Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

[SC] The Yetis is likely a real animal

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,564 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Gumbi wrote: »
    What are you talking about. Science is science is science. No one should be attacked for doing honest scientific work. You must be talking about pseudoscience, which is an entirely different matter.


    Actually the guy who wanted to test these hairs was labelled a pseudo scientist. To many people are calling themselves a skeptic and claiming that they speak from a position of scientific authority. I see nothing scientific or valuable in the sceptics who sit back and repeat their dogma that such and such isn't real ect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,564 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    I think you mean cynics

    The mountain gorilla? there is still debate over the classification. As for the first sightings, we're talking about a hundred years ago here.

    Komodo dragons - first discovered 100 years ago

    Abominable snowmen are still in the same camp as mermaids, ghosts and the Loch Ness monster - no real evidence yet

    You didn't counter a single point in my post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    You didn't counter a single point in my post.

    I don't need to - you can equate that rationale to any mythical creature

    People were cynical about x creature, it was discovered, therefore mermaids can exist

    It's just bad logic really :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    I was listening to an episode of Monster Talk last night, in which Donald Prothero was being interviewed regarding his new book on crypitds. He mentions that the yeti legend likely originated in bear sightings.

    So, it seems that the Yeti being based on a bear is a mainstream sceptical position.

    You can find the interview here http://www.skeptic.com/podcasts/monstertalk/episodes/2013/

    The July 31 episode at about 22 minutes and 20 seconds in.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ziphius wrote: »
    So, it seems that the Yeti being based on a bear is a mainstream sceptical position.

    You can find the interview here http://www.skeptic.com/podcasts/monstertalk/episodes/2013/

    The July 31 episode at about 22 minutes and 20 seconds in.

    Its the closest known animal to resemble what people are seeing. Until it legs it 30kmph on 2 legs.
    Its kind alike fitting shapes, you have an octagon hole but only have a circle to put in it .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭Ziphius


    A reanalysis of the DNA samples published today concludes that the hairs are actually from the Himalayan brown bear (Ursus arctos isabellinus), a subspecies of the brown bear.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-30479718

    Link to paper: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/282/1800/20141712


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭Gumbi


    And no one was surprised.


Advertisement