Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Changing demographics in NI?

Options
  • 05-01-2012 3:01pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭


    The following article is quite interesting look at the changing face of Northern Ireland.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0104/1224309780877.html

    It is predicted that in a number of nears time the majority of the North's population will be from a Catholic background. This will be interesting as in the past the minority Catholic population weren't treated perhaps as well as they should have. Decisions made weren't made with their interests in mind.

    I think a majority Catholic population wouldn't necessarily mean a more likely United Ireland (and a discussion on that is not what this thread is aimed at). It would however mean a change in the way the North is run. And i also believe a majority Catholic population would treat a minority Protestant population better than they have been treated (improvements have been made there too).

    Would a majority Catholic NI mean a fairer NI?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,003 ✭✭✭bijapos


    The sooner people stop considering themselves or others to be Catholic or Protestant the better. From my own experience most people up the North live happily together and don't discriminate for or against their colleagues or neighbours on their religion, ethnic background, gender or any other reason*. Long may it continue.


    *Yes, I know there are very vocal bigots in the North and indeed everywhere but most people dont discrimminate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    I don't think it holds as much water today as it probably would have done 30+ years ago. Most people will be turning away from religion in the near future anyway, so this isn't a big deal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    GERRY MORIARTY, Northern Editor
    THE BRITISH and Irish governments and the people of Northern Ireland are facing the prospect – and sooner than most people might think – of how to manage a transformed constitutional situation where the majority in the North are likely to be from a Catholic background.

    It’s going to raise serious questions for southerners too, who must also address complex constitutional problems that if not managed properly and creatively could land Northern Ireland – and the rest of the island – back in the mire.
    It’s time for the beginning of a calm debate.
    The figures are revealed in the statistics: there are now significantly more Catholics than Protestants in nursery, primary, second- and third-level education in Northern Ireland. If that trend continues, and it’s difficult to see a reason why it should not, then in another generation or so the majority population should be Catholic or from a Catholic background – people of voting age, most of whose immediate antecedents are nationalist in their political outlook.
    The figures clearly indicate shifting religious and political sands in Northern Ireland which First Minister and DUP leader Peter Robinson implicitly acknowledged recently by making a direct pitch to Catholics to hold with the North’s union with Britain.
    Figures from Northern Ireland’s Department of Education for 2010/11 show 120,415 Protestants and 163,693 Catholics in the North’s schools.
    SOLELY WITHIN THOSE figures that is a breakdown of 57.6 per cent Catholic, 42.4 per cent Protestant. Although that is not allowing for an additional 37,609 who classify themselves as “other Christian” (8,282), “non-Christian” (1,726) and the 27,601 who fall into the category of “other/no religion/religion not recorded”.
    Figures for 2009/10 obtained from the Higher Education Statistics Agency by Traditional Unionist Voice leader Jim Allister show that in Queen’s University there are 8,710 Northern Ireland domiciled students of a Catholic background compared with 6,740 from a Protestant tradition.
    On the University of Ulster’s four campuses there are 11,070 Catholics and 7,020 Protestants.
    In the two teacher-training colleges – Stranmillis and St Mary’s (which is virtually exclusively Catholic) – there are 1,215 Catholics and 650 Protestants.
    In total, therefore, at third level there are 20,995 students (59.3 per cent) from a Catholic background and 14,410 (40.7 per cent) from a Protestant background.
    Another issue is the predilection for many Protestants to attend higher education in Britain and for more of them – compared to Catholics at college in Britain – to remain living there rather than return to live and work in Northern Ireland.
    It is plain that the movement is in one direction. So, will that probable majority population also be predominantly nationalist and of such critical mass as to vote Northern Ireland into a united Ireland?
    There are a couple of answers to this: one is we don’t know; and the other is, it depends.
    The 2011 census figures based on religious affiliation will not be known until the autumn of 2012. The 2001 census had the Protestant population at 53.1 per cent and Catholics at 43.8 per cent. The latest census should show a higher Catholic representation with a more dramatic narrowing of the gap expected in the next census in 2021.
    LAST YEAR’S ASSEMBLY elections provided a reasonable notion of the current Orange-Green state of play. Some 48 per cent of voters opted for unionist parties and politicians while 42 per cent voted for nationalist parties and politicians – Alliance, the Greens and socialist or independent-types hoovering up the rest. Alliance won 7.7 per cent of the vote and some will argue that most of this vote would be pro-union which, if correct, bolsters the pro-union electoral representation.
    Most of the earlier aforementioned statistics refer to people who are too young to vote but in the coming years they will be enfranchised.
    While – as seems demographically likely – the number of people of voting age and of Catholic background will steadily increase, it does not necessarily follow that the vote for nationalist parties will rise at a parallel rate. But it certainly means that the political dynamic in Northern Ireland will progressively change and that will bring significant challenges for Northern politicians and for the British and Irish governments.
    Dr Peter Shirlow is a senior lecturer in the Queen’s University school of law. He is from a unionist background and in a mixed marriage and believes his own experience reflects a changing facet of Northern society, of an increasing religious and political cross-fertilisation, so to speak.
    “With secularisation there is a growing ‘1690 what do you mean’ group that is similar to the ‘1916 what do you mean’ group in the South,” he says. “There is a growth in people who feel politics is too sectarian or too nationalist. They are operating a civic-shared identity through their lifestyle. They will socialise together, intermarry, go to gigs together. They are in many ways – but not completely – sectarian blind, or tradition blind.
    “It was primarily within the unionist electorate but from my observations it is starting to grow within the nationalist community. It is neither unionist nor Irish, it is identity-less, at most pale Orange or Green.
    “There is also a slight social distance between the North and the South. You get it in sport, including in GAA, where people are described as ‘you Northerners, or you Nordies’,” he adds.
    A recent Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey – a rolling record of public opinion – found more than half of Catholics in Northern Ireland (52 per cent) want the long-term future of the North to be as part of the United Kingdom compared with just one in three Catholics favouring a united Ireland.
    “All of these surveys have shown over time that there are more Catholics that would stay in Northern Ireland than there are Protestants who would vote for a united Ireland,” says Shirlow. “That does not mean that they don’t speak Irish, or don’t feel culturally Irish but it is a material economic argument for them that this is a better place to live.”
    But Shirlow is also conscious of the cussedness of human nature and the unpredictability of events that can cast people back to their nationalist and unionist trenches and mindsets. For instance, and heaven forbid, if there were the equivalent of another Bloody Sunday, or even a Drumcree-type nationalist-unionist standoff, would that trigger shocks that could resurrect the old sectarian “them and us” divisions, he wonders.
    “What we need to know is what is the difference between emotional Irishness as in ‘I am Irish, I feel Irish’ and political Irishness as in ‘I have to be Irish, I have to be in a united Ireland’. All of that is up in the air and that is what Peter Robinson has picked up on.”
    FIONNUALA O CONNOR , a writer, commentator and journalist formerly of this parish, when considering the demographic landscape ahead, enters several caveats such as the questions: will Catholic numbers continue to rise ahead of Protestant numbers? Will issues such as lower university fees here prompt more young Protestants to remain in Northern Ireland rather than study and stay in Britain, as a high proportion of them do? Nonetheless, she points to an increasing confidence among Catholics, citing how it is “common knowledge among Catholics for some time that their schools have a higher enrolment than state schools, and more recently that school exam results are better”.
    Similar to Shirlow she notes a “very widespread awareness of the Republic’s mixed but mostly alienated disposition towards the North, Northern nationalists and unification – the McGuinness presidential campaign crystallising that view”.
    While her book, In Search of a State: Catholics in Northern Ireland, published 16 years ago, gives an insight into how Catholics might react if in a majority, she is careful to stress that nobody can really predict what will happen.
    Yet, O Connor is reasonably confident that whatever transformation unfolds that it will take place without major upheaval such is the level of Northern Catholic confidence.
    “A strong Northern Catholic community won’t ever be put down again,” she says. “If unification looks enjoyable and unwanted by the Republic, they’ll work something out. To know you have a majority among the young, and that growing numbers of those young are doing well in education, that’s a big underlying strength.”
    As for the prospects of a united Ireland in a generation or so?
    “It would need to be a handsome majority before Irish and British governments would agree a referendum on unification,” says O Connor. “A big resentful Protestant minority is a dislikeable enough prospect.”
    DR BRIAN FEENEY is a historian and author of Sin Féin: A Hundred Turbulent Years , a former SDLP councillor and a polemical weekly columnist for the nationalist Irish News.
    He believes that a nationalist majority may happen in about 25 years. “But what happens in the event of a plebiscite and the result is 51 per cent/49 per cent?” he asks, echoing O Connor’s argument.
    “Does anybody really believe that the British are going to say, ‘Right we are out of here on Tuesday?’ Of course not. You are going to have to try to find an agreement with that 49 per cent. Otherwise you are going to flip the coin over and have the same kind of alienation that existed before the Good Friday agreement, before the whole Troubles started.”
    Feeney wonders how the famous unionist siege mentality would cope with the demographic change that appears to be coming. “People have to be careful. If people feel threatened they are going to resist; there is no question about that,” he warns.
    “It is going to be a long process to try to demonstrate to people that their rights are not threatened,” he adds. “You have got to reach an arrangement where unionists will believe that they can still remain British, can call themselves British and have exactly the same rights as people in Shrewsbury or Birmingham.”
    That arrangement will be for the politicians and the two governments to work out. And such is the history of Ireland that many people at least will be familiar with concepts such as a united Ireland, joint sovereignty, some form of federalism, an independent Northern Ireland or the status quo.
    Feeney doesn't see a solution being a simple unitary state and suspects whatever arrangement is arrived at that Northern political self-interest will seek to maintain most power within the existing Northern Ireland geographical framework. They wouldn't want to be denied the “gravy train”, he says. There is also the very large issue of what the Republic might think of constitutionally connecting with the North.
    But Feeney is not totally cynical. He believes that Northern politicians and the British and Irish governments will have the “wit” to manage a situation that without careful handling could be rich for exploitation by purist nationalists and republicans – with a likely consequent backlash from unionists and loyalists.
    This issue, perforce, will move up the political agenda, he says. “Politicians will have to think about it. At the moment they don’t have to think about it.”
    To varying degrees that applies to most people on these two islands

    Its time for the beginning of a calm debate indeed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,741 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    woodoo wrote: »
    I think a majority Catholic population wouldn't necessarily mean a more likely United Ireland (and a discussion on that is not what this thread is aimed at). It would however mean a change in the way the North is run. And i also believe a majority Catholic population would treat a minority Protestant population better than they have been treated (improvements have been made there too).

    Would a majority Catholic NI mean a fairer NI?
    A majority Catholic population would treat a minority Protestant population better than the Catholic minority has been treated, but I think this has more to do with the liberalisation of society and the fact that most people are sick of violence. I wouldnt say a majority Catholic NI will mean a fairer NI, after all, the Catholic Church practically controlled the South for a long time and there was nothing fair about that period.

    I am sure not many in the North (be they Catholic, Protestant or whatever) are interested in a United Ireland given the economic situation of the South right now. However, with the British economy not looking too rosy either, and ever reducing support from "the mainland", Id imagine the Union with Britain will look less attractive. Its not that long since Cameron specifically named Northern Ireland as one part of the UK where the state’s share of the economy was too big. I reckon economics will have more to do with the decision to remain part of Britain than religion will. With the increasing likelihood of an independent Scotland, will there be a "British" identity to remain in?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    It would have a fairly significant psychological effect up there too i think. The Catholics no longer feeling like the unwanted minority and the Protestant (some) no longer feeling like NI is all about them and their wishes.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    woodoo wrote: »
    And i also believe a majority Catholic population would treat a minority Protestant population better than they have been treated .

    Agree wholeheartedly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    I reckon economics will have more to do with the decision to remain part of Britain than religion will.

    John Hume has been singing that tune for decades.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭Fromthetrees


    Ireland will most definitely gain more and more power over the north (as oppose to none), the people who feel British in the north I have no doubt will hold that citizenship forever in Ireland.
    Changing demographics in northern Ireland may never mean a united Ireland because who the **** is going to pay for it?
    The article suggests that by about 2020 odd there will be a catholic majority in northern Ireland so is that going to mean a united Ireland, who knows, Scotland will be independent and Wales possibly so is it going to be England and the most north eastern two counties of Ireland who are a part of the union?
    It's only right that Irish people who live in the six counties should be able to vote on Irish presidential elections, vote in TDs, have a voice in the national discourse.
    There's also the obvious negative financial benefits of having different administrations on a small island doing different things for the same reason.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,888 ✭✭✭Terrontress


    It's only right that Irish people who live in the six counties should be able to vote on Irish presidential elections, vote in TDs, have a voice in the national discourse.
    .

    Would you have some form of a citizenship test to allow voting? Or could anyone do it? And would you be happy with those paying tax to the UK voting to Dail Eireann? And do you propose specific constituencies for people in NI to vote for or would you have Ni constituencies where none of the issues voted on in the Dail have direct impact on their constituents?

    As well intentioned as your post may be, I do not think it is 'only right' that people in the six counties vote in TDs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    bijapos wrote: »
    The sooner people stop considering themselves or others to be Catholic or Protestant the better.
    This.

    The fact that more people labelling themselves as one over the other, or some shift in the label used, is still seen as an issue, merely confirms what I've always thought of Northern Ireland - socially, it has a lot of catching up to do with the rest of the UK & Ireland.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    I don't think it holds as much water today as it probably would have done 30+ years ago. Most people will be turning away from religion in the near future anyway, so this isn't a big deal.



    Like most cultural differences, the roots of the Protestant-Catholic enmity in Northern Ireland are buried in the distant past, with fresh incidents only serving to reopen old wounds and solidify negative stereotypes,It is to easy to say by turning away from religion things will be different,If it were only that easy,The political dispute about the existence and nature of Northern Ireland itself lies at the core of the conflict,It has two groups who have differed in political allegiance, religious practice and cultural values. One side believed that their land had been stolen, while the other was/is in a constant state of apprehension. Northern Ireland still suffers from the problems of rival ethnic groups living cheek by jowl and in suspicion of each other.But I slowly see a faint light at the end of a very long tunnel.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭Fromthetrees


    Would you have some form of a citizenship test to allow voting? Or could anyone do it? And would you be happy with those paying tax to the UK voting to Dail Eireann? And do you propose specific constituencies for people in NI to vote for or would you have Ni constituencies where none of the issues voted on in the Dail have direct impact on their constituents?

    As well intentioned as your post may be, I do not think it is 'only right' that people in the six counties vote in TDs.

    I think if it was up to me I'd start with reforming the senate to allow both orange and green politicians from the north in there, I would also like to see anyone born on the island of Ireland to vote in the presidential elections. I think these two things can easily be implemented and would be a good step forward. In a simple way of looking at it, Michael D. Higgins represents Ireland abroad and holds an Irish passport, every one I've ever met from Derry holds the same Irish passport but had no say over his election, I don't think that's right.
    I think you're right about voting in TDs and as long as Britain massively subsidises the northern statelet than the Irish government can never expect to see northern tax monies, in the future this can change though, the article is suggesting about 15 years time, by then our economy could [please god] be back on track, we might be contributing a lot to the north, be in a position to expect some tax money in return and then, obviously all hypothetically, would/should people from the 6 counties vote in TDs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    realies wrote: »
    Like most cultural differences, the roots of the Protestant-Catholic enmity in Northern Ireland are buried in the distant past, with fresh incidents only serving to reopen old wounds and solidify negative stereotypes,It is to easy to say by turning away from religion things will be different,If it were only that easy,The political dispute about the existence and nature of Northern Ireland itself lies at the core of the conflict,It has two groups who have differed in political allegiance, religious practice and cultural values. One side believed that their land had been stolen, while the other was/is in a constant state of apprehension. Northern Ireland still suffers from the problems of rival ethnic groups living cheek by jowl and in suspicion of each other.But I slowly see a faint light at the end of a very long tunnel.
    But what has this thread got to do with that though? It is about a Catholic majority in the near future.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,741 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I think if it was up to me I'd start with reforming the senate to allow both orange and green politicians from the north in there, I would also like to see anyone born on the island of Ireland to vote in the presidential elections. I think these two things can easily be implemented and would be a good step forward. In a simple way of looking at it, Michael D. Higgins represents Ireland abroad and holds an Irish passport, every one I've ever met from Derry holds the same Irish passport but had no say over his election, I don't think that's right.
    I think you're right about voting in TDs and as long as Britain massively subsidises the northern statelet than the Irish government can never expect to see northern tax monies, in the future this can change though, the article is suggesting about 15 years time, by then our economy could [please god] be back on track, we might be contributing a lot to the north, be in a position to expect some tax money in return and then, obviously all hypothetically, would/should people from the 6 counties vote in TDs.
    This is just ridiculous. Northern Ireland is a different country to Ireland, with its own devolved government, its own parliament and its own head of state (the Queen). You obviously have only met a narrow cross section of the community in Derry as any who holds an Irish passport does so by choice, and there are plenty of others who do not wish to be Irish citizens. You may as well be talking about allowing people in Northern Ireland to vote in the US Senate and Presidential elections.

    You may think it is "a good step forward" but it can only happen as part of a process where the final outcome will be to unite Ireland under a single government in Dublin, and this process can only start if the majority of the people of Northern Ireland wish for their state to become part of a united Ireland. This is not the case at present so any of these half way house ideas would be going against the wishes of the majority of the population of the North. Part from such a move being undemocratic and unconstitutional, and causing an international incident, it would probably kick start violence in the North again. As the article in the op points out, the North may have a majority of Catholics in twenty years time, but as I and others have stated, due to other issues Catholics in twenty years time may not favour a united Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    realize wrote: »
    Like most cultural differences, the roots of the Protestant-Catholic enmity in Northern Ireland are buried in the distant past, with fresh incidents only serving to reopen old wounds and solidify negative stereotypes,It is to easy to say by turning away from religion things will be different,If it were only that easy,The political dispute about the existence and nature of Northern Ireland itself lies at the core of the conflict,It has two groups who have differed in political allegiance, religious practice and cultural values. One side believed that their land had been stolen, while the other was/is in a constant state of apprehension. Northern Ireland still suffers from the problems of rival ethnic groups living cheek by jowl and in suspicion of each other.But I slowly see a faint light at the end of a very long tunnel.
    KeithAFC wrote: »
    I don't think it holds as much water today as it probably would have done 30+ years ago. Most people will be turning away from religion in the near future anyway, so this isn't a big deal.
    KeithAFC wrote: »
    But what has this thread got to do with that though? It is about a Catholic majority in the near future.



    I was pointing out this will not necessarily result in a weakening of different ethnic & communal feeling.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    I think if it was up to me I'd start with reforming the senate to allow both orange and green politicians from the north in there, I would also like to see anyone born on the island of Ireland to vote in the presidential elections.

    It sounds like a good idea but it would be hard to implement. I daresay that most Unionists would see it as a threat of U.I. creep (nothing to see here) and try to block it so even if it was somehow implemented it would probably only have the 'green' side voting.

    Also the established Southern parties would probably be even more hostile to all island voting because it would, inevitably, boost the performance of SF in elections.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    realies wrote: »
    I was pointing out this will not necessarily result in a weakening of different ethnic & communal feeling.
    That is the nature of politics. Nationalists don't need to convince Ulster Loyalists, they need to convince the people in the Irish Republic about a United Ireland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,888 ✭✭✭Terrontress


    Allowing people from NI to vote would only result in disproportionate increases in votes for Sinn Fein. For this reason it would never be agreed by other parties to give it the support it would need to be enacted. None of the other major parties have the structures in the North to effectively canvas and Sinn Fein are extremely efficient at mobilising their vote and telling them exactly who to vote for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    That is the nature of politics. Nationalists don't need to convince Ulster Loyalists, they need to convince the people in the Irish Republic about a United Ireland.

    We are going of track here but if your talking about convincing the people of the 26 counties towards a United Ireland,I would say that it would not
    take much convincing at all.



    But this should be for another thread and you can answer if you so wish and I will leave it at that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    Allowing people from NI to vote would only result in disproportionate increases in votes for Sinn Fein. For this reason it would never be agreed by other parties to give it the support it would need to be enacted. None of the other major parties have the structures in the North to effectively canvas and Sinn Fein are extremely efficient at mobilising their vote and telling them exactly who to vote for.


    Have FG/FF/ & LAB not helped supported and canvas with both the SDLP & ALLIANCE parties in there elections there for many a year now, and would there supporters with maybe moderate Unionists return the favour ?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    realies wrote: »
    We are going of track here but if your talking about convincing the people of the 26 counties towards a United Ireland,I would say that it would not
    take much convincing at all.



    But this should be for another thread and you can answer if you so wish and I will leave it at that.
    You might be right or wrong though. That is the point. Some of the biggest criticism I have seen towards a United Ireland have been on this forum and from Irish people. AH being a good example.

    The appetite doesn't seem to exist for a United Ireland in the Republic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 34,081 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    realies wrote: »
    We are going of track here but if your talking about convincing the people of the 26 counties towards a United Ireland,I would say that it would not
    take much convincing at all.

    Really? We've more than enough problems already without taking on the NI economic basket case, even if sectarianism and the threat of renewed violence weren't there.

    NI would be akin to Bosnia if the flow of money from London was cut off, and we can't afford to subsidise it.

    Nobody has considered what happens to the position of the minority Unionist population in the future in a majority-Nationalist NI, or in a UI. Exactly 100 years ago this island saw a Unionist minority facing the prospect of being forced into Home Rule, would their reaction be different this time around?

    If we're not very careful we will end up repeating all the same mistakes all over again.

    Fingal County Council are certainly not competent to be making decisions about the most important piece of infrastructure on the island. They need to stick to badly designed cycle lanes and deciding on whether Mrs Murphy can have her kitchen extension.



  • Registered Users Posts: 101 ✭✭Kingdomkerry


    The argument that the Republic of Ireland cannot afford Northern Ireland and therefore a United Ireland is over-simplistic and lacks substance. It does not take into account the billions in extra revenues that would be generated, the billions that would be saved and the huge benefits to the border region that a United Ireland would bring.

    On top of current tax revenues generated in NI and the ROI for the UK and Irish exchequers, a UI would see billions of extra revenues that would be generated as a result of focused economic and fiscal policy in NI. The tax take in NI is billions below what it ought to be because UK tax rates are set by what is in the best interests of the UK as a whole and in particular the London and South East England regions. UK taxation and fiscal policy has had a detrimental effect on the Northern Ireland economy.

    Economists believe a 12.5% CT rate would create between 50k-90k jobs in the medium term. The abolishment of the UK Airport Passenger Tax would greatly boost business and tourism in Ireland impacting positively on the tax take.

    Much of the taxes paid by companies on profits made in the region is not disclosed and instead is declared in London. Again this is not taken into consideration.

    Ending duplication of services, synergies and integration of public services would amount to billions in savings. There would also be significant savings from rebalancing the economy by gradually replacing public sector jobs with private sector jobs brought in from FDI as a result of an all-Ireland focused economic policy.

    A UI would bring about huge economic benefits to the border region, a region which was cut off from its natural hinterland as a result of partition. Right now people are crossing the border to shop in the South. This has a detrimental effect on businesses north of the border. A couple of years ago it was businesses in the South who suffered. While one side of the border feasts the other under goes a famine. The lack of stability is not good for business. Counties Louth, Monaghan, Cavan, Leitrim, Sligo, Donegal, Derry, Tyrone, Fermanagh, Armagh and Down have all suffered/will suffer. 11/32 counties make up the disadvantaged border region.

    With demographic change certain to bring about a Catholic majority in Northern Ireland in 15- 25 years, the real arguments will be the economic argument. Arguments in favour of a United Ireland are greater than arguments in favour of partition. A UI will increase the living standards for all Ireland’s citizens.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    It does not take into account the billions...
    You're right, it doesn't. Because they don't exist.
    On top of current tax revenues generated in NI and the ROI for the UK and Irish exchequers, a UI would see billions of extra revenues that would be generated as a result of focused economic and fiscal policy in NI. The tax take in NI is billions below what it ought to be because UK tax rates are set by what is in the best interests of the UK as a whole...
    Eh ... what? Westminster pours tax revenue into Northern Ireland - there would be absolutely no economy whatsoever north of the border where it not for taxpayers in GB.
    Economists believe a 12.5% CT rate would create between 50k-90k jobs in the medium term.
    What economists are these?


  • Registered Users Posts: 101 ✭✭Kingdomkerry


    djpbarry wrote: »
    You're right, it doesn't. Because they don't exist.
    What doesnt exist. Billions from extra tax revenues or billions from savings? If economists believe that Irish economic policy implemented in NI would create 90,000 then yes billions of extra tax revenue would be generated.

    Ending duplication of services etc would save billions. 1 education system, health system, water quango, road saftey quango etc. instead of 2 would save billions. Fact

    djpbarry wrote: »
    Eh ... what? Westminster pours tax revenue into Northern Ireland - there would be absolutely no economy whatsoever north of the border where it not for taxpayers in GB.

    As I said the only reason NI hands the begging bowl to London is because it exists in the UK who have created a basket case economy.

    djpbarry wrote: »
    What economists are these?

    These guys

    http://www.enniscorthyguardian.ie/breaking-news/national-news/tax-cut-could-create-90000-jobs-2065876.html

    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/business/business-news/corporation-tax-cut-could-generate-58000-top-jobs-in-northern-ireland-16175229.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Thread is over six months old and there's another discussion going on here.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement