Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Three to buy O2 Ireland for €780 million

13»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Making sure the MVNO market is open is a really big deal though.

    Tesco in particular had a very big impact.

    I wonder what's going to become of them now given that O2 (their partner network) is now 3...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    Making sure the MVNO market is open is a really big deal though.

    Tesco in particular had a very big impact.

    I wonder what's going to become of them now given that O2 (their partner network) is now 3...

    They, and UPC, are the two MVNO's mentioned, for whom 30% of the network is being made available.
    Whats not mentioned in this is how much TMI and UPC will pay for this access. The normal process to date has been cents per mb, text and minute wholesale, with this it seems the two MVNO's will pay a flat fee per annum. Theres no mention of how thats to be regulated or what mechanism will be used to calculate a fair price.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    They, and UPC, are the two MVNO's mentioned, for whom 30% of the network is being made available.
    Whats not mentioned in this is how much TMI and UPC will pay for this access. The normal process to date has been cents per mb, text and minute wholesale, with this it seems the two MVNO's will pay a flat fee per annum. Theres no mention of how thats to be regulated or what mechanism will be used to calculate a fair price.

    Yeah, it's a little too vague although it is only a memo. I'd like to see the full report before I cast judgment.
    I am guessing though that ComReg may be given the role of coming up with that price? It seems like the only logically placed body to do that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    clohamon wrote: »
    Silo'd bandwidth (lower speeds) and reduced coverage. It's a useless decision.

    The Commission seems to think reduced coverage in rural areas is a good thing - more 'efficient' they say - i.e. more profitable for networks.

    Earlier today I noted the deal will result in lower capacity, lower coverage.

    I only implied a poorer service. Problem is there is no genuine monitoring and enforcement of standards by Regulator, nor good enough licence conditions in the first place. Too much emphasis on "Competition" and not enough on good use of a limited National Resource and technical competence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭bealtine


    Amazing even Comreg are not too happy:

    http://www.comreg.ie/_fileupload/publications/ComReg1453.pdf

    "ComReg remains concerned that, given the substance and form of the Final Commitments, the EC’s competition concerns will not be fully addressed, and that significant negative consequences for Irish consumer welfare may result. In that regard, ComReg’s primary concerns with the Final Commitments are, in summary, as follows:
    they appear inadequate and ineffective to address the serious competition
    concerns and consumer harm identified by the EC (for example higher
    prices);and
    they do not appear to comply with the EC’s requirements as set out in its
    Remedies Notice."

    "ComReg remains of the strong view that the behavioural
    commitments are insufficient to address the structural competition deficit
    identified as likely to result from the Proposed Acquisition."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭bealtine


    I guess the name is fortuitous : Chinese billionaire Li Ka-shing. Thanks EU Li Ka-shing is going Ka-ching all the way to the bank


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    bealtine wrote: »
    Amazing even Comreg are not too happy:

    http://www.comreg.ie/_fileupload/publications/ComReg1453.pdf

    "ComReg remains concerned that, given the substance and form of the Final Commitments, the EC’s competition concerns will not be fully addressed, and that significant negative consequences for Irish consumer welfare may result. In that regard, ComReg’s primary concerns with the Final Commitments are, in summary, as follows:
    they appear inadequate and ineffective to address the serious competition
    concerns and consumer harm identified by the EC (for example higher
    prices);and
    they do not appear to comply with the EC’s requirements as set out in its
    Remedies Notice."

    "ComReg remains of the strong view that the behavioural
    commitments are insufficient to address the structural competition deficit
    identified as likely to result from the Proposed Acquisition."

    That's very interesting. ComReg seems to be a little unhappy with the decision. Surely the Irish Competition Authority would have been a more appropriate entity to rule on this merger? The European one is only really concerned about things that impact dramatically on intra-EU stuff. Hence, their concern about Aer Lingus / Ryanair as it was impacting on multiple countries (IRL + UK in particular but also flights into Ireland from other EU countries)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭bealtine




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,639 ✭✭✭✭The Cush




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,886 ✭✭✭cgarvey


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    Surely the Irish Competition Authority would have been a more appropriate entity to rule on this merger?

    Yup. The release even has that question in there. They provide 2 paragraphs of guff without answering the question, though!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭Rucking_Fetard




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 150 ✭✭_Jumper_


    Off buying O2 UK for £9 Billion now.

    techworld.com/news/networking/three-in-talks-buy-o2-from-telefonica-for-up-9bn-3594749/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Oh dear. Poor them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,019 ✭✭✭ct5amr2ig1nfhp


    I see the store rebranding is well underway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,542 ✭✭✭JTMan


    Which stores have you noticed a rebrand on?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭abyss


    Anyone know if there is a chance O2 base stations will be working with 4G(three) soon? I mean - if they can be upgraded to 4G system. I've read notice from County Council there will be some improvement done on O2 BTS near me, but there is a no more technical information.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,071 ✭✭✭ItHurtsWhenIP


    abyss wrote: »
    Anyone know if there is a chance O2 base stations will be working with 4G(three) soon? I mean - if they can be upgraded to 4G system. I've read notice from County Council there will be some improvement done on O2 BTS near me, but there is a no more technical information.

    I'm wondering this myself. I only get Edge from O2 at home, but there is good 3G coverage from Three in the area.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    abyss wrote: »
    Anyone know if there is a chance O2 base stations will be working with 4G(three) soon? I mean - if they can be upgraded to 4G system. I've read notice from County Council there will be some improvement done on O2 BTS near me, but there is a no more technical information.

    I don't think there has been any clear announcement from Three, but I certainly hope so.

    O2 was getting ready for a 4G roll-out and put that on hold after the buyout announcement. It is probably taking a bit of time because Three doesn't want to flick the switch for O2 customers only and needs to merge their infrastructure with O2's first - but I think once this is done they will be able to roll-out a much better 4G coverage very quickly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭clohamon


    Bob24 wrote: »
    I don't think there has been any clear announcement from Three, but I certainly hope so.

    O2 was getting ready for a 4G roll-out and put that on hold after the buyout announcement. It is probably taking a bit of time because Three doesn't want to flick the switch for O2 customers only and needs to merge their infrastructure with O2's first - but I think once this is done they will be able to roll-out a much better 4G coverage very quickly.

    The coverage obligation in their (O2 and Three and Vodafone) liberalised-use licences is 35% of population, or 0.36% of the national territory. There is no obligation to provide any particular technology; it can be 2g, 3g or 4g.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    They will have to announce 4G for O2 customers soon as they're going to lose out to Vodafone and Meteor if they don't.
    The licence is one thing, the market reality is that the other networks have growing 4G coverage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭clohamon


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    The licence is one thing, the market reality is that the other networks have growing 4G coverage.
    That's the ComReg argument; it might turn out to be true, but the licence conditions encourage operators to increase profits by reducing the size/cost of their networks, not by introducing new technology.

    I think people in rural areas generally use whichever operator has the best voice service in the area that they most need it. Data speed comes after that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    I'm not so sure about that tbh. With smartphones data is more important than voice.

    Many people barely use their phones for voice these days.

    The paradigm has shifted from data being an add-on on a phone to voice being an app on a smart device.

    It's not even very easy to buy a non smartphone anymore. I had terrible difficulty getting one for an elderly relative and she has gone for a HTC instead.


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    Many people barely use their phones for voice these days.

    And many people's livelihoods are completely and utterly dependent on a mobile voice network.

    The bizarre idea that voice is unimportant seems to be an unfortunately corollary to the idea that mobile data is broadband. Mobile voice is business-critical; mobile data is extremely useful (and can be business-critical); mobile broadband is an oxymoron.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    And many people's livelihoods are completely and utterly dependent on a mobile voice network.

    The bizarre idea that voice is unimportant seems to be an unfortunately corollary to the idea that mobile data is broadband. Mobile voice is business-critical; mobile data is extremely useful (and can be business-critical); mobile broadband is an oxymoron.

    Personally if I had to choose between voice service only or data service only, I would most likely go for the later. Not that I don't need voice at all, but losing data would be more of an annoyance to me (and a good bit of my voice calls and text messages are going through the data network anyway).

    If course different people have a different use of their phone, but there is a decent chunk of customers (but probably not a majority) for whom data is the most important service.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    And many people's livelihoods are completely and utterly dependent on a mobile voice network.

    The bizarre idea that voice is unimportant seems to be an unfortunately corollary to the idea that mobile data is broadband. Mobile voice is business-critical; mobile data is extremely useful (and can be business-critical); mobile broadband is an oxymoron.

    It might well be, but if you've no data and other networks do, a huge % of customers will vote with their feet.

    You might as well just not have a smartphone without a data connection (and a fast one at that)


  • Advertisement
  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    The point being debated was this one:
    clohamon wrote: »
    I think people in rural areas generally use whichever operator has the best voice service in the area that they most need it. Data speed comes after that.
    If your business depends on people being able to call you while you're on the road, then data is a distant second to reliable voice coverage; and remember, if a network doesn't have voice coverage in an area, it most definitely doesn't have data.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    They have a fairly huge contract with Nokia to integrate the 2G and 3G assets into a single network and also upgrade them.

    So I'm guessing there's a fair bit of work going on. It's not just going to be roaming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    I don't think just opening Three's 4G network to O2 customers will work. On Threee 4G in Dublin City centre, you'd be very happy to get 10mpbs download speeds, and it is often closer to 5. Add O2 customers to this, and you might not even get 3G speeds. They really need O2's network to become 4G enabled before they offer 4G to everyone.

    Also, in a number of areas (I sometimes see it in Dublin), they have already opened O2's 2G network for Three customers. The phone will display "3." Instead of "3" when connected to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,886 ✭✭✭cgarvey


    o2 have been saying June for their 4G service, in the several hundred emails/SMSs sent to customers!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    I would think so as well - especially since their original 4G licence didn't allow them to use lower frequencies which work much better for indoor coverage (I can see this in my office block in Dublin city centre - 4G coverage is very fine in front of the building - but is a but of a hit an miss inside, while there is no issue with 3G).

    I think they are concentrating their efforts into leveraging the 4G infrastructure O2 was ready to launch before the buyout, which is much better than what Three would ever have been able to deliver with their original network.

    And since it would look bad to give it to O2 customers only (giving better service to customer of the sister company that is bound to disappear), they have to wait until the networks are merged before they start using O2's capabilities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,465 ✭✭✭JohnC.


    Are they not completely rebranding O2 as 3? I was under the impression they were and O2 would disappear. But the Waterford O2 store closed to be refit, which I assumed would include rebranding. But new O2 signs were up there today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    Kahless wrote: »
    Are they not completely rebranding O2 as 3? I was under the impression they were and O2 would disappear. But the Waterford O2 store closed to be refit, which I assumed would include rebranding. But new O2 signs were up there today.

    They did say the O2 brand would disappear. I guess it is difficult for them to phase it out before the 2 networks are actually merged, but it is strange alright to refurbish a shop with the O2 branding at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    They are completely rebranding. O2 web site will be gone soon.

    C.f. UPC took ages to rebrand NTL & Chorus.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 4,621 Mod ✭✭✭✭Mr. G


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    They already have for me, I'm with 3 but can connect to 3. (which is O2 by process of elimination on a network search). I can connect to Vodafone's 2G and O2's 2G networks. Only get 3G & 4G with 3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭bealtine


    Press release...err news item sorry.


    O2 customers to get 4G from June as Three rebrand completes

    http://www.techcentral.ie/o2-customers-get-4g-june-three-rebrand-completes/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,340 CMod ✭✭✭✭Davy


    bealtine wrote: »
    Press release...err news item sorry.


    O2 customers to get 4G from June as Three rebrand completes

    http://www.techcentral.ie/o2-customers-get-4g-june-three-rebrand-completes/

    It will be €4.99 from July 1st for billpay and payg though

    http://www.three.ie/terms-conditions/promotions/4g-access-promotional-offer/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭bealtine


    O2 has now gone for good from Ireland – so what’s the deal for all its customers?

    http://businessetc.thejournal.ie/o2-rebranded-three-1970254-Mar2015/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    bealtine wrote: »
    O2 has now gone for good from Ireland – so what’s the deal for all its customers?

    http://businessetc.thejournal.ie/o2-rebranded-three-1970254-Mar2015/

    "O2 MOBILE PHONE customers can eventually look forward to higher data speeds after all their accounts were transferred yesterday to new owner Three!"

    Free advertisement from thejournal.ie? :-)

    If I was an O2 customer I wouldn't hold my breath. I made the move from O2 3G to Three 4G a few months ago and while peak speeds on speedtest.net are higher, the average speed isn't really better and the quality of service is much less consistent.

    Stayed with Three because the particular plan is much cheaper for my needs - but wouldn't have been happy if I had kept the O2 pricing for that service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭bealtine


    Bob24 wrote: »


    Free advertisement from thejournal.ie? :-)


    This is what passes for journalism these days


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭clohamon


    The full Commission Decision (v.long pdf) on this merger, including the market remedies, was published just before Christmas.

    There was a discussion of it at BEREC (the regulators' association) by one of the Commission's economists* (15 mins long, starts at 2 mins). The slideshow of that presentation is available here.

    The view expressed in the presentation was that O2/Three's prices would increase by 5-8% in the post paid sector, as a result of the merger, and that prices overall in that sector would also increase by 4-6%.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,417 ✭✭✭✭watty


    Quality of managing the network and honesty of marketing etc ignored.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,072 ✭✭✭mass_debater




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭bealtine


    Three UK have also bought O2

    No surprise there then, it's been on the market for a while


  • Registered Users Posts: 25 Pete69


    Both networks are a complete shambles now, as they try to consolidate them and rollout 4G all at once for as little investment as possible. Vodafone must be loving this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭clohamon


    Pete69 wrote: »
    Both networks are a complete shambles now, as they try to consolidate them and rollout 4G all at once for as little investment as possible. Vodafone must be loving this.

    Very hard to see how the Hutchison 3g licences could be compliant. Comreg seems to have adopted new conditions for the licences.

    https://www.comreg.ie/media/dlm_uploads/2016/12/ComReg-16113.pdf
    9. The current Drive Test is designed to give an indication of the MNOs performance in relation to individual licence conditions during the period that the route is driven. Furthermore, the Drive Test does not measure end user experience as it does not assess how well each MNO has integrated its various technology platforms which as the end users device roams between them strongly influences the perceived end user experience.

    10. It is noted that due to differences in both handsets and SIM (“Subscriber Identity Module”) provisioning, not all end users have the ability to access each of the MNOs technologies or bands.




    https://twitter.com/irelandoffline/status/834465266218258432


Advertisement