Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Black Mass

«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 347 ✭✭neamhspleachi


    Looking forward to this one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,498 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    johnny-depp-whitey-bulger-embed.jpg


    Count Bulger Depp :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,987 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    what happened to his eyebrows?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,701 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    Looks good.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,072 ✭✭✭OU812


    I'm predicting an Oscar nomination and possibly a win for Depp for this. I didn't recognise him at all until half way through the trailer.


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    Even in the trailer the prosthetic forehead bugged me. Depp cant seem to act without hiding behind a makeup mask.


  • Registered Users Posts: 637 ✭✭✭shazzerman


    Grew tired of Depp ages ago. On the evidence of the trailer his acting is rather cartoonish and a bit awkward to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,886 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    There was a time many years ago I really looked forward to a Johnny Depp film coming out.

    Now not so much.



    Jack Nicholson's Whitey Bulger..Frank Costello in The Departed will be hard to top in any film version of Bulger's life story I feel.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,795 ✭✭✭FortuneChip


    This is probably the first time in a long time that a Johnny Depp trailer hasn't annoyed me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,031 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    New trailer:



    Is that really the USA? Could just as easily be North Dublin. :cool:

    Death has this much to be said for it:
    You don’t have to get out of bed for it.
    Wherever you happen to be
    They bring it to you—free.

    — Kingsley Amis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,060 ✭✭✭jones


    Looks very promising


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,031 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Death has this much to be said for it:
    You don’t have to get out of bed for it.
    Wherever you happen to be
    They bring it to you—free.

    — Kingsley Amis



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,427 ✭✭✭mooseknunkle


    I watched this tonight and thought it was very good,nice to see Johnny Depp playing a real person again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    It did a good job in portraying Bulger as just another vanilla psycho. He only got lucky in his connection with the FBI. Depp does a good job of making a boring man interesting for as long as possible. The fact is Whitey Bulger is what happens when clerical errors, over-promoted mandarins and psychopaths get together.
    It isn't The Departed or Goodfellas for the simple reason that it sticks close enough to the facts that it may occasion a yawn. But it happened. And as for Benedict Cumberbatch and whatever movie he was in when he strayed on the set of this - I wish him well.

    Well made and worth a watch (the hard coded Korean subtitles might be unique to the cinema I viewed it in).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,787 ✭✭✭✭Charlie19


    After having a little read about it, I'd probably rather re-watch The Departed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,358 ✭✭✭Into The Blue


    Quite boring. Most scenes are 25% too long..
    Rte2 midweek movie material


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭IvaBigWun


    I walked out of the Korean cinema I viewed it in after 20 minutes. Might give it another shot some time in Ireland but on first viewing this was very boring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    IvaBigWun wrote: »
    I walked out of the Korean cinema I viewed it in after 20 minutes. Might give it another shot some time in Ireland but on first viewing this was very boring.

    Walking out of your own house is a bit drastic. Hope you remembered to bring a coat.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Chilling performance from Depp. Really enjoyable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    I thought Black Mass was supposed to be released into the cinema this Friday, it has an irish release date of the 13th of November but it isn't in any of the cinemas in Cork, anyone know when its coming in?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 848 ✭✭✭Superhorse


    Just watched it tonight and found it really enjoyable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,491 ✭✭✭moby2101


    Not a patch on the departed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    moby2101 wrote: »
    Not a patch on the departed

    Which in turn wasnt a patch on Infernal Affairs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,292 ✭✭✭GreNoLi


    Very poor, generic is the word.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    Just seen an ad for it, in cinemas November 25th, looking forward to seeing it.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 10,462 Mod ✭✭✭✭Axwell


    Saw this last night - very generic and brought nothing new to the table.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,207 ✭✭✭maximoose


    Thought Depp was pretty good, but agree with other criticisms that it was just a bit drab and mundane.

    The makeup on Bulger was pretty distracting I found, he looked slightly vampiric at times and there was something off about his eyes - contacts too big or something? Took my attention away from what was going on too often


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    Depp was excellent but film was very poor.

    It was all over the place and seemed to have no direction.

    Sloppy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭Wailin


    Which in turn wasnt a patch on Infernal Affairs.


    Your joking right?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've seen Black Mass. Sadly, I was disappointed.

    Here's an extract from my review, the rest of which can be read here.
    Just as Universal dominated the horror film genre in the 1930s (with movies like Frankenstein, Dracula and The Mummy), Warner Bros. cornered the gangster picture. The Public Enemy, Little Caesar, Angels with Dirty Faces, The Roaring Twenties – all stemmed from the same studio, and brought gun-toting tough guys of Chicago and New York to a global audience. It was fitting that Warners delivered what many consider to be the definitive mob movie with Goodfellas in 1990, but Black Mass, their dramatised take on notorious ‘Most Wanted’ gangster James ‘Whitey’ Bulger, has more a touch of stagnation about it. Remarkably, so many years after Martin Scorsese’s opus, long-established tropes are wheeled out as if they were a fresh or cliché-free take on a familiar story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭marklazarcovic


    disappointing ****ee


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,547 ✭✭✭Agricola


    Very average. Hard hitting scenes of murdering werent as intense as the director obviously envisioned them. Scenes were Depp is supposed to ratchet up the tension through the sheer force of his gangster menace werent pulled off either. Seemed aimless and disjointed. Pissed off I went all the way to feckin Korea for this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭e_e


    This was such a nothing movie that even Tom Hardy's Legend (a flawed film in its own right) seems like Goodfellas by comparison. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,547 ✭✭✭Agricola


    Ben Affleck's The Town is a better Boston crime drama than this. Pete Postlethwaite had more menace in his little finger. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,638 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Yeah I have to add my voice to the chorus of disappointment that's accompanying talk of the film. It's just....Meh.. I just can't help but feel a little short changed by that result. There were so many ingredients in there that should have yielded tastier results; the cast is good, the real life story is blackly fascinating and the production values and overall tone of the thing is, at times, pretty alluring and evocative. So for everything to come out so forgettable and half-baked is a bit of a mystery. I wasn't expecting a masterpiece but I was expecting something. Something with a bit more oomph to it, that could grab you a little, even if it wasn't perfect. There's a real feeling of "I've seen this before" throughout the entire film.

    You know when you go on a short break to a foreign city and you set yourself an itinerary, for, let's say two days. It's the whistle stop tour, right? It can be a wonderful experience, but sometimes you just wish you had that extra couple of days to do the four day tour. You'd really get to know a place that little bit better. Well, I think the good gangster movies - Scorsese, Coppola etc, etc - are the equivalent of a full satisfying tour of the sights of a place called Crimeland, whereas Black Mass is definitely more of the wham-bam variety. It shows you all the sights you'd expect - the rise to power, the turning away from the light into the darkness, the murder, the goddamn Feds - but it's all done so stop-start and elliptically that it never feels more than a skin deep and derivative portrayal of the actual history. It's hard to care and especially so when you're given no real insight into characters motivations or physiological make-up. The script is weak. Some of the violence is harsh, but it has no real impact because it doesn't really mean anything. It's just gangsters murdering people, cos that's what they do. And, like most other events in the story, we just kind of arrive at bloodletting randomly from time to time. I would have my suspicions that there's a much longer version of this film in some studio vault. I wonder if the final cut was subjected to some severe trimming. The cast is unbelievable, but yet so many good solid actors are barely utilized. How many lines do Kevin Bacon or Adam Scott have? Corey Stoll has two scenes. I find it hard to believe that they signed up just to be glorified extras. I feel like they may have been trying to go for a prestige picture, but ended up with something that had to be butchered into shape.

    Depp is pretty good here. A lot of people won't go near it just because he's in it. I wouldn't say that should be your foremost reason for turning your nose up at this. It's a good menacing and magnetic performance, in search of a better script and fresher dialogue. I think he can really act, he's just been sidetracked by rubbish for the last decade. If Matthew McConaughey and Ben Affleck can stage credibility renaissances, then I still have faith in Johnny. Still though, I wish he would stop with the outlandish make-up nonsense. The way he looks in the film is unnecessarily distracting and pointless. Just be yourself guy. You can convince me with your acting. It's like the star performer in a football team taking to the field and doing his best, but deciding to wear a really ostentatious jock-strap the whole time. Not required.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,464 ✭✭✭e_e


    I kinda wish the rest of the movie was as stylized and mad as Depp's performance, as well as being a more concentrated character study of Bulger (his scenes with Dakota Johnson were probably the most promising). All the film really told me about him was that he's just another one who looks sinister and kills people a lot. As it is it's pretty much the beigest (is that a word?) gangster movie imaginable. I'm not the biggest fan of The Departed but it might look amazing now on a re-watch. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,276 ✭✭✭Memnoch


    Wailin wrote: »
    Your joking right?

    He's bang on the money. The departed is a decent adaptation, but nothing close to the original.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭Wailin


    Memnoch wrote: »
    He's bang on the money. The departed is a decent adaptation, but nothing close to the original.

    Internal Affairs....the one with Richard Gere right?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,370 ✭✭✭GAAman


    Wailin wrote: »
    Internal Affairs....the one with Richard Gere right?

    Nope, the Asian film

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338564/

    Edit, I just watched The Departed now as it was mentioned here and I haven't watched it in years. Jesus Jack Nicholson hammed his way thought this film, and Ray Winstones accent was awful.

    Black Mass, while having its problems (Count Deppula for example) is a lot more believable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    Just seen Black Mass, I enjoyed it but I just love Boston gangster films, I think its a lot better than the film the drop anyway, really love Kevin Bacon and Joel Edgerton and like another poster said here it was nice to see Johnny playing a normal person again.
    I love the Boston accent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭Badabing


    Did people rate Donnie Brasco?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    Badabing wrote: »
    Did people rate Donnie Brasco?

    Ya I thought it was quite good, is that the one with Al Pacino and Johnny Depp?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭Badabing


    fin12 wrote:
    Ya I thought it was quite good, is that the one with Al Pacino and Johnny Depp?

    Yeah that's it, i thought Depp was very good in it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,934 ✭✭✭✭fin12


    Badabing wrote: »
    Yeah that's it, i thought Depp was very good in it.

    I used to love Johnny Depp and then got sick of him because he was playing the same characters all the time with Tim Burton so it was nice to see him in this film. Did you see his film Public Enemies?, love that film he's really good in that and so gorgeous!!!!!!!!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    maximoose wrote: »
    The makeup on Bulger was pretty distracting I found, he looked slightly vampiric at times and there was something off about his eyes - contacts too big or something? Took my attention away from what was going on too often

    Heard somebody on the radio saying that he looked liked a cross between Max Headroom & a doctored CGI version of Johnny Depp.

    https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-F60EPYUdjPk/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAC9g/eGGOUhKt-gU/photo.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 31 poshea69


    class film , cant wait to see it again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,337 ✭✭✭rockatansky


    Mediocre at best. I'm sure Depp did a good part playing Bulger, he certainly look the part.

    Nothing big really happens it. It's just a series of low level events with a large amount of dialogue in between each. I'm guessing the infamy relates to him having a contact in the FBI and avoiding capture for so long. At one point he starts going on about how he wants to be in control of the Vending machines in the south Boston area. Fairly low level stuff. Maybe I expecting more along the lines of your typical Italian gangster flick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,216 ✭✭✭Looper007


    It was a enjoyable 2 hour watch but it reminds me of Legend with Tom Hardy, great central performance that deserved a better film. Depp was excellent but the film did drag in places. Joel Edgerton was very good but poor Benedict Cumberbatch was totally wasted and above the role they gave him. Also Kevin Bacon and Peter Saragaard were also wasted.

    But the worst offence is the female characters, Poor Juno Temple was given two scenes and totally wasted of her talents, anyone could have done that role. I wonder if most of her scenes where cut, Sienna Miller was totally cut from the film (she was supposed to be Whitey's second wife). Also add Julianne Nicholson and Dakota Johnson to the badly underwritten roles and barely used.

    Not a total white wash, worth a watch but like after mentioned Legend, a wasted chance.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement