Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Do you think you'd survive the first 48 hours?

Options
2

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    There is little chance of people occupying my gaff without keys. I suppose the old porter guy could get in. I may need to neutralize him now or maybe just get the keys he has off him.

    If I were far from home I probably wouldn't try to get back. I'd hit the road and make for the sticks. This would not be ideal as my local knowledge is poor and the plan would need to be constantly improvised. Not a good place to be.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    I have the same problem. My place is fairly secure and private and would serve me well if I was at home when things went wrong. It I was out and about though, I don't know how I would fair.

    Being trapped in a big city would be a nightmare and severely reduce your chances of getting out. If you knew the city, that would be a small advantage but if you were just visiting for the day you would be fcuked. I think the best bet in that scenario would be to head to the sewers and try to meander out of the city by going under it and head for the country. Zombies never seem to look down.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Paddy Cow wrote: »
    Being trapped in a big city would be a nightmare and severely reduce your chances of getting out.
    Your pretty much screwed if you're stuck in a city when the poop hits the fan.

    I don't think anything can happen that quickly though. You'll have days to deal with the problem.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,750 ✭✭✭john the one


    ScumLord wrote: »
    You'll have days to deal with the problem.

    What happens when we assume?


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    What happens when we assume?
    It's not really an assumption, its just based on the fact a virus can't take over in the space of a few hours. Even the fastest acting virus needs around 3 days as far as I'm aware.

    There are physical limitations that make instantaneous transformation virtually impossible. Even if it was possible it would be a completely self limiting thing for a virus to do, with instantaneous transformation or even if it happens within a day the virus just won't be able to spread. It would get stopped pretty much where it started.

    Under normal circumstances the virus will spread hidden and by the time it shows symptoms it would have jumped continents.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭RiderOnTheStorm


    ScumLord wrote: »
    ...Even if it was possible it would be a completely self limiting thing for a virus to do, with instantaneous transformation or even if it happens within a day the virus just won't be able to spread. It would get stopped pretty much where it started....

    Thats if its a natural virus. If it was man-made (like Rage) or an alien virus, it could behave very differently. Its not as if we are dealing with a known virus. There are zombie-like viruses out there, but its not the known stuff that will cause the Zombie Apocalypse (imho), but rather a new and different virus.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭degrassinoel


    Thats if its a natural virus. If it was man-made (like Rage) or an alien virus, it could behave very differently. Its not as if we are dealing with a known virus. There are zombie-like viruses out there, but its not the known stuff that will cause the Zombie Apocalypse (imho), but rather a new and different virus.

    or a wizard!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭RiderOnTheStorm


    or a wizard!

    ...or voodoo!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,069 ✭✭✭Tzar Chasm


    What about a walking dead type airborne virus, so it takes the first 48 hours to infect, then once you die, instant zombification


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Thats if its a natural virus. If it was man-made (like Rage) or an alien virus, it could behave very differently.
    Not really, if it's a virus it's going to work a particular way, you have to remember to a virus your body is a continent, it can't travel from one end to the other and do the work it needs to do in hours, it is a physical process limited by physical and chemical processes.

    I'll have to look into it again but I'm pretty sure a virus can't even begin it's work proper for the first three days inside a body.

    There is a very real physical limitation that would prevent a virus working that fast. I think if you want something instant you'd need to look to something like a bacteria that could produce some sort of venom/chemical drug. The venom will give you fast acting behaviour changes and the bacteria will do the important work of taking over the host.

    A virus is probably to destructive and specific to zombify things, bacteria is much more complicated and as we know is good at manufacturing and converting things into other things.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    A 28 Days Later type virus only takes 20 seconds to infect someone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Paddy Cow wrote: »
    A 28 Days Later type virus only takes 20 seconds to infect someone.
    Yes, but that was a movie, in the real world 20 seconds is so far beyond the realms of possibility that it's really not worth worrying about.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭RiderOnTheStorm


    Maybe it will be a virus. Maybe it will be bacteria. Maybe it will be nanites controlling our brains. It may not be the traditional zombie experience. I find it best to plan for the worst. I hope I am planning for all versions (including the ones that are not currently possible). If I am wrong, and its a 3 day bite-me-virus, then I will be ahead of the game. If you are wrong ...... ;-)


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    If you are wrong ...... ;-)
    Unless the laws of physics change I'm not wrong.

    Sorry for being pedantic but I'm just that kind of bollox.


  • Registered Users Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    The creation of Zeds would need a physics and biology change.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭kiffer


    The creation of Zeds would need a physics and biology change.

    Except for that fungus that makes zombie ants...
    or that worm that makes zombie snails.
    Or toxoplasmosis which makes mice and rats attracted to cat urine so that they can get eaten so its life cycle can complete inside the cats stomach...


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    kiffer wrote: »
    Except for that fungus that makes zombie ants...
    or that worm that makes zombie snails.
    Or toxoplasmosis which makes mice and rats attracted to cat urine so that they can get eaten so its life cycle can complete inside the cats stomach...
    there is a Wasp that uses its venom to turn cockroaches into zombies so their larva can eat them.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭AlanS181824


    This has to be my new favourite forum!

    On topic, I think I would survive at least the first 48 hours anyway as I'm relatively athletic so escape should be easy enough, as for being violent eh...

    Not so much :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    Of course there is the response time of the emergency services/government etc to take into account. A fast acting virus might need a minimum of three days, but how quickly would a nationwide reaction to anything be? Plus what are the chances of something being reported or seen as some sort of flu outbreak.

    Then once we have the dead or infected starting to wander about there will no doubt be a mixture of either blind panic or media spin that could allow an outbreak the chance to get a foothold.


    Then we also have to look into the chance of an outbreak not being one that consists of the truly undead, but rather simply being one of "changed" humans. So we could be talking anything from a Romero style shuffler to a 28 Day Later style Rage sprinter.

    The slower the infected, the better the chances of surviving the earlier stages obviously enough, but what will give people the best chance of surving any sort of outbreak will always boil down to one simply thing. Location at the moment when the outbreak gains a true foothold.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Yes, but that was a movie, in the real world 20 seconds is so far beyond the realms of possibility that it's really not worth worrying about.
    A fast acting virus is unbelievable but zombies are? :p


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭DublinArnie


    I have a lot of pot noodles and canned food at home, so they'll last me at least a few days. I live in an apartment complex, and there's this roof/balcony on top of the building that can be locked. So I'll just barricade myself there, and I have an overview of the street aswell. Not to mention 7 years of martial arts and self defense can come in handy :p.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Kess73 wrote: »
    Of course there is the response time of the emergency services/government etc to take into account. A fast acting virus might need a minimum of three days, but how quickly would a nationwide reaction to anything be? Plus what are the chances of something being reported or seen as some sort of flu outbreak.
    The problem is officials wouldn't be able to treat infected as zombies until it's much too late. They won't be able to go around shooting people in the head without public outcry, police would more than likely have trouble carrying out acts like that. I expect most governments will prolong the act of disposing of the zombies until it becomes critical but even then that wouldn't be the real danger from a zombie outbreak, stopping international trade is what will ultimately bring down the modern world.

    In the beginning the big problem won't be zombies, in the first few weeks it will be the collapse of society and international trade that kills the most people. The planet can't support 7 billion humans without global food production and trade routes. Once that shuts down expect your shops to be empty and people rioting over food. We don't know starvation in the west, civilization will disappear overnight when people are hungry, the animal side will take over and there will be a chaos like the world has never witnessed before. Of course all this will help the final spread of the zombie disease.

    You'll have cities littered with corpses, a proportion of them will be zombies. If zombies lay inactive until they get some sort of stimulus they could hide amongst the dead (which will be absolutely everywhere) like an ambush predator.

    Paddy Cow wrote: »
    A fast acting virus is unbelievable but zombies are? :p
    A fast acting virus would have to break the laws of physics, a zombie disease would just need to find the right conditions to happen.


  • Registered Users Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    ScumLord wrote: »

    A fast acting virus would have to break the laws of physics, a zombie disease would just need to find the right conditions to happen.

    Who's to say it will be a virus?

    Lets just think what else could change the chemistry of a persons brain in seconds. Chemical simulates are all around us and act extremely quickly. Lets say the rage "virus" wasn't a virus but a drug that damaged the brain permanently. If that drug was in air or water supply, it is feasible that change would happen almost immediately.


  • Registered Users Posts: 709 ✭✭✭bushball


    The raises the bar abit....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 166 ✭✭popolive


    I have enough food at home to last for months but not water. Water would be the problem. if the water is not cut off I would close and lock my front door, all internal doors , barricade myself in, draw the curtains, possibly crawl into the attic space, keep calm, make as little noise as possible, draw as little attention as possible and wait it out for months just being calm and conserving energy while listening to a small radio for helpful instructions from what remains of government. I may draw rainwater from a borehole in the roof tiles. If a zombie or threat can make it into my attic space I will break through the roof with a bag of supplies and keep to high ground since zombies don't tend to climb. With plenty of paracord and a hammock I will hang off the side of a building secured to a chimney stack for example if I have to. The longer I stay alive, calm and using as little energy as possible while remaining as calm as possible then the greater my chances of being alive when it blows over. Eventually the zombies will die off I presume.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Who's to say it will be a virus?
    I think it's likely a virus may be to specific to bring about all the characteristics of a zombie. That's why I mentioned a bacteria that could produce a venom earlier. Bacteria can be just as infectious as a virus.
    Lets just think what else could change the chemistry of a persons brain in seconds. Chemical simulates are all around us and act extremely quickly. Lets say the rage "virus" wasn't a virus but a drug that damaged the brain permanently. If that drug was in air or water supply, it is feasible that change would happen almost immediately.
    A chemical could bring about a change instantly and while it could affect a large group of people it would have to be constantly administered to maintain those effects. The body would also need to be functioning to utilize the chemical so it wouldn't produce dead zombies, they could be killed as easily as a normal person and would probably die from exposure or recklessness.


  • Registered Users Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    Not necessary. A chemical doesn't need a living host. Coming in contact with it would be enough. There are currently thousands of long life toxic chemicals already that are pretty simple. A complex chemical could wipe us all out and drive us zed like beforehand.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,750 ✭✭✭john the one


    popolive wrote: »
    I have enough food at home to last for months but not water. Water would be the problem. if the water is not cut off I would close and lock my front door, all internal doors , barricade myself in, draw the curtains, possibly crawl into the attic space, keep calm, make as little noise as possible, draw as little attention as possible and wait it out for months just being calm and conserving energy while listening to a small radio for helpful instructions from what remains of government. I may draw rainwater from a borehole in the roof tiles. If a zombie or threat can make it into my attic space I will break through the roof with a bag of supplies and keep to high ground since zombies don't tend to climb. With plenty of paracord and a hammock I will hang off the side of a building secured to a chimney stack for example if I have to. The longer I stay alive, calm and using as little energy as possible while remaining as calm as possible then the greater my chances of being alive when it blows over. Eventually the zombies will die off I presume.

    Sounds like a holiday!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭RiderOnTheStorm


    popolive wrote: »
    I have enough food at home to last for months but not water. Water would be the problem. if the water is not cut off I would close and lock my front door, all internal doors , barricade myself in, draw the curtains, possibly crawl into the attic space....

    Totally agree about the home. They are very secure (against Z's). Remember, they dont have weapons, so a little barricading will go a long way. As mentioned before, if you can remove your stairs then the upstairs is very secure. I am always a fan of height in this scenario. Z's dont climb....

    Thats the first 48 hours...... a house / attic is not good for survival against other survivors / raiders.

    Loving the chimney-hammock idea! ;-)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    ScumLord wrote: »
    The problem is officials wouldn't be able to treat infected as zombies until it's much too late. They won't be able to go around shooting people in the head without public outcry, police would more than likely have trouble carrying out acts like that. I expect most governments will prolong the act of disposing of the zombies until it becomes critical but even then that wouldn't be the real danger from a zombie outbreak, stopping international trade is what will ultimately bring down the modern world.

    In the beginning the big problem won't be zombies, in the first few weeks it will be the collapse of society and international trade that kills the most people. The planet can't support 7 billion humans without global food production and trade routes. Once that shuts down expect your shops to be empty and people rioting over food. We don't know starvation in the west, civilization will disappear overnight when people are hungry, the animal side will take over and there will be a chaos like the world has never witnessed before. Of course all this will help the final spread of the zombie disease.

    You'll have cities littered with corpses, a proportion of them will be zombies. If zombies lay inactive until they get some sort of stimulus they could hide amongst the dead (which will be absolutely everywhere) like an ambush predator.


    .



    Which is what I am getting at. The response time of the state would aid in the spread of the infection as it would most likely be seen as some strain of flu. So by the time we actually got to the stage where we had mr and mrs Z shuffling about, the country would be in a bit of a mess anyway.

    But regardless the most important thing in terms of being able to survive the first 48 hours after the Zeds start to surface has to be location.


    And location becomes an even bigger factor if we were to spread the net a bit wider to include the possiblity of an outbreak of something that was a bit quicker on two legs than a regular shuffler. Although my own take is that if the infected or undead (depending on what decided to pop up) had more pace and mobility than a basic shuffler, then it would be an endgame scenario.

    The one type of infected that really would be a pain in the butt would be the zeds that were in the Morningstar strain trilogy by the late Z A Recht. They start off as infected humans so retain the kind of pace/mobilty that a regular human would have, but once "killed" (as long as it was not by a clean headshot) they come back as the more traditional shuffling undead.


Advertisement