Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

[FEEDBACK] any suggestions on how to improve the forum? post them here.

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    By no means should anyone be "banned" for not posting but the annoying part is they say ok ill find out the price of postage then 3 days later they say oh i dont want to post would a set up like adverts be able to be put in place
    Collection
    Delivery
    Post
    in the starting ad.
    One thing people should be made do is post pictures of what they are selling/trading no picture no ad and none of this pictures up later or ill post pictures if there is interest that bugs me if your taking the time to place an ad have the pictures ready
    Another thing is not posting asking prices/fps just lock the thread until they pm a mod to get it open again and post the info required


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 834 ✭✭✭tonycombat


    This may been mentioned before, seems to work well for the cycling adverts forum.
    A Trades Thread
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2054994925

    Just put up what you have & what you'd like to swap it for.
    Maybe a set template would be the way to do it.
    i.e.

    Looking to trade: M4, comes with.........

    Wanted: Famas

    May help
    Thanks for looking

    Regards
    TC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    Again i ask the question is it one rule for MODs and another for the rest of us ?????
    This guy was banned for a week for Profiteering http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056747381 and rightly so

    Then you have a MOD doing the same thing here http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056747215 and nothing is done about it :eek:
    Before the Mod edited the first post at 17:17 today it was up as €50 posted or €40 collected amazing how it was edited 6 minutes after i posted my question


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,439 ✭✭✭✭thermo


    grapeape wrote: »
    Again i ask the question is it one rule for MODs and another for the rest of us ?????
    This guy was banned for a week for Profiteering http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056747381 and rightly so

    Then you have a MOD doing the same thing here http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056747215 and nothing is done about it :eek:
    Profiteering:
    What is Profiteering?
    Profiteering is selling an item above RRP because it's scarce in supply and / or in high demand and is not permitted.

    If you believe someone is profiteering then please report the post and include a link to where the exact same item can normally be purchased for less. This must take into account any VAT / import duties / transport charges / downgrading / accessories - basically it must be a price for the exact same item being offered here, delivered in Ireland and fully legal. If the mods agree then we will post those fact on thread. Do not take it upon yourself to post on our behalf.

    trying to sell an item (not scarce or high in demand) for less than half the price of the same item as new is not profiteering.
    maybe re read the rules to understand them better or if you need help with definitions post here and have them explained.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    thermo wrote: »
    Profiteering:


    trying to sell an item (not scarce or high in demand) for less than half the price of the same item as new is not profiteering.
    maybe re read the rules to understand them better or if you need help with definitions post here and have them explained.
    Well then how come another MOD banned dryndantheman for a week and classed it as profiteering when he was selling the item for less than the price new but double what he paid for it ???? Maybe im not the only one that needs to reread the rules and understand them :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,439 ✭✭✭✭thermo


    grapeape wrote: »
    Well then how come another MOD banned dryndantheman for a week and classed it as profiteering when he was selling the item for less than the price new but double what he paid for it ???? Maybe im not the only one that needs to reread the rules and understand them :rolleyes:
    as always feel free to pm any mod about their decisions and im sure they will be happy to explain their actions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    grapeape wrote: »
    Again i ask the question is it one rule for MODs and another for the rest of us ?????
    This guy was banned for a week for Profiteering http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056747381 and rightly so

    Then you have a MOD doing the same thing here http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056747215 and nothing is done about it :eek:
    Before the Mod edited the first post at 17:17 today it was up as €50 posted or €40 collected amazing how it was edited 6 minutes after i posted my question
    Id still like my question answered by either another MOD (not the one whose actions I was questioning) or a Category Mod


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    thermo wrote: »
    as always feel free to pm any mod about their decisions and im sure they will be happy to explain their actions.
    I dont neeed to PM Dogwatch about his decision as he explained it quite clearly on the thread

    It has a value of about E100. You are asking for twice that.
    In my opinion that is profiteering and is a breach of the charter.
    1 week ban for breach of forum charter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,553 ✭✭✭Dogwatch


    In the current case the OP ( Thermo ) withdrew the item from sale as soon as he became aware of its origins.

    In the other case the OP (dryndantheman) persisted with the sale even though other posters were pointing out his error. When i asked a question, he queried why a MOD would be involved and only after my intervention did he withdraw the item.

    dryndantheman got a ban for persisting to push the sale even though the evidence against him from other posters was overwhelming.

    In this instance Thermo has done the right thing and no longer offers it for sale.

    I hope this answers your question.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    Dogwatch wrote: »
    In the current case the OP ( Thermo ) withdrew the item from sale as soon as he became aware of its origins.

    In the other case the OP (dryndantheman) persisted with the sale even though other posters were pointing out his error. When i asked a question, he queried why a MOD would be involved and only after my intervention did he withdraw the item.

    dryndantheman got a ban for persisting to push the sale even though the evidence against him from other posters was overwhelming.

    In this instance Thermo has done the right thing and no longer offers it for sale.

    I hope this answers your question.
    You stated he was banned for breach of the charter which was profiteering which is what thermo also did but because he is a MOD did not receive a ban which answers my question that there is one rule for us and another rule for the Mods


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    thermo wrote: »
    Profiteering:


    trying to sell an item (not scarce or high in demand) for less than half the price of the same item as new is not profiteering.
    maybe re read the rules to understand them better or if you need help with definitions post here and have them explained.
    Going by this post from thermo neither he nor dryndantheman were profiteering so how could did dryndantheman be banned for pushing it ????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,553 ✭✭✭Dogwatch


    He was banned for persisting with the sale even though it had been pointed out to him that he was looking for over twice what he paid. He only withdrew it when a MOD(me) stepped in. In this case. the OP withdrew the item as soon as he became aware of his error.

    In my opinion this incident is minor and was corrected as soon as possible. The other incident was pushed by the OP as far as possible to sell the item. IF you are unhappy with my opinion, please contact a C Mod by either PM or report the post and ask for a C Mod to review it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    Dogwatch wrote: »
    He was banned for persisting with the sale even though it had been pointed out to him that he was looking for over twice what he paid. He only withdrew it when a MOD(me) stepped in. In this case. the OP withdrew the item as soon as he became aware of his error.

    In my opinion this incident is minor and was corrected as soon as possible. The other incident was pushed by the OP as far as possible to sell the item. IF you are unhappy with my opinion, please contact a C Mod by either PM or report the post and ask for a C Mod to review it.
    I think ill get the same answer from a C Mod that you gave me i can see an end to me using this forum at this stage


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Neither of these cases were profiteering as defined by the rules.

    We're discussing what happened in the mod forum - I'm not entirely happy about how this was handled - the same rules apply to everyone in the forum with the exception that moderator posts do not constitute thread spoiling.

    I'll re-post what I posted there, this sums up the rule in question:
    Steve wrote:
    Just remember - profiteering is not the same as profiting. That's what gets most people.
    There is nothing in the rules that says you can't sell for more than you bought for.

    The profiteering rule is used mainly to stop ticket touts and people selling hard to get items (like a new release ipad or something) for mad money.

    If the forum needs a rule that specifically says you can't sell for more than you bought for then that can be discussed - from experience on adverts.ie it's a very unfair rule and practically non-enforceable.

    The head-wrecker for the mods here is trying to make a call on when someone is blatantly taking the pi$$ with their pricing vs someone making a few quid more than they paid for (which is not a rule breach).

    Hope that explains it a bit better :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    Steve wrote: »
    Neither of these cases were profiteering as defined by the rules.

    We're discussing what happened in the mod forum - I'm not entirely happy about how this was handled - the same rules apply to everyone in the forum with the exception that moderator posts do not constitute thread spoiling.

    I'll re-post what I posted there, this sums up the rule in question:


    If the forum needs a rule that specifically says you can't sell for more than you bought for then that can be discussed - from experience on adverts.ie it's a very unfair rule and practically non-enforceable.

    The head-wrecker for the mods here is trying to make a call on when someone is blatantly taking the pi$$ with their pricing vs someone making a few quid more than they paid for (which is not a rule breach).

    Hope that explains it a bit better :)
    It does explain it alot better and not taken a side but the way i see it is dryndantheman was asked why is he asking for over double what he paid for and was banned for a week for the charter breach of profiteering and then you have thermo asking again over double what he paid for the item and nothing happens A blind man can see how this looks I just think its taking the pi$$ Thanks for your time in this Steve and Dogwatch


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    Personally like id say 80% of the users here that if you buy item A for €10 and you try to sell it again for €30 thats profiteering and shouldnt be allowed by anyone on the forum


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    grapeape wrote: »
    It does explain it alot better and not taken a side but the way i see it is dryndantheman was asked why is he asking for over double what he paid for and was banned for a week for the charter breach of profiteering and then you have thermo asking again over double what he paid for the item and nothing happens A blind man can see how this looks I just think its taking the pi$$ Thanks for your time in this Steve and Dogwatch
    I'm well aware of how this looks and I've already said I'm not thrilled about it.
    The main thing to remember here is we (mods) are just ordinary guys as well - same as you and we don't always get it 100% right every time. That's part of why this feedback thread is here - so you can point it out. :)

    As I said, we're discussing what happened - we'll learn from it and fix what needs fixing and be wiser next time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    grapeape wrote: »
    Personally like id say 80% of the users here that if you buy item A for €10 and you try to sell it again for €30 thats profiteering and shouldnt be allowed by anyone on the forum
    What if they bought it on bookface / ebay for €10?
    What if they bought it in a closing down sale for €10 and all other retailers have it for €40?

    Would the rule only cover stuff specifically previously bought / sold on this forum?

    See the problem there? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    Steve wrote: »
    What if they bought it on bookface / ebay for €10?
    What if they bought it in a closing down sale for €10 and all other retailers have it for €40?

    Would the rule only cover stuff specifically previously bought / sold on this forum?

    See the problem there? :)
    Start with this Forum and work from there what your saying now is the launcher and sthunder i bought here for €50 i can now repost for €150 as its €200 in the shops now that would be taking the pi$$


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    Steve wrote: »
    I'm well aware of how this looks and I've already said I'm not thrilled about it.
    The main thing to remember here is we (mods) are just ordinary guys as well - same as you and we don't always get it 100% right every time. That's part of why this feedback thread is here - so you can point it out. :)

    As I said, we're discussing what happened - we'll learn from it and fix what needs fixing and be wiser next time.
    I understand that MODs are ordinary guys but the same rule should apply which is my question all along as it seems to be one rule for MODs and another for the rest of us


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    When its made clear on thread or pm to a mod like i did in the dryndantheman case when i offered on the item then dogwatch stepped in and banned him for a week which is 100% right granted hightower1 did it the other way on thermos thread but Deburca gives out to hightower1 for thread spoiling and does nothing to thermo for over charging Thats the part thats annoying me about the whole thing and made me ask the question in the first place


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    grapeape wrote: »
    Start with this Forum and work from there what your saying now is the launcher and sthunder i bought here for €50 i can now repost for €150 as its €200 in the shops now that would be taking the pi$$
    If you did that then there's no rule breach so you're perfectly entitled to do so.
    In an ideal world, and this is how we do it on adverts.ie, - the post would be reported with a link to the original thread (or place it was bought elsewhere) and a mod would then post that information on thread.
    It would then be up to anyone interested in making an offer to satisfy themself as to the item's worth. As I said above, this would normally be a threadspoil and only moderators are exempt from this rule when posting in an official capacity.
    grapeape wrote: »
    I understand that MODs are ordinary guys but the same rule should apply which is my question all along as it seems to be one rule for MODs and another for the rest of us
    I assure you it's not - as I said, there is an ongoing discussion of what went on. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    Steve wrote: »
    If you did that then there's no rule breach so you're perfectly entitled to do so.
    If this is so then why did dryndantheman get banned for a week for "pushing it" after a mod stepped in ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    grapeape wrote: »
    If this is so then why did dryndantheman get banned for a week for "pushing it" after a mod stepped in ?
    That's being discussed between the mods. There may be other factors to consider that aren't visible to all so let us do our job there, thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,977 ✭✭✭Just a Plinker


    Lads this has to stop, Make an offer for the fun of it ???? , You reply yes and lower your asking price, And no reply, Common this is not fair, You are intrested in an item or you are not, But at least Reply , If You want to make an offer let the seller know what you want to do, Example ,Hi Plinker I would like to make an offer based on collection if you are close to me, I am not willing to do postage so please let me know were you are based and how far you can travel before I make an offer,
    I've accepted offers twice on threads here were I have lowered my price and had to withdraw my items One link below,

    Very Very Annoyed, No I'm pi##ed off to be exact:mad::mad:
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056710053


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Anyone here who uses touch.boards.ie on their mobile would be interested in this:
    COLOR=#004b82]Feature Suggestion[/COLOR What would you like to see on the touch site?
    Get your oar in for them to get the [FOR SALE] / [WANTED] etc. thread prefixes working! :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 131 ✭✭Dec_


    Why have an Airsoft Adverts forum when you can buy a Desert eagle replica gas powered BB gun which just sold for €85 on Adverts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,553 ✭✭✭Dogwatch


    Link please


  • Registered Users Posts: 131 ✭✭Dec_


    Dogwatch wrote: »
    Link please

    It's Gone now. Was still there for a few hours after i reported it. That's a least 6 i have reported in the past week one even had ball bearings with it. Seller was KiKiKabooM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,553 ✭✭✭Dogwatch


    Unfortunately all you can do is report the post as soon as you see and let the local Mods deal with it.
    Thank you for the information and the concern.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,899 ✭✭✭S.E.A.L.s


    I've just thought of a great idea, that will benfit many and would not take much to setup, we already have a Users feedback sticky and cannot believe we do not have a Mod's feedback sticky in the Airsoft forum. As Mod's are always open and if something can be learnt, they are always open to that

    Also, this would be an excellent way for all to see how decisions are applied, with more transparency then ever and to be fair, there would be rules as to what cannot be posted

    Plus, if there is anything I can do to help, I'm offering my time and effort to get this off the ground

    Does anyone else feel this would be a good idea?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,553 ✭✭✭Dogwatch


    If what you want is a thread to critisise or critique Mod actions. then I do not see that happening. If you have a gripe with a Mod or a decision of a Mod, take it up the chain to the next level.
    Perhaps you need to re read the rules on Boards.ie and the rules for the Airsoft Forum again as most of what you asking is covered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    I've just thought of a great idea,

    ....

    Does anyone else feel this would be a good idea?

    I fail to see how it would benefit the forum.

    Are you asking for for a thread where you can slate the mods you don't like and thank the ones you do as if this was some form of democracy :)

    (that was a joke before you take it seriously.. ;))


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭brenak47


    just been looking at some of the feedback to the forum.i'm new to this site and airsoft in the game you play fair and take your hit and i think people using this to buy there stuff should be the same if your really interested in an item you should be allowed to take it to pm and if you want to haggle the price then do it there as this won't affect the orig price the person is trying to get.prices can be dropped if buyer has to do the traveling where as if the buyer is near enough the seller can get his full price or close to it.i've seen ones where people are having to repost 10 - 15 euro less cause of time wasters and i don't believe its fair on the seller.i myself will only post to the ones im really interested in to save this from happening fair is fair either way the price you get it from here is cheaper than the shop so why f**k people over thats all i have to say not many will agree with me but i don't care thats what this part of the forum is for


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭TommyKnocker


    brenak47 wrote: »
    just been looking at some of the feedback to the forum.i'm new to this site and airsoft in the game you play fair and take your hit and i think people using this to buy there stuff should be the same if your really interested in an item you should be allowed to take it to pm and if you want to haggle the price then do it there as this won't affect the orig price the person is trying to get.prices can be dropped if buyer has to do the traveling where as if the buyer is near enough the seller can get his full price or close to it.i've seen ones where people are having to repost 10 - 15 euro less cause of time wasters and i don't believe its fair on the seller.i myself will only post to the ones im really interested in to save this from happening fair is fair either way the price you get it from here is cheaper than the shop so why f**k people over thats all i have to say not many will agree with me but i don't care thats what this part of the forum is for

    IMHO while most of the folks who use the Airsoft Adverts forum are genuine, there have on occasion been chancers both buying and selling.

    As you pointed out, there are folks who fein interest in an item, haggle the asking price down and then walk away, leaving the seller with a lower asking price. This is not nice, but IMHO the onus is on the seller to have a figure in their head that they think is fair and which is the lowest they are prepared to go and then stick to their guns.

    On the flip side, there have on occasion been folks who have tried to sell items which the purchased on the forum for the same or a higher price. Having all dealings done on thread helps IMO limit these situations as other posters may spot this and report the poster.

    Again this is not nice and IMO the onus here is for parties interested in an item to check back in the forum (search function) to see if item was purchased here previously and at what price. If a higher price is being sought, have there been any upgrades which would account for the difference or is the seller just chancing their arm. Also check the user feedback forum to see if others have had dealings with this person and how they found the experience.

    This is why we have a User feed back thread. If you find yourself dealing with a buyer or seller like this, then provide negative feed back in the User feed back thread for that user.

    If you notice this carry on in a thread that you are not active in, but think another user is on the receiving end, then drop the Mods a PM highlighting your suspicions and they will investigate.

    By flagging dubious buyers and sellers in this way you will help weed them out and help others see who are the reputable folks to deal with


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,899 ✭✭✭S.E.A.L.s


    Dogwatch wrote: »
    If what you want is a thread to critisise or critique Mod actions. then I do not see that happening. If you have a gripe with a Mod or a decision of a Mod, take it up the chain to the next level.
    Perhaps you need to re read the rules on Boards.ie and the rules for the Airsoft Forum again as most of what you asking is covered.

    What I'm looking for, is a place for all users to express their gratitude and objective feedback towards the Mod's, as any on thread thanks or otherwise, could be (technically) thread spoiling or worse depending on what is said

    Also, we may just want to type out our opinions and observations, without fear of an infraction or ban, rather then escalate a case up the chain of command
    Steve wrote: »
    I fail to see how it would benefit the forum.

    Are you asking for for a thread where you can slate the mods you don't like and thank the ones you do as if this was some form of democracy :)

    (that was a joke before you take it seriously.. ;))

    To be honest, I've no intention of playing favorites, as that would be unobjective and against the spirit of this idea. As for the forum being a democracy, no comment (just a joke ;))

    The whole point of this idea, is to have a place we can express the positive and negative points of each interaction with the Mod's, in an objective and constructive way, without fear of an infraction or ban

    This would benefit the forum, as it serves to build a greater trust between those who run it and those who use it

    It's simple really :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    The whole point of this idea, is to have a place we can express the positive and negative points of each interaction with the Mod's, in an objective and constructive way, without fear of an infraction or ban

    This would benefit the forum, as it serves to build a greater trust between those who run it and those who use it

    It's simple really :)
    But - it would always place the moderators at a disadvantage because in most cases the reasoning behind an action is backed up by information we have access to that cannot be posted publicly.
    Therefore, if you wanted to say 'thanks, good job there banning an obvious troll' then it would be fine but if you wanted to ask why we acted harshly on a seemingly minor transgression then we cannot defend it. It may have been a persons previous warning or ban history - it may be that we got certain information from the site admins or employees, either way, it's confidential and therefore not within our remit or permission to post on a local public thread.

    If there is a larger issue, not specific to a single action, then, yes, with prior consultation, I will 100% guarantee that it can be discussed in the open in a civil manner without fear of moderator reaction or 'opression'. That has happened before.

    I still stand by my earlier statement that a mod critique thread is not in the best interests of this forum for the above reasons. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Steve wrote: »
    Anyone here who uses touch.boards.ie on their mobile would be interested in this:
    COLOR=#004b82]Feature Suggestion[/COLOR What would you like to see on the touch site?
    Get your oar in for them to get the [FOR SALE] / [WANTED] etc. thread prefixes working! :)

    This was fixed and rolled out a few days ago. Big thanks to the site developers. :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 86 ✭✭joshloveridge


    could u make sure ur admins are accusing people properly???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,561 ✭✭✭andy_g


    could u make sure ur admins are accusing people properly???

    Link please


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 86 ✭✭joshloveridge


    just in general like some of them are even harassing people on this :o i know its shocking


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Its a strict forum - we enforce the rules strictly because peoples money and Airsoft kit are at stake.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 86 ✭✭joshloveridge


    i certainly aggre but still it might push ppl away just a thought


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    Thing is though, it's our little piece of the internet (and by 'our', I mean the airsoft community here that use this place day in day out, not just the mods).

    There are plenty of places out there where people can go and buy or sell their stuff but anywhere you go you risk being scammed or people not paying or just having your time wasted. Our rules are there to minimise that risk and have been developed over a good many years based on bitter experience. They also provide a level playing field so everyone can benefit from a question that is asked - that's why the no off thread dealing is there.

    It sounds unfriendly, but if anyone doesn't like the rules here then they don't have to use the forum - if they want to use the forum then they must follow them or go elsewhere... simple really :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭Eoghan S


    May be a stupid idea, but what about an Airsoft News forum, where fellow airsofters can post links to the best new guns etc released, and just have general banter ;)
    Sounds silly but it would give us all something to talk about :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,561 ✭✭✭andy_g


    Eoghan S wrote: »
    May be a stupid idea, but what about an Airsoft News forum, where fellow airsofters can post links to the best new guns etc released, and just have general banter ;)
    Sounds silly but it would give us all something to talk about :)

    We already have one :) the airsoft news thread on the main forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,891 ✭✭✭Eoghan S


    andy_g wrote: »
    We already have one :) the airsoft news thread on the main forum.

    My god I completely missed that!
    Have no clue how though ;)
    Anyway, sorry for that complete waste of time haha
    I can only laugh at myself ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,561 ✭✭✭andy_g


    Eoghan S wrote: »
    My god I completely missed that!
    Have no clue how though ;)
    Anyway, sorry for that complete waste of time haha
    I can only laugh at myself ;)

    You mean we cant all laugh at you i mean with you :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ShadowFox


    Can it be made part of the rules that seeing as you can edit your first post within 24 hours that people are not technically allowed to bump their thread by adding new information or pictures with another post hours after their first one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    ShadowFox wrote: »
    Can it be made part of the rules that seeing as you can edit your first post within 24 hours that people are not technically allowed to bump their thread by adding new information or pictures with another post hours after their first one

    I know that sort of tactical 'bumping' happens the odd time but I don't think it's widespread enough to warrant a rule change.

    As it stands, I prefer the current setup where when someone adds details then whoever is following the thread gets a notification - that's practical.

    Will keep an eye on it though, thanks.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement