Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M28 - Cork to Ringaskiddy [advance works ongoing; 2025 start; 2028 completion]

1568101134

Comments

  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Off topic posts deleted.

    Any posts not in the appropriate thread will be deleted and the users warned.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    For regular N28 sufferers, especially at this time of the year:

    The final scheme is to be displayed before the end of the year, and the publishing of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Motorway Order are expected in January. It will then be put before An Bord Pleanala, where objections will be heard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,428 ✭✭✭quietsailor


    Has anyone seen drawings of what the road will LOOK like, not plans or abstract ideas?

    Could a dedicated bus lane be included and then the bus service can be improved just by not having to fight the other traffic.

    Edit: I found some better plans on the official website, when I get to a pc I'll upload them here but it looks like they aren't including bus lanes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭Kevwoody


    Has anyone seen drawings of what the road will LOOK like, not plans or abstract ideas?

    Could a dedicated bus lane be included and then the bus service can be improved just by not having to fight the other traffic.

    Edit: I found some better plans on the official website, when I get to a pc I'll upload them here but it looks like they aren't including bus lanes


    Why would there be bus lanes??
    It's a motorway!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭KCAccidental


    Has anyone seen drawings of what the road will LOOK like, not plans or abstract ideas?

    Could a dedicated bus lane be included and then the bus service can be improved just by not having to fight the other traffic.

    Edit: I found some better plans on the official website, when I get to a pc I'll upload them here but it looks like they aren't including bus lanes

    only the 220x goes down carrs hill. the 220 goes through Douglas plus if the route stuck to the old road post-upgrade, it will see a benefit for lighter traffic anyways.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11 Nuf


    I've just seen that the Anti M28 has been locked due to the rants of one poster. (also the reason for setting up the Anti thread in the first place)
    Now there is no where for dissenting voices to debate issues as we were told this thread is for pro posts only!
    Such a pity that it has come to this.
    Thanks for reading, I'm out.
    Nuf


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,148 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Bye bye.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Leonard Hofstadter


    Apologies in advance if I'm O/T, but having looked at the website provided by the so-called 'steering group' that route is completely impractical, it would force vehicles to do an extra 10-15 km to go from the tunnel to Carrigaline/Ringaskiddy, therefore everyone will continue to use the existing road and the problem does not go away.

    It actually is a good idea to have the road they're talking about (such a road would take a lot of pressure off the Douglas flyover and the magic roundabout) - but in addition to the proposed M28 route not in replacement of the proposed route.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Apologies in advance if I'm O/T, but having looked at the website provided by the so-called 'steering group' that route is completely impractical, it would force vehicles to do an extra 10-15 km to go from the tunnel to Carrigaline/Ringaskiddy, therefore everyone will continue to use the existing road and the problem does not go away.

    It actually is a good idea to have the road they're talking about (such a road would take a lot of pressure off the Douglas flyover and the magic roundabout) - but in addition to the proposed M28 route not in replacement of the proposed route.
    If the new road was routed that way, it would be busy as far as Shannonpark where most of the vehicles would leave to take the existing N28 to connect with Bloomfield/the N40.

    Westbound/N71 bound traffic would use the new route but not enough traffic to justify it being a motorway, which it would have to be to conform to TEN-T regulations.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 327 ✭✭gerogerigegege


    If anyone would like a list of insults levelled at other posters by Marno21 feel free to pm me.
    This place is moderated by some seriously brainless losers
    Toodles


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,871 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    If anyone would like a list of insults levelled at other posters by Marno21 feel free to pm me.
    This place is moderated by some seriously brainless losers
    Toodles

    Mod: gerogerigegege I think you need a time away to rethink your attitudes.

    Banned for 7 days.

    Sam


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Depressing article on how the arsing around with the M28 is affecting Cork and the port area in particular:


    Ovxwuvr.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,935 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    That's depressing reading alright... at the very least though they should resurface the existing N28 in the interim - particularly from Douglas to Carrigaline.. the surface is a mess, and the foliage could do with some pruning to improve visibility. Add in cats eyes and better signage as well would help I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭Kevwoody


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    That's depressing reading alright... at the very least though they should resurface the existing N28 in the interim - particularly from Douglas to Carrigaline.. the surface is a mess, and the foliage could do with some pruning to improve visibility. Add in cats eyes and better signage as well would help I think.

    I agree with you that the existing road needs resurfaced, but I'd be afraid if they spent a few million upgrading the surface, that would cause the government to kick the can (M28) further down the road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,935 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Kevwoody wrote: »
    I agree with you that the existing road needs resurfaced, but I'd be afraid if they spent a few million upgrading the surface, that would cause the government to kick the can (M28) further down the road.

    I dunno.. when Michael Martin and Michael McGrath get into Government next time out (the most likely outcome regardless of one's personal politics) it might well speed things up - particularly considering the latter's constituency office and residence is in Carriagline, and he might well replace Martin in the future.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,555 ✭✭✭kub


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    I dunno.. when Michael Martin and Michael McGrath get into Government next time out (the most likely outcome regardless of one's personal politics) it might well speed things up - particularly considering the latter's constituency office and residence is in Carriagline, and he might well replace Martin in the future.

    I have never voted that way, but the way i have has done nothing for Cork, they say all politics is local so i for one might be casting my votes differently next time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭Baldilocks


    I wouldn't be banking on FF making it happen. Micheal Martin has expressed a degree of support for those opposed to the current proposed routing of the scheme (up through the 'scenic' Mulcon valley). I'll certainly be challenging him on his support for such lunacy.
    Hard to see Michael McGrath PUBLICLY coming out with an opposing view to his leader.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Baldilocks wrote: »
    I wouldn't be banking on FF making it happen. Micheal Martin has expressed a degree of support for those opposed to the current proposed routing of the scheme (up through the 'scenic' Mulcon valley). I'll certainly be challenging him on his support for such lunacy.
    Hard to see Michael McGrath PUBLICLY coming out with an opposing view to his leader.

    Anyone local remember if there was any objection to the existing road (Sli Carrigdhoun) when it was being built?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,555 ✭✭✭kub


    marno21 wrote: »
    Anyone local remember if there was any objection to the existing road (Sli Carrigdhoun) when it was being built?

    If my memory serves me correctly the Mulcon Valley road project was complete in the early 90's, therefore pre social media days.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭KCAccidental


    ok a bit of an update from the "steering group" which gives the NRA's position with regards to concerns from residents. If this belongs in the locked anti-m28 thread can a mod move it please?
    Hi All,
    M28 delegates met with TII / RPS consultants in the County Hall Cork on Tuesday the 4th April 2017. This meeting was facilitated by Michael Martin TD and was held to discuss TII’s up to date plans for the M28 motorway scheme.
    Delegates were given a powerpoint presentation of the draft EIS which outlined the following;
    Motorway is to be constructed through the Mulcon Valley as originally planned.
    Maryborough slip road is to be closed off as originally planned.
    Additional roadway (Wavering Lane) through Rochestown Rise /Newlyn Vale to be constructed as originally planned
    New Bridge to be constructed adjacent to Newlyn Vale as originally planned.
    Bloomfield flyover bridge to be moved towards the church to facilitate additional flyover as originally planned.
    Two -Way link road on Maryborough Hill to be constructed as originally planned.
    Traffic congestion on Maryborough Hill will be far in excess of what was originally planned.
    Please note “as originally planned” is included in the above to demonstrate the fact that despite ALL of our endeavours in terms of representations made to include political, both locally and nationally along with countless meetings, TII and the Minister Mr Shane Ross not to mention over 500 submissions to TII - ALL of which has fallen on deaf ears.
    To compound matters further what we learned at last Tuesdays briefing by TII is that residents will also have to accept the following;
    TII confirmed noise levels will increase up to 4 times from its current levels of between 60 & 80 dbl along the Mulcon Valley / Bloomfield areas
    Some noise ameoliaration barriers are to be erected however these barriers whilst enabling a decrease in places, noise levels will still be as high as 70 to 80dbl- TII have confirmed that noise dbl will continue to be in excess of current values and there is nothing they can do about it.
    To protect residents a 3 metre concrete wall is to be erected along parts of the route from the Rochestown Park Hotel through to Lissadell with a lower level wall up to Maryborough bridge.
    All trees and hedgerows currently lining this route are to be removed to facilitate the construction of the additional north bound laneway. Although some replanting is to take place it will be a generation before these are high enough to restore noise to existing levels which are already in breach of guidelines
    Wall will also be built from the slip road on the N40 at Bloomfield passing homes near St Patricks Church and run up Bloomfield to the Mount Oval slip road. This wall will be erected once widening of the slip road takes place to include the removal of ALL trees currently lining this route.
    3 metre concrete wall is a safety barrier and NOT a noise ameoliration barrier. Articulated vehicles are coming extremely close to many homes and this wall will (with the construction of the new laneway) ríse to almost roof level of homes at Newly Vale.
    800 new homes to be built at Shannon Park along with 500 new builds at Castletreasure.
    New roadways to be put in place from Grange and Castletreasure with the added consequences for residents on Maryborough Hill and surrounding areas.
    Acknowledgement by TII that major increases in traffic along Maryborough Hill leading to traffic congestion at ALL points along this route to include the Douglas Fingerpost roundabout – Plans to ultimately remove roundabout and replace with traffic light system. Inevitable increase in rat runs through Maryborough Estate etc.
    M28 delegates were stunned to say the least! Our counter proposal for an alternative route was simply brushed aside by RPS / TII as a box ticking exercise and nothing more. No Tangable or meaningful response was forthcoming from them. They had not done a detailed costing or analysis for an alternative route - but they did say that it would be a LITTLE dearer (whatever that means without having costed or identified an alternative route to be compared with the proposal for the M28.) even if it the alternative route was a little dearer surely it is not the only criterion by which a decision should be made considering the serious health implications for children and all residents arising from the proposal for M28. No proper examination of alternatives to the current preferred route was carried out other than to explain that the current proposal for the N28 Is a Project and that no other routes were now in positive consideration.
    We are in receipt of a hard copy of the draft EIS presentation given by TII and are studying it closely! Whilst still in draft stage it outlines various statistics in terms of projected traffic volumes around peak times in all areas and shows clearly the increased traffic volumes around Douglas, Maryborough Hill and R610 Rochestown Road. We will discuss these figures and all aspects of TII’s conclusions at our next steering group meeting.
    The above is just a snapshot of what we as a community will face in the coming months and years ahead. Our quality of life will be greatly affected not to mention our health and wellbeing particularly for those in the eye of this unacceptable imposition.
    At the close of our meeting TII informed us that they are to hold a presentation at the Carrigaline Court Hotel on Tuesday the 11th April from 2PM – 8PM. Given this acute and untimely notice we requested for this presentation to be deferred in order for our group to take stock and brief residents on what we had just learned however this too fell on deaf ears and consequently the presentation by TII will go ahead as scheduled.
    Incidentally we asked TII why they did not see fit to hold such presentation in Douglas or Rochestown and their response was to state that they could not source a meeting room either in the Maryborough Hotel or the RPH?????????? We kindly offerred an alternative venue in the Douglas area but they declined!
    It is of critical importance that residents attend this presentation and we ask each of you in turn to spread the word of the upcoming presentation to your resident association members also. We also ask that you query TII/RPS with the very pertinent questions around Noise and Air emissions, traffic volumes & congestion, route alignment near Bloomfield and how close the wall barrier and additional roadway will be to your homes.
    In light of the above and given what we now know, a full steering group meeting will take place on Tuesday 18th April at the Rochestown Park Hotel to further appraise members on what we have learned. Our meeting on the 18th requires that ALL residential steering group members and reps of private householders are in attendance. Put simply the matters for discussion are very serious indeed and this meeting will be defining moment in our campaign.
    Kind regards,
    Gerard Harrington & Frances Murphy
    Co- Chair M28 Steering Group

    I call that a success if I'm honest!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,122 ✭✭✭c montgomery


    9 Pharma plants in ringaskiddy have been lobbying collectively for this road for years. No disrespect to the residents who think they are effected but money talks and in reality this road is well overdue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Does this mean that the new Carrs Hill interchange will link to Maryborough Hill through Rochestown Rise?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    The steering groups Facebook page is full of comments supporting the road.

    These people actually think they talk for the residents of Douglas. This scheme will save Douglas.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Delighted that they've been told where to go. Possibly the most "bang for your buck" road scheme in Ireland being hampered by a couple of whiny residents. The M28 is only a bare widening of the 1990s constructed Sli Carrigdhoun (what is now the N28 from the N40 to Carrs Hill), and without the Sli Carrigdhoun Douglas would be an unholy mess of traffic. This scheme only removes traffic from Douglas, Maryborough and Rochestown.

    According to Michael Nolan, CEO TII, the scheme is being sent to An Bord Pleanala before the end of May.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,148 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    That is great news, I am very glad the road wasn't watered down to some basic dualler with stopped traffic idling beside people's houses.

    The alternative routes weren't workable and traffic pollution and noise will lessen in future years as transport is electrified.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 157 ✭✭DylanGLC


    How exactly does one get from Maryborough Hill to it without going down the hill? Through a new road through Maryborough Ridge to Carr's Hill? I assume you can also just go through Maryborough Woods, too, to Carr's Hill


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    DylanGLC wrote: »
    How exactly does one get from Maryborough Hill to it without going down the hill? Through a new road through Maryborough Ridge to Carr's Hill? I assume you can also just go through Maryborough Woods, too, to Carr's Hill

    There will definitely be a new road from where the Maryborough slip is now to the new Carr's Hill interchange along the side of the golf course.

    The paragraph above also seems to indicate that the Maryborough Ridge link road will be built.

    I cannot fathom how this will cause more traffic on Maryborough Hill. That slip is always backed up at rush hour and causes chaos on Maryborough Hill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭Ludo


    So is there a map anywhere of what all this will look like as currently planned? A road from Maryborough Hill to Bloomfield thru Rochestown Rise is mentioned above. That'll me messy and I can understand why people wouldn't want it. Interested to see where it is supposed to be.

    This website:
    http://www.n28cork-ringaskiddy.com/

    seems a mish mash of various stages of plans and mentions nothing about it.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/residents-may-seek-judicial-review-of-motorway-link-447604.html

    http://www.eveningecho.ie/corknews/Anger-over-M28-motorway-route-c5aa8502-289e-40b6-ad76-ea29a6be4b8c-ds

    I'm disappointed that the Echo have said that 10,000 residents are outraged. That's simply not true.

    Take note also that Buttimer has taken the side of these residents as opposed to a motorway scheme worth €3.5bn to the economy of Cork.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Pablo Escobar


    marno21 wrote: »
    http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/residents-may-seek-judicial-review-of-motorway-link-447604.html

    http://www.eveningecho.ie/corknews/Anger-over-M28-motorway-route-c5aa8502-289e-40b6-ad76-ea29a6be4b8c-ds

    I'm disappointed that the Echo have said that 10,000 residents are outraged. That's simply not true.

    Take note also that Buttimer has taken the side of these residents as opposed to a motorway scheme worth €3.5bn to the economy of Cork.

    The Echo/Examiner in fabrication of the facts shocker!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭KCAccidental


    marno21 wrote: »
    http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/residents-may-seek-judicial-review-of-motorway-link-447604.html

    http://www.eveningecho.ie/corknews/Anger-over-M28-motorway-route-c5aa8502-289e-40b6-ad76-ea29a6be4b8c-ds

    I'm disappointed that the Echo have said that 10,000 residents are outraged. That's simply not true.

    Take note also that Buttimer has taken the side of these residents as opposed to a motorway scheme worth €3.5bn to the economy of Cork.

    the steering group FB page has around 190 'likes'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Leonard Hofstadter


    Well say what you want about TII and Shane Ross, but thanks be to goodness for once in Ireland common sense is being applied and the so-called 'steering group' is being told to take quite a spectacular hike. I don't know anyone in Cork who does not want the scheme to go ahead - ask anyone who has the displeasure of using Carr's Hill during rush hour. Even off peak it is quite busy and all the so-called 'concerns' of the steering group are a steaming pile of nonsense. Message for the Government: just get on with it!


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Well say what you want about TII and Shane Ross, but thanks be to goodness for once in Ireland common sense is being applied and the so-called 'steering group' is being told to take quite a spectacular hike. I don't know anyone in Cork who does not want the scheme to go ahead - ask anyone who has the displeasure of using Carr's Hill during rush hour. Even off peak it is quite busy and all the so-called 'concerns' of the steering group are a steaming pile of nonsense. Message for the Government: just get on with it!
    In fairness, the primary reason this project is going ahead at the minute is that it's required under EU TEN-T directives.

    But still, great to see them not holding it back (for now!).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Well say what you want about TII and Shane Ross, but thanks be to goodness for once in Ireland common sense is being applied and the so-called 'steering group' is being told to take quite a spectacular hike. I don't know anyone in Cork who does not want the scheme to go ahead - ask anyone who has the displeasure of using Carr's Hill during rush hour. Even off peak it is quite busy and all the so-called 'concerns' of the steering group are a steaming pile of nonsense. Message for the Government: just get on with it!

    It's amazing that this "steering group" are getting all this exposure.

    They are a very small group of wealthy land owners who do not want the road to go ahead due to proximity to their own homes.

    They're campaigns are a disgrace and with 190 Facebook followed, The Echo is peddling an incredible amount of lies to carry a non story.

    I see the posturing campaign in Douglas is back with the group advertising for a new meeting. No doubt a few locals will believe the group in them saying it will make traffic in Douglas worse (it will do the complete opposite and alleviate current junction points between the N28 and the local road network.

    Let's just hope the scheme gets through as is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭Ludo


    Not 100% sure what side of discussion about this road I am on...There is definitely a need for it but hard to get full picture of what is being proposed exactly.
    Certainly don't believe all that the steering group are saying but also don't believe a word on this forum since it is against the rules here to discuss both sides or say anything negative about it. Fanboys only allowed judging by the mod post which is crazy. This supposed to be a discussion forum but I guess not. This place is a bad as the steering group as only one side being allowed here.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,871 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Ludo wrote: »
    Not 100% sure what side of discussion about this road I am on...There is definitely a need for it but hard to get full picture of what is being proposed exactly.
    Certainly don't believe all that the steering group are saying but also don't believe a word on this forum since it is against the rules here to discuss both sides or say anything negative about it. Fanboys only allowed judging by the mod post which is crazy. This supposed to be a discussion forum but I guess not. This place is a bad as the steering group as only one side being allowed here.

    Mod: @Ludo - If you have a problem with a mod, then report the post or PM the mod in question. There should be no interference by a mod with posters views, only with posters straying off topic, attacking other posters, or contravening the charter.

    You might read the charter yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Ludo wrote: »
    Not 100% sure what side of discussion about this road I am on...There is definitely a need for it but hard to get full picture of what is being proposed exactly.
    Certainly don't believe all that the steering group are saying but also don't believe a word on this forum since it is against the rules here to discuss both sides or say anything negative about it. Fanboys only allowed judging by the mod post which is crazy. This supposed to be a discussion forum but I guess not. This place is a bad as the steering group as only one side being allowed here.

    Their arguments are

    1. Destruction of the "historic" Mulcon Valley.
    2. Noise pollution
    3. Pollution
    4. The destruction of Douglas, Rochestown and Maryborough Hill (their exact words)

    1 is nothing but an excuse. They don't give 2 hoots about that Valley which will end up as housing if not motorway.

    2. Maybe a point of note. Sufficient barriers required etc.

    3. Stationery traffic is causing most of the pollution. This scheme will aid traffic flow greatly in the area.

    4. For this to be true, some sort of medium sized nuclear device would be required. Not part of the design schematics I believe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭KCAccidental


    T

    4. For this to be true, some sort of medium sized nuclear device would be required. Not part of the design schematics I believe.

    withdrawn before public consultation if i remember correctly.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    If the destruction of the Mulcon Valley is so much of an issue why was the N28 Carrs Hill - Bloomfield (Sli Carrigdhoun) allowed to be constructed?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭Ludo


    marno21 wrote: »
    If the destruction of the Mulcon Valley is so much of an issue why was the N28 Carrs Hill - Bloomfield (Sli Carrigdhoun) allowed to be constructed?

    Again not saying if the new road is right or wrong but that is not a good argument. Lots of things were done 20/30 years ago that would not be done today (and rightfully so). Just coz something was always done a certain way does not make it right. Weak point.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Ludo wrote: »
    Again not saying if the new road is right or wrong but that is not a good argument. Lots of things were done 20/30 years ago that would not be done today (and rightfully so). Just coz something was always done a certain way does not make it right. Weak point.

    Because the M28 is being constructed on the current alignment of the Sli Carrigdhoun. If that didn't destroy the Mulcon Valley I don't see how this will


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭Ludo


    A lot of trees being removed and replaced with walls...doesn't exactly sound nice does it. Port container traffic now taking this route through a suburb whereas they were across in Tivoli previously where there are no houses next to the road (I believe this is the plan right?). It is understandable to me why locals would be upset and want some kind of compromise and noise reduction effort made. Of course they are overstating the issues with it...they have to. Just as someone above saying it will be worth 3.5 billion to the cork economy is overstating it also. Ah I ust checked that and I see it was you. You presumably got that from somewhere but i cannot believe that will be true.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,148 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    marno21 wrote: »
    In fairness, the primary reason this project is going ahead at the minute is that it's required under EU TEN-T directives.

    But still, great to see them not holding it back (for now!).

    I think it's because Rinsaskiddy is ramping up as the new port of Cork.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,148 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    It's a matter of opinion that building the original N28 through the valley caused it any damage as the actual amount of space it takes up is small.

    The building of thousands of houses certainly did though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Irish_rat


    spacetweek wrote: »
    I think it's because Rinsaskiddy is ramping up as the new port of Cork.

    29k per day on single carriageway road is a deathtrap too


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,935 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    spacetweek wrote: »
    I think it's because Rinsaskiddy is ramping up as the new port of Cork.

    Speaking of Ringaskiddy... was down there over the weekend with the little fella (he likes the playground) and there is some sign up objecting to the route of a new road saying it'll divide the town in half etc

    Not being from the area myself I don't get the locations/impact involved but any idea what they're on about? Will get a picture next time I'm there,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭mikeym


    The M28 needs to be built, thousands of people work in the Ringaskiddy area.

    Then you have the Carrigaline/Crosshaven traffic commuting towards the City/Tunnel in the mornings.

    The traffic volumes are huge already and are only going to get worse with the new housing development in Carrigaline and other developments around the Ringaskiddy area.

    Even if the Bloomfield Interchange end wasnt given the go ahead Carrs Hill still needs to be bypassed.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    mikeym wrote: »
    The M28 needs to be built, thousands of people work in the Ringaskiddy area.

    Then you have the Carrigaline/Crosshaven traffic commuting towards the City/Tunnel in the mornings.

    The traffic volumes are huge already and are only going to get worse with the new housing development in Carrigaline and other developments around the Ringaskiddy area.

    Even if the Bloomfield Interchange end wasnt given the go ahead Carrs Hill still needs to be bypassed.

    No, it needs ALL doing.

    The amount of money spent on retrofitting in Cork is ridiculous. Kinsale Rd R/A, Bandon/Sarsfield roundabouts, now the Dunkettle Interchange, Mallow Road dualling and the dualling here of the Sli Carrigdhoun. Let's do it right for once and for all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,935 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Speaking of Ringaskiddy... was down there over the weekend with the little fella (he likes the playground) and there is some sign up objecting to the route of a new road saying it'll divide the town in half etc

    Not being from the area myself I don't get the locations/impact involved but any idea what they're on about? Will get a picture next time I'm there,

    As promised..

    14kvbqe.jpg

    nqr9ug.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭Ludo


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    As promised..

    Pic missing?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement