Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sinn Fein to meet the Queen

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    no, i dont know how clearer i can be but ill have a go. after may 2011 with the success of both visits (queen elizabeths/obamas). fine gael and labour both gained popularity, sinn fein lost popularity which im guessing was to do with the way they acted during the visits, plus all i could see was scumbags out at there protesting on there behalf, it certainly wasnt decent people!! anyway, its been over a year since then and what im trying to explain to you is that its obvious to me why sinn fein are gaining popularity because there in opposition and make believe land. they have no clear cut plan. its not hard for an opposition party to gain popularity in a recession!!!!!!!!!


    You've provided no evidence to back your claim re a drop in support linked to that specific event.

    Your video and remarks above refer to protests "organised" by groups with no affiliation to Sinn Fein, as pointed out by a number of posters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭guinnessdrinker


    Nodin wrote: »
    You've provided no evidence to back your claim re a drop in support linked to that specific event.

    Your video and remarks above refer to protests "organised" by groups with no affiliation to Sinn Fein, as pointed out by a number of posters.

    In fairness to man.about.town I have seen this type of thing many times before - whereby either through confusion, ignorance or plain opportunism a person tries to associate the actions of splinter or dissident supporters with SF.

    The fact that these groups despise SF does not seem to occur to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    realies wrote: »
    That's only at soccer matches :) Even though FF still calls its self the republican party, Most people imo when talking/writing about Republicans in Ireland are more than likely talking about SF/IRA/RIRA etc



    Generally when it comes to Irish politics (or American :D) when people identify themselves as Republicans, it means a lot more than their just believing in a republic

    Dissident republicans lob grenade into labor relations meeting when.. teaparty member Mr Bloggs described Republican Governor A.N.Other as a "thundering disgrace"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,483 ✭✭✭Fenian Army


    fwiw FF got rid of that official sub-title a few years back (though they still believe it of themselves).

    Generally when it comes to Irish politics (or American :D) when people identify themselves as Republicans, it means a lot more than their just believing in a republic
    No they didn't


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,625 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    As a nationalist I think it's a fantastic step towards furthering and enhancing and embracing peace and harmony on this island. Well done to Martin and Sinn Fein on this. And, well done to Queen Elizabeth II too!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭blahfckingblah


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4mTKRWoJNQ

    sinn fein youths protest, enough said...
    you obviously have a chip on your shoulder, you guessed that it was a sinn fein protest despite having no evidence and ignored the eirigi flag in the centre background to try validate your point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭man.about.town


    i wouldnt say i have a chip on my shoulder. i dont support sinn fein and thats my choice. i do accept that im not versed on the other groups and i see my mistake in the video. i was in the city centre on the day of the visit and was appalled by what i saw and i labelled them all the same. i think anyone can see where im coming from by saying "decent people".

    i still think the cleansing ceremony in garden of rememberance was pathetic as was sinn feins refusal to shake lizzys hand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,483 ✭✭✭Fenian Army


    i wouldnt say i have a chip on my shoulder. i dont support sinn fein and thats my choice. i do accept that im not versed on the other groups and i see my mistake in the video. i was in the city centre on the day of the visit and was appalled by what i saw and i labelled them all the same. i think anyone can see where im coming from by saying "decent people".

    i still think the cleansing ceremony in garden of rememberance was pathetic as was sinn feins refusal to shake lizzys hand.
    That "cleansing ceremony" was nothing to do with Sinn Féin but rather our good friend Cael and his pals.

    Will you get your facts right or just stop posting?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,483 ✭✭✭Fenian Army


    you obviously have a chip on your shoulder, you guessed that it was a sinn fein protest despite having no evidence and ignored the eirigi flag in the centre background to try validate your point.

    Indeed he does.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 70 ✭✭Bonus_Pack


    "Why do Irish people say ''the Queen'' still??"

    It sounds like that she is your queen when you say that.
    I am Irish born and bred but I think it rediculous and factually wrong when the media refer to the Queen as the British or English Queen - she's the monarch of a good third of Ireland too.
    I have no problem with her coming here and when she came to cork last year the warm welcome she got was great. It just goes to show that republicanism is fully rejected by the majority of right minded people her in Southern Ireland.

    Sinn Feins hand shake is just a cheap PR stunt for them. Patheticn really


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,565 ✭✭✭southsiderosie


    MOD NOTE:

    The comments on this thread are getting way too personal. You can address the substance of people's posts without making comments about the poster in question; play the ball, not the man.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,730 ✭✭✭europa11


    Bonus_Pack wrote: »
    I am Irish born and bred but I think it rediculous and factually wrong ........ minded people her in Southern Ireland.

    Sinn Feins hand shake is just a cheap PR stunt for them. Patheticn really

    First instance I've ever seen of someone claiming to be "Irish born and bred" using that term to describe this country. Official name of this state is Ireland.

    More of "You Kay" thing, .....sorry that's U.K., innit?

    Bit like UKIP or the hard nosed Tories and Ulster Unionists who insist on calling us "Eire" but fail to carry through by calling Germany "Deutschland" or Spain "Espana". Old Colonial hang-up I guess.

    Sure you're not just a little confused about where you're from BP?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Kinski wrote: »
    Haha, Kevin Myers' head must be exploding - even Martin McGuinness gets to meet the Queen, while nobody in the British establishment seems to give a **** that Myers exists.

    The Queen has already had the pleasure of meeting him

    myarse.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,483 ✭✭✭Fenian Army


    muffler wrote: »
    McGuinness could be in bother



    photo1.gif
    Wouldnt know about that, he can handle a gun :D

    martin-mcguinness-1972.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,565 ✭✭✭southsiderosie


    MOD NOTE:

    OK fellas, while I think we have the potential makings of a 'Martin and Lizzie' photo thread in the Politics Cafe, this isn't really appropriate for the main page.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,305 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    Apologies :o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Posted by somebody in another forum. I think it was issued by Derry SF if anyone is looking for sources. I can find out for definite if it's important.


    I think this clarifys and debunks what some are claiming for the handshake. I also find the thinking here very progressive, responsible and non-provocative.
    The Queen of England visits Ireland – An IRA Volunteer's View!

    There is a lot of comment regarding the upcoming visit of the British Queen to Ireland. I think that is hardly surprising as it is momentous and I am sure that it is difficult to accept for some people on all sides of this argument. I decided to set out some of my views on this as a former prisoner of war and someone who has been active in all aspects of resistance to British Rule in Ireland throughout my life.

    Context

    Our country is partitioned and the British State is the agency that imposed that partition and sustained the unjust sectarian statelet that was the 6 counties. Despite all the attempts to claim that we were engaged in a sectarian war – I can assure you that my comrades and I were in no doubt, the war we fought was against the British state. We did so until we succeeded in forcing the British state to the negotiating table.

    After the most sustained period of armed struggle in our history, and the most damaging to Britain and her interests we were able to force a negotiated settlement. We did not get our United Socialist Republic, at this stage. But we did get a settlement that we had to assess and analyse; taking into account our long-term strategic objectives, the efficacy of various options available and the moral imperative that armed struggle should only be used when there are no other methods open.

    The vast majority of Irish republicans (and the vast majority of the Irish nation in a referendum) accepted the Good Friday Agreement as an acceptable arrangement at this stage. Irish Republicans made it clear that we did not think it gave us everything we were struggling for and that it did not settle the issue between ourselves and Britain. We did accept however that it did give us enough to allow us, for the first time in history, to complete our journey by peaceful and democratic means. The struggle was not over but would change in character to become a political and social struggle for a United Ireland.

    Constitutional Position.

    The British agreed FOR THE FIRST TIME to abandon their claim to the 6 Counties. The removal of the Government of Ireland Act means that Britain has NO CHOICE but to legislate for withdrawal from our country as soon as a majority within the 6 Counties votes for that. That was not the case so long as the Government of Ireland Act remained on the British statute books.

    This is a big compromise by us as we do not accept that any part of Ireland has the right to prevent our reunification and independence. But Britain has abandoned its territorial claim and their presence was now solely on the basis of the wishes of a section of the Irish people. Our challenge is to win a majority in this part of Ireland.

    Winning that majority is something that Republicans should be committed to in any case as we aspire to the following

    “The Republic guarantees religious and civil liberty, equal rights and equal opportunities to all its citizens, and declares its resolve to pursue the happiness and prosperity of the whole nation and of all its parts, cherishing all the children of the nation equally, and oblivious of the differences carefully fostered by an alien government, which have divided a minority from the majority in the past.”

    Given all of this the current situation is that we have entered a phase of struggle in which we seek to reunite our people and bring about the “cordial union” as the founders of the United Irishmen declared.

    Governance arrangements for 6 Counties

    New governance arrangements were drawn up for the 6 Counties. These arrangements were innovative and unique to here.

    An assembly was established that was of such a size and elected by such a method that maximised representation for smaller parties and ensures inclusivity. Even though Sinn Fein is the largest or second largest party in the North, at this time – I still welcome this aspect of the assembly structure.

    The members of the assembly do not swear any oath or make any declaration of allegiance to the UK, the Queen or any other aspect of the British presence in Ireland.

    The Executive is drawn from the assembly in accord with the D'Hondt mechanism of Proportional Representation which guarantees a position in Government for all parties, that wish to avail of it, according to their electoral strength as demonstrated in the election to the assembly.

    None of the ministers, including the First and Deputy First Ministers, swear any oath or make any declaration of allegiance to the UK, the Queen or any other aspect of the British presence in Ireland. This, by the way, should be pointed out to any of those who claim that Martin McGuinness or anyone else in the 6 Counties Executive are Ministers of the Crown – They are not!

    All-Ireland institutions are to be established and they are to expand and grow to deliver better governance across the whole of Ireland. (Often described as all-Island for those who find the use of all-Ireland too challenging at this stage).

    There are bilateral and multi-lateral relations with Britain and its constituent parts. Given the clear evolution of Scotland towards independence, these bilateral relations might well turn out to be the most de-stablising for the Union of any of the structures arising out of the Good Friday Agreement,

    Government at all levels must act in accordance with certain principles which include the duties of openness, transparency, equality and the promotion of Good Relations. Now here is where the struggle is fought most keenly and is where the building blocks of the new “Cordial Union” will be built on this island.

    Constitutional Issue

    It should be recalled that the President of Ireland now visits the 6 Counties on a regular basis – and is received by all sections of the community here. Unionists have greeted and entertained successive Irish Presidents for many years now. Of course they will say that they do not greet the President as their head of state but as a guest to the North while most Nationalists and Republicans will greet the President as Head of State.Whilst the visit of the Queen of England to the 6 Counties is being conducted a part of her Jubilee celebrations and includes several engagements that will be enthusiastically attended by Unionists. I am told that several SDLP members are planning to attend the party in Stormont but this will not be attended by anyone from Sinn Fein.

    But Martin McGuinness is meeting the British Queen but not in her capacity as Head of State. He is meeting her in the Lyric Theatre in Belfast, in her capacity as the co-patron of an all Ireland charity – Co-operation Ireland. She is attending that on an equal basis to the President of Ireland who is the other co-patron. There is no question of the British Queen or President Higgins attending this function as head of state. The protocol is very clear on this and there is no constitutional implications of the meeting in that context.

    Community Relations.The unionist community will be celebrating this visit and indulging in a degree of Jubilee frolics and they have a right to do this. Most people will have read of the euphoria around visits by the Irish President to the Irish Community in Britain and no-one in Britain objected to the Irish flag being widely displayed and the Irish National Anthem being played. Several British politicians have attended many of these functions.

    Of course, in Ireland, there is a particular need for everyone to be sensitive at times like this and this is especially so given the British monarch’s relationship with various British regiments. The British Monarch has a responsibility to be sensitive to the feelings of the victims and survivors of state violence.

    Many people including many Irish Republicans who opposed her visit to Dublin have acknowledged that two important gestures were made by the British Queen at that time. She visited and laid a wreath, bowing her head in respect, at the Garden of Remembrance to those who gave their lives fighting Britain for Irish freedom. That is as it should be and can be seen between many countries that were once at at war.

    At another event she acknowledged that there were many things Britain had done that ought to have been done differently or not all at all. This is the nearest any British monarch has ever come to apologising for crimes committed under colonialism. It is only a few decades ago that she refused to apologise to the Indian people for the massacre at Amritsar even as she visited that city. So the words spoken in Dublin are significant.

    SummaryI believe as an undefeated and unrepentant IRA volunteer and a Sinn Fein member that we are in a very different place from where we were when I took up arms against the British State.

    I still repudiate any claim to any of our territory by Britain and am working hard to bring about the United Ireland that I have pledged my allegiance to.

    I think we can now achieve this by peaceful and democratic means thanks to the sacrifice of Irish Volunteers and their families over generations and in particular in the last phase of armed struggle.

    I believe that the phase of struggle we are now engaged in is one of nation building where we are seeking to heal “the differences carefully fostered by an alien government, which have divided a minority from the majority in the past.”

    I believe that this gesture by Martin McGuinness does not compromise any constitutional principles as he is not meeting her as head of the so-called UK state.

    I believe that in giving this space to Unionists we are demonstrating that we are serious about “cherishing all the children of the nation equally” and that Unionists have nothing to fear from the United Ireland that we will achieve.

    This will not be universally accepted by Republicans. I find it a stretch myself. People are entitled to disagree with me and to put forward an alternative view. But we should all disagree honestly and not distort the real position.

    Martin McGuinness is not a British Minister and is not a minister of the crown.Martin McGuiness is not meeting the British Queen as the head of state.

    You’re entitled to disagree but you’re not entitled to twist the truth.

    I can tell you that I am the same Irish Republican I was the day I joined the IRA and the day I took part in my first attack on the British State. I am the same Irish Republican I was when I refused to bow the knee in a dock and was sent to prison by the British State. And I can assure you that I am the same Irish republican today when I refused to shirk the political challenges that this phase in our freedom struggle demands!

    Three different phases of struggle, all leading to the same goal; a United Democratic Socialist Irish Republic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    Quite eloquent for a terrorist.

    'The vast majority of Irish republicans (and the vast majority of the Irish nation in a referendum) accepted the Good Friday Agreement as an acceptable arrangement at this stage'

    Why let democracy bother you now? The Anglo-Irish treaty had similar support and provided a political means to fight for a united Ireland.

    Question is, what makes this 'progressive' now where it wasn't progressive a year ago when the rest of the country were being civil and welcoming the Queen?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Quite eloquent for a terrorist.

    'The vast majority of Irish republicans (and the vast majority of the Irish nation in a referendum) accepted the Good Friday Agreement as an acceptable arrangement at this stage'

    Why let democracy bother you now? The Anglo-Irish treaty had similar support and provided a political means to fight for a united Ireland.

    Question is, what makes this 'progressive' now where it wasn't progressive a year ago when the rest of the country were being civil and welcoming the Queen?
    They are the key questions. SF has stated again today that this has nothing to do with getting the upper hand politicilly over other parties, but it very plainly does.


  • Registered Users Posts: 457 ✭✭chainsawman


    I have been a Sinn fein since 1975, I am delighted that Sinn Fein, Martin McGuinness decided to shake the Queen hands. Fair play to the Queen to go ahead with it even though she lost her favorite cousin, Lord Mountbatten... Time to move on , not to look back..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    kippy wrote: »
    They are the key questions. SF has stated again today that this has nothing to do with getting the upper hand politicilly over other parties, but it very plainly does.

    They are milking it at a time when serious questions were being asked about their financial behaviour. The media, locked out from this controlled PR stunt should ignore it, after all it is just them seeking attention for what everyone else already did.

    'Man seeks praise for living in the 21st century'. The rest of us jumped that hurdle a long time ago, and the rest of us welcomed (or at least didnt avoid welcoming) the queen last year.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Quite eloquent for a terrorist.

    I would have thought somebody so superior as to say the above would comprehend the following.
    The protocol is very clear on this and there is no constitutional implications of the meeting in that context..........


    I believe that this gesture by Martin McGuinness does not compromise any constitutional principles as he is not meeting her as head of the so-called UK state.


    It would have been very irresponsible for them to meet her in Dublin, because what most don't realise, is the ongoing work to keep people onside. Protocols and sensitivities have to be observed to keep the agreement on track. Eevn though the juvenile tuanters will have a field day with this, I, for one, am glad that 'eloquence' of thought will win out over knee jerk hat doffing!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    I would have thought somebody so superior as to say the above would comprehend the following.

    It would have been very irresponsible for them to meet her in Dublin, because what most don't realise, is the ongoing work to keep people onside. Protocols and sensitivities have to be observed to keep the agreement on track. Eevn though the juvenile tuanters will have a field day with this, I, for one, am glad that 'eloquence' of thought will win out over knee jerk hat doffing!

    ex-terrorists pandering to potential 'wannabe' terrorists. I don't want these people kept onside. I want them jailed. How about ostracise and inform on the dissident backward looking thugs in your republican communities rather than try and appease them?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    I would have thought somebody so superior as to say the above would comprehend the following.[\QUOTE]

    Superior in the sense that I was never a terrorist nor have I murdered or maimed any innocent people for any reason let alone for simply being British.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42



    Superior in the sense that I was never a terrorist nor have I murdered or maimed any innocent people for any reason let alone for simply being British.

    Well let's see you equally criticising Mrs Winsdor for being there today then. Isn't she selling out you? :D


    She is shaking the hand of an equal, a democratic politician supported by the likes of the person who wrote that statement.
    Notice a sea-change there, a progression or are you missing the war too much?:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Well let's see you equally criticising Mrs Winsdor for being there today then. Isn't she selling out you? :D


    She is shaking the hand of an equal, a democratic politician supported by the likes of the person who wrote that statement.
    Notice a sea-change there, a progression or are you missing the war too much?:rolleyes:

    AFAIK the queen was willing to shake their hand last uear. They are not equals, the queen is not a democratically elected politician and mcguinness is not a monarch.

    The person who wrote that piece is still a republican ex-IRA member who even now refuses to recognise British rule in the north

    'I am the same Irish Republican I was the day I joined the IRA and the day I took part in my first attack on the British State. I am the same Irish Republican I was when I refused to bow the knee in a dock and was sent to prison by the British State'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    AFAIK the queen was willing to shake their hand last uear. They are not equals, the queen is not a democratically elected politician and mcguinness is not a monarch.

    The person who wrote that piece is still a republican ex-IRA member who even now refuses to recognise British rule in the north

    'I am the same Irish Republican I was the day I joined the IRA and the day I took part in my first attack on the British State. I am the same Irish Republican I was when I refused to bow the knee in a dock and was sent to prison by the British State'

    Read the GFA, he is quite entitled to that position and to align himself to whatever political ideology he wants. Mrs Winsdor recognised that in the Garden of Remembrance....remember?
    Again, read the agreement, McG has never and isn't recognising the legitimacy of the monarchy. When she is on Irish soil, she is an equal. He is free to pursue his desire for a United Ireland by democratic means. The Crown has no longer any right to intefere with the wishes of Irish people, from both sides of the divide.

    And you haven't answered my question, why are you not equally vociferous in your criticism of her? Is she selling out?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Read the GFA, he is quite entitled to that position and to align himself to whatever political ideology he wants. Mrs Winsdor recognised that in the Garden of Remembrance....remember?
    Again, read the agreement, McG has never and isn't recognising the legitimacy of the monarchy. When she is on Irish soil, she is an equal. He is free to pursue his desire for a United Ireland by democratic means. The Crown has no longer any right to intefere with the wishes of Irish people, from both sides of the divide.

    And you haven't answered my question, why are you not equally vociferous in your criticism of her? Is she selling out?

    She is not an irish representative or running for election here. Her choice to engage in a civil act (to shake or not shake hands) was not dictated by the murmurings and threats of discontented dissidents that Sinn Fein apparently need to keep 'onside' rather than dissociating themselves with the violent minded and cutting their support. It seems SF want to tip toe around the sensibilities of dissident groups that threaten to bring back the gun, they are still too close for comfort.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,706 ✭✭✭junder


    Happyman42 wrote: »

    Superior in the sense that I was never a terrorist nor have I murdered or maimed any innocent people for any reason let alone for simply being British.

    Well let's see you equally criticising Mrs Winsdor for being there today then. Isn't she selling out you? :D


    She is shaking the hand of an equal, a democratic politician supported by the likes of the person who wrote that statement.
    Notice a sea-change there, a progression or are you missing the war too much?:rolleyes:

    Equal? She is the head of a state, he failed to be one


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    junder wrote: »
    Equal? She is the head of a state, he failed to be one

    I know it's complicated, but you need to read the GFA, it's a unique and complex document, hard fought and negotiated.
    McG does not recognise her as 'his' head of state. That is a position he is allowed to have and to hold and one of the primary reasons why the war was ended.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    Question is, what makes this 'progressive' now where it wasn't progressive a year ago when the rest of the country were being civil and welcoming the Queen?

    To a certain extent one has to say the SF move is hypocritical (not overly so as they are admitting that the handshake is 'difficult').

    While I am not claiming that SF engaged in any flag burning, like the poster a few pages back, during the visit last year they were certainly sitting on their hands, rather than extending them. As least SF has allowed itself be moved somewhat by popular opinion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,706 ✭✭✭junder


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    junder wrote: »
    Equal? She is the head of a state, he failed to be one

    I know it's complicated, but you need to read the GFA, it's a unique and complex document, hard fought and negotiated.
    McG does not recognise her as 'his' head of state. That is a position he is allowed to have and to hold and one of the primary reasons why the war was ended.

    As it happens I have original copy's of both the framework document and the GFA all very nicely worded so as not to offend anybody, but that's niether here nor there, sinn fein can play the semantics game all they want, fact is the queen is the head of s state as recognised by the rest of the world Martin tried and failed to be one. Sinn fein had hoped that Martin would get elected president before he met the queen so they could spin the whole 'meeting of two heads of state' he wasn't elected so instead he has been forced (by Irish public opinion) to meet her as nothing more then a minister


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 141 ✭✭Patrick Cleburne


    junder wrote: »
    As it happens I have original copy's of both the framework document and the GFA all very nicely worded so as not to offend anybody, but that's niether here nor there, sinn fein can play the semantics game all they want, fact is the queen is the head of s state as recognised by the rest of the world Martin tried and failed to be one. Sinn fein had hoped that Martin would get elected president before he met the queen so they could spin the whole 'meeting of two heads of state' he wasn't elected so instead he has been forced (by Irish public opinion) to meet her as nothing more then a minister
    Sean Gallagher beat Martin Mcguinness in the Irish Republic which says it all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Sean Gallagher beat Martin Mcguinness in the Irish Republic which says it all.

    Sean Gallagher has been run out of politics, as is right. Martin however, hasn't gone away, you know.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    junder wrote: »
    As it happens I have original copy's of both the framework document and the GFA all very nicely worded so as not to offend anybody, but that's niether here nor there, sinn fein can play the semantics game all they want, fact is the queen is the head of s state as recognised by the rest of the world Martin tried and failed to be one. Sinn fein had hoped that Martin would get elected president before he met the queen so they could spin the whole 'meeting of two heads of state' he wasn't elected so instead he has been forced (by Irish public opinion) to meet her as nothing more then a minister

    You accuse them of semantics? :D

    Go do a little more research and you will find SF party analysts openly admiting before the Presidential elections, precisely what they wanted to achieve by running McG.
    The amount of spinning of events you guys are having to do to make sense of this day is verging on the hilarious.
    She shook his hand, transpose that image back to 20, 10 and even 5 years ago and you will realise the monumental progress that has been achieved......we have come a long way and some are being left behind, through their inability to swallow hard and face certain realities.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    294500_1.jpg?ts=1340797737


    Well its happened. All done. So in the best Sinn Fein spirit 'its in the past, lets move on'

    Now SF expenses - that's current


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    we have come a long way

    since the queens visit last year


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭hyperborean



    Now SF expenses - that's current

    Ah, current and important political issue's, good luck getting SF fanboys to engage in those area's without hyperbole and soapboxing


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Ah, current and important political issue's, good luck getting SF fanboys to engage in those area's without hyperbole and soapboxing

    They are as answerable as anybody else if members are corrupt.
    What the bigots will do is try to intimate that all republicns are corrupt, which is as ridiculous as saying that all Fianna Fail supporters are corrupt because some where caught with their hands in the till.:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭COYW


    Well its happened. All done. So in the best Sinn Fein spirit 'its in the past, lets move on'

    Now SF expenses - that's current

    And the sources of their funding needs to be examined. We can also really start to probe SF on the genuinely important issues of the economy and the like. You never know, her majesty might have given MMG a royal calculator as a gift and SF might actually produce some figures that actually make sense relating to their economic alternative.
    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Sean Gallagher has been run out of politics, as is right. Martin however, hasn't gone away, you know.

    Sean Gallagher was never an elected politician. MMG was and is in the UK. Sean Gallagher has gone back to his career in business, his fallback plan, MMG went back to his fallback plan i.e. his role in NI.

    IIRC, SG pretty much doubled the vote of MMG in that election even with the huge issue of his FF connection hanging over his head. Only SF could make a silk purse out that hammering at the hands of an ex-FF associate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭hyperborean


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    They are as answerable as anybody else if members are corrupt.
    What the bigots will do is try to intimate that all republicns are corrupt, which is as ridiculous as saying that all Fianna Fail supporters are corrupt because some where caught with their hands in the till.:rolleyes:

    What bigots are you on about?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    What bigots are you on about?

    The ones on here for starters. How much movement in their stances have they made?

    Bigotry; is the state of mind of a "bigot", a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one who exhibits intolerance or animosity toward members of a group.


  • Site Banned Posts: 109 ✭✭saspeir


    Is it just me or did the Queen of Engerland look like part of the Wedgewood gnome collection or what???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,410 ✭✭✭sparkling sea


    Sinn Fein will say and/or do anything to acheive their aim of uniting the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland; fortunately they are on their way down in the polls - its not like they would actually be interested in what the majority would want anyway

    Martin McGuiness and SF went to great lenghts to point out that he was not a member of the IRA; now that it suits the SF purpose, its being made out to be some big deal for him to shake the hand of a woman who is just doing her job as queen.

    He wanted the job of deputy first minister - he now has it - he is doing the job he is paid for by shaking the Queen's hand and getting paid a nice wage aswell.

    As long a Mr McGuiness and his cronnies keep their antics out of this country - whoops -actually they support common criminals: look for freedom for people who murder Gardai; use tax payers money to print their literature by technically not stealing ink; have election materials stored in the boot of a car with tools of serious crime. But worse of all they oppose everything whether or not it will benefit this country; and possess an extraordinary ability to not answer specific questions they are asked - does anyone even know what they actually stand for apart from the above and trying to unite to separate countries; they seem to have different polices in different countries???

    Poor deputy first minister of a different country having to shake a public representatives hand; it could be worse though he could be unemployed - or much worse.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42




    Poor deputy first minister of a different country having to shake a public representatives hand; it could be worse though he could be unemployed - or much worse.

    He didn't 'have' to do anything. The Sinn Fein Ard Comhairle (an all Ireland body) sanctioned him doing it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,706 ✭✭✭junder


    Happyman42 wrote: »


    Poor deputy first minister of a different country having to shake a public representatives hand; it could be worse though he could be unemployed - or much worse.

    He didn't 'have' to do anything. The Sinn Fein Ard Comhairle (an all Ireland body) sanctioned him doing it.

    You keep telling yourself that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,714 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    its kinda good to see how many are getting hot under the collar about the shinners. obviously a party to be reckoned with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    junder wrote: »
    You keep telling yourself that

    One would suspect that one didn't want normal diplomatic and couteous relations, so one would! :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Thread is going off topic and there are too many one line, "smart" responses. There already has been a couple of mod warnings so a harsher line will be taken from now on.

    There's a thread for discussion of the expenses issue here, no need to discuss it on this thread.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement