulation or are you just against the poor breeding?

Daroxtar · 14-06-2010 11:22pm

scudzilla wrote: »

I think the Chinese have it spot on when they limit couple to 2 children (May even be 1)

We should do that over here, limit people to 1 child per person, Unless they could prove that they could support an extra child, and for each extra child they must prove that they can support said child.

I've just had enough of some of these scumbags just popping out kid after kid then claiming a fortune in benefits, never have to work a day in there life and the likes of myself, hard working tax payer, having to pay out just cos they can't keep there legs closed.

As for the young lads, Fine them and stop there dole or charge them 33% of there earnings for every child they father, that'll soon sort them out.

What does everyone else think?

Do you think they have it spot on when they abort a huge amount of female babies because of the tradition of male heirs? Or maybe you think this is the way to go...http://blog.sanriotown.co.id/vievie:hellokitty.co.id/files/2009/10/chinababy_severalhrs.gif

pablomakaveli · 14-06-2010 11:31pm

questionmark? wrote: »

Anybody that thinks tucking their tracksuits into their white socks is cool should be shot sterilized. That should help.

You'd think that doing that would be enough to repel women but unfortunately the world is a crazy place.

CamperMan · 14-06-2010 11:36pm

if a person wants to have kids then let them, it is not up to a government to decide on whether or not a person can have kids and how many. Screw China, they eat dogs and execute tax dodgers to sell their organs on the black market! :mad:

starbelgrade · 14-06-2010 11:37pm

scudzilla wrote: »

I think the Chinese have it spot on when they limit couple to 2 children (May even be 1)

We should do that over here, limit people to 1 child per person, Unless they could prove that they could support an extra child, and for each extra child they must prove that they can support said child.

I've just had enough of some of these scumbags just popping out kid after kid then claiming a fortune in benefits, never have to work a day in there life and the likes of myself, hard working tax payer, having to pay out just cos they can't keep there legs closed.

As for the young lads, Fine them and stop there dole or charge them 33% of there earnings for every child they father, that'll soon sort them out.

What does everyone else think?

Rah, rah, rah.

The f*cking Daily Mail mentality that often pervades After Hours, not only surprises me quite often (due to it's persistant & popular nature), but often makes me think that there's a lot of people out there who really don't spend much time contemplating anything in any great depth, but just open their mouths & let their unfiltered biases spill out onto the page.

Rah, rah, rah.

ScumLord · 14-06-2010 11:41pm

Ireland's constant supply of young people and lack of an ageing population is probably what's kept our heads above water. Overpopulation is not a problem in Ireland, your suggesting solutions that have nothing to do with the cause of the problem your describing.

scudzilla · 14-06-2010 11:42pm

starbelgrade wrote: »

Rah, rah, rah.

The f*cking Daily Mail mentality that often pervades After Hours, not only surprises me quite often (due to it's persistant & popular nature), but often makes me think that there's a lot of people out there who really don't spend much time contemplating anything in any great depth, but just open their mouths & let their unfiltered biases spill out onto the page.

Rah, rah, rah.

So in your world then it's perfectly acceptable for somebody to not work a day in there life and pop out kid after kid, and having there benefits increased wit each one. Also it must be fine in your eyes that we're paying more tax for these leeches.

Do you volunteer for Greenpeace at weekends?

14-06-2010 11:42pm

Millicent wrote: »

Can't tell if you're joking or not so if you're not, I'll just point the huge numbers of infanticide cases in China, over-burdened orphanages and the unequal gender divide which now means there are a crazy amount of men for every woman in China.

ETA: This photo says it all.

touché

CD. · 14-06-2010 11:44pm

it's a ridiculous idea. who would enforce it? how would you stop people giving birth at home? what happens when you find someone has more children than they are supposed to have?

not only that but there are people who will pass the money requirment but are crap parents.

if you're worried about people who pump out children and encourage their children to commit crime/don't look after their children so their children commit crimes, simple, three strike law for the child. If your child is caught stealing/anti-social behaviour three times, the child allowance for that child is removed.

But then you have the problem of parents who need the money and who try to raise their kids well and do everything they can for the child, but their kids are just pr!cks. whether from social interference (freinds etc) or are just naturally pr!cks.

ScumLord · 14-06-2010 11:46pm

CD. wrote: »

it's a ridiculous idea. who would enforce it? how would you stop people giving birth at home? what happens when you find someone has more children than they are supposed to have?

not only that but there are people who will pass the money requirment but are crap parents.

Forced abortions, we'd still have to keep abortions illegal for those that wanted it though.

starbelgrade · 14-06-2010 11:51pm

scudzilla wrote: »

So in your world then it's perfectly acceptable for somebody to not work a day in there life and pop out kid after kid, and having there benefits increased wit each one. Also it must be fine in your eyes that we're paying more tax for these leeches.

Do you volunteer for Greenpeace at weekends?

No, I don't work for Greenpeace. I don't write for the Daily Mail either though.

northern lights · 14-06-2010 11:51pm

tbh I just don't know what the answer is..
I work in a detox unit and heard one of the residents say was that the great thing about her being there was that her child (aged 5) 'was in care and they'd now taken care of potty training him/her' It just made me feel what in gods name is society coming to :mad:

whatamothinks · 14-06-2010 11:52pm

scudzilla wrote: »

I think the Chinese have it spot on when they limit couple to 2 children (May even be 1)

We should do that over here, limit people to 1 child per person, Unless they could prove that they could support an extra child, and for each extra child they must prove that they can support said child.

I've just had enough of some of these scumbags just popping out kid after kid then claiming a fortune in benefits, never have to work a day in there life and the likes of myself, hard working tax payer, having to pay out just cos they can't keep there legs closed.

As for the young lads, Fine them and stop there dole or charge them 33% of there earnings for every child they father, that'll soon sort them out.

What does everyone else think?

jesus you have a very un realistic idea of what its like having kids!!!! (( kids are a piece of piss :rolleyes:....)

and u have no idea

License to have Children

Comments