Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

UPC ordered to implement 3 strikes rule....

  • 27-03-2015 8:57pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭


    .... for illegal music downloading.

    RTE Link
    Mr Justice Brian Cregan granted three music companies an injunction requiring UPC Communications to move against its subscribers involved in internet piracy.

    The Irish companies of Sony Music, Warner Music and Universal Music sought the orders.
    ......
    Under the court's order, UPC must set up a computerised detection system within 12-15 months under which infringing subscribers are told their service will be terminated unless they stop the illegal downloading.

    Under this automated software programme, UPC would receive monthly internet protocol (IP) information from the music companies.

    It would then automatically search UPC's computer architecture to locate the relevant subscriber name and address.

    I find it hard to argue against this, but there must be a dozen ways to get around it, so how effective will it be?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11 oisinaodh


    Peppa Pig wrote: »
    I find it hard to argue against this

    Really ? Are you off your meds ? Or have you been living under a rock for the past decade? You see no problem with people being denied a fundamental human right (d'apres the UN and European Parliament) based solely on the unproven ALLEGATIONS of a commercial entity ? As it appears to have escaped your notice, the very reason that the copyright cartels have been lobbying for this type of Kangaroo court is precisely because they know that the type of 'evidence' of wrong-doing they intend to collect will never stand up in court. So their solution: we'll just have to take due process out of the equation. And you see no problem with this ? I find it particularly bizzare that any member of the legal profession (such as a judge) would not take gross offence to this blatent attempt to short circuit the legal process. Does anyone know anything about Cregan's track record ? Is he simply an imbicile or is he in bed with the media cartels ?

    Usjes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,983 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    apparently eircom have never cut anybody off 5 years into their 3 strikes system


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Peppa Pig


    oisinaodh wrote: »
    Really ? Are you off your meds ? Or have you been living under a rock for the past decade?
    No - I'm not off my meds and I have been living in normal society since I was born,

    I find it hard to argue against music companies trying to prevent illegal downloading. Same as I would find it hard to argue against a shopkeeper trying to prevent shoplifting.

    Using your logic nobody should be prevented from visiting child porn sites as we have a "human right" :rolleyes: to do what we want online. I (thankfully) don't hear any complaints about ISPs blocking access to those.
    apparently eircom have never cut anybody off 5 years into their 3 strikes system
    Which is why I am saying it will not be effective


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,850 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    Look, while this is in a very interesting decision from a number of angles, regular Boards users will know that there is now a site-wide policy that any case currently before the courts cannot now be discussed here and it applies as much to civil cases as it does to criminal cases. When the case is finished I will re-open this thread.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement