Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What have you watched recently: Electric Boogaloo

1137138140142143200

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,564 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Looper007 wrote: »
    Christopher Plummer said it best about Malick that he has to oversee everything and he has a habit of re writing his screenplays to the point it ends up been pretentious.

    I can see why he hired big name actors, bigger names on the cast list means more money for the budget. I think Thin Red Line is one of his best films probably his last film I can sit through without been bored. I admire Tree of Life but it's hard work at times.

    There were big names ringing him up to be in 'The Thin Red Line'.

    I think Sean Penn did his part for a couple of grand.

    But I don't think Malik gives a tuppence haypenny about actors TBH and if some of the stories regarding how he treated actors before, during and after their work was done is to be believed, I can well believe that.

    I think Malik would happily work with anyone, so long as he has absolute and complete control.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Tony EH wrote: »
    There were big names ringing him up to be in 'The Thin Red Line'.

    I think Sean Penn did his part for a couple of grand.

    But I don't think Malik gives a tuppence haypenny about actors TBH and if some of the stories regarding how he treated actors before, during and after their work was done is to be believed, I can well believe that.

    I think Malik would happily work with anyone, so long as he has absolute and complete control.

    For The Thin Red Line I think Malik has a lot to thanks Nick Nolte for. For me he was the best thing about that movie and brought a huge charisma to his scenes even if I remember correctly he wasn't in all that much of it.
    Tree of Life and New World I found hit and miss and too tough going which sums him up perhaps, Badlands was brilliant though.

    Looking on IMDB he seemed to do nothing for 20 years, anyone know why? Some sort of Mctiernan esque law suit?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭Chain Smoker


    Tony EH wrote: »
    I'm not sure but I think a lot of Clooney's efforts ended up on the cutting room floor, as did a lot of other people like Gary Oldman and Mickey Rourke. 'The Thin Red Line' had an original running time of about 6 hours or something. IIRC, a lot got snipped to try and make it an, even remotely, cinema friendly film. Even then, I still think there's a lot of guff left in the 3 hour picture we have today.
    That 6 hour figure is misleading, it was almost certainly a fairly early into post-production workprint. You hear the same thing be said about that 5.5 hour version of Apocalypse Now that's online but it's clearly not a finished product.
    Looper007 wrote: »
    Christopher Plummer said it best about Malick that he has to oversee everything and he has a habit of re writing his screenplays to the point it ends up been pretentious.
    That sounds fairly on the money! He's able to get it down right for some characters (Nolte's voiceover in the Thin Red Line, Brad Pitt's in the Tree of Life) but horrifically wrong for others, women in particular.
    Tony EH wrote: »
    I think Malik would happily work with anyone, so long as he has absolute and complete control.
    Yep, that's about the sum of it all. It definitely sounds like the reason for his 20 years of silence.
    I'd say having these actors on the cheap at his disposal certainly gets him a bit extra funding but I wouldn't be sure how much.
    Can remember thinking part of the reason he shot two films immediately after Tree of Life was such a critical hit was because he might never find it as easy to get funding to take things off the ground as in that moment.
    Looking on IMDB he seemed to do nothing for 20 years, anyone know why? Some sort of Mctiernan esque law suit?
    Nope, just a ton of projects that never got past pre-production. Mostly due to his own uncompromising nature but a few had extenuating circumstances. It's made into a bit more of a mystery than it probably was.




    RE: People magazine's sexiest man in the world 1992, Nick Nolte, I think he's almost always great to be honest. Feel like he gets something of a bad rap for his weird voice and not having a ton of range, but the guy absolutely exudes a certain charisma and is capable of carrying some really weak material by times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,283 ✭✭✭gucci


    Zero Dark Thirty

    Watched this on Friday night, which was a little unnerving considering when I turned off the play station the news was on and was facing into more terrorist action…..

    Anyway back to the movie:
    To be honest I remember a lot of chatter about this movie when it came out, obviously people had big expectations with the subject matter and the previous work on Hurt Locker. I found some elements of the film slightly difficult to follow regarding the investigations, but perhaps that was more down to a long week at work and not the fault of the production.
    The final phase/climax of the movie is well constructed, and I was very happy to see that it was treated on screen with the same sort of cold hearted ruthless efficient manner that would probably be true to the level of the actual mission. These people are professional killing robots, even when the helicopter crash happened they seemingly don’t blink and just get on with it and finish the job. I am sure the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but I would imagine it was reasonably accurate. I was glad it didn’t resort to too much high fiving and flag waving(there was no flag waving at all by the way, just some gentle back patting!) and in contrast the final scene was very fitting. The main character sitting alone…..has dedicated her life to the hunt of this man and yet there doesn’t seem to be the joy there you think she was expecting to have felt.
    A good solid 7.5/10 movie for me, and something I will give a re watch to again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,564 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    That 6 hour figure is misleading, it was almost certainly a fairly early into post-production workprint. You hear the same thing be said about that 5.5 hour version of Apocalypse Now that's online but it's clearly not a finished product.

    Yeh, sure it's a first cut. My point is there are loads of parts involving many actors that simply never appear in the final 3 hour film.

    Also, I'm absolutely positive that if he could have got a Once Upon a Time in America - esque 4 hour cinema cut, Malik would take that happily.

    Personally, there's too much waffle in the 3 hour version as it is. I think another hour or more would be nearly unwatchable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,385 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    Carol

    Apparently this is gonna win Blanchett another oscar (Or Rooney Mara). I dunno. I heard it got a standing ovation after the credits rolled in Cannes (or wherever). Maybe its beacuse of the "being a lesbian in the 50's/60's theme" that people are drooling over it...I just found it rather bland and plodding. It meanders along to its final conclusion without much drama. Very stylish but lacking substance imo. 6/10


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭Chain Smoker


    Tony EH wrote: »
    Yeh, sure it's a first cut. My point is there are loads of parts involving many actors that simply never appear in the final 3 hour film.

    Also, I'm absolutely positive that if he could have got a Once Upon a Time in America - esque 4 hour cinema cut, Malik would take that happily.

    Personally, there's too much waffle in the 3 hour version as it is. I think another hour or more would be nearly unwatchable.
    He pretty much makes his films in the editing room though, I'd rather someone who's willing to cut whole characters in that stage.

    Not so sure about the 4 hour thing, the final product for Days of Heaven was only something like 90 minutes long with an extensive editing process. His most recent two are under the two hour mark and Tree of Life, outside of the whole creation section and the ending, was fairly lean imo, especially for something that was being worked on on and off for 30 years. It's also somewhat interesting to note that there is no clear specification of which version (135min, 150min and 170min), if any, of the New World Malick stands by (with the longer version being titled "the Extended Cut" rather than the much stronger title of "Director's Cut"). I can't find anything about him being made to do different edits at any point either.
    I reckon if length was something he wasn't conscious of, he'd at least try to get longer versions of his films put out instead of toiling away in the editing room for absolutely ages while everyone's demanding some kind of idea of what he's got.



    Honestly though, I'm glad I saw Tree of Life before the Thin Red Line and, especially, To The Wonder. A lot of his approach would likely have grated on me quite a bit otherwise because I'd've seen it before in less effective overall systems for it.
    Kind of dread his next two films potentially drifting into perfume ad level silliness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭Sugarlumps


    The Redemption of the Devil

    Big EODM fan, was looking forward to seeing this. Pretty lackluster, I was hoping for more studio footage. Ordained as a minister segment, got boring real quick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭Psychedelic


    Uncanny (2015)
    This was similar to Ex Machina, in the story setup - someone visits a reclusive scientist who claims to have developed the most realistic AI. Both films also share a slightly unsatisfying conclusion. The script was clever enough but
    within the first few minutes I knew there would have to be a twist and it was very easy to guess that the robot and the scientist were playing opposite roles.
    In fairness it played out okay. 7/10

    Triangle (2009)
    This was a good psychological thriller, with a small cast of Melissa George in the lead and some unknowns. Part slasher horror, part time travel-ish head scratcher. One of those films that's fun to puzzle over during and afterwards. 8/10

    The Gift (2015)
    Excellent suspenseful thriller, well written, like a Hitchcock film. 8/10

    The Fall (2006)
    Lovely film this, cinematography is amazing, loads of colour, elaborate sets and costumes. Similar in narrative structure and spirit of The Princess Bride and The NeverEnding Story. 9/10

    Ben Hur (1959)
    This is a proper classic, some fantastic scenes such as the rowing scene and the famous chariot race. It dragged after the race but overall this was classic filmmaking and storytelling with a bit of everything. 8/10


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭OldRio


    'Bridge of Spies'

    A Spielberg film with Tom Hanks and Mark Rylance. A Cold War spy thriller.

    I am a great fan of Spy books and films. The Karla trilogy by John Le Carre are all such a wonderful read. The adaptions for the small and big screen have been very good. Alas this is not Le Carre.

    Set in 1959 the first part of the film is superb catching the feeling of paranoia in the USA during the Cold War period. Unfortunately when the drama moves to Berlin the story becomes way to 'Hollywood' for my liking.

    Very good performance by the two main actors. Rylance in particular.

    6.5/10.....Disappointing and easily forgot.


  • Registered Users Posts: 34 InTheMidst


    e_e wrote: »
    Seconding Heaven Knows What, it's a case of a very low budget actually benefiting the film greatly. The lo-fi digital aesthetic, synthy score and jarring editing are so visceral there.

    Went to see this recently and would definitely recommend it too. There was an intense silence in the audience for the entire film. I can see why Arielle Holmes has made such an impact so quickly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,385 ✭✭✭✭D'Agger


    Watched 'Dope' last night

    One of the best and most refreshing movies I've seen in a long while

    Great story, well acted out, funny without being obvious - overall, just a very smart, funny, refreshing watch. Would highly recommend


  • Registered Users Posts: 40 figges


    Skyfall

    Meh.

    Saving graces

    Q - v good

    Severein - great scene in the bar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,940 ✭✭✭De Bhál


    Saw The Martian tonight. Very enjoyable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Mother Night http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117093/

    Nick Nolte, Alan Arkin, John Goodman in a movie based on a Kurt Voinnegut book. I went in expecting a depressing movie about some bloke who did Nazi propaganda and lived to regret it. I didn't expect the blackest comedy I've seen in years. Enjoyable madness.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,385 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    Wild Tales

    Set of revenge stories of everyday life. Thoroughly enjoyed it. Few twists and turns along the way. Especially liked the story with the two guys in the car. Some very funny moments in the last story!! 2 hours long but didnt feel like it. 8/10


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    "BAT 21" (1988) on Netflix.

    Enjoyable enough Vietnam War movie with Gene Hackman and Danny Glover in the lead roles.Loosely based on a true story, Hackman plays a US weapons expert who is shot down over communist occupied territory in Vietnam;and Danny Glover is a US reconnaissance pilot charged with helping extract him before the pursuing Vietcong forces can capture him.

    8/10


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,748 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Dheepan - Lyrical social realist refugee drama meets Rambo and Straw Dogs. It's exactly as jarring as that sounds.

    I was glad Jacques Audiard (following up Rust & Bone and A Prophet) himself and a co-screenwriter were on hand for a Q&A after the screening, because it did help clarify what the film was aiming for in some respects. There's plenty to like in the moment, of course - there's some beautifully realised moments throughout, and plenty that's emotionally and intellectually engaging. A story of refugees adjusting to life in France couldn't feel any more timely than it does now (of Sri Lankan rather than Syrian origin here), and this is generally sensitively observed. But yeah, the quite unhinged clash of genres - the most obvious transition marked very literally by a character crossing a line within the film - is one that needs a bit of reflection afterwards. As the Cannes reaction showed the film has already and understandably divided viewers, particularly with regards to the aforementioned line crossing. I think it just about works, if without question a tad clunky now and then - the differing tones ultimately help Audiard both explore and artfully complicate the psychological makeup of the title character, and the challenging situations he - and his 'fake' family, especially his 'wife' who could accurately be described as the co-lead here - face.

    Definitely an interesting film with a story that benefits greatly from being simple and accessible. Not everything works by any stretch of the imagination, but to be fair arthouse social realist action packed romantic thrillers are fairly thin on the ground so it hasn't much in the way of competition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭OldRio


    The Lady in the Van.

    Starring Maggie Smith and Alex Jennings.

    The true story of the strained relationship between Alan Bennett and a homeless woman who parks her van in Bennett's drive.
    Alex Jennings is excellent playing Bennett. Underplayed performance, much like Bennett in real life.
    A tour de force by Maggie Smith. She must have rubbed her hands when she read the script.
    Enjoyable funny and rather thought provoking. (I admit I am a fan of Alan Bennett)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    Song of the Sea. Treat for kids and adults alike and it's so beautifully made.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,272 ✭✭✭Barna77


    Amy

    The documentary about Amy Winehouse.
    That was some troubled life. I don't know who would be more to blame, her poisonous husband or her father who wouldn't do anything when everybody around Amy was begging him to take her to rehab and he didn't

    Very touching when at the Grammys, her idol Tony Bennett gave her an award and she was in London. She knew if she hadn't basically fúcked up , she'd be in LA live.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,419 ✭✭✭cowboyBuilder


    No Country For Old Men

    An absolute gem, love Tommy Lee Jones,Javier Bardem and Josh Brolin in this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    Maze Runner - Scorch Scotch Trials (I keep calling it Scotch Trials and I'll be damned if I'm changing it :pac:)

    Didn't think much of the 1st film and this one didn't do much either though it's not bad and certainly more tolerable than most teenage guff out there at the moment but that's pretty much it.

    Nothing special about it and it just plodded along feeling a bit aimless though I did enjoy seeing Giancarlo Esposito (Gus from Breaking Bad) get some scenery to chew on. Aidan Gillen's character reminded me far too much of Littlefinger in that he was a sneaky can he / can't he be trusted character, not really his fault though his accent was all over the shop throughout the film.

    Did the job in passing 2 hours on a Sunday anyways.......even if we did pause it halfway so we could both snooze on the couch :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,419 ✭✭✭cowboyBuilder


    Interstellar
    Saw this again tonight in 70mm at my local classic cinema , amazing as always - he had the volume up at 11 , my ears were ringing , that docking scene - :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek: superb !

    Amazing film , can't believe it wasn't even nominated for best film
    10/10


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,419 ✭✭✭cowboyBuilder


    A simple plan

    Finally finally got to see this !!!

    I was very impressed, enjoyed it a lot, quite dark though.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120324/


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    I watched the new live action version of Cinderella last night.
    It's alright. I have to say it's quite nice to see an old fashioned traditional telling of a fairytale. Way too many rubbish "re imagined" versions of them lately. (I know lots of them are based on the Grimm tales which were dark and twisty and not the Disney versions we know)

    This version of Cinderella isn't revolutionary but they do throw in a few mentions of ladies helping ladies, the ugly stepsisters are ugly in personality, the step mother even has some reasoning for being a cow without losing any of her nastiness. The Prince even gets a bit of personality and back story and when he's proclaiming he intends to marry the girl with the glass slipper they even throw in a "if she is willing". Ella's not burning her bra or wearing a "this is what a feminist looks like" tshirt, not even close, but I do think the manage to make her a slightly better version of the Disney Princess for young girls to aspire to.

    All in all I'd say it's a decent enough film for enjoying over the Christmas holidays with younger kids.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,564 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    A simple plan

    Finally finally got to see this !!!

    I was very impressed, enjoyed it a lot, quite dark though.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120324/

    It's the only Sam Raimi film I can actually rate nowadays.

    Easily the best thing he's ever done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,419 ✭✭✭cowboyBuilder


    Tony EH wrote: »
    It's the only Sam Raimi film I can actually rate nowadays.

    Easily the best thing he's ever done.


    My God, glad I didn't check his CV before watching this film ....
    he did the 3 spiderman films ... enough said !!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,385 ✭✭✭Nerdlingr


    My God, glad I didn't check his CV before watching this film ....
    he did the 3 spiderman films ... enough said !!!

    I thought the first Spiderman was alright. Went steadily downhill after that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,846 ✭✭✭✭Liam McPoyle


    Tony EH wrote: »
    It's the only Sam Raimi film I can actually rate nowadays.

    Easily the best thing he's ever done.

    Evil Dead is not only his best movie it is also one of the best horror movies ever made.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    "K-19: The Widowmaker" (2002) on Netflix USA.

    If you like submarine movies you'll like this one. Cold war movie starring Harrison Ford and Liam Neeson. The latest Russian nuclear submarine, captained by Ford, experiences serious difficulties off the US coast. It's not 'Das Boot' but still nicely claustrophobic. 8/10



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,748 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Not digging the unspoken but potent Drag Me to Hell hate on this thread recently...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,033 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Saw The Man From U.N.C.L.E. the other night. I can see why some critics didn't get it, but I rather enjoyed it. The final showdown did not play out as I was expecting it to, which was a good thing. If I ever saw any of the original TV series, it was so long ago that it doesn't matter, so I was new to the characters. Minor spoilers ahead.

    Napoleon Solo isn't the usual squeaky-clean G-man, while Ilya Kuryakin was a more complex character than the trailer would have you believe. Before he meets Gabby (Vikander), he's only seen her in photographs, but they first meet while he's picking out clothes for her with a finely-tuned eye for high fashion. All the fabulous '60s outfits she wears for the rest of the film were basically picked out by him - a Spetsnaz veteran and KGB agent ...

    Death has this much to be said for it:
    You don’t have to get out of bed for it.
    Wherever you happen to be
    They bring it to you—free.

    — Kingsley Amis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    bnt wrote: »
    Saw The Man From U.N.C.L.E. the other night. I can see why some critics didn't get it, but I rather enjoyed it. The final showdown did not play out as I was expecting it to, which was a good thing. If I ever saw any of the original TV series, it was so long ago that it doesn't matter, so I was new to the characters. Minor spoilers ahead.

    Napoleon Solo isn't the usual squeaky-clean G-man, while Ilya Kuryakin was a more complex character than the trailer would have you believe. Before he meets Gabby (Vikander), he's only seen her in photographs, but they first meet while he's picking out clothes for her with a finely-tuned eye for high fashion. All the fabulous '60s outfits she wears for the rest of the film were basically picked out by him - a Spetsnaz veteran and KGB agent ...

    Ya I really enjoyed that film when I watched it and loved the clothes as well and Henry Cavaill is so gorgeous in it.!!!!!!!! :):)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,846 ✭✭✭✭Liam McPoyle


    Not digging the unspoken but potent Drag Me to Hell hate on this thread recently...

    Thats a movie I really disliked.

    Saw it in the cinema and to me it felt like the sound (loud noises!) was used to elicit scares as opposed to actual tension. Plus it dragged out the gross scene - the one with the old lady gumming/drooling - should have been one shot and left there but instead it was 3 or 4 iirc, I felt it was almost Dirty Sanchez like in that it did something that gave a reaction and kept it going to the nth degree.

    Must give it a rewatch to see if my opinion changed.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,748 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I love it, think it's one of the most tonally pitch perfect horror/comedy films of recent times. It's gross without being particularly gory or repugnant. It's creepy but also hilarious. Alison Lohman is totally game, and that her character is a horrible person is a refreshing change from the bland innocents one often sees in the genre. And of course Raimi embraces his best Evil Dead instincts with super stylish filmmaking that is physically intensive and gleefully OTT.

    A delightful antidote to typical mainstream horror fare, almost as if Raimi wanted to prove exactly the sort of creativity and cheekiness one could get away with while retaining a PG-13 rating.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,694 ✭✭✭Glebee


    Got lucky I guess and have seen three film in a row I really enjoyed.

    City Island(2009)
    Comedy drama with Andy Garcia and Julianna Marguiles(The Good Wife) that I though was a really nice watch. Nothing to taxing and would recommend. 4/5

    Nebraska(2013)
    just up on Netflix. Road trip, black comedy staring an aging Bruce Dern. Loved the way it was shot in Black & White. Brill. 5/5

    Interstellar(2014)
    Been meaning to watch this for a while but the length kept putting me off. Wow what a movie, just brilliant. Apart from the bit just before the end
    The black hole scene
    i thought it was excellent. 6/5


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,564 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Evil Dead is not only his best movie it is also one of the best horror movies ever made.

    Was never fan.

    'Evil Dead II' was decent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    Two I seen at the French Film Fesitival @ the IFI:

    The Measure of a Man.

    The first half of this was excellent. Loved it. But then it just petered off into nothing. Was very odd. Felt like watching the first half of a film as overall it seemed pointless. Think the audience felt the same was got the impression they were equally as engrossed for the first half and yet you could sense people fidgeting for the second half and then there was bemused laughter when it ended. Worth watching though.


    Valley of Love

    Another strange one. About an aging couple (Gérard Depardieu and Isabelle Huppert) who are reunited on request of their dead so who has just committed suicide and left a letter instructing them to travel to a specific location at a specific time where he says that he will appear to them. Pretty unique and interesting idea for a story but it really goes nowhere and has some quite bizarre scenes. Watchable I suppose but not really all that entertaining.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    The Dressmaker

    Seen this earlier and wasn't sure what to expect but was pleasantly surprised. It's an quirky tale for sure, but one well told and quite entertaining. Somewhat predictable as those aspects could have easily been avoided but otherwise a really nice little film with some decent performances. If Judy Davis doesn't get an award for her performance as Molly, I will eat my hat.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And Justice for All 1979

    Very good legal drama with Pacino in fine form. Drags a little in the middle, but great indictment of the US court system in a subtle satirical sort of way.

    The Driver 1978

    Very cool action movie with Ryan O'Neal. Something about the silent types in older movies that works much better then it does these days. I would take O'Neal over Gosling any day. Movie is stylish with some great acting. Nothing too deep, but very enjoyable for what it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    Yeah, Drag Me To Hell did absolutely nothing for me despite looking forward to that film on release. Have seen it since and my opinion didn't change, the scene in the car with the gypsy was the most memorable scene but the rest of the film just didn't hit it's mark for me.

    Anywho, saw Antman the other night which I found middling. Some of the fight scenes had great energy to them as he changed from big to small taking out people around him, I hope they expand on that in the future.

    Corey Stoll had a good crack at being the villain by going the good old 80's route of being a corporate dickhead, he was entertaining though he had some terrible lines towards the end and they hid him away in that suit.

    Some of the jokes fell flat and so..........many........."small" puns got real old real quick. Strangely, when Rudd was in costume his voice rarely seemed to match what the tone of what his character was doing (Antman escapes from jail, falls off curb looking panicked but his voice is very calm)

    Not bad but I pretty much forgot about it once the film was over, I think I'm just fatigued from superhero stuff at this point and generally don't care much for Marvel films anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    As someone who's seen an awful lot of cinema, I only got to see Schindler's List in the last couple of weeks for the very first time. I avoided it completely at the time of release as I simply couldn't buy into the hype that was around it at the time (which was insane, even by the relatively poor media and non-existant social media presence of those days). Back then there was this belief that the film was simply above criticism due to its sensitive subject matter and that both annoyed and disturbed me. Not quite sure how I ended up waiting 22 years and a VHS and DVD copies I'd never even opened before finally watching it on blu ray. I have to be honest in that I found it a lot better than I expected, but it still has an awful lot of flaws. It's brilliant in places, but clumsy, silly, patronising and condescending in others. Whilst it is Neeson's film, it's Fiennes' turn as the crazed Nazi that stays with you afterwards (on Fiennes, in one scene he looks eerily like Bradley Cooper - very strange when you see it). Ben Kingsley's restrained performance is also worthy of note - it really shows how talented he is that he can play this role and something as polar opposite as Don Logan and have both be credible. The ending is just awful and completely unnecessary (Actually both endings
    the first being Neeson crying over the ring and saying "I could have saved one more" and the second being the procession to the grave and the pacing of rocks on it.
    ); but it has strong enough performances and the story is interesting enough to keep you engaged despite the bleakness. The complete change in Neeson's character from money-grabbing, manipulative and womanising bon viveur to saviour though is explained very poorly and handled awkwardly, and some of the scenes are frankly ridiculous and completely incredible even allowing for the regime at the time. Neeson's and Fiennes' accents both lack consistency throughout (I was waiting for Neeson to say he had "a sepcial set of skills") and bizarrely for such a heavily financed production his clothes and suits are very ill-fitting at times. It's not as grim as I was led to believe either. It's worth seeing; but it is not as many people claim the greatest/most important movie ever made. Not by a long shot. 7-7.5/10.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭charlie_says


    Mississippi Grind

    Fun enough road trip/gambling spree/buddy movie with the excellent Ben Mendelsohn who plays a burnt out talented but compulsive gambler who teams up with a younger smooth talking player Ryan Fleck who stakes him some cash to gamble along a road trip in the South of America to a high stakes poker game somewhere in Mississippi.

    Enjoyable script and a really great pumping blues soundtrack make am altogether pleasant watch. I liked the almost dead end bar scenes and the odd camaraderie of the gamblers throughout.

    Will be checking out the soundtrack.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭charlie_says


    I love it, think it's one of the most tonally pitch perfect horror/comedy films of recent times. It's gross without being particularly gory or repugnant. It's creepy but also hilarious. Alison Lohman is totally game, and that her character is a horrible person is a refreshing change from the bland innocents one often sees in the genre. And of course Raimi embraces his best Evil Dead instincts with super stylish filmmaking that is physically intensive and gleefully OTT.

    A delightful antidote to typical mainstream horror fare, almost as if Raimi wanted to prove exactly the sort of creativity and cheekiness one could get away with while retaining a PG-13 rating.

    I really enjoyed it and had several great laughs throughout. It's probably the best of Raimi's almost cartoonish like violence, refined from the Evil Dead series. I just love the whole playfulness of his style which permeates the entire film.

    As mentioned above I must check out A Simple Plan.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,447 ✭✭✭run_Forrest_run


    Under the Skin - good god, not sure what I thought of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭Sugarlumps


    13 Sins - Really enjoyable flick surprisingly.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,748 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Sunset Song - A film of three thirds. Let's call them acts for good measure. Act One is pretty good. Act Two is magical. Act Three is ho-hum.

    It's in the hour in the middle that Terence Davies' passion project really sings. It has been building up until that point, but for a good long chunk there's this hypnotic lyricism to the film, offering drama and images full of meaning and beauty. It's a love story, but one where the emotions are complicated, a vague yet oddly powerful sense of melancholy and uncertainty clouding events. Some of the moments and shots are among the year's best. Davies fans are unlikely to be disappointed - it's his usual style but on a more lavish platform than usual.

    The final third is therefore troubling and a bit confusing. There's hints of what's so special about the rest of the film, but the wartime melodrama that takes over is disappointingly trite. It's not only that it's familiar, but it feels like the clichéd plot takes over (the clichés semi-forgivable due to the age of the source material). There are far fewer moments of lyricism. There's a crude 180 degree turn in one character's personality, which they could have probably pulled off with even a touch more subtlety. A bizarre flashback near the end fails to gel with the style of the rest of the film (thankfully followed by a sequence where Davies manages to capture the essence of great war cinema in two shots, without a person to be seen). It just about pulls things together for a fittingly elegiac conclusion, but definitely the last half hour or so feels sluggish.

    Uneven though parts of the film are, there is one saving grace throughout (well, beyond the often breathtaking compositions, and the care Davies has clearly put into choosing his locations and art design). Agyness Deyn is the perfect fit for lead character Chris Gutrie. The character is put through the wringer several times (and again for good measure), but Deyn captures her strength, intelligence and determination with total conviction. Not only can she handle both the quiet and loud moments, but she even loads the film's occasional voiceover with a sense of poetry and meaning not often heard in that most easily abused of narrative devices. After a few weeks of especially noteworthy performances by actresses, this might just be the most accomplished of the lot. When the filmmaking backs her up, it's beautiful stuff. But that it falls short in other respects is an unfortunate thing to say about a frequently extraordinary piece of work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭e_e


    High and Low 10/10

    Kurosawa directs a very modern mystery (even to this day) on par with anything by Hitchcock, ****ing amazing.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭Chain Smoker


    Annoys me that kurosawa done so few films in a modern setting, basically all my favorites are the more modern set ones.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement