Galway Harbour Company has banned Motorhome Parking

AutostratusEB · 12-10-2014 9:35pm #1

Disappointed to see this sign (attached) in the Docks this morning in Galway. It would appear that Siobhanrua was right about motorhomes being banned from the popular parking spot by the docks in Galway.

moodrater · 12-10-2014 11:36pm

AutostratusEB wrote: »

Disappointed to see this sign (attached) in the Docks this morning in Galway. It would appear that Siobhanrua was right about motorhomes being banned from the popular parking spot by the docks in Galway.

Is that where the designated spaces were?

*Kol* · 13-10-2014 10:22am

What do they mean by privately operated parking? Is it pay and display?Strange that they would put a blanket ban on MH parking. If you pay and display for parking what harm are you doing?

*Kol* · 13-10-2014 10:38am

AutostratusEB wrote: »

Disappointed to see this sign (attached) in the Docks this morning in Galway. It would appear that Siobhanrua was right about motorhomes being banned from the popular parking spot by the docks in Galway.

Which street is that sign on? The camper space were/are on dock street.

AutostratusEB · 13-10-2014 11:00am

*Kol* wrote: »

Which street is that sign on? The camper space were/are on dock street.

Yes the sign is on the corner by the red brick building - corner of dock road and dock street.

All the land around the Harbour ( and the parking spaces) belong to Galway Harbour Company so they canset different rates. In effect all parking around the docks is privately operated.
Tis an awful pity they made this decision. And they will enforce it with clamps as they are pretty strict with non display of parking tickets also.

Irishgoatman · 13-10-2014 11:18am

Were the designated MH parking spaces on Harbour Company land? if so, why the sudden turn around?.

How did/does the on-street (council) parking charges compare with Harbour Co. charges? does anyone know off-hand.

*Kol* · 13-10-2014 11:33am

Irishgoatman wrote: »

Were the designated MH parking spaces on Harbour Company land? if so, why the sudden turn around?.

How did/does the on-street (council) parking charges compare with Harbour Co. charges? does anyone know off-hand.

It must be Galway port land. Perhaps there is an insurance/liability issue?

It was €4 from 20:00 to 08:00 and €2 per hour at other times. Generally on street there is no charge for parking after 18:00. The €2 per hour during the day would be comparable to most on street parking in cities.

revileandy · 13-10-2014 11:58am

Strange turn of events, especially considering the money they would have spent on installing the electricity / water points.

I stayed here during the summer, had a great 2 nights in Galway, nice quiet spot, a few minutes walk from Eyre Square - there were a lot of foreign campers making use of the spots due to our chronic lack of aires.

Irishgoatman · 13-10-2014 12:08pm

*Kol* wrote: »

It must be Galway port land. Perhaps there is an insurance/liability issue?

It was €4 from 20:00 to 08:00 and €2 per hour at other times. Generally on street there is no charge for parking after 18:00. The €2 per hour during the day would be comparable to most on street parking in cities.

Thanks, I visit my Daughter in Merlin Prk area most weeks but we take bus into town as it's easier.

Can't really see why it should be an insurance issue, but you could be right. Never having parked there, just walked along, I've never noticed if car parking spaces were marked out? if so perhaps MH's taking up too much room?. Even if not marked they would still be losing money as less MH's means more cars.

I'm going to give the company a ring later and see if I can find anything out. I'll report back.

AutostratusEB · 13-10-2014 12:28pm

revileandy wrote: »

Strange turn of events, especially considering the money they would have spent on installing the electricity / water points.

I stayed here during the summer, had a great 2 nights in Galway, nice quiet spot, a few minutes walk from Eyre Square - there were a lot of foreign campers making use of the spots due to our chronic lack of aires.

They installed the electricity/water points originally for the marina right beside the designated parking. I think this is where the problem lies - I think there is more money in selling marina space to yachts owners than motorhomes parking overnight. They may not want to share the space/facilities with motorhomes. This is only my guess by the way, there may be other reasons.

Its a pity they can't accommodate both though. I've sent loads of foreign motorhome owners I've met to Galway and told them to park there.

There is also the Black Box (on the Dyke Road) car park don't forget - €4 a day and free 18:00-08:00. Not as salubrious a surroundings as the docks but popular with foreign MH owners.

There is a lot of land over by the harbour enterprise park - though not as convenient to the city (a 10 minute longer walk) - it would be great if this could be used as an aire - perhaps with proper grey/black water disposal as well as AC/water

shaysue · 14-10-2014 2:00pm

Port authority say City Council Planning Authority enforcer closed them down due to no planning permission for campers parking. Methinks there is more to this than meets the eye.....

Malta1 · 14-10-2014 3:51pm

shaysue wrote: »

Port authority say City Council Planning Authority enforcer closed them down due to no planning permission for campers parking. Methinks there is more to this than meets the eye.....

Is this a case of "Dungarvanitis" spreading country wide??

niloc1951 · 14-10-2014 9:50pm

shaysue wrote: »

Port authority say City Council Planning Authority enforcer closed them down due to no planning permission for campers parking. Methinks there is more to this than meets the eye.....

Motorhomes are in the same EU vehicle category as cars.
If there is planning permission to park motor vehicles then motorhomes can also park there.
The only way there could be no planning permission to park motorhomes there is if there was a special condition within the original planning permission to operate the parking area which stipulated that the parking of motorhomes was not allowed.

Now for some good news CLICK HERE

niloc1951 · 14-10-2014 11:50pm

shaysue wrote: »

Port authority say City Council Planning Authority enforcer closed them down due to no planning permission for campers parking. Methinks there is more to this than meets the eye.....

That doesn't seem to add up

Last year shortly after the parking area at Bandon SEE HERE came into operation the operator of the facility got a visit from a County Council official, it is believed following a complaint from a caravan and camping park operator.

To cut a long story short he left with his mission of closing the facility down unfulfilled

It was explained to him that there was no camping activity permitted and the motorhomes were simply being allowed to use existing parking which formed part of the premises planning permission.

The common use of the term camping or wild camping to describe what is in reality parking is muddying the water.
The discussion by councillors at the September meeting of the Dungarvan and Lismore Electoral Area Council is clear evidence that the difference between parking and camping when referring to motorhomes being stationary for a period of time is not at all understood by those in officialdomand their confusion is compounded by the constant use of wild camping by our own community when referring to parking up overnight.

If we look to the situation which prevails in Europe there is a clear understanding of the difference between parking and camping and while parking is widely provided in the form of Aires de Stationnement camping is usually prohibited.

Consider this:
Is the driver of a truck with a sleeper cab who pulls in for the night, prepares himself/herself a meal using on-board facilities, settles down to watch a bit of telly or read a book before climbing into the bunk for a nights sleep parked or camping

shaysue · 16-10-2014 1:42pm

If motorhomers feel strongly enough about this retrograde step in Galway, perhaps they could e mail Galway City council, Galway Bay FM, Bord Failte and perhaps some Galway city councillors to try to get this situation reversed or rectified. Look on the motorhomecraic.com site to get craicers reactions and also some e mail addresses to the aforementioned authorities!!! I, with some other motorhomers, have already made contact by phone and e mail. We need to keep up the pressure....for whatever good it may do.. Here's hoping.

shaysue · 16-10-2014 6:53pm

Reply received from Galway City Council planning official:

"Following a complaint from a member of the public in relation to motorhomes using car parking spaces at Dock St., Galway City Council were obliged to investigate the claims, as per Section 152 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended. Following a site inspection it was found that authorised car parking spaces were being utilised for the unauthorised parking of motorhomes, which were giving rise to traffic and pedestrian safety concerns.
It should be noted that planning permission does not exist for the parking of motorhomes at the site. The parking of motorhomes at this location represents a change in the authorised use of the land, from temporary car parking use permitted under PI. Ref. 12/67 (permitted until 26/06/2018), to a motorhome parking use. The unauthorised use of the land does not have the benefit of planning permission and therefore must cease. The parking of motor homes at this location also gives rise to issues of traffic and pedestrian safety, as the parking spaces are sized for cars only.
Should Galway Harbour Company wish to facilitate motorhome users at their site, then they are within their rights to consider their options with regard to seeking appropriate planning permission for the area in question.
Yours sincerely,
Peter Staunton
Assistant Planner / Enforcement Officer

killalanerr · 16-10-2014 8:24pm

Im confused and i don't claim to have the answer,but do motorhomes not come under the same group as cars when it comes to parking temporary or other wise when it comes to EU law ?

Just seen post 13,so would this mean that no further planning permission would be needed to continue with the current arrangements ?

CJhaughey · 16-10-2014 10:26pm

From my reading of it, its a load of codswallop.
The planners are attempting to stop this by using some kind of quasi legal gobbledegook.
* change in the authorised use of the land, from temporary car parking use permitted under PI. Ref. 12/67 (permitted until 26/06/2018), to a motorhome parking use.*
Then its a case of try and use the old H&S chestnut, pedestrian safety and traffic safety.
I'd say if a good barrister got onto this they would find it hard to defend in court.

niloc1951 · 17-10-2014 12:01am

shaysue wrote: »

Reply received from Galway City Council planning official:

"Following a complaint from a member of the public in relation to motorhomes using car parking spaces at Dock St., Galway City Council were obliged to investigate the claims, as per Section 152 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended. Following a site inspection it was found that authorised car parking spaces were being utilised for the unauthorised parking of motorhomes, which were giving rise to traffic and pedestrian safety concerns.
It should be noted that planning permission does not exist for the parking of motorhomes at the site. The parking of motorhomes at this location represents a change in the authorised use of the land, from temporary car parking use permitted under PI. Ref. 12/67 (permitted until 26/06/2018), to a motorhome parking use. The unauthorised use of the land does not have the benefit of planning permission and therefore must cease. The parking of motor homes at this location also gives rise to issues of traffic and pedestrian safety, as the parking spaces are sized for cars only.
Should Galway Harbour Company wish to facilitate motorhome users at their site, then they are within their rights to consider their options with regard to seeking appropriate planning permission for the area in question.
Yours sincerely,
Peter Staunton
Assistant Planner / Enforcement Officer

PURE RUBBISH

Motor caravans are in the same vehicle category as cars, hearses, ambulances, wheelchair accessible vehicles and disabled persons vehicles, see HERE

Unless motor caravans were specifically excluded as a condition of planning when permission was granted for parking vehicles then there is now no grounds to prohibit them. The fact that the planning application was for 'car parking' does not mean that vehicles other than cars may not use the facility as in such contexts the use of the word car has the meaning of vehicle.
Furthermore the word car, it is in fact an abbreviation of carriage and has different meanings in different contexts. It has no legal standing which is why when motoring related prosecutions are being perused the description vehicle or motor vehicle is always used.

Additionally, seeking to single out motor caravans from other M1 Special Purpose Vehicles for different treatment would need to be very carefully thought out and good reason put forward if a charge of unjustified discrimination is to be avoided.

If certain areas of a parking place are proven to be unsuitable for larger vehicles any controls necessary should be based on vehicle size not category. In such circumstances an appropriate area suitable for larger vehicles should be identified and reserved for such vehicles.

Galway City Council has an obligation to provide adequate parking facilities for vehicles of all sizes and weights which arrive within their jurisdiction which are legally entitled to use the road, failure to do so could compromise any prosecution for parking or standing such a vehicle within the area unless clear indication of such status quo is signposted on all approach roads to the city.

Malta1 · 17-10-2014 9:40am

niloc1951 wrote: »

PURE RUBBISH

Motor caravans are in the same vehicle category as cars, hearses, ambulances, wheelchair accessible vehicles and disabled persons vehicles, see HERE

Unless motor caravans were specifically excluded as a condition of planning when permission was granted for parking vehicles then there is now no grounds to prohibit them. The fact that the planning application was for 'car parking' does not mean that vehicles other than cars may not use the facility as in such contexts the use of the word car has the meaning of vehicle.
Furthermore the word car, it is in fact an abbreviation of carriage and has different meanings in different contexts. It has no legal standing which is why when motoring related prosecutions are being perused the description vehicle or motor vehicle is always used.

Additionally, seeking to single out motor caravans from other M1 Special Purpose Vehicles for different treatment would need to be very carefully thought out and good reason put forward if a charge of unjustified discrimination is to be avoided.

If certain areas of a parking place are proven to be unsuitable for larger vehicles any controls necessary should be based on vehicle size not category. In such circumstances an appropriate area suitable for larger vehicles should be identified and reserved for such vehicles.

Galway City Council has an obligation to provide adequate parking facilities for vehicles of all sizes and weights which arrive within their jurisdiction which are legally entitled to use the road, failure to do so could compromise any prosecution for parking or standing such a vehicle within the area unless clear indication of such status quo is signposted on all approach roads to the city.

Very well put - thank you

My question to the group is how do we make the authorities see the error of their ways - can anybody draft up a "standard" letter which is detailed and accurate in its legal argument which we all should send to the "powers that be"? From memory, this is how we handled the DOE issue

niloc1951 · 17-10-2014 11:41am

Have been studying the implications of the following statement by Peter Staunton Assistant Planner / Enforcement Officer:
The parking of motorhomes at this location represents a change in the authorised use of the land, from temporary car parking use permitted under PI. Ref. 12/67 (permitted until 26/06/2018), to a motorhome parking use

Planning application Ref. 12/67 was granted with six condition attached.
Condition number 5 states clearly This permission relates to the use of the land for parking purposes only
None of the six conditions refer to the category of vehicle which may or may not park there.
Once the offering from The Galway Harbour Company is confined to parking and no other services are offered at the area subject to permission Ref. 12/67 there would appear to be no valid grounds to prevent the parking of any category of vehicle on the site.

It would be interesting if Mr Staunton would elaborate on how he views the parking of a motorhome for a time bound period as not temporary. He should also understand that motor caravans share the same vehicle category as cars by EU Directive.

Mr Staunton goes on to say "The parking of motor homes at this location also gives rise to issues of traffic and pedestrian safety, as the parking spaces are sized for cars only."
If vehicle size is a problem then that needs to be addressed in that context and not in the context of vehicle category.
It should be known to Mr Staunton that there are many motor caravans of a size similar to other passenger vehicles and light goods vehicles and which will fit within a space lined for cars.
Having regard to the above it therefore appears that the current action is exclusively against motorhomes for undisclosed reasons with the planning and size issues being nothing but unsubstantiatable excuses.

Irishgoatman · 17-10-2014 12:23pm

niloc1951 wrote: »

Have been studying the implications of the following statement by Peter Staunton Assistant Planner / Enforcement Officer:
The parking of motorhomes at this location represents a change in the authorised use of the land, from temporary car parking use permitted under PI. Ref. 12/67 (permitted until 26/06/2018), to a motorhome parking use

Planning application Ref. 12/67 was granted with six condition attached.
Condition number 5 states clearly This permission relates to the use of the land for parking purposes only
None of the six conditions refer to the category of vehicle which may or may not park there.
Once the offering from The Galway Harbour Company is confined to parking and no other services are offered at the area subject to permission Ref. 12/67 there would appear to be no valid grounds to prevent the parking of any category of vehicle on the site.

It would be interesting if Mr Staunton would elaborate on how he views the parking of a motorhome for a time bound period as not temporary. He should also understand that motor caravans share the same vehicle category as cars by EU Directive.

Mr Staunton goes on to say "The parking of motor homes at this location also gives rise to issues of traffic and pedestrian safety, as the parking spaces are sized for cars only."
If vehicle size is a problem then that needs to be addressed in that context and not in the context of vehicle category.
It should be known to Mr Staunton that there are many motor caravans of a size similar to other passenger vehicles and light goods vehicles and which will fit within a space lined for cars.
Having regard to the above it therefore appears that the current action is exclusively against motorhomes for undisclosed reasons with the planning and size issues being nothing but unsubstantiatable excuses.

It appears to me that Mr Staunton is getting confused. In his letter he refers to "...tempory car parking.." meaning, I assume, a limited amount of time that a vehicle can park there, yet in the file that you, niloc, have attached it is quite clear that the word "temporary" refers to the granting of change of use of the land not to the length of time a vehicle can park. There is a world of difference between "tempory car parking" and "a temporary car park".

Leaving that aside, where do I and others with small MH's stand?. If it's all about the size of the parking spaces, my vehicle is a fraction shorter and narrower than a large BMW!!!!!.

If it actually does come down to the parking of large vehicles being a danger, and as I said earlier, I've never taken any real notice of what the area looks like, then that's a different matter. Perhaps someone has a 'photo of the area?.

And by the way, I got the same response from the Harbour board as the earlier poster.

killalanerr · 17-10-2014 9:08pm

It would seem that ultimately this is a issue between the city council and the port authority . One would wonder if the port authorities would wish to question the councils decision considering the small gain that they get from motorhome parking .

the shelly · 17-10-2014 10:22pm

moodrater wrote: »

Is that where the designated spaces were?

So disappointed that this ban in place. I love Galway just don't like their attitude... They really don't like Motorhomes do they. I think at this stage they are all trying to run motorhome out of the country.. So its looks like foreign for me as it doesn't seem that hard find a place to stay over night in France for example.. Loads of aires.. I think its time that motorhome owners take a stand to this.. Even though things seem to come along nicely for us motorhomers.. Then boom this happens. What harm are we doing..
.

CJhaughey · 17-10-2014 10:50pm

the shelly wrote: »

So disappointed that this ban in place. I love Galway just don't like their attitude... They really don't like Motorhomes do they. I think at this stage they are all trying to run motorhome out of the country.. So its looks like foreign for me as it doesn't seem that hard find a place to stay over night in France for example.. Loads of aires.. I think its time that motorhome owners take a stand to this.. Even though things seem to come along nicely for us motorhomers.. Then boom this happens. What harm are we doing..
.

Its only small minded shíte, either they have had complaints from the hotel next door.
Just don't take it, write to the planning dept and ask about this.
The more people lie down the less they will be respected.

campingcarist · 18-10-2014 5:43pm

Irishgoatman wrote: »

It appears to me that Mr Staunton is getting confused. In his letter he refers to "...tempory car parking.." meaning, I assume, a limited amount of time .....

.....
If it actually does come down to the parking of large vehicles being a danger, and as I said earlier, I've never taken any real notice of what the area looks like, then that's a different matter. Perhaps someone has a 'photo of the area?.

And by the way, I got the same response from the Harbour board as the earlier poster.

A parked vehicle the size of the majority of motorhomes are no more dangerous in a car park than any other parked vehicle.

*Kol* · 18-10-2014 5:59pm

campingcarist wrote: »

A parked vehicle the size of the majority of motorhomes are no more dangerous in a car park than any other parked vehicle.

It's not a car park. It's right on the side of the road. I can see where long vehicles could be an issue if they were protruding out onto the road.

Irishgoatman · 18-10-2014 8:31pm

campingcarist wrote: »

A parked vehicle the size of the majority of motorhomes are no more dangerous in a car park than any other parked vehicle.

But the point I was making was that I do not know what kind of parking is in place, parallel or nose in to kerb etc. I did know that it wasn't a car park.

*Kol* has now answered it for me. Ta.

gozunda · 18-10-2014 9:08pm

Malta1 wrote: »

Is this a case of "Dungarvanitis" spreading country wide??

Interesting Link here

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/demands-for-ban-oncamper-van-parking-288036.html

*Kol* · 18-10-2014 9:16pm

Irishgoatman wrote: »

But the point I was making was that I do not know what kind of parking is in place, parallel or nose in to kerb etc. I did know that it wasn't a car park.

*Kol* has now answered it for me. Ta.

This is it (hope the link works from my phone)

niloc1951 · 18-10-2014 9:34pm

Irishgoatman wrote: »

But the point I was making was that I do not know what kind of parking is in place, parallel or nose in to kerb etc. I did know that it wasn't a car park.

*Kol* has now answered it for me. Ta.

Its planning permission states it's an area of land on which parking is permitted.
If it is kerb side parking on a public road it would not need planning permission.

It is in fact a development on premises (operated by The Galway Harbour Company) to be used as off-street parking otherwise it would not have needed planning permission in the first place.

It should also be noted that the grant of permission does not contain any references to category, weight or size of vehicle which may use the facility.
The fact that it is referred to as a car-park carries no meaning that its use is restricted to cars, as is the case when the term car is applied to such things as car-ferries, car-ports, car-wash, etc., etc..

Irishgoatman · 19-10-2014 1:59pm

niloc1951 wrote: »

Its planning permission states it's an area of land on which parking is permitted.
If it is kerb side parking on a public road it would not need planning permission.

It is in fact a development on premises (operated by The Galway Harbour Company) to be used as off-street parking otherwise it would not have needed planning permission in the first place.

It should also be noted that the grant of permission does not contain any references to category, weight or size of vehicle which may use the facility.
The fact that it is referred to as a car-park carries no meaning that its use is restricted to cars, as is the case when the term car is applied to such things as car-ferries, car-ports, car-wash, etc., etc..

Sorry niloc but most of the above is irrelevant to this discussion.

Now I'm even more confused!. Kol's picture clearly shows that it is not off street parking, I know many towns here in Mayo where we park in the main street in exactly the same way. Nose/tail first and no way would it be referred to as off street parking.

Any large vehicle, be it MH or a lorry, could easily obstruct either the road or the foot path along side the dock. The obvious question, in my mind, is who owns Dock Street?, the council or the Harbour Board?. If it's the council then the Harbour Board surely could not have been granted permission to put in parking places, that would have been down to the council. If it's the Harbour Board then it is not a change of use because it's still being used by vehicles, albeit some of them are not moving.

Does the strip of land where the parking spaces are belong to the Harbour Board? if so I assume they must also own the footpath, so they could narrow the footpath a little thus giving more room for MH's to park without obstructing the road if that's owned by the council.

Please let me know if I'm missing something.

zambo · 19-10-2014 7:23pm

It looks to me as though the strip of land next the dock may be the Galway version of the campshires in Dublin i.e. the area used for loading and unloading vessels and as such part of the port area.However that does not mean the harbour board would own the roadway.
It is a great pity that they wish to ban us using this space at night when some of the other potential users are likely to be somewhat anti-social,they are passing up the chance of having people on site who have the best interest of the area in mind.

*Kol* · 19-10-2014 8:04pm

zambo wrote: »

It looks to me as though the strip of land next the dock may be the Galway version of the campshires in Dublin i.e. the area used for loading and unloading vessels and as such part of the port area.However that does not mean the harbour board would own the roadway.
It is a great pity that they wish to ban us using this space at night when some of the other potential users are likely to be somewhat anti-social,they are passing up the chance of having people on site who have the best interest of the area in mind.

The way the sign is worded it looks like they don't want campervan parking day or night. I have come across beachfront in France with signs like this (as far as I recall Carnac Plage was one of them).

To be honest f I parked the MH there front in, it would protrude out onto the road, back in it would obstruct the path. Either way a bit careless and inconsiderate for road or path users. I would personally prefer not to park there in that case and certainly wouldn't stay there overnight.

For vehicles that fit within the dimensions of the spaces I would see no problem allowing those to park there.

niloc1951 · 19-10-2014 8:04pm

Irishgoatman wrote: »

Sorry niloc but most of the above is irrelevant to this discussion.

Now I'm even more confused!. Kol's picture clearly shows that it is not off street parking, I know many towns here in Mayo where we park in the main street in exactly the same way. Nose/tail first and no way would it be referred to as off street parking.

Any large vehicle, be it MH or a lorry, could easily obstruct either the road or the foot path along side the dock. The obvious question, in my mind, is who owns Dock Street?, the council or the Harbour Board?. If it's the council then the Harbour Board surely could not have been granted permission to put in parking places, that would have been down to the council. If it's the Harbour Board then it is not a change of use because it's still being used by vehicles, albeit some of them are not moving.

Does the strip of land where the parking spaces are belong to the Harbour Board? if so I assume they must also own the footpath, so they could narrow the footpath a little thus giving more room for MH's to park without obstructing the road if that's owned by the council.

Please let me know if I'm missing something.

What is relevant is the fact that the parking of motorhomes has been stopped because The Galway Harbour Company were advised by Galway City Council Planning Department that they were in contravention of the planning permission granted for the facility.

Therefore the issue of the layout of the parking is irrelevant, the place may look like a public street/road but is obviously not, otherwise it would be under the direct control of Galway City Council.

The signs prohibiting motorhome parking have been erected by The Galway Harbour Company at the insistence of Galway City Council. Again this action points to the fact that the area is not under the direct control Galway City Council and is within the premises of The Galway Harbour Company..

niloc1951 · 19-10-2014 8:15pm

*Kol* wrote: »

.................... I have come across beachfront in France with signs like this (as far as I recall Carnac Plage was one of them). ................................

So have I,BUT you will find parking provided elsewhere in the vicinity.

See HERE and HERE

*Kol* · 19-10-2014 8:31pm

niloc1951 wrote: »

So have I,BUT you will find parking provided elsewhere in the vicinity.

See HERE and HERE

In context my comment related to the fact that parking appeared to be prohibited day or night (you omitted that part). Alternative overnight parking is not relevant as there is no obligation for it to be provided. In regard to daytime parking I am sure it is available elsewhere in the city.

Irishgoatman · 19-10-2014 10:41pm

niloc1951 wrote: »

What is relevant is the fact that the parking of motorhomes has been stopped because The Galway Harbour Company were advised by Galway City Council Planning Department that they were in contravention of the planning permission granted for the facility.

Therefore the issue of the layout of the parking is irrelevant, the place may look like a public street/road but is obviously not, otherwise it would be under the direct control of Galway City Council.

The signs prohibiting motorhome parking have been erected by The Galway Harbour Company at the insistence of Galway City Council. Again this action points to the fact that the area is not under the direct control Galway City Council and is within the premises of The Galway Harbour Company..

Sorry niloc but, for once & me and thee usually see eye to eye, I can't follow your logic. You said in an earlier post that MH's and cars come under the same catergory so how could the Harbour Board have contravened planning for car parking other than the safety aspect?. If the Council do not own the road then the harbour Board could alter the road markings to make the road a little narrower.

Many years ago, in the U.K., I on a daily basis, along with hundreds of other motorists, used a road that went through an army base. Although it was fully open to the public and maintained by the council, once a year the Military had to post a checkpoint on the road to inform traffic that they were on a private road. The only say that the Council had was that the public be allowed to use it. Nothing more.

Should have added to the above that one year there was chaos because the soldiers on checkpoint duty were not told that they couldn't stop people using the road. I was over 30 minutes late to work that morning!!!.

It really comes down, as I said/asked earlier, to who actually owns the road?.

niloc1951 · 19-10-2014 11:18pm

*Kol* wrote: »

In context my comment related to the fact that parking appeared to be prohibited day or night (you omitted that part). Alternative overnight parking is not relevant as there is no obligation for it to be provided. In regard to daytime parking I am sure it is available elsewhere in the city.

Of course it's relevant, off-street overnight parking is a common requirement for vehicles of any and every category, be they buses, coaches, HGV's, cars or whatever and of course there is an obligation on local authorities to provide it. If such parking was not provided there would be a situation where vehicles would be required to be driven around all night or park kerb-side on a street or housing estate.
Such an option is not always an environmentally friendly one for certain vehicles. Who wants a freezer unit, coach or box-van parked outside their door all night, or a motorhome for that matter. One can be fairly confident that residents so effected would beat a path to their local council office to lodge a complaint.
Then there is the width issue for such vehicles, being in the region of a half a meter wider than a car can cause its own problems if parallel parked on the average urban street.

However, if there is no off-street parking provided at all that's a different story and obviously the above is irrelevant.

The real issue is that there is clear discrimination against the drivers of motorhomes when their vehicles are singled out for the ludicrous special treatment of being denied access to off-street overnight parking throughput a whole municipality or council area as in the current situation in the City of Galway.

As a matter of interest, do you not expect that overnight parking is provided for you if you are away from your own home in your own car or whatever vehicle you may be driving, and would you not prefer it to be in the relative safety of an off-street parking area as opposed to kerb-side where your vehicle is more exposed to vandalism from passers by or damage from careless drivers.

*Kol* · 20-10-2014 12:36am

niloc1951 wrote: »

Of course it's relevant, off-street overnight parking is a common requirement for vehicles of any and every category, be they buses, coaches, HGV's, cars or whatever and of course there is an obligation on local authorities to provide it. If such parking was not provided there would be a situation where vehicles would be required to be driven around all night or park kerb-side on a street or housing estate.
Such an option is not always an environmentally friendly one for certain vehicles. Who wants a freezer unit, coach or box-van parked outside their door all night, or a motorhome for that matter. One can be fairly confident that residents so effected would beat a path to their local council office to lodge a complaint.
Then there is the width issue for such vehicles, being in the region of a half a meter wider than a car can cause its own problems if parallel parked on the average urban street.

However, if there is no off-street parking provided at all that's a different story and obviously the above is irrelevant.

The real issue is that there is clear discrimination against the drivers of motorhomes when their vehicles are singled out for the ludicrous special treatment of being denied access to off-street overnight parking throughput a whole municipality or council area as in the current situation in the City of Galway.

As a matter of interest, do you not expect that overnight parking is provided for you if you are away from your own home in your own car or whatever vehicle you may be driving, and would you not prefer it to be in the relative safety of an off-street parking area as opposed to kerb-side where your vehicle is more exposed to vandalism from passers by or damage from careless drivers.

Overnight parking whether off street or not may be a requirement but there is no obligation for this to be provided. I hope you are being tongue in cheek when you say that HGV and bus drivers may drive around all night in the absence of overnight parking being provided for them? There is nowhere in any city that you won't find a space at night for a bus or a HGV or car for free. Yes it would be preferable to have off street parking but it's not always available.

When I go away there is normally parking available off street. I am trying to think of an instance where I couldn't get satisfactory car parking but I cannot. To be honest your car would be safer on the street than in some of the off street obstacle course car parks that are around these days. Between narrow spaces, concrete pillars and narrow manouvering space you are more likely to get your car damaged than out on the street. Plus the guy who is supposed to be looking after the cars at night is probably too busy posting on boards than watching the security camera screens!!!

Don't get me wrong. I do see your frustration regarding the lack overnight parking for MH's around the country in general. Hopefully this will be addressed in the not too distant future.

niloc1951 · 22-10-2014 3:40pm

The situation at The Galway Harbour Company's parking area was discussed on Galway Bay FM during The Keith Finnegan Show this morning, it's 00:18:05 into the recording.

piuswal · 23-10-2014 2:09am

niloc1951 wrote: »

The situation at The Galway Harbour Company's parking area was discussed on Galway Bay FM during The Keith Finnegan Show this morning, it's 00:18:05 into the recording.

Just listened to Phoenix Motorhome representative discuss the issue re Galway.

Any chance he might get on Waterford Local Radio to discuss the issue in Dungarvan?

The question was asked as to what or who prompted the "Planning" authorities to take such a keen interest in the Docks. Has that question been asked directly of the authorities? Would they respond? Would it be worth making some enquiries under FOI, or is that possible?

Has anyone contacted Damien Geoghegan, chairman of Waterford Council and if so have they got a response? The November meeting cannot be too far away.

shruikan2553 · 23-10-2014 2:31am

It is a bit odd. I see the area daily and they were never an issue. Now the place hardly has anyone in it so I would guess the owners aren't happy about the loss of revenue.

*Kol* · 23-10-2014 8:47am

shruikan2553 wrote: »

It is a bit odd. I see the area daily and they were never an issue. Now the place hardly has anyone in it so I would guess the owners aren't happy about the loss of revenue.

I doubt the loss of revenue is significant. How many spaces were there?

niloc1951 · 23-10-2014 9:34am

*Kol* wrote: »

I doubt the loss of revenue is significant. How many spaces were there?

It's not so much the loss of revenue from the parking fee but the loss to local businesses.
The tourists who stayed there undoubtedly patronised local restaurants, bars and shops. Surveys have shown that tourists who travel by motorhome spend an average of €28 per person daily in the local retail/pub/restaurant economy of where they overnight.

It's for the above reason that so many villages/towns/cities on The Continent, and a few here in Ireland, provide the parking for free.

niloc1951 · 23-10-2014 9:41am

piuswal wrote: »

...................................................Has anyone contacted Damien Geoghegan, chairman of Waterford Council and if so have they got a response? The November meeting cannot be too far away.

I believe that Cllr Geoghegan, who is the Chair of the council area in question has facilitated a meeting with representatives of The Phoenix Motorhome Club at the councils November meeting.
I also believe that The Phoenix Motorhome Club will be giving a presentation to the meeting on the benefits of providing official regulated parking for motorhomes and the economic benefits which can flow from such a venture.

piuswal · 23-10-2014 11:14am

shruikan2553 wrote: »

It is a bit odd. I see the area daily and they were never an issue. Now the place hardly has anyone in it so I would guess the owners aren't happy about the loss of revenue.

Nothing is odd when it comes to bureaucrats following the rules and regulations for whatever reason.

The radio interview referred to the fact that some railing was put around the dock for the Volvo Race, how long ago was that?

Presumably it was for crowd control and safety. The radio presenter said there were no fatal accidents -that's my recollection but it may not be precise but I'm sure you get the meaning - since it went up but it must now come down because it does not have the proper planning permission. Something about blocking the view, of whom one might ask?

It was also said that any ships there tower over the railings.

The mentality displayed reminds me of the post WW2 story of a NAZI due for execution next morning; he was a smoker and was asked if he would like a last smoke. On refusing he was asked why. He pointed to the sign in the corridor "Nicht Rauchen"..

So, the railing will taken down, someone will drive into the water and drown, but that's alright, the railing didn't have the proper planning permission.

A long winded story just to remind people of the mentality of some bureaucrats and politicians that one may have to deal with concerning the parking of motor homes.

I've already mentioned that Councillor Geoghegan has said the matter has to be dealt with centrally!!!!!!!

Morgan The Moon · 23-10-2014 6:36pm

This whole aspect needs sensible authoritative research. Many "stelplatz" have huge description signs detailing the cost of the development of the facility. Many have European Funding Assistance to part pay for the project. The stellplatz at "Hitzacker" on the Elbe river does not charge an overnight fee. It is not allowed to because EU Funds were used to develop the site. Motorcaravan users pay for water and electricity if they need it. Grey water and Chemical Toilet emptying is free.

Does anyone have direct access to Luke "Ming" Flanagan.

Within the EU parliament there is a body with direct access to ADAC. They make representations for thousands of Motorcaravan owners. It is my belief and experience that every council or town must have a solution for motorcaravan users to be accommodated.

Unfortunately that can mean that motorcaravans are directed to campsites.

But if no campsite is available or not accessible, ie it is closed the authorities, if they have not a usable solution, would not be able to "move along" or issue a fine etc if a motorhome is legally parked for a period of 24 hrs. Many villages and small towns use this as the reasoning for being considered for EU assistance in developing "Aires" "Stelplatz" "Sostas" or what ever we want to call them. Can someone come up with a good Irish Name,for such a facility. The Funding might come flooding in if the councillors approach this as a necessity to comply with an EU directive. I will try and research as much info as possible and post the results. I will dig out some pics showing the signage, They may be useful in trying to educate the councillors and objectors.

niloc1951 · 23-10-2014 9:17pm

Morgan The Moon wrote: »

.................................................... Can someone come up with a good Irish Name,for such a facility. ..................................

Limistéar Páirceála le Thithe Mótair
or what about
Páirceála Bhaile Mótair

Hopefully someone who is a native Irish speaker will come along and give us a proper translation for Parking Area for Motorhomes or Motorhome Parking Area which ever reads easiest as Gaeilge.

Des32 · 24-10-2014 9:31am

They could be called "fáilte"

campingcarist · 24-10-2014 3:13pm

niloc1951 wrote: »

Limistéar Páirceála le Thithe Mótair
or what about
Páirceála Bhaile Mótair

Hopefully someone who is a native Irish speaker will come along and give us a proper translation for Parking Area for Motorhomes or Motorhome Parking Area which ever reads easiest as Gaeilge.

Is that just your literal translation or the correct gaelige for a Motorhome?

Galway Harbour Company has banned Motorhome Parking

Comments