Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"If I'm not out there training, someone else is."

15556575961

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 928 ✭✭✭TRR_the_turd


    So I'm going to play Devil's advocate here!!!!!!

    What was the thinking behind that session? Looking at prescribed reps and recoveries I'm guessing it's a bench mark session. Something to compare against in a few weeks time! If that was the case it's a bit odd that the pace for all reps was basically identical! Looks like a one gear session. Maybe that's where you are at the moment and the gears will come over the coming weeks but for them to come there will have to be a bigger emphasis on shorter explosive reps 150-300 metres in my opinion.

    Getting back to the original question of the thinking behind this session! I had assumed you were targeting 3k! I wonder is this the best type of bench mark for a 3k runner? I know you said it was a sprinter type session. No two ways about it. This is a 400/800 type bench mark session in my opinion. More speed based that aerobic and speed required for 3k! Would you agree or disagree?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    So I'm going to play Devil's advocate here!!!!!!

    What was the thinking behind that session? Looking at prescribed reps and recoveries I'm guessing it's a bench mark session. Something to compare against in a few weeks time! If that was the case it's a bit odd that the pace for all reps was basically identical! Looks like a one gear session. Maybe that's where you are at the moment and the gears will come over the coming weeks but for them to come there will have to be a bigger emphasis on shorter explosive reps 150-300 metres in my opinion.

    Getting back to the original question of the thinking behind this session! I had assumed you were targeting 3k! I wonder is this the best type of bench mark for a 3k runner? I know you said it was a sprinter type session. No two ways about it. This is a 400/800 type bench mark session in my opinion. More speed based that aerobic and speed required for 3k! Would you agree or disagree?

    Devils advocate? You? Never :D

    Good spot on the paces, yes they were one paced and that pace is roughly 800m effort (maybe a shade under) ideally this was supposed to be a little bit progressive but not hugely and I didn't have in the legs. The plan itself has quite a bit more 800 paced 2s than I would be used to. This session was about flooding the legs with lactic and holding form and pace (effectively building up lactic tolerance which is something I have very little experience in over the last few years due to the nature of my training)

    With regards 3k being the target - yes and no :D Main target is just to work on speed a bit more over shorter distances (800-3k) the reason I chose 3k as target race for nationals was simple - its the only one I stood a hope of not being blown out the back of and effectively being left to time trial on my own. Before than I will be doing a 1500 and 800 and going well then nationals will be on the card (realistically feel I need to be in about sub 9.05 shape). Most of the training is however based around a 1500 plan.

    Effectively these 2 months are simply working on area's of weakness and tackling improved fitness from a different angle before focusing on 5k/10k for the summer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 851 ✭✭✭thewolf_ie


    What's your weekly mileage at the minute bud? I think I need a few explosive 100-200 sessions as my speed is zapped over all the slow running. Im going to hang around with 70 mpw for a few weeks and try a few sessions down on the TAC track after the 31st ;) Between the layers and the cravel track here I'm not able to get my bearrings.


  • Registered Users Posts: 928 ✭✭✭TRR_the_turd


    Ok so maybe 3k isn't the sole focus. Maybe fair to say 1500/3000? I'm still think there is a bit of a disconnect between that session and your goals. No doubt it will have some benefits but in the grand scheme I think it has limitations. As an example one of seb coes benchmark sessions would have been reps of 200s but they be high in volume 8-10. Similarly I remember watching Niall Briton doing a session of 400s finishing off with 200s and 150s. I can't remeber the exact number of reps. In my mind that's what I thought you'd be at yourself.

    I know there is more than one way to skin a cat and I'm not been argumentative for the sake of it. Myself and TBB made a pact a while ago to question people's training if we could in the hope we'd get constructive comments on our own.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    I welcome the discussion that is what these logs is all about otherwise they just become about back slapping and ego stroking.

    In terms of middle distance training obvious I wouldn't have the same background as yourself growing up so its definitely open to interpretation from you and others.

    In terms of bench mark sessions these would not be the aim looking at the program there seems to be 3 particular 1500 specific sessions through the weeks

    3x(500, 1 min jog, 300 at 1500 pace)
    3x(600, 1 min jog, 200 at 1500 pace)
    3x800 @ 1500 pace

    The references you made regarding Coe and Bruton are interesting alright. There are a number of sessions would be of the same vein as the latter you described and in terms of Coe's high volume approach in the past when I have pursued this style of running I often found that I either recovered to quickly to make these race specific or I upped the pace or reduce the recoveries to the point where it was not sustainable for any duration without injury or niggle ensuing. Most likely it could have been a case that I was not being sensible about the training at the time but this is why this plan appealed to me. The session you mentioned is simply one of 2 under distance specific sessions and by no means the primary sessions of the plan.

    With this session I found it longer sustained distances more useful for getting the body to maintain paces while lactate build up overloaded and caused fatigue (well Hydrogen ions but you know what I mean)

    Overall my strength is definitely my aerobic base but I am interested to see where a little bit of focus on my weaknesses but I would be lying if I aid I had all the answers these 2 months are very much un chartered territory in that regard.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    thewolf_ie wrote: »
    What's your weekly mileage at the minute bud? I think I need a few explosive 100-200 sessions as my speed is zapped over all the slow running. Im going to hang around with 70 mpw for a few weeks and try a few sessions down on the TAC track after the 31st ;) Between the layers and the cravel track here I'm not able to get my bearrings.

    Mileage last week was around 75, to be honest I am not really tracking it that closely I am just running frequently and letting the training excel do the counting for me and what ever comes out at the end of the week well and good.

    Loss of speed? Didn't I see you bust out a 60 sec 400 after a 13 mile run? Would say the speed hasn't gone away and you will surprise yourself with how quickly turnover can be brushed up if you have a good base (and a few strides after easy running)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,290 ✭✭✭Oregano_State


    I agree with TRR in that I would see that session as a 400/800 session, however even though those events are not what you're aiming for, I think touching on those paces semi-regularly is important for all types of runners. AFAIK Alberto Salazar's group do sets of 100m regularly throughout the season to work on speed, for example.

    On the point that you ended up running each of the reps at roughly the same pace, I would say is down to not having done this type of session in while, more than the design of the session itself. As I said already, if you repeated the session in a couple of weeks, I bet you'd find it much easier to pick up the speed on the 300m and 200m reps.

    However, if you are interested in working on pure speed and/or acceleration, I would be more inclined to go shorter in the rep distance; 30-60m IMO. I realise Ecoli that you know all this stuff already but I'll leave it here anyway as a lot of people read your log and it might be of benefit to some of them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    I would completely agree with you guys with regards this being a 400/800 session there is no doubt about it. I do see the merit in doing the odd under and over distance session as well for certain.

    In terms of pure speed I don't plan on doing much of this as I am trying to focus on sustaining speeds I already have (2.02-2.04 is about as fast as I am hoping to run with racing 800)

    I will however be bringing back in the gym work as well as the 10m resistant sprints (similar to sleds style stuff) as a way to focus on explosive power


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Tuesday PM 5.5 miles easy (7.23 min pace)

    Legs felt a bit crap on this run just as a result of the session earlier but overall actually felt pretty good kept it nice and handy in the cold temps though. Think I got luck as by the time I got out for this run the snow was gone and there were very few icy patches

    Wednesday AM 10 miles easy (7.33 min pace)

    Continued my weekly tourist run, not quite to the Lemon levels but getting to run in new places atleast once a week. This time it was seanmoore park with quirky and dublinrunner. A nice handy one as the legs still fairly heavy from yesterdays session. Was enjoyable and a nice little hidden gem that I had never ventured near (bar the odd track race at Irishtown)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 928 ✭✭✭TRR_the_turd


    ECOLII wrote: »

    In terms of bench mark sessions these would not be the aim looking at the program there seems to be 3 particular 1500 specific sessions through the weeks

    3x(500, 1 min jog, 300 at 1500 pace)
    3x(600, 1 min jog, 200 at 1500 pace)
    3x800 @ 1500 pace

    Is this from a Magness programme? I get they're not the main sessions but just haven't come across these type of sessions myself in the past so was interested.



    I agree with TRR in that I would see that session as a 400/800 session, however even though those events are not what you're aiming for, I think touching on those paces semi-regularly is important for all types of runners. AFAIK Alberto Salazar's group do sets of 100m regularly throughout the season to work on speed, for example.

    Wouldn't disagree with you but I'd be surprised if the length of recoveries for these sets of 100s were very more than a minute and I'd expect the volume of them to be quite high 10+. If you look at most marathon runners you will see they talk about throwing in "some strides", that's what road runners refer to sets of 100 metres as!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    I would not see anything wrong with doing a 800-400m pace session in the pre-comp phase of a 1500m plan. In fact there would be something wrong if you did not do them (though Jack Daniels might disagree). In an 800m race (or a 1500m championship event) you will need to be able to cover the first 200m in around 30s to get yourself into position. You do not want that to be the first time you hit those paces.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Is this from a Magness programme? I get they're not the main sessions but just haven't come across these type of sessions myself in the past so was interested.

    Yup from the Magness programme alright I have an excel done up with my training and I will post up (without the few tweaks I have made myself) to give you an idea of the training for this block.

    These broken sets are actually not too uncommon believe it or not and, funny enough, I was talking to a lad over the weekend about them sessions and his old college coach (1.46/3.35 man) seemed to be a big fan and had him doing good bit of this style of work.
    Wouldn't disagree with you but I'd be surprised if the length of recoveries for these sets of 100s were very more than a minute and I'd expect the volume of them to be quite high 10+. If you look at most marathon runners you will see they talk about throwing in "some strides", that's what road runners refer to sets of 100 metres as!

    I think that Salazar had them doing a good bit of work with John Cook in the past and not all the sessions would be what are typically described as distance type sessions with a huge emphasis on long recoveries due to the CNS susceptibility to fatigue. (Open to correction on this part though)


  • Registered Users Posts: 851 ✭✭✭thewolf_ie


    ECOLII wrote: »
    Mileage last week was around 75, to be honest I am not really tracking it that closely I am just running frequently and letting the training excel do the counting for me and what ever comes out at the end of the week well and good.

    Loss of speed? Didn't I see you bust out a 60 sec 400 after a 13 mile run? Would say the speed hasn't gone away and you will surprise yourself with how quickly turnover can be brushed up if you have a good base (and a few strides after easy running)

    Yes but I was pushing like I was trying to hit 55. And then during 12 x 400 off 60 seconds last night I found it hard hit 79-77 and even got a couple of 81. Maybe it was the cold, snow and all the layers. Just felt my body won't kick into the higher gear to get into mile pace. Maybe I just need to get down to that 1500 and hit it hard!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    thewolf_ie wrote: »
    Yes but I was pushing like I was trying to hit 55. And then during 12 x 400 off 60 seconds last night I found it hard hit 79-77 and even got a couple of 81. Maybe it was the cold, snow and all the layers. Just felt my body won't kick into the higher gear to get into mile pace. Maybe I just need to get down to that 1500 and hit it hard!

    Weather can play a major factor. I would say that unless you are targetting indoors it's probably a good thing that you are not sharp at this stage of the year. The speed stuff is the icing on the cake. While all the fast stuff and sessions that look great on paper usually happen in the last few weeks of training ultimately they don't mean squat unless you have the substance put in prior to that.


    "Milers are made in winter not in summer"

    (Can't remember who said it but great quote)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    ECOLII wrote: »

    I think that Salazar had them doing a good bit of work with John Cook in the past and not all the sessions would be what are typically described as distance type sessions ...

    John Smith too, allegedly :rolleyes:

    http://www.oregonlive.com/trackandfield/index.ssf/2013/03/oregon_track_field_rundown_alb_9.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 851 ✭✭✭thewolf_ie


    ECOLII wrote: »
    Weather can play a major factor. I would say that unless you are targetting indoors it's probably a good thing that you are not sharp at this stage of the year. The speed stuff is the icing on the cake. While all the fast stuff and sessions that look great on paper usually happen in the last few weeks of training ultimately they don't mean squat unless you have the substance put in prior to that.


    "Milers are made in winter not in summer"

    (Can't remember who said it but great quote)

    Ah yes you are correct indoor will be a session not a race if I even go. Only reason I do a few blocks of fast stuff is to maintain my stride and I like doing it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    dna_leri wrote: »

    Right you are sorry getting mixed up with Cook who was involved with NOP in the very early stages


  • Registered Users Posts: 928 ✭✭✭TRR_the_turd


    dna_leri wrote: »

    If it's good enough for the junkies, it's good enough for ecoli! :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    If it's good enough for the junkies, it's good enough for ecoli! :)

    You can take the man out of Tallaght but not Tallaght out of the man :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Wednesday PM 30 min flexibility

    Maybe I am going soft in my old age but despite the ego telling me to man up and face a bit of weather my head was telling me that this run was gonna be counterproductive and I would get more out of a bit of flexibility work.

    Thursday AM 5 miles easy (7.07 min pace)

    Handy one around Tymon park this morning, a little sluggish at the start but got into it nicely, was supposed to have a 1500m paced session tomorrow but if don't improve I will probably swap it with Sunday's session given that one I can do from a more effort based perspective.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,290 ✭✭✭Oregano_State


    I agree with you on the decision to duck the weather! Can't be doing any type of quality running in that crap out there at the moment. I was waiting around all day yesterday in my running gear waiting for a calm window that never materialised, and it was quiet enough earlier today until the exact moment I get my runners on, and then it starts howling wind and pissing rain again!

    :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    I agree with you on the decision to duck the weather! Can't be doing any type of quality running in that crap out there at the moment. I was waiting around all day yesterday in my running gear waiting for a calm window that never materialised, and it was quiet enough earlier today until the exact moment I get my runners on, and then it starts howling wind and pissing rain again!

    :mad:

    I have no problem with running in that weather for easy runs and tempos and the like but for 1500m paced stuff if possible I would prefer to try and be in ball park of race paces beyond just effort if for nothing else than the mental aspect

    With last night was more just a case of happy to leave it at the 10 from the AM and do a bit of flexibility work over a short run.

    Hopefully this storm blows over Sunday morning (but not before Saturday night as goig to the Leinster game and the handicap on Castre looks very big considering windy conditions :D)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Thursday PM 8 miles easy (7.10 min pace)

    Was not in the mood of this however given how much the wind had died down in comparison to the day before I had no excuse. Decided to be tactic with my route choice and venture up to Brother's Pearse territory (thankfully under the stealth of night I could manage to roam these streets without being lynched :P) I purposely made this an out and back loop with wind in my face on way out, in this way I was able to convince myself that realistically this was only a 4 mile of a bit of mental effort and the last 4 would just be cruising home. This helped and after four miles of numbing wind in my face as well as rain I turned a corner and things were hunky dory. Surprised the 1st half was as quick pace was ass it was but really reeled myself back in the second half of the run.

    Friday AM

    2.5 miles easy,
    1 miles stride straights/jog bends
    5x400m with 100m jog rec (35 sec ave)
    2.5 miles easy

    Splits: 70, 70, 71, 71, 71

    Today proved to me why I am not a morning person for sessions, I struggle to get the motivation in the morning's unless I am up and active for a few hours so sensibly I headed out for breakfast and got a number of errands ran and low and behold that teeny tiny Obama voice spoke out with a "Yes we can".

    Down to the track and the warm up and strides did not feel great I was as sluggish as hell and with the wind while not to bad I felt would be worth atleast a second. Hit the first one and it felt very controlled however this was short lived as after the second one I could really feel the short recoveries, by the third one I was hurting and legs were getting rubbery, 4th one really felt like third lap of a 1500m so I put in a real effort to stay relaxed and hold form. Last one and legs were gone so it was just about digging in and seeing what I had left.

    Very happy with that session as the more I thought about it the more I was dreading it but a great race simulation one for the race in 2 weeks and inspired a good bit of confidence.


  • Registered Users Posts: 928 ✭✭✭TRR_the_turd


    ECOLII wrote: »

    Very happy with that session as the more I thought about it the more I was dreading it but a great race simulation one for the race in 2 weeks and inspired a good bit of confidence.

    now that's my sort of session :) Perfect race simulation.

    Back in the day when I use to run these sessions we'd do something similar or sometimes alter the distances. So for 1500
    600-400-300-200
    600 and 400 would be at goal race pace
    Would be a slight pick up on the 300 and 200 would be eyeballs out.

    I was a young buck at the time so recoveries would have been more than 35 seconds, maybe a minute. These were the benchmark sessions I would have been familiar with.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    now that's my sort of session :) Perfect race simulation.

    Back in the day when I use to run these sessions we'd do something similar or sometimes alter the distances. So for 1500
    600-400-300-200
    600 and 400 would be at goal race pace
    Would be a slight pick up on the 300 and 200 would be eyeballs out.

    I was a young buck at the time so recoveries would have been more than 35 seconds, maybe a minute. These were the benchmark sessions I would have been familiar with.

    That breakdown one you mention looks a really good one for getting someone in good race shape for sure.

    Not criticizing a session?:confused::confused:

    People beware there is a turd floating in the waters looking for a new target :P:P


  • Registered Users Posts: 928 ✭✭✭TRR_the_turd


    ECOLII wrote: »
    People beware there is a turd floating in the waters looking for a new target :P:P

    swimming-pool-turd.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 851 ✭✭✭thewolf_ie


    ECOLII wrote: »
    Thursday PM 8 miles easy (7.10 min pace)

    Was not in the mood of this however given how much the wind had died down in comparison to the day before I had no excuse. Decided to be tactic with my route choice and venture up to Brother's Pearse territory (thankfully under the stealth of night I could manage to roam these streets without being lynched :P) I purposely made this an out and back loop with wind in my face on way out, in this way I was able to convince myself that realistically this was only a 4 mile of a bit of mental effort and the last 4 would just be cruising home. This helped and after four miles of numbing wind in my face as well as rain I turned a corner and things were hunky dory. Surprised the 1st half was as quick pace was ass it was but really reeled myself back in the second half of the run.

    Friday AM

    2.5 miles easy,
    1 miles stride straights/jog bends
    5x400m with 100m jog rec (35 sec ave)
    2.5 miles easy

    Splits: 70, 70, 71, 71, 71

    Today proved to me why I am not a morning person for sessions, I struggle to get the motivation in the morning's unless I am up and active for a few hours so sensibly I headed out for breakfast and got a number of errands ran and low and behold that teeny tiny Obama voice spoke out with a "Yes we can".

    Down to the track and the warm up and strides did not feel great I was as sluggish as hell and with the wind while not to bad I felt would be worth atleast a second. Hit the first one and it felt very controlled however this was short lived as after the second one I could really feel the short recoveries, by the third one I was hurting and legs were getting rubbery, 4th one really felt like third lap of a 1500m so I put in a real effort to stay relaxed and hold form. Last one and legs were gone so it was just about digging in and seeing what I had left.

    Very happy with that session as the more I thought about it the more I was dreading it but a great race simulation one for the race in 2 weeks and inspired a good bit of confidence.

    That's the session I done before running the 1500 at Tallaght. At the time I didn't know it was a bench mark session as my coach doesn't give them fancy names. I remember thinking it must be an easy week as the reps were low and fast. It was my first time running on a track. It feels easier on race day though!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭ThebitterLemon


    swimming-pool-turd.jpg

    Is that a purple snack :)

    TbL


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Saturday 3 miles very handy (no watch)

    Just tipped along with one of the lads from the club for this one. Brekkie not agreeing with me though and cut of short enough.

    Sunday 8 miles easy (7.29 min pace)

    Just a handy one tipping along. Took a page out of jebuz's playbook this week as the OH has joined the race effort, 2nd toblerone cheesecake of the week made, I will have to PB by the end of Feb otherwise I fear I will have to go on the Turd's Ricky Hatton style diet the way I am going haha

    Monday AM

    2.5 miles easy + 6x80m strides
    5km tempo (3 min rec), 1km (2.30 rec) 600 (3 min rec) 5x150 (90 sec rec)

    Splits
    5km: 17.38 (3.31, 3.32, 3.33, 3.33, 3.29)
    1km: 3.22
    600: 1.54
    150s: 21.7, 22.2, 21.9, 22.0, 21.8

    This was one of those sessions where I was not stuck for time and enjoyed the build up to, didn't know how it was gonna go as was unsure where strength is at the moment but more a session up my alley than the most recent ones. Tempo was a little quicker than I thought it would be though felt very controlled, mp3 player died just before 4k but I just lengthened out the stride in the last one as I was convinced I was fading on the last two laps but when saw the split appeared I was consistent :o

    The one km and I went off like a scalded cat, it was very poorly paced as I thought legs would be heavy so the effort would have to be high, each 200 was slower than the last though despite the poor pacing the overall rep pace was fine

    600 was grand and I was enjoying working down through the gears, felt nice and controlled and form felt good.

    The 150s hurt and struggled a bit to maintain form as I am not used to doing these on very heavy legs buts despite this the splits were consistent (variance being that every second one was into the very slight wind) By the end though I was happy to be done and very happy with the session overall


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,272 ✭✭✭Dubgal72


    Perfect splits on the 5k (and the 150s), was that internal pace awareness or technology? Or a mix?!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Dubgal72 wrote: »
    Perfect splits on the 5k (and the 150s), was that internal pace awareness or technology? Or a mix?!

    All done on track so it was relatively easy to track the splits for the tempo but to be honest used a simple stop watch and just had an idea of what each k split would be for 17.30 and just checked where I was in comparison when I went by rather than actually chasing the splits.

    With the 150s it was more a case of focusing on running relaxed while running hard if that makes sense, the old mantra of "train, don't strain"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Tuesday AM 9.5 miles (7.10 approx)

    Garmin went walkabouts so I just ran off the watch but met up with tRR for this one just a handy enough one, calves a little stiff from yesterday but nothing drastic ended up curbing the pace a little also, felt generally not too bad at all on this one


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Tuesday PM GYM

    1st time back in a long while and something I have been reluctantly putting off since my gym membership expired back in November. Mixed in low intensity plyometrics with the weights and ended up a decent session

    3 x 8 1/2 squats
    6 x 10m high knees over drills hurdles
    3 x 8 lat pulldowns
    6 x 10m lateral high knees (both sides) over drill hurdles
    3 x 8 Bulgarian squats (each leg)
    6 x 10m bunny hops over drill hurdles
    3 x 8 unweighted pistol squats from incline step
    6 x 10m single leg hops over drill hurdles (each leg)
    3 x 8 deadlifts

    Wednesday AM 10 miles (7.09 min pace)

    Body really didn't like me today as the DOMS in the glutes was horrific, eased into the run and was cruising down to Sean Moore park with dublinrunner but tended to fade a little in the late stages of the run


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,290 ✭✭✭Oregano_State


    Good stuff. That's a handy pace you did the ten miler at with DOMS taken into account.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Good stuff. That's a handy pace you did the ten miler at with DOMS taken into account.

    Was all in the glutes so once I got going it wasn't too bad plus the company helped as I always tend to run a little faster with company.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Wednesday PM flexibility work and foam rolling

    Thursday OFF

    Woke up and the body still in ribbons from the DL's on Tuesday so I said I would play it save and push back session till after work for extra recovery, only problem was ended up getting out of work late and was starving so by the time I was dressed to head out for session it was near 2am, looked at myself in the mirror and thought "your not this mad", sense won over and jumped into bed instead

    Friday AM 4 miles easy (7.14 min pace)
    Friday PM

    2 miles easy,
    1 mile jog bend/stride straights,
    600, 200, 400, 200, 500 w/ 3 min rec
    2 miles easy

    Splits: 1.44, 29.4, 68, 29.8, 1.25

    Hamstrings still a touch delicate today but none the less I wanted to get this session done and said to myself that I would just play it by ear and see how it went.

    Few strides and felt a little better (i.e hamstrings felt like they could take a bit of intensity without snapping :) ) had an issue with the fact that the back light on the watch is muck and on these late night sessions there is only one place where it is visible as a result of near by street lights, the 400 mark, so I was effectively running these blind and just going off effort.
    Started the 600 and I felt like muscles were near cramp from the get go so I kept the effort controlled and just below "cramp threshold" wind up the home straight pretty crap and just dug in, saw 68 on the watch which was ideal however the last 200 hurt and finish in 1.44, very happy with that split all things considered I had said to myself a sub 1.45 would be best case scenario for the night.
    200 felt great though had wind on back so was a little quicker as a result again kept in control and couldn't really push for fear of cramp.
    400 and I was hurting as I came around the bend at 300 and the wind really knocked me for sevens up the homes stretch, thankfully though the 200 after again was a more enjoyable affair.
    Last 500 and for the first half I felt okay, started to hurt a little with the wind then and the last 100m probably resembled Forest Gump breaking free from his leg brace my form was that bad but got through it bang on split. Came across the line and was dry wretching which brought me back to my college days; 1am on a sat wretching with the sound of Flashdance Maniac ringing in my ears from the MP3 (for all you agists yes it is before my time but the disco's we went to had retro nights :P)

    All in all I would rank this session pretty highly for the simple reason that despite the wind, threat of cramp, running pace blind I managed to pretty much hit ideal splits while being relatively in control, even though the recoveries were generous has me confident for what I can do when completely fresh


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,893 ✭✭✭Hannibal Smith


    ECOLII wrote: »
    . Came across the line and was dry wretching which brought me back to my college days; 1am on a sat wretching with the sound of Flashdance Maniac ringing in my ears from the MP3 (for all you agists yes it is before my time but the disco's we went to had retro nights :P)

    It was probably all that cheese in your ears ;). (Unless it was Mark Kavanaghs version)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    It was probably all that cheese in your ears ;). (Unless it was Mark Kavanaghs version)

    Hell's to the no. Scientifically proven that cheesy music makes you run faster:p

    My running MP3 is quite "eclectic" mix ranging from 80s Cheese to Dubstep and everything in between


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,893 ✭✭✭Hannibal Smith


    ECOLII wrote: »
    Hell's to the no. Scientifically proven that cheesy music makes you run faster:p

    My running MP3 is quite "eclectic" mix ranging from 80s Cheese to Dubstep and everything in between

    Lol...does a song ever come on and you think...jees I hope no one else can here this?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,370 ✭✭✭pconn062


    Well there goes any thoughts I had of tagging onto you next weekend! :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Lol...does a song ever come on and you think...jees I hope no one else can here this?

    Unfortunately its more a case of "hope I'm not singing too loud" :P

    I have been previously described as being born to be the embarrassing dad/uncle at weddings :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    pconn062 wrote: »
    Well there goes any thoughts I had of tagging onto you next weekend! :eek:

    To be fair the recoveries were fairly generous here so wouldn't read to much into the times in terms of being able to hold that pace on race day, I would like to but we will see how it goes next Saturday


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Saturday 7 miles easy (7.45 min pace)

    Handy one with "the exile" today around PP both were happy to take it nice and slow. Also booked in for a coaching presentation with Honore Hoedt in 3 weeks time. At the rate I am going I might as well move to Athlone for the month of Feb with how much I will be in AIT:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Sunday 6 miles easy (no watch)

    Handy one after work Garmin still MIA at the moment so stuck to a pre determined route legs finally free of the DOMS from early week gym :D

    Monday Session

    2.5 miles easy
    1 mile jog bends/stride straights
    3x(600, 1 min rec, 200) 4 min recovery between sets
    2.5 miles easy

    Splits
    (1.45, 31.5)
    (1.43, 33.7)
    (1.43, 35.1)

    There was goods and bads to be taken from this session

    The good
    - 600 splits generally on target)
    - Form pretty good
    - Felt much better doing this than the 500/300 sets a few weeks back at relatively same paces

    The bad
    - Pacing of session itself a little erratic, 1st set went too slow followed by too fast and the last 200 I switched off a bit having focused too much on the 600

    All in all not a bad session though and nice to get it out of the way early week with race on Saturday


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    pconn062 wrote: »
    Well there goes any thoughts I had of tagging onto you next weekend! :eek:
    ECOLII wrote: »
    To be fair the recoveries were fairly generous here so wouldn't read to much into the times in terms of being able to hold that pace on race day, I would like to but we will see how it goes next Saturday

    And here I thought he was referring to your choice in music and uninhibited singing, and not your pace!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Dory Dory wrote: »
    And here I thought he was referring to your choice in music and uninhibited singing, and not your pace!

    Quite possibly, I would imagine that pconn's ear for music might be offended by the likes of Flashdance and Dubstep alright :o


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Tuesday 1.5 miles easy, 5 miles steady (6.40 pace), 1.5 miles easy

    Nice handy one with TBL up around the waterworks this morning feeling generally pretty good, coming back down I got a shock and had to put the boot down a bit to keep with him as he started upping it more than I expected and caught me off guard.

    Wednesday OFF

    Sleep won out by the time I was able to get out the door after work, weighed up the few miles v the extra hour sleep in a race week I think it was the sensible option

    Thursday Afternoon 4 miles easy (7.17 min pace)

    Handy one around UCD on lunchbreak from work, great feeling seeing the gridlock not moving an inch as I skated by. Legs feeling really good for the weekend and should be good after a light session to keep ticking over later tonight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 928 ✭✭✭TRR_the_turd


    Rather you then me heading back out there this evening!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Rather you then me heading back out there this evening!

    Thankfully it looks like I won't have to bring the shovel down to the track :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭ECOLII


    Thursday PM

    2 miles easy,
    10x200m w/ jog 200 (90 sec) recovery
    2 miles easy

    Splits:
    34.4, 33.5, 33.6, 33.2, 32.8, 32.4, 31.7, 31.3, 29.3, 28.9

    Couldn't bail on this session or put it off with race on Sat so finished work and slowly trekked towards the track. As if I was getting a sign the wind was in my face the whole way urging me to head back to the confines of a nice warm house.

    Didn't bother with drills or indeed removing layers and just went as is, this session was just about getting the legs turning over for the race. Was even nice to myself and ran with wind on my back for the simple reason being this was not a session I was supposed to be running hard it was all nice and controlled. Was great having the track to myself with a fresh coat of powdered snow

    1st rep a bit too controlled and ended up a little slow but I got into my running after this. Got into a bit of an interesting game with myself analysing stride length of each rep in comparison to the previous ones as a result of the footprints in the snow (surprisingly very little difference in majority of cases)

    I dunno whether the legs were loosening out, the wind was picking up, or my hands were losing dexterity due to the temperatures but what ever the cause the reps were progressively getting faster without much change in effort and was running nice and relaxed.

    Around the 6th rep and I was coming down the last 100m and got the fright of my life getting hit with a clump of snow in the back of the head. 1st thoughts were that some thugs had spotted me on the track and decided to come down for a bit of fun (which could have ended up with me getting pneumonia camping out till they allowed me to leave). Thankfully as I finished the rep I realised that it was just as a result of the kick back.

    Last few and really got the knee's driving and put caution to the wind slightly and decided to run best relaxed effort shocked to see a 28 on the watch although again the wind and cold fingers probably had alot to do with that

    Nice little tune up session and legs are feeling good for the weekend


  • Advertisement
Advertisement