Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time to legalise some drugs?

Options
  • 27-07-2008 12:00pm
    #1
    darkman2
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,632 ✭✭✭


    Just listening to a conversation on the radio there about drugs and for or against legalising certain drugs to deal with the criminal dealers. What do you think?


    I can see the benefits.


    More tax revenue
    Stricter, safer controls and distribution
    Take away potentially billions of euros from Drug Lords and criminal networks (which lets not forget those that use anything from hash to cocaine or meth are propping up)

    Also the downsides which tbh we already have.

    We have been fighting drug abuse for so long. It has not worked. Is legalisation something which is inevitable to deal with the criminal suppliers and dealers?


«134567…10

Comments

  • Options
    #2
    chickenhawk
    Registered Users Posts: 656 ✭✭✭chickenhawk


    I don't agree with legalising drugs. I think the drug dealers will still turn over enough of a profit to keep doing it and it just might make it seem more acceptable to do drugs.

    I think harsher prison terms. Solitary confinement and less luxuries in prison like flat screen tv's and cable channels. I know that would make life harder for prison officers but the guys in prison are still running the drug scene and have gangs around them. Put them in a cell on their own for a couple of years and see how attractive life is for them.


  • Options
    #3
    kowloon
    Registered Users Posts: 13,320 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Prison doesn't work, a long accepted fact. Harsher prisons make feck all difference. Just makes people feel better that somethings being done.


  • Options
    #4
    Sam Vimes
    Registered Users Posts: 21,611 ✭✭✭✭Sam Vimes


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    I don't agree with legalising drugs. I think the drug dealers will still turn over enough of a profit to keep doing it and it just might make it seem more acceptable to do drugs.
    How :confused:

    why would anyone buy cocaine cut with rat poison off the local scumbag if they could go to a government run shop and buy top quality stuff?
    chickenhawk wrote: »
    I think harsher prison terms. Solitary confinement and less luxuries in prison like flat screen tv's and cable channels. I know that would make life harder for prison officers but the guys in prison are still running the drug scene and have gangs around them. Put them in a cell on their own for a couple of years and see how attractive life is for them.
    there are countries that execute drug dealers and those countries still have drug problems


  • Options
    #5
    Wile E. Coyote
    Registered Users Posts: 1,560 ✭✭✭Wile E. Coyote


    Sam Vimes wrote: »
    How :confused:

    why would anyone buy cocaine cut with rat poison off the local scumbag if they could go to a government run shop and buy top quality stuff?

    I really don't see the government legalising cocaine. If they do decide to legalise some drugs, which i really wouldn't like to see happen, it will be hash that they legalise. This will still leave drug dealers free to make their money selling cocaine, heroine etc etc.


  • Options
    #6
    chickenhawk
    Registered Users Posts: 656 ✭✭✭chickenhawk


    Sam Vimes wrote: »
    How :confused:

    why would anyone buy cocaine cut with rat poison off the local scumbag if they could go to a government run shop and buy top quality stuff?

    If someone wants to take cocaine they deserve the rat poison imo.

    The same people will complain about crime on the streets and yet they are funding it.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    gogglebok
    Closed Accounts Posts: 696 ✭✭✭gogglebok


    kowloon wrote: »
    Prison doesn't work, a long accepted fact. Harsher prisons make feck all difference. Just makes people feel better that somethings being done.

    I think it might be even worse than that, and harsher prisons make criminals worse. I don't think it's hard to make a link between the disgusting violence of American prison life, and the high rates of crime on the streets. If we take people who have already broken the law, beat and rape them for ten years, and then turn them free to no job and no prospects - what do we expect? "I've learned my lesson"?

    On the drugs legalisation issue, we should surely start with the principle of consent. Adults should be allowed to do whatever they want with their bodies, as long as it doesn't harm other people. Then let's listen to the arguments for prohibition.


  • Options
    #8
    AckwelFoley
    Registered Users Posts: 12,556 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    I would like to see the stigma of Flunitrazepam disapated.

    The prescription of flunitrazepam as a hypnotic is generally tended to be for short-term treatment of severe insomnias, that are not responsive to other hypnotics, especially in inpatients.

    also more widely known as Rohypnol or slang terms such as - rophy, rufflels, roachies, roofies, ruffies, ruff up, rib, roach 2, roche, rope, ropies, circles, circes, forget it, forget-me-pill, Mexican Valium, Run-Trip-And-Fall and snypers little friend.

    Insomniacs need our help.


  • Options
    #9
    chickenhawk
    Registered Users Posts: 656 ✭✭✭chickenhawk


    gogglebok wrote: »
    I think it might be even worse than that, and harsher prisons make criminals worse. I don't think it's hard to make a link between the disgusting violence of American prison life, and the high rates of crime on the streets. - what do we expect? "I've learned my lesson"?.

    If they go into prison when they are 30 and get out when they are 70 I doubt they'll be in any condition to do much crime.

    I do see your point though and maybe separating people in prison and try to educate them and set them up with jobs might be a better idea.


  • Options
    #10
    DublinWriter
    Registered Users Posts: 9,555 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    I don't agree with legalising drugs. I think the drug dealers will still turn over enough of a profit to keep doing it and it just might make it seem more acceptable to do drugs.

    Which reminds me, I must give my Guinness and cigarette dealer a call later today.
    chickenhawk wrote: »
    I think harsher prison terms. Solitary confinement and less luxuries in prison like flat screen tv's and cable channels. I know that would make life harder for prison officers but the guys in prison are still running the drug scene and have gangs around them. Put them in a cell on their own for a couple of years and see how attractive life is for them.

    That approach was already tried in the Victorian era and all the prisoners went insane after a year.

    If you still want to make the point for tougher punishments then draw the argument to its logical conclusion - shoot any one who breaks any law.

    Break a red light? Death? Rob a bar of chocolate? Death. That way we'll all live in a law-abiding, crime-free, tax-paying society.


  • Options
    #11
    gogglebok
    Closed Accounts Posts: 696 ✭✭✭gogglebok


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    If they go into prison when they are 30 and get out when they are 70 I doubt they'll be in any condition to do much crime.

    I do see your point though and maybe separating people in prison and try to educate them and set them up with jobs might be a better idea.

    I think you're right on both counts, but the very long or lifetime sentences should be held for extreme cases or persistent violence. I wouldn't advocate that for drug use.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #12
    chickenhawk
    Registered Users Posts: 656 ✭✭✭chickenhawk


    gogglebok wrote: »
    I think you're right on both counts, but the very long or lifetime sentences should be held for extreme cases or persistent violence. I wouldn't advocate that for drug use.

    I'm talking about the suppliers and the dealers not the users.

    Dublinwriter. There is a difference between alcohol and heroine. You seem to think I'm all for a police state. I'm not. I just have no time for drug dealers and suppliers who cause most of the serious crime in the state.


  • Options
    #13
    30txsbzmcu2k9w
    Closed Accounts Posts: 578 ✭✭✭30txsbzmcu2k9w


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    If someone wants to take cocaine they deserve the rat poison imo.

    The same people will complain about crime on the streets and yet they are funding it.

    So your blaming the user because they buy from a dealer and fund crime? And you don't want to legalise it?
    I Accept that the legalisation of drugs may not completely halt dealers' trade, but it will significantly reduce crime if recreational drugs like marijuana and ecstasy are legalised.
    Safer streets, safer drugs, safer intake and a solution to binge drinking and all that comes with it when the pubs close.


  • Options
    #14
    gogglebok
    Closed Accounts Posts: 696 ✭✭✭gogglebok


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    I'm talking about the suppliers and the dealers not the users.

    Fair enough. Most of the problems there come from the very fact that the drugs are illegal and unregulated, though. Not many off-licence owners are shooting each other in the head over shipments of Guinness Draft.

    I presume most of the gangsters would move on to other things after legalisation, as they did in America after alcohol prohibition ended. But the huge profits to be made from the illegal trade must entice some young people in. Those insane profits wouldn't be there in a taxed and regulated legal trade.


  • Options
    #15
    chickenhawk
    Registered Users Posts: 656 ✭✭✭chickenhawk


    Nasir Elegant Wintergreen wrote: »
    So your blaming the user because they buy from a dealer and fund crime? And you don't want to legalise it?
    I Accept that the legalisation of drugs may not completely halt dealers' trade, but it will significantly reduce crime if recreational drugs like marijuana and ecstasy are legalised.

    If marijuana and ecstasy were legalised I don't think the drug dealers would stop. The government would probably weaken the effects of these drugs (most drink is limited to 40%) and some people would want to have more of a hit so they buy the illegal stuff. Then it would be harder to catch the dealers because they could just say it was for personal usage etc.
    gogglebok wrote: »
    Those insane profits wouldn't be there in a taxed and regulated legal trade.

    Diesel and cigarettes are taxed and regulated and people still smuggle them into the country and make huge profits.


  • Options
    #16
    gogglebok
    Closed Accounts Posts: 696 ✭✭✭gogglebok


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    Diesel and cigarettes are taxed and regulated and people still smuggle them into the country and make huge profits.

    True, but don't you agree that the problems associated with smuggling and distribution of drugs would be lessened considerably if the drugs were legal? I'm not saying crime will disappear, but the fact is that we don't have thirty or forty people a year shot dead in turf wars for the illegal cigarette or diesel trade.

    And you're not suggesting that the proper response to diesel and cigarette smuggling is to ban cigarettes and diesel. So why ban heroin?


  • Options
    #17
    Davidius
    Registered Users Posts: 4,893 ✭✭✭Davidius


    Alternatively you could just not do drugs.

    Also you won't have to try and spin it in such a way that you make it out so that all the crime is the government's fault for not regulating drugs rather than your fault for funding the criminals. It can't possibly be your fault because you don't want it to be. Amirite? :pac:


  • Options
    #18
    Snake Plisken
    Registered Users Posts: 12,469 ✭✭✭✭Snake Plisken


    I don't see this happening in our lifetime, unless they take some of the US state's thing of Medicinal Cannabis, the govenment could go with similar laws that Spain have in that you can grow your own plants (I think its a fixed number maybe 4 or 5) and smoke the produce, as long as you don't go out on the streets with it, to me thats a fair enough rule.


  • Options
    #19
    gogglebok
    Closed Accounts Posts: 696 ✭✭✭gogglebok


    Davidius wrote: »
    Alternatively you could just not do drugs.

    Also you won't have to try and spin it in such a way that you make it out so that all the crime is the government's fault for not regulating drugs rather than your fault for funding the criminals. It can't possibly be your fault because you don't want it to be. Amirite? :pac:

    No-one here is talking about whether they do drugs. I haven't said I fund criminals, and neither has anyone else. I'm not trying to "spin" anything, and I believe everyone else is also arguing honestly. And nobody is suggesting that all the crime is the government's fault.

    Wouldn't it achieve more to argue your case instead of caricaturing the people you disagree with?

    Why do you think drugs should be banned?


  • Options
    #20
    chickenhawk
    Registered Users Posts: 656 ✭✭✭chickenhawk


    gogglebok wrote: »
    I'm not saying crime will disappear, but the fact is that we don't have thirty or forty people a year shot dead in turf wars for the illegal cigarette or diesel trade.

    And you're not suggesting that the proper response to diesel and cigarette smuggling is to ban cigarettes and diesel. So why ban heroin?

    I've heard about people in the border areas that have been kneecapped and they have been known to work in with illegal diesel.

    To ban diesel and cigarettes would be impractical. Diesel is a usable produce which runs a large amount of machinery on our roads. Cigarettes are a large part of society and as a drug them and alcohol are more acceptable in terms of the damage and deaths they cause to the amount of taxes they bring in. Also you can't ban everything or people would not have any choice or quality of life. This does not mean you should legalize everything and hope for the best.

    It's like speed limits on our roads. Some roads can handle higher speed limits others can handle less but you have to set a limit somewhere and try to enforce it. If it was just a free for all can you imagine the amount of crashes on the road.


  • Options
    #21
    gogglebok
    Closed Accounts Posts: 696 ✭✭✭gogglebok


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    It's like speed limits on our roads. Some roads can handle higher speed limits others can handle less but you have to set a limit somewhere and try to enforce it. If it was just a free for all can you imagine the amount of crashes on the road.

    I don't think it is like speed limits. The argument against speeding is that it can cause harm to people other than the driver. That's not the case with taking drugs, so we need a compelling reason to ban them.

    Do you accept as a general principle that people should be allowed to do what they like as long as it doesn't harm other people?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #22
    c - 13
    Registered Users Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭c - 13


    gogglebok wrote: »
    I don't think it is like speed limits. The argument against speeding is that it can cause harm to people other than the driver. That's not the case with taking drugs, so we need a compelling reason to ban them.

    Do you accept as a general principle that people should be allowed to do what they like as long as it doesn't harm other people?

    Because no one in the country have ever been mugged by a junkie so they can get their next fix ?


  • Options
    #23
    chickenhawk
    Registered Users Posts: 656 ✭✭✭chickenhawk


    gogglebok wrote: »
    The argument against speeding is that it can cause harm to people other than the driver. That's not the case with taking drugs.

    Do you accept as a general principle that people should be allowed to do what they like as long as it doesn't harm other people?

    I've seen famlies of people hurt because the person who wants drugs keeps stealing off them to feed their habbit or have watched their loved ones fading away in front of them and won't listen to reason.
    c - 13 wrote: »
    Because no one in the country have ever been mugged by a junkie so they can get their next fix ?

    I agree.


  • Options
    #24
    brow_601
    Closed Accounts Posts: 161 ✭✭brow_601


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    I've heard about people in the border areas that have been kneecapped and they have been known to work in with illegal diesel.

    To ban diesel and cigarettes would be impractical. Diesel is a usable produce which runs a large amount of machinery on our roads. Cigarettes are a large part of society and as a drug them and alcohol are more acceptable in terms of the damage and deaths they cause to the amount of taxes they bring in. Also you can't ban everything or people would not have any choice or quality of life. This does not mean you should legalize everything and hope for the best.

    It's like speed limits on our roads. Some roads can handle higher speed limits others can handle less but you have to set a limit somewhere and try to enforce it. If it was just a free for all can you imagine the amount of crashes on the road.

    but don't more people die every year from these than other drugs.like, i've heard of people dying from drinking too much, or getting lung cancer from smoking, but i've never heard of anyone dying from too much weed...


  • Options
    #25
    Phototoxin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭Phototoxin


    If marijuana and ecstasy were legalised I don't think the drug dealers would stop. The government would probably weaken the effects of these drugs (most drink is limited to 40%) and some people would want to have more of a hit so they buy the illegal stuff. Then it would be harder to catch the dealers because they could just say it was for personal usage etc.

    just make your own e. Get some contraceptive pills and some viagra, grus them up and mix them with tippex. Then put them into little pill shapes and stamp a mitsubishi logo on them :pac:


  • Options
    #26
    chickenhawk
    Registered Users Posts: 656 ✭✭✭chickenhawk


    brow_601 wrote: »
    but don't more people die every year from these than other drugs.like, i've heard of people dying from drinking too much, or getting lung cancer from smoking, but i've never heard of anyone dying from too much weed...

    And if you read on you would have seen I mentioned that the death rate is acceptable to the amount of taxes they bring in. Even if you deduct the cost of caring for the people who are ill from effects caused by alcohol and cigarettes the government is still making a huge amount of money.

    If weed was legalised the amount of people that would take it up or continue to do it would not be enough of an incentive tax wise to the problems it would cause in other areas i.e. people saying other drugs should be legalised and others trying to get it banned again.


  • Options
    #27
    Dudess
    Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    If someone wants to take cocaine they deserve the rat poison imo.
    That's a ridiculous statement - wishing illness or death on someone because they might try cocaine once out of curiosity.

    Although I doubt drugs would be cut with harmful substances - why would a dealer try to kill potential customers?

    Legalisation of drugs ftw - after that, personal responsibility.


  • Options
    #28
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    chickenhawk wrote: »
    If someone wants to take cocaine they deserve the rat poison imo.

    The same people will complain about crime on the streets and yet they are funding it.
    I agree. I have no sympathy for addicts, if they dont want help with their addiction, they can rot for all i care. Irelands bad enough as it is for drug addicts.
    Dealers should be shot as well.


  • Options
    #29
    chickenhawk
    Registered Users Posts: 656 ✭✭✭chickenhawk


    Dudess wrote: »
    Legalisation of drugs ftw - after that, personal responsibility.

    Ya cause that's not ridiculous. :rolleyes:

    People have been known to be so responsible in the past. Most of these drugs are more highly addictive than others so people need to feed their habit more and eventually they run out of money so they turn to crime.


  • Options
    #30
    Dudess
    Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    You could apply that to alcohol.

    I just haven't been brainwashed by anti drugs propaganda, that's all. Saying stuff like drug users can rot in hell and all that crap is just laughable.

    Apart from heroin, drugs can be taken recreationally and most people don't develop problems - just like alcohol.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #31
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Laughable my arse. I agree with the drink part, but most people who go out and take drugs possibly dont know what they are using or how to use it.


Advertisement