Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Driving in the middle lane

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,237 ✭✭✭✭djimi


    corktina wrote: »
    Can you imagine the chaos without this rule? It would give carte blanche to even more people to hog the overtaking lane and you'd have people weaving in and out, constantly having to switch lane to under- and overtake

    It would be more or less exactly as it is now in fairness, except there might be a better flow in the traffic as people would not hesitate to pass on the left.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    djimi wrote: »
    It would be more or less exactly as it is now in fairness, except there might be a better flow in the traffic as people would not hesitate to pass on the left.

    No it wouldn't because now most people respect the Law and don't undertake. If it were legal, everyone would be doing it...Giant Slalom style


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    djimi wrote: »
    It would be more or less exactly as it is now in fairness, except there might be a better flow in the traffic as people would not hesitate to pass on the left.

    It would be exactly what the M50 and its approaches are now.

    Going to Dublin on the M6/M4, the muppetry starts immediately after the last tollgate.

    Please let's not turn all our other motorways into the M50.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,237 ✭✭✭✭djimi


    corktina wrote: »
    No it wouldn't because now most people respect the Law and don't undertake. If it were legal, everyone would be doing it...Giant Slalom style

    Its not my experience that most people respect the law; both poor lane discipline and undertaking is absolutely rife on any road that I regularly drive on. Drive the N7/M7 any day and you would never think to look at it that it was the law to either drive on the left or pass on the right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭ldxo15wus6fpgm


    corktina wrote: »
    Can you imagine the chaos without this rule? It would give carte blanche to even more people to hog the overtaking lane and you'd have people weaving in and out, constantly having to switch lane to under- and overtake

    As djimi rightly said, this mentality here is the problem. Someone sitting in the overtaking lane is easily the most common reason for someone to undertake in the first place. Sort this problem out and there wouldn't be any 'chaos' if undertaking was allowed. I suspect we'd have far fewer road rage incidents too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,815 ✭✭✭creedp


    Failing to drive on the left: 1 point
    Dangerous overtaking: 3 points


    OK you've made my mind up for me .. that me hogging the right lane in future


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 3,816 Mod ✭✭✭✭LFCFan


    Is there anything in the law/rules that says you can't flash your lights/blow your horn at the idiot in the overtaking lane to get them to move over? Not that it makes a blind bit of difference to some people who will most likely just give you the finger for having the audacity to want them to move in to the correct lane so you don't have to break the law by undertaking them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,063 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    LFCFan wrote: »
    Is there anything in the law/rules that says you can't flash your lights/blow your horn at the idiot in the overtaking lane to get them to move over? Not that it makes a blind bit of difference to some people who will most likely just give you the finger for having the audacity to want them to move in to the correct lane so you don't have to break the law by undertaking them

    I didn't see any law against flashing the lights at someone to ask to move over, but it's fairly uneffective in Ireland.
    People flashed treat it like sign of aggression from driver from behind, and usually they intentionally fail to move, or if they eventually do - they show up the finger.
    Amount of finger's I've seen shown to me in Ireland on motorways is just tremendous.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 3,816 Mod ✭✭✭✭LFCFan


    CiniO wrote: »
    Amount of finger's I've seen shown to me in Ireland on motorways is just tremendous.

    Have seen a fair few myself and 95% of them were from people 100% in the wrong. In fairness I made a couple of mistakes myself and deserved the finger but the vast majority are from people who clearly have no idea how to drive and also have a serious attitude problem :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,327 ✭✭✭highdef


    Have probably got the finger myself but I concentrate more on what's ahead and in my mirrors rather then have a gawk to see what the person in the adjacent car is doing/looks like.
    On the rare occasion that I am a passenger in a car, I'm amazed by the amount of people that look into every car that passes them......watch the road, muppets!!!
    Anyway, that was a bit off-topic. As mentioned before, if I am in lane 1 and passing a car in lane 2, I am at fault if the car decides to pull into me in lane 1. However, if I am in the auxiliary lane (where available) and pass a car to the left of a car in lane 1, they are at fault if they pull over and into me as the aux lane is treated as a separate carriageway.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 102 ✭✭dtipp


    dtipp wrote: »
    This is an interesting debate and I'd love a definite answer.

    Regularly, I'm driving out of Dublin on the Naas dualcarriageway late at night.
    So I sit into the left of the 3 lanes and stick on the cruise control at around 100km/h.

    There's usually very little on the road at the time of night I'm driving.
    Whatever is on the road, however, is usually in the middle lane.

    So I don't change lanes, I just pass on the inside - to me it's far safer than changing lanes four times every time I want to pass on vehicle (two out to right lane, two back to left lane).

    Am I breaking the law?

    Even if I am, I think I'm definitely doing the right thing - it's far more dangerous surely to be constantly changing lanes.


    Thanks for all the replies to this question.

    Leaving aside the law for a second, I can't believe anyone really thinks that continuing on the left lane (and therefore undertaking any car that is driving slower in the middle lane) is more dangerous then changing lanes 4 times every few minutes.

    Either way, I won't be changing how I drive on the Naas dualcarriageway.
    It's simply too dangerous IMHO to use the outside lane every time I see an idiot cantering along late at night in the middle one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    djimi wrote: »
    I suppose to present the observation/expectation point from a different angle:

    Lets say I am driving on a motorway at the speed limit in the left hand lane. There is a car in front of me that I wish to overtake. Can I therefore pull into the overtaking lane without looking, on the basis that as I am doing the speed limit there should not be a car in that lane that is travelling faster than me?

    Just because someone is breaking the law does not mean that they wont be there; if driving in Ireland has thought me anything its that if you can think of any scenario, no matter how unlikely or moronic it may seem, there is fair chance that at some stage in your driving life you will probably encounter it!

    I think that's a key point here, when driving you must always expect the unexpected and that means that you have to expect that some people will not always do what you think they should be doing. AFAIK the law sees it that way too, I heard of a case a few years back where a motorcyclist was in the bus lane. A motorist moved into the bus lane in order to get around a car in front that was turning right. The car driver had the motorcyclist in their blind spot and moved in on him, knocking him clean off the bike. When it came to court the car drivers solicitor argued that the motorbike was breaking the law by being in the bus lane in the first place and that therefore the case should be dismissed as a consequence in that if the motorcyclist hadn't of broken the law then the crash would never have happened to begin with. Their argument was that the motorcyclist was to blame for the accident happening.

    Anyway the judge was having none of it and remarked 'what if it had of been a cyclist?', it didn't matter to the judge that the motorcyclist was partly to blame for the situation he found himself in because at the end of the day it would never have happened if the car had of done the proper observation checks before moving into the bus lane. It didn't matter that it was a motorcyclist to the judge because it could have just as easily been a cyclist who got knocked over due to poor observation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,267 ✭✭✭visual


    Im surprised no one has touched apon mirrors

    the right mirror is magnified compared to the left and has more focused view to allow you better judge distance for the purpose of over taking.

    Its also the reason that we are taught once we do overtake and want to return to the driving lane that we shouldn't rely on the left mirror but wait until we can see the car we have just passed in the centre rear mirror.

    This brings blind spots into the debate and all cars have blind spots. The biggest blind spot is to your rear left its much bigger than the right rear.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    Something just went through my head last night, when people in lane 2 suddenly swerve to take their exit i.e. Very few middle lane drivers 'prepare' and move to the left lane (Where they should be anyway) to take their exit. Do they ever stop and think, "Wouldn't it be easier if I just stayed in lane 1 unless I had to?" Seems like an obvious solution to me. Saw this behaviour at every single junction on the M50 last night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,344 ✭✭✭Thoie


    ironclaw wrote: »
    Something just went through my head last night, when people in lane 2 suddenly swerve to take their exit i.e. Very few middle lane drivers 'prepare' and move to the left lane (Where they should be anyway) to take their exit. Do they ever stop and think, "Wouldn't it be easier if I just stayed in lane 1 unless I had to?" Seems like an obvious solution to me. Saw this behaviour at every single junction on the M50 last night.

    A million years ago, before we had motorways in Ireland, if I was driving in France I used pretty religiously stick to the right hand lane (their driving lane) on the basis that that's where the exits were, and it would save me from missing my exit.

    There are some extremely rare occasions in Ireland where you may have to exit right, but middle-lane people seem to think that it's equally common to exit right or left, and that by staying in the middle they'll be prepared to go in either direction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,237 ✭✭✭✭djimi


    Thoie wrote: »
    There are some extremely rare occasions in Ireland where you may have to exit right

    There are? Got any examples? (Im not doubting you; Im just curious as I have never come across one!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭whomitconcerns


    coming up to the old toll bridge (M50) last night at about 11pm in lane 1..a car joins from the last exit before, empty motorway in front of him and he just sails across to the lane 3, about 60/70 metres in front of me @ 80/85kph.

    I come all the way across from lane 1 to the lane 3 as I want to pass him legally. After a min or two I end up flashing him and eventually after a few flashes beeping him, before he moves across, gives me the finger, I pull back across the whole way to the lane 1 and he merrily went back to lane 3 as soon as I passed!!

    All fun and games!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,611 ✭✭✭Valetta


    coming up to the old toll bridge (M50) last night at about 11pm in lane 1..a car joins from the last exit before, empty motorway in front of him and he just sails across to the lane 3, about 60/70 metres in front of me @ 80/85kph.

    I come all the way across from lane 1 to the lane 3 as I want to pass him legally. After a min or two I end up flashing him and eventually after a few flashes beeping him, before he moves across, gives me the finger, I pull back across the whole way to the lane 1 and he merrily went back to lane 3 as soon as I passed!!

    All fun and games!

    He was preparing to go straight on to Malahide rather than get caught in the inside lane and be forced to exit for the airport. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,344 ✭✭✭Thoie


    djimi wrote: »
    There are? Got any examples? (Im not doubting you; Im just curious as I have never come across one!)

    The one I had in mind is if you're heading northbound on the M50, and want to go to Clarehall/Malahide. If you're in the driving lane, you reach a point where you need to go right to what was the middle lane in order to continue on to the N32. It's a bit unclear whether people taking the N32 are exiting right, or continuing straight ahead, but you can't stay in the driving lane and get to Malahide. Further up you end up with 5 lanes with markings like:
    1 | 2 3 | 4 5 (where | shows the auxiliary lane road markings). The bulk of the traffic is taking lanes 2 and 3, which would kind of seem like 4 and 5 (to Malahide) are a right exit, albeit on the flat and straight ahead.
    http://goo.gl/maps/6CDeC


    The road markings around there are a bit odd in general. At the spot I've placed the little man on the map, I'd really consider that the very left lane there is still the auxilliary, where people would be merging from the previous junction, but I presume at busy times it starts filling with people queuing. If you were being very conscientious, and moved to the very left once the auxiliary lane finished, you'd find yourself a bit stuck for continuing on the N32, as you'd need to get across 3 lanes (if for some reason you missed the overhead gantries, which can happen in busy traffic if you're behind a truck).


    I can't think of any others, but if I had said there was only one, someone would have popped up to tell me I'm wrong. ;) And someone probably will now anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,815 ✭✭✭creedp


    coming up to the old toll bridge (M50) last night at about 11pm in lane 1..a car joins from the last exit before, empty motorway in front of him and he just sails across to the lane 3, about 60/70 metres in front of me @ 80/85kph.

    I come all the way across from lane 1 to the lane 3 as I want to pass him legally. After a min or two I end up flashing him and eventually after a few flashes beeping him, before he moves across, gives me the finger, I pull back across the whole way to the lane 1 and he merrily went back to lane 3 as soon as I passed!!

    All fun and games!


    But isn't this the point though .. it is just fun and games. Presumably some people think its actually safer to do what's outlined above than continuing on in Lane 1 simply because that's what's set out in the ROTR? I simply don't believe a garda would lash on his blue light and chase you because you continued in Lane 1 in this circumstance


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    creedp wrote: »
    But isn't this the point though .. it is just fun and games. Presumably some people think its actually safer to do what's outlined above than continuing on in Lane 1 simply because that's what's set out in the ROTR? I simply don't believe a garda would lash on his blue light and chase you because you continued in Lane 1 in this circumstance

    The M50 toll bridge is at least 10+ mins from the end of the M50. To be in lane 3 at that stage is lunacy. Its not that hard to traverse 3 lanes, in any traffic conditions.

    Anyone I see going straight for lane 3 in a newish car is generally a rental in my experience. I've often had to flash people out of the way and when you look in its Hertz and maps all over the dash :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    djimi wrote: »
    There are? Got any examples? (Im not doubting you; Im just curious as I have never come across one!)

    Approaching the M50 from the West is a dualler, not a motorway, but the rules for good lane discipline should be the same. It is quite unclear where you transition from "keep left" to "get in the right hand lane to exit right for the M50 North". Many people seem to think around Kinnegad is appropriate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    ironclaw wrote: »
    The M50 toll bridge is at least 10+ mins from the end of the M50. To be in lane 3 at that stage is lunacy. Its not that hard to traverse 3 lanes, in any traffic conditions.

    Anyone I see going straight for lane 3 in a newish car is generally a rental in my experience. I've often had to flash people out of the way and when you look in its Hertz and maps all over the dash :pac:

    I think he was joking....see the smilie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,815 ✭✭✭creedp


    ironclaw wrote: »
    The M50 toll bridge is at least 10+ mins from the end of the M50. To be in lane 3 at that stage is lunacy. Its not that hard to traverse 3 lanes, in any traffic conditions.

    Anyone I see going straight for lane 3 in a newish car is generally a rental in my experience. I've often had to flash people out of the way and when you look in its Hertz and maps all over the dash :pac:


    Yes but my point stands .. its not black and white and the idea that everyone should religiously cross from Lane 1 to Lane 3 and try and cajole a Lane 3 hogger to move to Lane 2 so he can overtake him and then promptly move back to Lane 1 is plain ridicuous in my view.

    One of the main arguments put forward against overtaking on the left is that the person on your right might miraclously decide to swerve into the left lane without warning and you would cause them to have an accident!! Surely that could not be considered a high risk if they are in Lane 3 and you in Lane 1? Secondly, it is considered against the law and therefore the Gardai would pull you in for committing such a heinous crime .. in this case I will have to 'put my fingers in the wound' before I believe that a Garda would seek to prosecute the Lane 1 driver in this circumstance. Again, instead of trying desperately to abide by the letter of the law even with the most bizarre results, I think people should consider driving in a maner that it practical and reasonable given the circumstances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,237 ✭✭✭✭djimi


    Thoie wrote: »
    The one I had in mind is if you're heading northbound on the M50, and want to go to Clarehall/Malahide. If you're in the driving lane, you reach a point where you need to go right to what was the middle lane in order to continue on to the N32. It's a bit unclear whether people taking the N32 are exiting right, or continuing straight ahead, but you can't stay in the driving lane and get to Malahide. Further up you end up with 5 lanes with markings like:
    1 | 2 3 | 4 5 (where | shows the auxiliary lane road markings). The bulk of the traffic is taking lanes 2 and 3, which would kind of seem like 4 and 5 (to Malahide) are a right exit, albeit on the flat and straight ahead.
    http://goo.gl/maps/6CDeC


    The road markings around there are a bit odd in general. At the spot I've placed the little man on the map, I'd really consider that the very left lane there is still the auxilliary, where people would be merging from the previous junction, but I presume at busy times it starts filling with people queuing. If you were being very conscientious, and moved to the very left once the auxiliary lane finished, you'd find yourself a bit stuck for continuing on the N32, as you'd need to get across 3 lanes (if for some reason you missed the overhead gantries, which can happen in busy traffic if you're behind a truck).


    I can't think of any others, but if I had said there was only one, someone would have popped up to tell me I'm wrong. ;) And someone probably will now anyway.

    Ah right I get you; in my head thats more where lanes split off to different roads rather than an exit as such, but I get what you mean.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,541 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    highdef wrote: »
    I may be incorrect but as far as I am aware the aux lane is considered to be separate from the main carriageway and that is why overtaking on the inside is an ok thing to do. Saying that, I am only ever in the aux lane when I am entering the motorway or if I am taking the next exit, i would not use the aux lane as a loophole lane to overtake traffic on the inside if I was not taking the follwoing exit.

    You're allowed pass on the left if you are taking the next turn to the left. This would cover the auxiliary lane scenario - if you were using that lane correctly.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    ninja900 wrote: »
    You're allowed pass on the left if you are taking the next turn to the left. This would cover the auxiliary lane scenario - if you were using that lane correctly.

    No you aren't .Not on a motorway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,327 ✭✭✭highdef


    corktina wrote: »
    No you aren't .Not on a motorway.

    I think you may be incorrect. The whole point of the auxiliary lane is that it is treated as a separate carriageway to the mainlines of the motorway, so as to ease congestion and cut out unnecessary lane changes. If I enter the M50 at junction 4 and intend to exit at exit 5, I stay in the aux lane and never actually enter the motorway proper. If the traffic on the main carriageway is heavy and travelling at slow speed (say 60 - 80 or something like that), I am not restricted to travel at such slow speeds as long as the aux lane is clear and moving.

    Obviously, common sense would have to prevail as with all aspects of driving; if the main carriageway is at a crawl or stopped and the aux lane is clear, the driver with half an ounce of brain power will drive with caution at lower speed to expect the unexpected but nonetheless will proceed at a greater rate than those in the main carriageway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Banjoxed wrote: »
    Still doesn't stop idiots from doing it. Probably the minority of drivers on the motorways actually know how to drive on a motorway. Undertakers, tailgaters and middle lane hoggers please note!

    Yes, speeders are ok though. Its only some types of "against the law" driving that annoys the easily annoyed drivers.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    highdef wrote: »
    I think you may be incorrect. The whole point of the auxiliary lane is that it is treated as a separate carriageway to the mainlines of the motorway, so as to ease congestion and cut out unnecessary lane changes. If I enter the M50 at junction 4 and intend to exit at exit 5, I stay in the aux lane and never actually enter the motorway proper. If the traffic on the main carriageway is heavy and travelling at slow speed (say 60 - 80 or something like that), I am not restricted to travel at such slow speeds as long as the aux lane is clear and moving.

    Obviously, common sense would have to prevail as with all aspects of driving; if the main carriageway is at a crawl or stopped and the aux lane is clear, the driver with half an ounce of brain power will drive with caution at lower speed to expect the unexpected but nonetheless will proceed at a greater rate than those in the main carriageway.

    on an auxiliary lane yes (perhaps) but not on a motorway. In your scenario, you are in any case allowed pass on the inside.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,327 ✭✭✭highdef


    corktina wrote: »
    on an auxiliary lane yes (perhaps) but not on a motorway. In your scenario, you are in any case allowed pass on the inside.

    Well merely being present in the auxiliary lane is an indication that you are taking the next exit and passing on the left is allowed if you are indicating to take the next exit. You are most likely not to have your actual indicators on but you are still indicating by being in the aux lane.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭doolox


    ....driving towards the airport on an EMPTY M50 when I see a pickup truck with Wicklow plates sitting in to rightmost lane at 80kph and nobody else near him.

    He should have been in the leftmost lane at this point of his journey and in those conditions, no one else on the road.

    I see this every day on the M50, M4 and M11. Slow moving cars in righmost lane holding everyone else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,063 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    corktina wrote: »
    on an auxiliary lane yes (perhaps) but not on a motorway. In your scenario, you are in any case allowed pass on the inside.

    According to our law, you can overtake on left, if you intend to turn left, and signalled this intention with indicator.
    That includes motorways.


  • Registered Users Posts: 49 captain_irish


    Last week driving on n7 passing rathcoole there was a woman with her elderly mother in the car doing 60 in the middle lane at rush hour. People overtaking were causing massive tailbacks everyone slamming on brakes nearly crashing. She refused to move to the left. I moved from right lane to left one and undertook her beeping and shouting all sorts of obscenities at her.I got up to the limit and as long as she was in my rear view mirror she was on the middle lane. 5 mins after I got home I heard garda and ambulance on n7. Apparently a motorbike was involved. I have absoutely no doubts whatsoever that that woman was to blame but it happened behind her so she was oblivious to it prob blamed someone else..... was I wrong to undertake her or should I have just added to the pile up???????


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    I think many drivers go out of their way to find other drivers who are doing wrong.

    Beeping and shouting at every annoying driver is just silly and as annoying as the oblivious drivers themselves.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 49 captain_irish


    Sorry me n technology ain't friends. I dunno how to quote. But are you telling me that the woman doin 60 in the middle lane was just someone I was going out of my way to find ?? The woman caused a pile up for fcuk sake a motorbike was involved God help that poor person I hope their okay. I don't travel the country to find people like that. God forbid anybody like that should be on our roads. Shame on the person that passed her in her driving test. I'd say she was just passed there and then because the tester was too afraid to spend any longer in her car.


  • Registered Users Posts: 228 ✭✭Bacon and Cabbage


    IMO if someone is negligent enough to not check their left mirror when changing to the left lane then they're just as likely to not check the right one going to the right


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Sorry me n technology ain't friends. I dunno how to quote. But are you telling me that the woman doin 60 in the middle lane was just someone I was going out of my way to find ??
    No, but concentrating more on what you're doing and less on going mental might improve you're own driving safety.
    The woman caused a pile up for fcuk sake a motorbike was involved God help that poor person I hope their okay.
    Did you see the pile up and its cause? If drivers didn't drive so close to those in front of them for their given speed, many pile ups may be avoided.
    I don't travel the country to find people like that. God forbid anybody like that should be on our roads. Shame on the person that passed her in her driving test. I'd say she was just passed there and then because the tester was too afraid to spend any longer in her car.
    What will happen when you become incompetent someday, you'll just quit driving will you?

    If you shout and roar, and beep at every middle lane hog driver, then you are already a driver easily distracted. It is annoying, no doubt about it, but just have a go at calmly passing them, instead of losing the plot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    Last week driving on n7 passing rathcoole there was a woman with her elderly mother in the car doing 60 in the middle lane at rush hour. People overtaking were causing massive tailbacks everyone slamming on brakes nearly crashing. She refused to move to the left. I moved from right lane to left one and undertook her beeping and shouting all sorts of obscenities at her.I got up to the limit and as long as she was in my rear view mirror she was on the middle lane. 5 mins after I got home I heard garda and ambulance on n7. Apparently a motorbike was involved. I have absoutely no doubts whatsoever that that woman was to blame but it happened behind her so she was oblivious to it prob blamed someone else..... was I wrong to undertake her or should I have just added to the pile up???????

    I passed that accident - it took place on the M7, not the three lane carriage way of the N7.

    BTW - does anyone know what happened to that motorcyclist?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,561 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Sorry me n technology ain't friends. I dunno how to quote. But are you telling me that the woman doin 60 in the middle lane was just someone I was going out of my way to find ?? The woman caused a pile up for fcuk sake a motorbike was involved God help that poor person I hope their okay. I don't travel the country to find people like that. God forbid anybody like that should be on our roads. Shame on the person that passed her in her driving test. I'd say she was just passed there and then because the tester was too afraid to spend any longer in her car.

    You didn't do any wrong and don't believe anyone who tells you so.

    There is a crazy setup in this country where speeding, drink driving and mobile phone usage are seriously clamped down on, but all other facets of driving are seemingly ignore.

    Driving at 60kph in the middle lane of a motorway is absolutely insane and you attempting to let the woman know that what she was doing was down right dangerous is the correct thing to do.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    Bruthal wrote: »
    Beeping and shouting at every annoying driver is just silly and as annoying as the oblivious drivers themselves.

    An oblvious driver is not going to suddenly realise they are in the wrong if we all starting flashing, beeping and blinding at them. Its a fruitless exercise and the only person we wind up is ourselves. People in Ireland need to learn the concept of maintaining an average speed, keeping the cool and just getting to where they need to go. Keep a distance, pass the middle lane hogger safely and just be on your way.

    Driving emotional is a bad idea. We have no proof this lady caused an accident. What she was doing was wrong but it wasn't as stupid as two cars (or whatever) that didn't have the wits, maturity and cop on to maintain a distance. Instead, I'm assuming, everyone was getting rilled up over a few seconds of wasted time and this was the end result.

    Seconds lads, thats what your saving. Seconds.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    You have a duty of care to those directly in front of you. Just because someone 2km down the road is in the wrong lane doesn't waive that. In fact, you shouldn't even care. Concentrate on what is in your immediate vicinity. Unfortunately, as road users, we have no way of educating these people. Thats the (failing miserably) job of the RSA :rolleyes:

    She was in the wrong, no question, but there are people that seem to think a 5m gap is sufficient stopping distance at all times of night and day. The N11 / M11 interchange at rush hour is a perfect example of if we all left a gap, we'd be all home a lot sooner.

    These people arn't causing accidents, they are facilitating them purely because people (more and more I think) are becoming hot headed behind the wheel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭vibe666


    can't we all just calm down and be reasonable about all this and agree that middle lane hoggers all need to be exterminated so they no longer inconvenience the rest of us? :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    RSA should stick up a TV add on lane discipline.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 932 ✭✭✭paddyland


    ...God forbid anybody like that should be on our roads. Shame on the person that passed her in her driving test. I'd say she was just passed there and then because the tester was too afraid to spend any longer in her car.

    I would go further, and say that it is unlikely she passed any test at all.

    The standard of driving by some on the road is so bad, that they could not possibly have passed, or even sat, any form of test at all. If the truth were known, I would firmly believe that the number of drivers in Ireland who have sat no test, intend to sit no test, carry no L plates, and in some cases perhaps, are not even aware of the necessity to pass a test, is in the thousands, or even the tens of thousands.

    Whenever have you heard of someone booked for driving unaccompanied with L plates? Whenever have you heard of a learner booked for carrying no L plates? Practically never, or few enough that the odds of being stopped are in six or seven figures.

    The driving test standard as it stands, I would say is about a 3, on a scale of 1 to 10. The very minimum to be allowed drive on a public road at all. I would prefer if it were a stepping stone to a further test, which would be a standard of say, 5 or 6. What we are witnessing are drivers who are a standard of 1 or less, on a scale of 1 to 10, who are driving self-taught, unaccompanied and unenforced on the public road in their thousands, causing untold danger, delay and mayhem to everyone else.

    The RSA are a joke.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,541 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    RSA should stick up a TV add on lane discipline.

    For all the good it did, there was one years ago (late 70s) - doesn't appear to be on youtube unfortunately but some here may remember it.

    Featured a Fiat making a spectacular 'three lane changes in one go with no indicators' manoeuvre on the Stillorgan dual carriageway. They probably just stuck a camera on the Belfield flyover and waited for the inevitable muppetry to happen.

    There was also a black Merc on the Naas Road - southbound on Kylemore Rd / Walkinstown Ave junction I think. From the rightmost straight ahead lane, he tried to turn right when the lights turned green - "Now he's banjaxed TWO lanes of traffic." Strange that they picked that as one of the most important bad behaviours on the road that needed to be rectified, but there you go.

    It also emphasised the basic rule of the road - "Keep Left, Pass Right" which few drivers seem aware of these days :(

    Scrap the cap!



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    you attempting to let the woman know that what she was doing was down right dangerous is the correct thing to do.

    Yes, beeping and becoming filled with rage, that's how to tell an incompetent driver they are incompetent. The problem is, most incompetent drivers think they are fine. So someone beeping at them will mean little to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    I do be giving out to the missis for it. She feels comfortable in the middle lane as once she gets over into the left lane, the middle lane drivers seem to get some sort of satisfaction in blocking her in there when she comes up to a slower truck and wants to pass.

    This would be a true assessment in my view. I live my life in the left lane with a limited speed commercial and see this happen often. Which forces the left lane passer to brake and loss momentum due to a knob end block passing them instead of reading the road and moving into the right lane .

    Although Irish drivers are very courteous in general, the ignorance of their surroundings can be annoying somewhat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    RSA should stick up a TV add on lane discipline.

    I actually have some ideas for this but wish I had the funding to go through with it. Wouldn't take much and you could easily make it very well.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement