Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Post Scrappage Rant

  • 14-06-2011 12:21pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭


    Scrappage? Personally I am glad it is going to be over. People are getting a lot of money for crap at the expense of the Tax payer. I believe this scrappage scheme has destroyed the Private Used Car Market, why buy a 10k 2008 car when you can get a brand new for 15k by trading in your Toyota Starlett with no wheels, jees, when you actually put it like that it does sound ridiculous doesn't it.

    Also, private sellers feel a double blow with websites like Carzone, Autotrader and Adverts inundated with Dealers trying to get rid of the petrol cars they cant sell at, knock off 'help! we are going to die' prices, because people availing of scrappage are all buying Diesels, which is a false economy on anything over a 1.4 petrol.

    Do we really, really, want to prop up the Dealers in this country?. I can imagine the government are now feeling hurt in the VRT region has no one can sell there cars privately anymore. I want to sell my car in return for going to England to buy a higher spec UK model for the same price, in return, I will put some money in the VRT pot, but I cant, because Borris with his 96 Fiat Panda is looking at a brand new Corrolla with 3 grand off. Goodbye Scrappage, please don't come back.

    What a mess. We fail, then make it worse. **** Stains.

    Scrappage or no scrappage? 33 votes

    Scrappage
    0% 0 votes
    No Scrappage
    100% 33 votes


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    How exactly is the scrappage scheme at the expense of the tax payer exactly? Seems to be a revenue generator to me. A lot of those cars would not have been sold in the first place which would reduce the take on VRT.


  • Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭DHFrame


    Berty wrote: »
    How is the scrappage scheme at the expense of the tax payer exactly? Seems to be a revenue generator to me.

    Doesnt the government not pay the VRT? It has to happen somewhere.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,689 Mod ✭✭✭✭stevenmu


    I would have thought that with all the older cars taken off the road that it's propping up the 2nd hand market too. A lot of 'bangernomics' style cars which people would be buying are simply dissapearing. It'll be interesting to see if prices fall or rise when it ends.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    DHFrame wrote: »
    Where do the dealers get the money for selling a car 3 grand cheaper/VRT relief? God?

    Distributor and a VRT relief from the government. But how many cars would have been sold without the VRT relief? In effect it doesnt cost the government a penny to give the relief as they wouldnt have the intake in the first place.


  • Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭DHFrame


    Berty wrote: »
    Distributor and a VRT relief from the government. But how many cars would have been sold without the VRT relief? In effect it doesnt cost the government a penny to give the relief as they wouldnt have the intake in the first place.

    No but it creates a senario of a lot less income on new cars. I wonder if they have wanted that back another way. That's all I am saying.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    DHFrame wrote: »
    No but it creates a senario of a lot less income on new cars. I wonder if they have wanted that back another way. That's all I am saying.

    But surely more cars were sold because of the deal making up for any potential loss? I see where you're coming thought:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,257 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    I imagine it's also kept a lot of people in employment as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭knifey_spoonie


    It aint really costing the tax payer anything, infact it is overall revenue positive.If you take the average price of a new car sold on scrappage say €10,000.

    Government scrappage € 1250
    Government VAT intake from €10,000 = €1735.54

    so
    €1755.54-€1250(Gov. addition) = €485.56
    This is money that would never have entered the revenue stream as most people who bought a new would have not done so without the scrappage bonus.

    Your comment about private sellers getting a double blow is a mute point. The fact is dealers are selling cars to make money, but it is impossible to sell a car above market value. Market value is decided by supply V demand. The fact is there is an over supply of petrol vehicles with a low demand therfore dealers reduce prices untill it comes in line with what joe public are willing to pay. The real fact of the matter is you and the majority of private sellers over value your car and are not willing to sell it at reasonable market value. It all has very little to do with scrappage it got more to do with unrealistic expectations.


  • Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭DHFrame


    Eoin wrote: »
    I imagine it's also kept a lot of people in employment as well.

    True, true, I have just been thinking about staff at dealers, Car Tax generated, Fuel Purchases.... list goes on. mm, rethink alert.


  • Registered Users Posts: 104 ✭✭leviathon


    DHFrame wrote: »
    I can imagine the government are now feeling hurt in the VRT region has no one can sell there cars privately anymore. I want to sell my car in return for going to England to buy a higher spec UK model for the same price, in return, I will put some money in the VRT pot, but I cant, because Borris with his 96 Fiat Panda is looking at a brand new Corrolla with 3 grand off. Goodbye Scrappage, please don't come back.

    What do you mean? VRT is only applied to new car sales, not second hand. You selling you car privately is not going to add a penny to vrt, it's already been paid when the vehicle was purchased new.

    EDIT : Just re-read, sorry yes vrt would be paid on the car you are importing in from england, presume that's what you meant.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,699 ✭✭✭ronaneire


    Rethink alert is right, takes a lot of bangers of the road and is keeping people in jobs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 214 ✭✭Antikythera


    Nothing but a big scam to encourage people to scrap perfectly good cars and borrow money to buy a crappy, overpriced new one and keep up with the joneses. The amount of late model cars I see in the scrapyards is an absolute disgrace.


  • Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭DHFrame


    leviathon wrote: »
    What do you mean? VRT is only applied to new car sales, not second hand. You selling you car privately is not going to add a penny to vrt, it's already been paid when the vehicle was purchased new.

    EDIT : Just re-read, sorry yes vrt would be paid on the car you are importing in from england, presume that's what you meant.

    Yes, I could have worded it properly, but rethinking about it, my contribution to VRT by buying a car from the UK is probably not much in the grand scheme. It's all speculation isn't it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭DHFrame


    Poll results are hidden. Moderator help please.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    DHFrame wrote: »
    Poll results are hidden. Moderator help please.

    Done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    I have to agree. Selling more new cars may be good for the motor trade, but it's bad for the country - the money goes straight to whatever country built the car. Far better that they spend their money here, building extensions or whatever.


  • Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭DHFrame


    Anan1 wrote: »
    I have to agree. Selling more new cars may be good for the motor trade, but it's bad for the country - the money goes straight to whatever country built the car. Far better that they spend their money here, building extensions or whatever.

    I think the main problem for me is all the Petrol Cars that are sat on the courtyards. The best that can happen next I suppose is keep the scrappage going and, reduce the price of petrol, and push the co2 tax relief on June 2008 cars to 2007 or something. It's amazing, here in Portlaoise, the Toyota garage have 22 petrol's and no diesels. Whats gonna happen there?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,699 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    DHFrame wrote: »
    It's amazing, here in Portlaoise, the Toyota garage have 22 petrol's and no diesels. Whats gonna happen there?

    Hopefully they bought the petrol cars at the right price to allow for them to sell them at a low price.

    If priced correctly, there is a market for everything. Even a Hyundai Grandeur XG, and I can't think of a less appealing car to try and sell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    I'm never going to qualify for scrappage, as I'll never own a car old enough to scrap.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If the scrappage scheme has kept lots of folk in employment than can we expect more job losses from the retail end of the motor industry once it finishes?

    Artificially boosting or propping up a certain sector of the economy is not something I find economically wise unless it is sustainable. Unfortunately the economy as a whole is not recovering so without the scrappage incentive new car sales in 2012 may well be quite poor compared to 2011 levels. Now that's presuming that most of the folks who availed of the scrappage wouldn't have bought a new car otherwise.

    Introduce a 75% VAT discount on anything will increase the sales, why pick the motor industry? Plenty of hardware shops, hairdressers, restaurants etc going bust around the country.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,441 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    RoverJames wrote: »

    Introduce a 75% VAT discount on anything will increase the sales, why pick the motor industry? Plenty of hardware shops, hairdressers, restaurants etc going bust around the country.


    Because hardware shops , hairdressers , restaurants don't pay VRT.


  • Registered Users Posts: 402 ✭✭DHFrame


    How, if any, will it effect the Private car sales market, once the Scrappage is over?


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    jhegarty wrote: »
    Because hardware shops , hairdressers , restaurants don't pay VRT.

    Which is why I said VAT ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,059 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    RoverJames wrote: »
    Which is why I said VAT ;)
    And do you think that reducing VAT to 5.2% would be beneficial to anyone?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Leonard Hofstadter


    There are several problems with having scrappage schemes:

    - they prop up the car trade at the expense of other sectors of the economy, many of which allow more money to stay in Ireland rather than sending it abroad
    - they are bad for the environment, as they facilitate the removal of perfectly good secondhand cars from the road
    - worst of all, and ironically this is from the point of view of the car industry itself, a scrappage scheme, as any economist will tell you, is designed to brings forward a purchase of a car. A scrappage scheme might give say 10000 extra sales in 2011 but that is at the expense of 2012, 2013 etc. This means that we are putting off the evil day where downsizing and the inevitable loss of jobs occurrs. It is kicking the can down the road and "hoping for the best". Ireland is in even more trouble now than it was when sales first fell off a cliff back towards the end of 2008.

    I don't believe in people being bailed out, end of story. We cannot have the capitalist system and free markets etc when things are going well and then all of a sudden decide to be socialists when a business gets into trouble. If we are going to be bailing out wealthy car dealers or property developers etc then they should be taxed heavily on their profits so at least we can afford to fund them when things go bad.

    - the scrappage scheme is NOT good for all of the Irish car trade, but only a part of it (the salesman in the main dealer). The scrappage scheme means that people in for example the parts trade, or independent mechanics have a much tougher time as people who otherwise might spend money on fixing their old car decide it's not worth the bother when they can get €1500 for it and have a brand new car with cheap tax and low fuel consumption.

    Keeping old cars on the road (once properly maintained, obviously) is better for the many independent garages who look after these cars. Keeping old cars on the road ensures that more money stays in Ireland, and you don't need to be an economist to figure out that this is a very good thing. Consequently, the scrappage scheme is not actually good for the economy at all! It undeniably increases VAT and VRT revenue, but at the expense of what? The jobs lost by those outside of the SIMI network? The other sectors of the service based economy, who are making less money because people have spent their money on a car instead of say improving the house, buying a new TV etc?

    Lastly, a lot of the new cars being bought are complicated diesel engines, with turbos, injectors, DMFs, DPFs and God knows what other gubbins that could go wrong.

    Now, if you're like me, or anyone else on this forum who knows about cars, you'll know how to look after a modern diesel properly and touch wood the worst that will happen is the DMF. But as we know, most people don't have a clue how to look after cars, and I know of people who just drive around the town all the time but have a diesel because of the low tax etc. So for some people, who do not know how to look after their diesel car properly, the new car will end up costing more and causing more hassle in the long run as it will be less reliable than the older car.

    Goodbye scrappage scheme, and good riddance. I hope we never see the likes of it ever again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,699 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    RoverJames wrote: »
    Introduce a 75% VAT discount on anything will increase the sales, why pick the motor industry? Plenty of hardware shops, hairdressers, restaurants etc going bust around the country.

    Any idea what the total tax take in those industries is? I'd hazard a guess that it's not approaching that of the motor industry.

    I've an invoice for an A4 on my desk - over €11,000 between VAT and VRT - that's almost 30% of the invoice value.

    Extrapolate those figures to take in to account all the new cars sold, and you'd find that new car sales make a substantial contribution to the Revenue.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Quazzie wrote: »
    And do you think that reducing VAT to 5.2% would be beneficial to anyone?

    See below ;)
    RoverJames wrote: »
    ..........Artificially boosting or propping up a certain sector of the economy is not something I find economically wise unless it is sustainable.................


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    The problem is that they make it difficult for the typical banger driver to get rid of his car as he won't have owned it long enough. Getting rid of the time limits would get more heaps of sh!te off the roads for good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,059 ✭✭✭✭Quazzie


    RoverJames wrote: »
    See below ;)

    It is an artificial lift but I think the intention was one of two things.

    1. See how bad things were going to get, and try help absorb some of the impact of the crash on a massive industry that hosts many jobs in the country.

    2. Soften the crash if it did (which is more obvious now) go on longer than at first predicted.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    R.O.R wrote: »
    ........
    I've an invoice for an A4 on my desk - over €11,000 between VAT and VRT - that's almost 30% of the invoice value............

    Someone scrapped something against that A4 did they?


  • Registered Users Posts: 99 ✭✭gazmc18


    - the scrappage scheme is NOT good for all of the Irish car trade, but only a part of it (the salesman in the main dealer). The scrappage scheme means that people in for example the parts trade, or independent mechanics have a much tougher time as people who otherwise might spend money on fixing their old car decide it's not worth the bother when they can get €1500 for it and have a brand new car with cheap tax and low fuel consumption.

    Keeping old cars on the road (once properly maintained, obviously) is better for the many independent garages who look after these cars. Keeping old cars on the road ensures that more money stays in Ireland, and you don't need to be an economist to figure out that this is a very good thing. Consequently, the scrappage scheme is not actually good for the economy at all! It undeniably increases VAT and VRT revenue, but at the expense of what? The jobs lost by those outside of the SIMI network? The other sectors of the service based economy, who are making less money because people have spent their money on a car instead of say improving the house, buying a new TV etc?

    Lastly, a lot of the new cars being bought are complicated diesel engines, with turbos, injectors, DMFs, DPFs and God knows what other gubbins that could go wrong.

    Now, if you're like me, or anyone else on this forum who knows about cars, you'll know how to look after a modern diesel properly and touch wood the worst that will happen is the DMF. But as we know, most people don't have a clue how to look after cars, and I know of people who just drive around the town all the time but have a diesel because of the low tax etc. So for some people, who do not know how to look after their diesel car properly, the new car will end up costing more and causing more hassle in the long run as it will be less reliable than the older car.

    Goodbye scrappage scheme, and good riddance. I hope we never see the likes of it ever again.
    user_online.gif

    I think you just totally contradicted yourself all in one post.

    eg, you say with everyone buying new cars there will be no old cars for mechanics to fix (which is something i find totally flawed btw)
    Then in the next breath you say a lot of people cant look after their complicated diesel engine? so going by your train of thought surely the mechanics you said that would lose all their work because of the scrappage scheme can fix these?

    I would love to see figures to back up the parts trade loss too as i dont agree with what you said.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,699 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    RoverJames wrote: »
    Someone scrapped something against that A4 did they?

    No - it's an example of the huge amount of tax the government get on each new car sold. Giving a €1,500 or €1,250 rebate off the amount is very little in the grand scheme of things, and has more than likely paid for itself many times over.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    gazmc18 wrote: »
    I would love to see figures to back up the parts trade loss too as i dont agree with what you said.

    I worked in a motor factors back in the 90s when the first scrappage scheme was about, there was a significant drop in turnover and most of our customers (indy garages) were hit by it. It makes sense really.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    R.O.R wrote: »
    No - it's an example of the huge amount of tax the government get on each new car sold. Giving a €1,500 or €1,250 rebate off the amount is very little in the grand scheme of things, and has more than likely paid for itself many times over.

    It's not a great example though in fairness, the tax take on a Megane, Clio or similar would be more relevent :)

    The A4 you mention and those like it would have been bought regardless of the scrappage scheme.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭DeepBlue


    It aint really costing the tax payer anything, infact it is overall revenue positive.If you take the average price of a new car sold on scrappage say €10,000.
    If that were true then we would always have a scappage scheme as the Government would be making money out of it.
    Arguably the scrappage scheme is bringing forward car purchases that would have to be made anyway so instead of buying in the next couple of years people take the plunge now but that will leave a hole in car sales in one to two years time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,699 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    RoverJames wrote: »
    It's not a great example though in fairness, the tax take on a Megane, Clio or similar would be more relevent :)

    It's a slightly better example than the €14,000 of VAT and VRT on the 3 Series Touring invoice, which is the only other one on my desk :D Both cars would qualify under scrappage though.

    Still comes to just shy of 30% of the invoice price, so that figure seems about right for a VRT Cat B vehicle.
    RoverJames wrote: »
    The A4 you mention and those like it would have been bought regardless of the scrappage scheme.

    Not neccesarily. The scrappage scheme has made it more "acceptable" overall to own a new car. People were worried in 09 & 10 about having a new plate, but it's much more accepted now.

    Plus, you've got to keep up with the O'Malley's down the road....


  • Registered Users Posts: 99 ✭✭gazmc18


    Even if the VRT on a car is only €2000 and the €1250 rebate is given. Its still €750 earned that would not of been without the scheme.

    Everyone updates their car eventually, you will always have a use for mechanics and parts! I still dont see how the scrappage scheme ruins this. Everywhere has gone slow, with or without the scrappage scheme it would still be the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    gazmc18 wrote: »
    Even if the VRT on a car is only €2000 and the €1250 rebate is given. Its still €750 earned that would not of been without the scheme.
    It's €750 into the coffers in VRT and maybe €10,000 straight over to whatever country manufactured the car. Had that €10,000 been spent here, it would have supported jobs throughout the economy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,102 ✭✭✭✭Drummerboy08


    Anan1 wrote: »
    It's €750 into the coffers in VRT and maybe €10,000 straight over to whatever country manufactured the car. Had that €10,000 been spent here, it would have supported jobs throughout the economy.

    Spent on what though??!

    Are you suggesting that Irish people shouldn't buy a car at all because they can't buy one that is built in Ireland?

    If that's the case, we shouldn't buy TV's, IPod's, cookers, or pretty much anything that is used in our day to day lives, because very few of these everyday items are built in Ireland too.

    Your posts make no sense to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 99 ✭✭gazmc18


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by gazmc18 viewpost.gif
    Even if the VRT on a car is only €2000 and the €1250 rebate is given. Its still €750 earned that would not of been without the scheme.

    It's €750 into the coffers in VRT and maybe €10,000 straight over to whatever country manufactured the car. Had that €10,000 been spent here, it would have supported jobs throughout the economy

    So what your saying is spend your money on something "Irish" instead of buying a car. So maybe we could all go spend 10K on spuds and guinness.

    Seriously though no cars are made in Ireland so you got no choice. Again if we didnt send that €10,000 to another country we couldnt make our €750 so whatever way you look at it its what we got to do to make revenue on our end. I would rather get a small percentage of something than 100% of nothing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    RoverJames wrote: »
    It's not a great example though in fairness, the tax take on a Megane, Clio or similar would be more relevent :)

    The A4 you mention and those like it would have been bought regardless of the scrappage scheme.

    no , it wouldnt, not everybody who used the scrappage scheme was stupid enough to buy those cars which will probably be on the scrap heap before the next scrappage scheme rolls around


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    Spent on what though??!

    Are you suggesting that Irish people shouldn't buy a car at all because they can't buy one that is built in Ireland?

    If that's the case, we shouldn't buy TV's, IPod's, cookers, or pretty much anything that is used in our day to day lives, because very few of these everyday items are built in Ireland too.

    Your posts make no sense to me.

    The industry which was most decimated by the collapse should have been propped up not car sales, which BTW is still going to be decimated with no long term benefit to anyone Irish or the environment.

    The housing stock in this country is in bits, badly insulated and made. If the government gave as good a grant for improving our housing stock it would have made a bigger impact here then people buying new cars.

    I know there are grants for home improvements, but these have only come in now that everyone with any spare cash has spend it on a shiny new 11 car and can't afford fix up their house now.

    Or they could have reduced VAT on restaurant's and hotels to 0% to get people spending their money, as opposed to a lot of cases the with cars spending the banks money, on something that will provide direct employment in Ireland.

    The UK, USA and all the other countries which had scrappage schemes where trying to stimulate their own car industries, and failed miserably since nearly everyone bought small Asian cars, yet we decided the best industry to stimulate was one we don't have:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Leonard Hofstadter


    no , it wouldnt, not everybody who used the scrappage scheme was stupid enough to buy those heaps

    A lot of people who bought cars on scrappage did though, and the other point about scrappage is that most of those cars have such low VRT that after the €1500 refund is given, there is no VRT left, so not all cars sold under scrappage resulted in the Government getting VRT, so it's just VAT they got!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,102 ✭✭✭✭Drummerboy08


    Del2005 wrote: »
    The industry which was most decimated by the collapse should have been propped up not car sales, which BTW is still going to be decimated with no long term benefit to anyone Irish or the environment.

    I have to disagree with you there - it's of huge benefit to the thousands of PAYE workers who are employed in the motor trade. If these people were to be made redundant the Taxpayer would end up footing a bill of hundreds of millions to support these people.

    Also, the scrappage scheme has encouraged alot of people to buy low emission cars. Explain to me how that's not good for the enviroment?
    The housing stock in this country is in bits, badly insulated and made. If the government gave as good a grant for improving our housing stock it would have made a bigger impact here then people buying new cars.

    People here are trying to encourage buying Irish products, but you've just claimed that one of the biggest Irish made items out there are poorly made?

    Not only that, but if people had have paid more attention to what they were spending their money on in the first place, they wouldn't have to worry about this problem.

    It also wouldn't have kept half as many people in employment, which goes back to my first point above.
    I know there are grants for home improvements, but these have only come in now that everyone with any spare cash has spend it on a shiny new 11 car and can't afford fix up their house now.

    That's someone's personal choice - if they want to buy a new car instead of building an extension then it's up to them to do so.

    Alot of people put money into home improvements instead of buying a car, so this is kind of a moot point.
    Or they could have reduced VAT on restaurant's and hotels to 0% to get people spending their money, as opposed to a lot of cases the with cars spending the banks money, on something that will provide direct employment in Ireland.

    Again, the Irish motor trade provides direct employment in Ireland. Thousands of people in fact. Just because car's aren't built in Ireland anymore does not mean that the motor trade is useless.

    I can also assure you that the majority of people who bought a new car in the last two years more than likely did so with their own cash. The banks in Ireland simply do not have the money to lend.
    The UK, USA and all the other countries which had scrappage schemes where trying to stimulate their own car industries, and failed miserably since nearly everyone bought small Asian cars, yet we decided the best industry to stimulate was one we don't have:confused:


    Again, I don't see your point. We DO have a Motor Industry in Ireland. While it is not involved in the manufacturing end of things, it is involved in the sales, and maintenance end of things.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭Gophur


    Del2005 wrote: »
    The industry which was most decimated by the collapse should have been propped up not car sales,.........

    You mean the construction industry? The industry where semi-skilled hod-carriers were pulling home over €1k a week, for building cr4p houses?

    Del2005 wrote: »
    .......

    The housing stock in this country is in bits, badly insulated and made. If the government gave as good a grant for improving our housing stock it would have made a bigger impact here then people buying new cars.

    ............:

    I doubt it!

    Del2005 wrote: »
    ..............
    I know there are grants for home improvements, but these have only come in now that everyone with any spare cash has spend [sic] it on a shiny new 11 car and can't afford fix up their house now.

    .............

    Only people with 10 year old qualifying cars were able to avail of the scrappage scheme. A bit strange to say that everyone with spare cash has spent it on a new car.

    (There's approx €60B on deposit in Irish Banks. Not much of this was spent on new cars)

    Del2005 wrote: »
    .........
    Or they could have reduced VAT on restaurant's [sic] and hotels to 0% to get people spending their money, as opposed to a lot of cases the with cars spending the banks money, on something that will provide direct employment in Ireland.

    .....:

    So, a 0% VAT on Hotels and Restaurants. If that was the case, are you suggesting prices would have come down significantly enough to stimulate that sector of the economy?

    Del2005 wrote: »
    ..................
    The UK, USA and all the other countries which had scrappage schemes where [sic] trying to stimulate their own car industries, and failed miserably since nearly everyone bought small Asian cars, yet we decided the best industry to stimulate was one we don't have:confused:

    The Irish stimulus was for the Car Retail 'Industry', it was never designated to be a stimulus for any manufacturing industry.

    For a safe, clean economy, we need to refresh our motoring stock. The scrappage scheme helped in that respect. If we have no new cars sold, we will have a shortage of used cars. (Try getting a '09 car?)

    As for messing up the used car market? Surely taking used cars out of the market, for scrappage would help increase the prices of used cars and help the used car sales industry?


    Also, if the scrappage scheme saved 5,000 people from being on the dole for the past two years, it's worth it. (5,000 x 2 years dole payments would be in the region of €50m in benefit)


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    no , it wouldnt, not everybody who used the scrappage scheme was stupid enough to buy those cars which will probably be on the scrap heap before the next scrappage scheme rolls around

    I think anyone in the trade can confirm that the A4 or similar was not the most popular seller to folks availing of the scrappage scheme. Do you honestly think the majority of those who availed of the scheme did not buy the likes of a Megane, Focus, Clio, Yaris, i30, C'eed etc??
    I have to disagree with you there - it's of huge benefit to the thousands of PAYE workers who are employed in the motor trade. If these people were to be made redundant the Taxpayer would end up footing a bill of hundreds of millions to support these people..

    How many new cars sold since the scrappage scheme was introduced were sold to someone who availed of the scrappage scheme? Ish/ballpark figures are fine if anyone has them :)

    Once the scrappage scheme ends are all these thousands of folk going to be made redundant so?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Spent on what though??!

    Are you suggesting that Irish people shouldn't buy a car at all because they can't buy one that is built in Ireland?

    If that's the case, we shouldn't buy TV's, IPod's, cookers, or pretty much anything that is used in our day to day lives, because very few of these everyday items are built in Ireland too.

    Your posts make no sense to me.
    That's because you work in the motor industry.;) I'm suggesting that our government shouldn't encourage the importation of consumer goods from abroad.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,102 ✭✭✭✭Drummerboy08


    RoverJames wrote: »

    How many new cars sold since the scrappage scheme was introduced were sold to someone who availed of the scrappage scheme? Ish/ballpark figures are fine if anyone has them :)

    Once the scrappage scheme ends are all these thousands of folk going to be made redundant so?

    I don't have clue tbh.

    On your second point, I think that there will be a number of redundancies once the scrappage scheme ends, but not near as many if we never had the scheme in the first place.

    The scrappage scheme has generated a lot of cash flow, and a small amount of income for dealers that would not have been able to survive without it. Because of this, they can now keep their heads above water.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,102 ✭✭✭✭Drummerboy08


    Anan1 wrote: »
    That's because you work in the motor industry.;) I'm suggesting that our government shouldn't encourage the importation of consumer goods from abroad.

    Yes, I work in the industry but I don't see what that has to do with it?

    How many day to day consumer items are manufactured in Ireland? In fairness, if Ireland didn't import these goods, we wouldn't have TV's, Radios, Cookers, shower units...........the list is endless.

    We'd be back to the times of spuds and wattle and daub homes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 99 ✭✭gazmc18


    A lot of people who bought cars on scrappage did though, and the other point about scrappage is that most of those cars have such low VRT that after the €1500 refund is given, there is no VRT left, so not all cars sold under scrappage resulted in the Government getting VRT, so it's just VAT they got!

    The VRT Refund is €1250 btw, not many cars have lower VRT than €1250 so anything got in above that is profit. I dont see the problem here.
    Even if they only got VAT isnt that a more positive contribution than having to pay people on the dole every week that lost their jobs?

    I dont think this anti scrappage scheme argument has been thought through properly, very little to argue against it imo


  • Advertisement
Advertisement