Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Claim and Insurance .

  • 30-06-2014 7:54pm
    #1
    bcmf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭


    If ,hypothetically of course, if a person was involve in a collison and was hurt.
    The insurance company of the guilty party arranged a medical assessment. The medical assessment was a farce and the injured party wasnt even examined.
    Another medical assessment was done with scans etc at the injured parties cost an submitted to the insurance company.
    So the insurance company then decides upon receipt of the scans and medical report that they need a second examination as the scans have showed significant damage.
    Can the injured party tell the insurance to go eff off and to use the documention submitted because if they hired a donkey to do the inital assessment that is an internal problem that they have to address.
    What would be the outcome if the injured party refused to go to the second medical appointment.


Comments

  • #2
    kennM
    Registered Users Posts: 603 ✭✭✭kennM


    bcmf wrote: »
    If ,hypothetically of course, if a person was involve in a collison and was hurt.
    The insurance company of the guilty party arranged a medical assessment. The medical assessment was a farce and the injured party wasnt even examined.
    Another medical assessment was done with scans etc at the injured parties cost an submitted to the insurance company.
    So the insurance company then decides upon receipt of the scans and medical report that they need a second examination as the scans have showed significant damage.
    Can the injured party tell the insurance to go eff off and to use the documention submitted because if they hired a donkey to do the inital assessment that is an internal problem that they have to address.
    What would be the outcome if the injured party refused to go to the second medical appointment.

    Welcome to the game. Basically its a numbers game ultimately. Defense wants to play down the injuries, plaintiff who is injured just wants what's fair. Are you going through injuries board??? got a solicitor? Feel free to PM if you don't want to post through public form. Have gone through all this rubbish recently


Advertisement