Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2013

Rayne Wooney · 24-04-2013 3:48pm

I don't understand the over reaction by some pool supporters, he bit a fellow player before and got a 7 game ban, he obviously didn't learn his lesson and did it again so they gave him a 10 game ban and hopefully he won't do it again now. It's probably the only bit of logic the FA have ever applied to any ruling they've made.

I thought a 9 game ban would be spot on what he should get.

I don't think the club should appeal, he could potentially get a 15 game ban and be out for the first 12 competitive games next season which would force Liverpool to sell, but other clubs will realise this and the lowball offers will flood in.

The club should take the ban and start planning for next season and decide if it will be with or without Suarez in the team.

amiable · 24-04-2013 3:48pm

ShiverinEskimo wrote: »

If you can show me a player who has a history of racial abuse and multiple instances of biting a fellow-pro then fair enough. But Suarez is quite the pioneer.

If all you've got are scummy tackles to compare these extraordinary offences to when scummy tackles exist up and down football from top to bottom then there's no debate. Not like Suarez isn't guilty of some horror tackles of his own is it?

So only repeat offences of certain offences should be taken in to account?

That_Guy · 24-04-2013 3:48pm

missingtime wrote: »

I dont like Fair City but I dont go into the Fair City thread mentioning how much I dont like Fair City or making fun of its actors.

Knex. wrote: »

I am indeed, and discussing the issues is fine. But coming in just to point out your hate of a team whom 90% of the thread occupants support is a different issue.

I was asked to tell of my opinion of Liverpool so I obliged

kfallon wrote: »

Do Newcastle even have their own thread?

Yes we do.

Knex. wrote: »

Yeah, it consists of about 30 pages of "PARDEW OUT" comments.

Incorrect.

kfallon wrote: »

Each post is from That_Guy :P

Incorrect.

amiable wrote: »

It's not a two way thing though. Newcastle are too insignificant for most Liverpool fans to hate.

*slow clap*

That_Guy · 24-04-2013 3:50pm

5starpool wrote: »

We are playing them at the weekend. Bad timing for that comment imo.

Not necessarily.

I stated in the Newcastle thread (yes we have one) that we'll more than likely lose given the nature of our performances this season and that Sturridge will want to give a really good showing to be Liverpool's main man from here on out.

Barring a crazy sending off and Enrique going in goal I don't see any joy coming our way.

Kess73 · 24-04-2013 3:52pm

ShiverinEskimo wrote: »

If you can show me a player who has a history of racial abuse and multiple instances of biting a fellow-pro then fair enough. But Suarez is quite the pioneer.

If all you've got are scummy tackles to compare these extraordinary offences to when scummy tackles exist up and down football from top to bottom then there's no debate. Not like Suarez isn't guilty of some horror tackles of his own is it?

Not sure if your post is one of the funniest posts or one of the dumbest post I have ever read on here.

missingtime · 24-04-2013 3:53pm

That_Guy wrote: »

I was asked to tell of my opinion of Liverpool so I obliged

Either way, you should love us considering we gave you 35 million for Andy Carroll.

Kess73 · 24-04-2013 3:53pm

amiable wrote: »

So only repeat offences of certain offences should be taken in to account?

Looks like that is what is being put forward. Like I said already it is either one of the funniest or dumbest posts I have ever read.

Handsome Bob · 24-04-2013 3:53pm

What a load of ****ing bollox.

barone · 24-04-2013 3:55pm

its clear to see luis is a marked man in england, any future incident on the pitch even if 100 % accidental will be deemed a crime and he will be carded, red/yellow for damm all.. opponents will play on it and get him booked, sent off.

we cant pretend ref's aren't influenced by reputation.

so it will only cost lfc more points ,goals in future.. which is when you gotta say ,its time to say goodbye, as good as he is, he's tarnished in england, and will never get a fair crack of the whip now, not ever.

a terrible loss for lfc.

ten games is not befitting the crime.. if he took a chunk outa his arm then id understand and support the outrage..

but the fake outrage going on is as over the top as the punishment handed down.

mosstin · 24-04-2013 3:55pm

Mr Alan wrote: »

Yep. Me too.

To be honest, with our manager being out of his depth & the club showing no signs of advancement he should probably be looking for a way out anyway....add in the crusade against him combined with his seeming inability to stop doing stupid stuff, he'll probably think, "**** this, lets get out of here!"

Thing is that this is a goldfish bowl all of his own making.

That_Guy · 24-04-2013 3:55pm

missingtime wrote: »

Either way, you should love us considering we gave you 35 million for Andy Carroll.

In hindsight yes. At the time it was crazy. But when you spend that money on the likes of Gabriel Obertan it makes me a sad panda.

gafferino · 24-04-2013 3:56pm

Net spend

Nuri Sahin · 24-04-2013 3:56pm

That_Guy wrote: »

I don't like Liverpool.

My horrible secret is out.

Happy?

Rhetorical question. Thanks for sharing it here though.

gimli2112 wrote: »

This would only worry me if Suarez was a komodo dragon

You still playing Far Cry 3? :pac:

Gbear · 24-04-2013 3:57pm

event wrote: »

Please say it wasnt you that made that.

Nope.

Not sure what you're objecting to.

Are you actually suggesting that biting someone is worse?

Knex* · 24-04-2013 3:58pm

amiable wrote: »

So only repeat offences of certain offences should be taken in to account?

That seems to be solid FA logic anyway by all accounts. Just don't ever define what those certain offences should be and you're golden.

Gbear · 24-04-2013 3:59pm

One good thing about this whole affair is that it's firming up candidates for my ignore list.

event · 24-04-2013 3:59pm

Gbear wrote: »

Nope.

Not sure what you're objecting to.

Are you actually suggesting that biting someone is worse?

Im suggesting someone made a poster like that, as if excusing Suarez.
Not saying any offence is worse than the other, but none should be excused.

hefferboi · 24-04-2013 4:00pm

F.A will probably give us United, City, Chelsea, Spurs and Arsenal in our first 5 fixtures next season. All away from home.

ShiverinEskimo · 24-04-2013 4:01pm

hefferboi wrote: »

F.A will probably give us United, City, Chelsea, Spurs and Arsenal in our first 5 fixtures next season. All away from home.

I predict an international tin-foil shortage by the weekend.

missingtime · 24-04-2013 4:01pm

Nuri Sahin wrote: »

You still playing Far Cry 3? :pac:

"What the hell is that hissing sound?"
"AHHH! Get off my ****ing leg"

Bastards :mad:

That_Guy · 24-04-2013 4:01pm

Nuri Sahin wrote: »

Rhetorical question. Thanks for sharing it here though.

My pleasure.

Gbear · 24-04-2013 4:03pm

event wrote: »

Im suggesting someone made a poster like that, as if excusing Suarez.
Not saying any offence is worse than the other, but none should be excused.

Not only can people not understand "condone" but also "excuse".

Saying murder isn't as bad as genocide doesn't mean that murder is fine.

I don't understand why people keep failing in basic reading comprehension.

ShiverinEskimo · 24-04-2013 4:06pm

Gbear wrote: »

Not only can people not understand "condone" but also "excuse".

Saying murder isn't as bad as genocide doesn't mean that murder is fine.

I don't understand why people keep failing in basic reading comprehension.

Much the same concept that just because other offences were punished leniently doesn't make the punishment for this one harsh.

Ryu Hayabusa · 24-04-2013 4:06pm

If Suarez is to be sold during the summer

how much would he be valued at?

Who would you like to replace him?

5starpool · 24-04-2013 4:07pm

Players are warned about their future conduct all the time. Any 3 game ban carries a warning as to their future conduct. Collect 5 bookings it results in a warning as to the players future conduct. The FA smelt blood and a cause as well as a suitable villain and took their usual route which included them saying a 3 match ban is clearly insufficient before allowing a 3 man 'independent commission' to make their judgement on it.

That_Guy · 24-04-2013 4:09pm

Ryu Hayabusa wrote: »

If Suarez is to be sold during the summer

how much would he be valued at?

Who would you like to replace him?

I'm not sure how much he'd be worth. Racism/biting aside he's been amazing this season.

Sturridge and Borini cost a fair bit so is there any real need to bring someone in? Maybe a change of tactics perhaps to accommodate them both. Thought Borini looked better playing in the centre than when he was asked to play in a wider role before he got injured.

Mr Alan · 24-04-2013 4:10pm

The bolded sentence in this is actually just comical.

I'll not lie, when I read it originally last night I actually presumed it was a joke

5starpool wrote: »

The FA smelt blood and a cause as well as a suitable villain and took their usual route which included them saying a 3 match ban is clearly insufficient before allowing a 3 man 'independent commission' to make their judgement on it.

klose · 24-04-2013 4:12pm

Ryu Hayabusa wrote: »

If Suarez is to be sold during the summer

how much would he be valued at?

Who would you like to replace him?

Only bayern will be in for him imo and after going for gotze straight away for 37 mill i think we could well get 50 for suarez. However, i dont want him to be sold for any amount but i dont blame the man at the this stage, hell be driven out by the fa and not the club as much as im sure hed like to stay here longer.

Handsome Bob · 24-04-2013 4:15pm

That_Guy wrote: »

I'm not sure how much he'd be worth. Racism/biting aside he's been amazing this season.

Sturridge and Borini cost a fair bit so is there any real need to bring someone in? Maybe a change of tactics perhaps to accommodate them both. Thought Borini looked better playing in the centre than when he was asked to play in a wider role before he got injured.

Sell Suarez and don't replace him, now I know you're on the wind up.

That_Guy · 24-04-2013 4:17pm

Handsome Bob wrote: »

Sell Suarez and don't replace him, now I know you're on the wind up.

There's still Andy Carroll.

hefferboi · 24-04-2013 4:17pm

ShiverinEskimo wrote: »

I predict an international tin-foil shortage by the weekend.

I wasn't being sarcastic at all.

*I was, and still am.

daRobot · 24-04-2013 4:21pm

Can this be appealed?

whatawaster · 24-04-2013 4:21pm

Boggles!!!

Dub13 · 24-04-2013 4:22pm

Grayditch · 24-04-2013 4:24pm

Slow day at the ChâteauNouveau thread.

Super-Rush · 24-04-2013 4:24pm

Such a joke.

Lovely Bloke · 24-04-2013 4:25pm

Liverpool have a nice loophole here, with Joey Barton as a proper precedence.

Barton went on loan to France to try to get around his suspension, but he wasn't allowed to play in France either.

Liverpool should send Suarez on loan to an Irish side for the summer, let him serve his suspension here.

SlickRic · 24-04-2013 4:27pm

Baldy Conscience wrote: »

Liverpool should send Suarez on loan to an Irish side for the summer, let him serve his suspension here.

could Shels do with him?

5starpool · 24-04-2013 4:27pm

Baldy Conscience wrote: »

Liverpool have a nice loophole here, with Joey Barton as a proper precedence.

Barton went on loan to France to try to get around his suspension, but he wasn't allowed to play in France either.

Liverpool should send Suarez on loan to an Irish side for the summer, let him serve his suspension here.

lol, I'd love if that were possible. Is it not the case that the French FA decided to honour the FA suspension, but that if Barton came back to England he would still have to serve the 12 games ban?

Lovely Bloke · 24-04-2013 4:27pm

SlickRic wrote: »

could Shels do with him?

lol no, we already get enough red cards as it is.

barone · 24-04-2013 4:27pm

pepe got a ten game ban for this ...very similar incidents

http://gerrard8fanpage.lockerdome.com/articles/107366166

5starpool · 24-04-2013 4:29pm

Anyhow, I'm done talking about it, for now at least. I'm only going to drive myself insane otherwise.

Gbear · 24-04-2013 4:30pm

barone wrote: »

pepe got a ten game ban for this ...very similar incidents

http://gerrard8fanpage.lockerdome.com/articles/107366166

I think he did something like push him, kick him and then on his way off the pitch he called the ref's mother a whore.

By the Barton logic he should've got about 9 concurrent red cards.

K-9 · 24-04-2013 4:30pm

Ryu Hayabusa wrote: »

If Suarez is to be sold during the summer

how much would he be valued at?

Who would you like to replace him?

Barnes made the point well, if Liverpool are forced to sell him because of his behaviour, how does that make any club who buys him look? Anyway the club has said they wont sell him, and I don't think they'll entertain it.

Vanolder · 24-04-2013 4:30pm

It's done, get over it, move on.

missingtime · 24-04-2013 4:31pm

barone wrote: »

pepe got a ten game ban for this ...very similar incidents

http://gerrard8fanpage.lockerdome.com/articles/107366166

That's outrageous.

That_Guy · 24-04-2013 4:32pm

Grayditch wrote: »

Slow day at the ChâteauNouveau thread.

It's always a slow day. There's only so much bitching and moaning about your team you can do so I came in here and... oh.

Dub13 · 24-04-2013 4:33pm

Baldy Conscience wrote: »

lol no, we already get enough red cards as it is.

He has never been sent of for us.

googled eyes · 24-04-2013 4:33pm

barone wrote: »

pepe got a ten game ban for this ...very similar incidents

http://gerrard8fanpage.lockerdome.com/articles/107366166

Holy Sh`t !

Lovely Bloke · 24-04-2013 4:34pm

Dub13 wrote: »

He has never been sent of for us.

cool, but why would we want another player who's going to be suspended?

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2013

Comments