The story of original sin doesn't make sense.

qualitee wrote: »

From what I understand from the story of the garden of eden, Man was created in the garden essentially as a perfect being, without sin. But also created without the knowledge of good and evil (being that when he eats the fruit from the tree of knowledge, he suddenly gains the knowledge that he has sinned).

How then can you blame Adam or Eve for eating from the tree even if they were directly told not to?

Being created without the knowledge of good and evil they are essentially robots without right and wrong programming. If they do something wrong it doesn't make the robot evil, it just means they don't know the difference between right and wrong. Until you give it the right programming (they eat the fruit) you can't essentially blame them for doing wrong things because they don't know the difference. To them its just another option.

So if you wouldn't blame the robot without the programming why blame the man in the same position?

How could he have truly committed original sin if he had no idea what he was doing was wrong untill he did it?

But they did know that if they ate of it then they would surely die. They did not know what “to die” meant. They had life eternal; death was as abstract to them as eternal life is to us today. They knew very well that God said No to this one tree. They didn’t know good and evil but they knew that. Is knowing that you’re not supposed to do something in and of itself good or evil? No, its just knowledge that if you do it you will die, which as already pointed out they did not know anyhting about yet either.

But anyway let us assume that the story is indeed true (and I do believe it is but so what). If we assume it is true then put yourself in God’s position if you can. You are God and you create things by merely speaking. What you say becomes fact, this is the kind of power that you have. So you speak the universe into existence, you speak the earth and the fullness thereof into existence and you also speak Adam and Eve into existence. All your curses and blessings come via your Word and you are faithful to it even to your own hurt. You then speak to them saying that of all the trees in the garden you may eat but of the tree of the knowledge of good an evil you may not eat for in the day that you eat you shall surely die. So at this point Adam and Eve have not yet the knowledge of good and evil but they have life eternal, this tells us that the knowledge of good an evil is not essential to having eternal life. So along comes the devil and says to Eve, “did God really say that you would die if you eat of the tree?” She said “yes He did say that.” He then says “you won’t die, in fact if you eat of it then you will be like God”. So we have God saying one thing and the devil saying another. Like I already pointed out above, to Adam and Eve death was as abstract to them then as eternal life is to us today, they didn’t know what death was but God did speak of it and told them how it would come. It had not yet entered the world though. It could only enter the world if they did what God said would cause it. Namely to eat of the tree. This they did by believing what the devil said and not what God said. Now as creator you have the right to lay down the terms and conditions to your creation don’t you? Which said terms and conditions were simple: “Eat = die” Don’t eat = live” you don’t even need to be in kindergarten to understand that. You gave them everything but held back that one little tree. This tree became the most attractive tree because it was God’s no no tree. If you read the record you’ll see that the devil actually found Eve looking at it when he lied to her. She in turn tempted Adam and he also ate. Simply put they believed the devil and disbelieved God.

Now for God to be faithful to His Word they must now die which they started to do when you banished them from the Garden. (Eden by the way means “Heart of God”) So, you are God and you are the source of all life and you are also faithful to your Word. They have been banished from you the source of all life and are thus alienated and are dying. So you now have a problem. You do not want Adam and his descendants to die eternally so you put into affect your fail safe system whereby you can break down the barrier that has been put up and still be faithful to your word, which is what unfolds if you read the record right through to the New Testament. The first thing God did for them when they were banished was to clothe their nakedness with the skins of an animal. This is the very first type of Christ in the Bible and from here the revelation proceeds right up to the fulfilment of these types from Jacob’s Stone through the Tabernacle and the ark of the covenant and all the feast days as outlined in Numbers 23 including the feats of Passover. Christ was the fulfilment of them all even if there are 3 left to be fulfilled which shall be fulfilled in their time.

Anyway the scene is like this. God is in heaven with all his angels. One of them (Lucifer) rebels and a third of heaven’s angels go with him. They are cast out and there is now a void in heaven. God wants to fill the void and creates Adam from the dust of the earth for this very purpose but after the effect of the first vile rebellion in heaven God places a test tree. He wants “trusters” in what He says now, no more con artist which Lucifer revealed himself to be. All they have to do is believe what He (God) says and act on it, the action in this case is not to eat the fruit of the no no tree. They failed but there was a fail safe plan in place for fallen Adam that was not there for fallen angels, namely the Lamb that was slain from the foundation of the earth. Apparently their (Lucifer et all) rebellion was so vile that it turned God off on them forever, but not so for Adam and his descendants. God goes to work to redeem Adam’s descendants and postpones their deaths giving them a natural death as the life they had been given waned. A day with the Lord is as a thousand years an thousand years is as a day, if you read the genealogies of the antediluvian descendants of Adam you’ll notice that none of them lived up to or longer than a thousand years so in a sense in the day they ate they surely did die but not forever only a natural death. From then till now God has been looking for people who will believe what He says, who act on His Word, who trust Him. It is these people who will fill the void left by Satan and his angels and who will inherit eternal life. But because of Adam’s sin Satan has access back to the heavens by default, any power Adam had defaulted to Satan when Adam sinned. Satan is there in heaven to accuse Job and he was there to accuse Joshua the High Priest in Zachariah’s vision and is still there today to accuse all of us before God. Jesus comes and breaks down the barrier put up by Adam’s sin by taking the punishment Adam was to get on Himself. He (Jesus) is now seated (seated being a work finished picture) at the right hand of God making intercession for us. It is He whom God points to when the devil accuses us now. He is our advocate with the father. No longer are we seen as sinners if we just trust in God’s Word. When you have faith in God’s Word you are covered by Christ sacrifice just like the children of Israel were spared death when they put the blood of the lamb on their doors and their lintels. The death angel passed over their house from whence that feast get its name. Christ is our Passover lamb and lives forever and it is He whom we shall rule and reign with in the Kingdom of God forever.

That is of course if Jesus actually rose from the dead as a fact of History. It’s all balderdash if He didn’t.

Wacker wrote: »

If Adam and Eve had eternal life in the Garden of Eden, but they faced expulsion once they ate the fruit of the forbidden tree (i.e. they will be there until they ate from the tree, even if it takes a billion years), then isn't in ineivitable that they would eat from the tree?

No. Why would it be inevitable? Maybe you are speaking on behalf of yourself, but that doesn't mean we'd all do it.

I mean, by my understanding is that there was no other way for them to leave the Garden of Eden, regardless of the time involved. Sounds like a raw deal to me.

I don't think there is a definitive explaination of the Adam and Eve story around. It certainly reads like a very brief explaination. However, the important detail is what God was revealing, i.e. Adam was a perfect man, he sinned, and through sin death entered the world and someone just as perfect will be required to pay that debt, which leads us to Christ. There may be symbolism etc in the story, I'm not sure, but the message which we are given in the Adam and Eve account is enough to know what we need to know.

the dee wrote: »

It wouldn't have been 'free will proper' before the fall. The only way it makes sense is the god wanted us to fall in order to have the opporunity to think for ourselves. Is mortality all that bad? Would you rather live forever in a state of mindless ignorance? I also don't think hell makes any sense but that's an argument for another day. I was just god's way of making us choose - thus introducing real choice into the world. If you lived forever would your choices really matter?

Aren't we supposed to be rewarded in heaven with eternal life, eternal bliss and no more pain or suffering (no sin)

So if you wouldn't like to live in a state of mindless ignorance then why would you aspire to go to heaven?

Blue_Lagoon wrote: »

I would think that the larger question would be, by eating from the tree of knowledge, to what extent did this provide (wo)man with an enlarged source of free will?

For arguments sake, lets assume I actually believe in the literal creation story. There is no reason to assume or free will was in any way altered after eating the forbidden fruit.

Wicknight wrote:

yes it does.

No it doesn't

Wicknight wrote: »

Groan ... ok lets go over this again.

There is a time line, with the present at A, and some point in the future at B.

At point B in the future you will have the choice to steal a chocolate bar or to not steal a chocolate bar.

Right now, at point A you have not stolen the chocolate bar.

God knows the outcome of point B. It is that you steal the chocolate bar, a sin.

So the present moves on and reaches point B.

You now have a choice, do you or do you not steal that chocolate bar.

You think about it, you consider it, and you decide not to steal it.

But wait. You can't decide not to steal it, because God has already seen you steal it. The time line is fixed, you stole the chocolate bar a week ago, you stole it 10 years ago, you stole it before you were born. The outcome of the choice you make will and can only be that you steal the chocolate bar

But if you already stole it then what choice are you actually making at point B in the time line?

I don't understand your logic. You seem to be stating that if there was no God, yet you travelled along the same path - stealing the bar in the process - your choice somehow becomes a matter of free will, where as God knowing what you were about to do somehow makes free will an impossibility. Why? Do you believe that if you could go back in time you would decide not to steal the bar?

I made a concious effort to ignore that thread.

JoeBallantine wrote: »

God really comes across as fairly stupid for an omnipotent being.

After all, all he had to do was use his foresight and not put any appes on the tree, and not create the devil.. and simply create heaven and put robots in it.

And then bemoan his own boring immortal cursed existence and wonder about his own creation and where he came from. And then finally taking the only logical step of attempting to commit suicide.

Is god omnipotent enough that he could commit suicide?

(omnipotence is such a silly concept)