Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Has anyone heard the anecdote about the thin tube drilled down the middle?

  • 01-08-2014 9:41pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,205 ✭✭✭


    Hi all

    Years ago, I heard a story about this engineering lab somewhere in
    the world. They made this extremely thin piece of material.

    They were very proud of this and send a piece of it to a competing
    lab somewhere else in the world, with a message "What do you think?"

    The second lab sent it back to them some time later with a note
    saying, "not bad, what do you think of it now?"

    They original lab had a look at the sample under the microscope to
    discover that their rivals had drilled a perfect hole down the center
    of the sample.

    Has anyone else ever heard this story or knows the true circumstances?


    EDIT: Thanks to the power of Google it appears this story is an urban legend:

    http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/wire.asp

    Maybe you've heard a variation of it youself?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 642 ✭✭✭Bafucin


    Not sure where this comes from originally maybe a biography.
    a question in a physics degree exam at the University of Copenhagen: "Describe how to determine the height of a skyscraper with a barometer."
    One student replied:

    "You tie a long piece of string to the neck of the barometer, and then lower the barometer from the roof of the skyscraper to the ground. The length of the string plus the length of the barometer will equal the height of the building."
    This highly original answer so incensed the examiner that the student was failed immediately. The student appealed on the grounds that his answer was indisputably correct, and the university appointed an independent arbiter to decide the case. The arbiter judged that the answer was indeed correct, but did not display any noticeable knowledge of physics. To resolve the problem it was decided to call the student in and allow him six minutes in which to provide a verbal answer which showed at least a minimal familiarity with the basic principles of physics.
    For five minutes the student sat in silence, forehead creased in thought. The arbiter reminded him that time was running out, to which the student replied that he had several extremely relevant answers, but couldn't make up his mind which to use. On being advised to hurry up the student replied as follows:
    "Firstly, you could take the barometer up to the roof of the skyscraper, drop it over the edge, and measure the time it takes to reach the ground. The height of the building can then be worked out from the formula H =3D 0.5g x t squared. But bad luck on the barometer."

    "Or if the sun is shining you could measure the height of the barometer, then set it on end and measure the length of its shadow. Then you measure the length of the skyscraper's shadow, and thereafter it is a simple matter of proportional arithmetic to work out the height of the skyscraper."

    "But if you wanted to be highly scientific about it, you could tie a short piece of string to the barometer and swing it like a pendulum, first at ground level and then on the roof of the skyscraper. The height is worked out by the difference in the gravitational restoring force T =3D 2 pi square root (l / g)."

    "Or if the skyscraper has an outside emergency staircase, it would be easier to walk up it and mark off the height of the skyscraper in barometer lengths, then add them up."
    "If you merely wanted to be boring and orthodox about it, of course, you could use the barometer to measure the air pressure on the roof of the skyscraper and on the ground, and convert the difference in millibars into feet to give the height of the building."

    "But since we are constantly being exhorted to exercise independence of mind and apply scientific methods, undoubtedly the best way would be to knock on the janitor's door and say to him: "If you would like a nice new barometer, I will give you this one if you tell me the height of this skyscraper'."


    The student was Niels Bohr, the only Dane to win the Nobel Prize for Physics. :)


  • Site Banned Posts: 8 Yop on yop oF


    Bore-ing... :rolleyes:

    Oh, ...oh!


Advertisement