Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Website Designers who just use Joomla/Wordpress

  • 27-06-2009 3:12am
    #1
    Cróga
    Registered Users Posts: 184 ✭✭


    Hi, i've a few years experience with Wordpress and Joomla but im still relatively new to web designing (studying software programming in college). I want to get into the web designing business and make a few bucks out of it. Today i checked out the websites of other web designers who advertised in my local paper, to get a feel for the competition. Surprisingly i found all of them just use wordpress or joomla and slap on a free template with its original source removed. Some of these guys are charging 300+ for their services - to do something which only takes a half an hour. Is this normal? Are there any real web designers/coders out there who write their own code and make a website design from scratch?

    The reason why I was put off setting up a website business for so long was because of my lack of skills in photoshop. I dont want to let a client down with a site that doesnt look good. Im just shocked to see that people are doing this and getting away with those kind of prices! If thats the case i could have been doing this a long time ago.

    I would also like to hear what you guys make out of this? Is it right or wrong? Is this the norm these days? cheers


«1

Comments

  • #2
    Chardee MacDennis
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    Croga wrote: »
    Are there any real web designers/coders out there who write their own code and make a website design from scratch?

    :confused: of course there are....


  • #3
    smemon
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,467 ✭✭✭smemon


    Anyone who codes & designs a client project from scratch (no templates, no frameworks, nothing) is either lying or most likely getting well paid.

    The reality is everyone has tools and tricks to speed up the process. Depending on theme licences, it's perfectly legit to remove source code. If the client knows about it & agrees to it, it's not a problem.

    If on the other hand you download a pirated 'premium' template, remove footer links, change the logo & call it your own without telling anyone, well that's another story.

    I find that if people come to me, they're looking for something cheap (as i'm a student)... they don't have massive budgets - if they did they wouldn't be coming my way! They hear about wordpress / joomla etc... and know they're free so they know that keeps costs down. They've also *probably* heard how much i've charged someone else so they know what to expect in terms of a quote and what standard of work to expect.

    The problem arises if a client wants something custom coded or custom designed and you can't do either... then the guys you're talking about are pretty screwed ;)

    Know xhtml, know css, know php and learn how to use photoshop and you're flying. You don't need to be able to code from scratch, you need to be able to understand code if/when you need to mess about with it.

    You also need to understand server stuff as well. ftp, shell, permissions etc... that's pretty essential if you're building websites too.

    €300 is not a lot for lets say a custom design, coding, installation, hosting, training etc... it's certainly not a 30 minute job either :D

    If it's for a FREE template & open source software though it's tad expensive :P


  • #4
    Hydrosylator
    Closed Accounts Posts: 275 ✭✭Hydrosylator


    It's a case of the right tool for the right job, really. Most important is to let the client know which parts of the site came pre-built and which parts didn't.

    If you charge someone to build every bit of a big fancy website and then use an open source CMS, that could be a breach of contract. I myself don't usually use contracts, but I do value my reputation.

    For smaller sites, I'll usually use my own code. For a big massive database-driven site, it's usually better all round to use an existing CMS, rather than building it from the ground up. However sometimes they just don't cut the mustard, and you have to make something unique. That's when knowing what you're doing comes in handy.

    Even if you write every website you do, you'll always end up re-using chunks of your old php code, it just makes sense. If it works and you know it works, you won't write it twice. Personally, I find this preferable to always using a CMS, because I know what everything does, and when I'm adding new functionality, I can do it without breaking the whole site.

    The thing about using free templates all the time is that you can't really put them in your portfolio in case you get stung.
    Another thing is that the really good design jobs (long-running, well paid) are usually for companies who can spot a cowboy a mile away. Well, you know, unless it's a government website. Template jockeys can only ever be template jockeys.

    One **** thing about using CMS's though, modules can be an absolute pain. They're usually a godsend, but I've had experiences where the additional functionality a client wanted added to an open source didn't exist in an add-on, anywhere. When that happens you're talking about either telling a client, "I don't know how to do that" (never say this), spending way too much time figuring out how the whole thing works so you can write a custom component, or starting from scratch.

    But yeah, use free stuff to make sites as long as you're honest about it, but don't expect to progress very far if that's all you do.


  • #5
    Scotty #
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    I'm a Joomla 'hobbyist' who has just recently started doing commercial work. I've been playing around with Joomla for about two years but work in a completely non related profession. A work colleague of mine recently had a site made and was bragging to me how great it was. I had a look and immediately saw it was Joomla & Virtuemart with a pirated Joomlart template. I nearly fell over when he told me how much he paid... €14,500! I didn't tell him it was Open-Source.

    So I thought to myself hey... I can do that. 3 or 4 jobs a year like that is a good living. Working from home, own hours, etc etc. I just finished my first commercial site, a property site for Bulgaria (in English), using Joomla and integrating Open-Realty (Open-Source) and I charged €2,000. I would have charged 6-8K if the customer was Irish.

    I don't think I'm doing anything unfair or immoral. The client got everything he asked for and was delighted with the finished product. He was quoted up to €10K for the job. Yes, anyone can go and download Joomla and throw up a basic website but there is a lot more to it than just that. You're charging for design (I always change templates from the originals), customisation, implementation, experience and expertise.

    Clients really don't care how you make the site once they get everything they want and within their budget.


  • #6
    lucideer
    Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    smemon wrote: »
    Anyone who codes & designs a client project from scratch (no templates, no frameworks, nothing) is either lying or most likely getting well paid.
    As someone who has designed a few client projects from scratch, all I can say is: "I wish" :D
    smemon wrote: »
    The reality is everyone has tools and tricks to speed up the process.
    True, but most good developers use either self developed tools or at the very least tools they have a working knowledge of (internals wise)
    smemon wrote: »
    Depending on theme licences, it's perfectly legit to remove source code.
    I believe the OP was referring to the removal of the source of the work - i.e. hiding where you got the code from (removal of licence) which is most certainly illegal and should be reported.
    smemon wrote: »
    If the client knows about it & agrees to it, it's not a problem.
    Oh the client doesn't need to know about it. The original author however does, and the licence should be available should the client ever care to look for it.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    littlegreenman
    Closed Accounts Posts: 24 ✭littlegreenman


    I've done a few blogs and CMS in our time, and there is not a huge amount of money in it (enough to pay the bills though). I find the real money is in the bespoke programming.

    I outsource my Designs for Wordpress as I wouldn't be able to pay a local designer to design and split and then be in a position to sell the product. There can be a lot of work in design - you must remember that the client can come back a few times before s/he is fully satisfied. It also goes down to the quality of the design as well (montenotte.ie). There are other expenses other than design, software and advertising costs can chew into it.

    I'd suggest if you are going down the road to make a living out of the Internet, have strong programming skills. Most work can be outsourced (but programming tends to stay at home).

    Regards


  • #8
    Fr Martin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 50 ✭✭Fr Martin


    That site montenotte.ie looks terrible - I hope you meant as an example of how not to use wordpress - plus the banner is really poorly done.

    I always use wordpress but I never keep any of the wordpress design - as in blog or search bar, The fact is if you understand PHP and CSS and can build a website from scratch, then you can design the site properly using wordpress but now have a stable backend.

    We were told in college don't try reinvent the wheel but you still need to understand it to properly edit it.


  • #9
    littlegreenman
    Closed Accounts Posts: 24 ✭littlegreenman


    I liked that design. More importantly the customer liked it exactly like that. Apart from yourself, I haven't had any negative feedback. As mentioned, at the end of the day its the customer who is paying, and they must be satisified.

    Point of the thread was (an Fr Martin will laugh) I'm not a designer I'm a coder, but you don't have to be a designer to get the job done! In this instance there was a little money to be made by outsourcing the design to professionals and delivering on the customers expectations.


  • #10
    Fr Martin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 50 ✭✭Fr Martin


    Ok, well I really think you should learn more about editing wordpress and not just using its dashboard, you should learn how to edit the actual PHP and CSS pages and change its look to what you exactely want.

    I'm going to go through a list of what I find wrong with that site and this is constructive criticism so please take as that and not a dig at you.

    Firstly you say your a designer but why does a website for a hotel have a banner with pictures of hurlers and a church randomly (and badly) photoshopped in? First thing I taught when I seen it was that it was a GAA site or something, and have a good look at how that church is imposed on it? can you honestly say that it looks good.

    Your navigation is all over the shop, maybe the site isnt finished but you use the categories widget for navigation, but then further down you do have a seperate page widget for navigation too. even the placement of the widgets is unbalanced (the left and right side).Why not just use a navigation bar at the top?

    In all the site doesnt look like a hotel site, Im not trying to claim to be an expert but knowing how to manipulate wordpress is really the key to creating good sites.


  • #11
    littlegreenman
    Closed Accounts Posts: 24 ✭littlegreenman


    Friendly criticism always welcome. I don't want to go to off topic on this thread as its not fair on the thread owner. But firstly I mentioned I wasn't a designer, that I was a coder.

    The initial brief was that the hotel in quesitoned supplied the photographs and insisted these photographs be in the header, and the hotel photo in the middle. What the designer's done in my opinion was very good.

    The design was built and integrated into Wordpress, whereby the hotel added the categories and navigation etc. From their initial brief, the site is not supposed to be a hotel site. Its supposed to (unless they've changed their minds) communicate various events in their region. I presume they will be dropping in a couple of offers on some of their posts and may get some bookings that way ... (U2 plays in Cork ... at the bottom could be ... great hotel rate ... that type of thing)

    I agree that knowing how to edit wordpress is essential, like in any software. But the default layout from Wordpress is also sufficent most of the time. If a layout needs changing that's not a problem, I don't need to learn it as suggested, I know it. The point is whether it warrents changing. In this instance it wasn't required by the customer or by myself.

    Sorry for hi-jacking the thread


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    ocallagh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,140 ✭✭✭ocallagh


    smemon wrote: »
    Anyone who codes & designs a client project from scratch (no templates, no frameworks, nothing) is either lying or most likely getting well paid.
    Anyone who relies on templates and frameworks is not a proper developer/designer IMO. A proper developer should be able to build custom solutions right from scratch, and many do. Aside from using the Mochikit JS library most of my sites are built from scratch with a new PHP Project in Eclipse and The GIMP 2. I would use EE if it's a simple CMS system, and perhaps Joomla if the client wanted a shopping cart done asap but trying to fit a complex web app into a framework is sometimes not the best approach, a custom system can provide the client with a much much faster and easily maintained product provided it is built the right way and has proper documentation.


  • #13
    Hydrosylator
    Closed Accounts Posts: 275 ✭✭Hydrosylator


    ocallagh wrote: »
    Anyone who relies on templates and frameworks is not a proper developer/designer IMO. A proper developer should be able to build custom solutions right from scratch, and many do. Aside from using the Mochikit JS library most of my sites are built from scratch with a new PHP Project in Eclipse and The GIMP 2. I would use EE if it's a simple CMS system, and perhaps Joomla if the client wanted a shopping cart done asap but trying to fit a complex web app into a framework is sometimes not the best approach, a custom system can provide the client with a much much faster and easily maintained product provided it is built the right way and has proper documentation.
    Yep, that's more or less exactly the way I've found it.
    Self sufficiency is important, especially when things break.


  • #14
    Scotty #
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Before i checked out other web designers i was working out how much i'll charge clients and i worked it out at say 60/70 for a wordpress blog with hosting and domain (maybe make profit of 30/40)
    At €40 profit per install you're sure going to have to install a lot of sites to make a living! Why not do a good job on a nice custom design and charge €300-400 for something unique? Most template clubs will install Joomla and their template for about $40 anyway.


  • #15
    Fr Martin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 50 ✭✭Fr Martin


    Scotty # wrote: »
    At €40 profit per install you're sure going to have to install a lot of sites to make a living! Why not do a good job on a nice custom design and charge €300-400 for something unique? Most template clubs will install Joomla and their template for about $40 anyway.


    Ye, I find most of the work really to be filling the site with the content the client wants - which tends to include meeting up with them and ages spent on the phone convincing them what they should and shouldn't have on - the other main work is the design of it, to make sure it looks good - thats what their paying for - don't underestimate your work, its skilled.


  • #16
    Scotty #
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Came across this article this evening... may be of interest.

    http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-sites/british-telecom-rolling-out-joomla-to-customers/


  • #17
    TheHoban
    Closed Accounts Posts: 19 ✭TheHoban


    Scotty # wrote: »
    Came across this article this evening... may be of interest.

    http://www.alledia.com/blog/joomla-sites/british-telecom-rolling-out-joomla-to-customers/

    Well I'm guessing it saves them time having to constantly update clients websites and deal with 'how do I' support requests.


  • #18
    lucideer
    Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    ocallagh wrote: »
    Anyone who relies on templates and frameworks is not a proper developer/designer IMO.
    Templates/CMSes yes. I'm not sure about framework however. I've never deployed one for a client, but it's something I'm considering. It seems they are as advertised, merely frameworks and require a lot of developer expertise and coding components that fit into the framework from scratch - they're simply a method of structuring and ordering an application that you essentially write yourself.

    I don't speak from experience though, that's merely my interpretation of what frameworks seem to be.


  • #19
    ocallagh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,140 ✭✭✭ocallagh


    lucideer wrote: »
    Templates/CMSes yes. I'm not sure about framework however. I've never deployed one for a client, but it's something I'm considering. It seems they are as advertised, merely frameworks and require a lot of developer expertise and coding components that fit into the framework from scratch - they're simply a method of structuring and ordering an application that you essentially write yourself.

    I don't speak from experience though, that's merely my interpretation of what frameworks seem to be.
    You'd be surprised at how far frameworks go to remove the developer from actual coding. I was also under the impression that PHP frameworks were simply a standard architecture but recently I tried out 6 of the more popular ones. Given a small bit of perserverance someone with minimal html/php knowledge could churn out a fairly complex web application without really knowing what's going on. Some of the frameworks provide you with a command line tool to actually create the tables, SQL, classes etc. One just needs to install a few components and a template and they're away. I think framework is probably the wrong word to use for the likes of Zend, Cake etc.


  • #20
    tomED
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭tomED


    smemon wrote: »
    Anyone who codes & designs a client project from scratch (no templates, no frameworks, nothing) is either lying or most likely getting well paid.

    Completely untrue. In the world of bespoke web development it's even hard to reuse your own catalogue of code at times.

    It's dog eat dog out there too, so getting well paid isn't something that happens very often either!


    ocallagh wrote: »
    Anyone who relies on templates and frameworks is not a proper developer/designer IMO. A proper developer should be able to build custom solutions right from scratch, and many do.

    Relying on a framework is different than "using" one. I know a lot of top quality developers who wouldn't want to work with anything else than some form of framework - why? Because it speeds up their job immensely. It allows them to develop applications in a fraction of the time it would to develop from scratch.

    This doesn't make them any less a developer - but then again - they wouldn't "rely" on one to build an application. It's purely choice.
    ocallagh wrote: »
    You'd be surprised at how far frameworks go to remove the developer from actual coding. Given a small bit of perserverance someone with minimal html/php knowledge could churn out a fairly complex web application without really knowing what's going on.

    But that's the beauty of frameworks - leaving newbies aside - for someone that really understands the ins and outs of how the framework and code behind it works, it's a god sent in a lot of cases. Granted in some cases that they can become a little too restrictive.

    I've seen a few who touted Ruby on Rails for example, now give up on it for more complex applications because they felt it was too restrictive.

    To the OP, I don't see anything wrong with providing a service like that at those prices once you are completely transparent to the client as to what they are actually getting.


  • #21
    ocallagh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,140 ✭✭✭ocallagh


    good post, tomEd - that's the compromise this thread needed!


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    NickNolte
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭NickNolte


    ocallagh wrote: »
    Anyone who relies on templates and frameworks is not a proper developer/designer IMO.

    Rails is a framework. .NET is a framework. The best Web developers in the world use frameworks to be honest.


  • #23
    lucideer
    Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    Hrmmm... while I was defending frameworks above, putting "the best web developers" and ".NET" in the same sentence is just about the silliest thing one can do. ASP.NET sites are without doubt the WORST made on the web.


  • #24
    NickNolte
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭NickNolte


    lucideer wrote: »
    Hrmmm... while I was defending frameworks above, putting "the best web developers" and ".NET" in the same sentence is just about the silliest thing one can do. ASP.NET sites are without doubt the WORST made on the web.

    Spoken like someone who doesn't have a clue what they're talking about. Granted I know that ASP.NET (which I don't use myself) makes a dogs dinner out of CSS and has a few other foibles but it's hardly the mark of a good or bad developer. Some of the brightest developers I know are .NET developers.


  • #25
    Placebo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,070 ✭✭✭Placebo


    Joomla is terrible and
    wordpress is for blogs.

    I've worked with both, I had to offer a site with article features, updated seasonly, so i had to go with wordpress, i had to read a good bit of the wordpress api to meet the customers unique specs, all in all i took a 3 column basic theme and edited it to bits.

    for a simple website, i would find it easier to make it from scratch. Rather than having to edit wordpress, messy.


  • #26
    lucideer
    Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    NickNolte wrote: »
    I know that ASP.NET (which I don't use myself) makes a dogs dinner out of CSS and has a few other foibles but it's hardly the mark of a good or bad developer. Some of the brightest developers I know are .NET developers.

    The mark of a good developer comes not only from their technical expertise and prowess Nick, but also from their ability to distinguish good, useful development tools from "a dogs dinner" as you put it. ASP.NET developers have failed this second test.


  • #27
    MOH
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,465 ✭✭✭MOH


    lucideer wrote: »
    The mark of a good developer comes not only from their technical expertise and prowess Nick, but also from their ability to distinguish good, useful development tools from "a dogs dinner" as you put it. ASP.NET developers have failed this second test.

    Because of course everyone in every job is free to choose whatever development tools they want


  • #28
    lucideer
    Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    MOH wrote: »
    Because of course everyone in every job is free to choose whatever development tools they want
    Absolutely.A plumber is free to choose to use sellotape to connect gas-pipe joints - that doesn't preclude me from saying he is a bad plumber, even if he does a better job of it than any other plumber could possibly do, even if his plumbing skills are superior - he is a bad plumber.


  • #29
    ocallagh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,140 ✭✭✭ocallagh


    NickNolte wrote: »
    Rails is a framework. .NET is a framework. The best Web developers in the world use frameworks to be honest.

    The term framework has now lost all meaning to me. Wordpress is a framework to some people, .NET is a framework how can the two be comparable? I am talking about frameworks such as Zend and Cake which IMO are fine for some jobs but not for others as tomEd pointed out.

    I can't argue that the best developers don't use frameworks if the term framework = Rails or .NET (although I would add the word 'some' in to your broad sweeping statement). To be honest, your definition of framework sits a little better with me. I'd prefer to call .NET and Rails a framework and call the likes of Code Ignitor or Cake something else. But in the context of this thread (of which I assume your reply was) I think you have made a fairly moot point.


  • #30
    Sully
    Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 24,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sully


    What do you expect from someone who offers design at €300+! 9/10 they have no experience, no quality design and are just out to make a quick buck. Setup Joomla/WordPress with a skin thats already out there. There are plenty out there who do similar, but create the design for the system themselves and integrate it - which is probably suitable for budget websites.

    The somewhat more mainstream create the design themselves and the back-end themselves. I offer both this and WordPress/Joomla solutions (this more so lately to help those on a budget or who require a complex CMS system which our own doesn't cover).


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    NickNolte
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭NickNolte


    lucideer wrote: »
    The mark of a good developer comes not only from their technical expertise and prowess Nick, but also from their ability to distinguish good, useful development tools from "a dogs dinner" as you put it. ASP.NET developers have failed this second test.

    I don't like .NET myself. All I'm saying is that I know some s**t hot developers who happen to develop with .NET. For most intents and purposes, .NET's pretty good. I prefer Rails myself but each to their own. Silly argument.
    The term framework has now lost all meaning to me. Wordpress is a framework to some people

    WordPress isn't a framework.


  • #32
    ocallagh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,140 ✭✭✭ocallagh


    NickNolte wrote: »
    I don't like .NET myself. All I'm saying is that I know some s**t hot developers who happen to develop with .NET. For most intents and purposes, .NET's pretty good. I prefer Rails myself but each to their own. Silly argument.



    WordPress isn't a framework.
    I never said it was. You've made some fairly pointless comments in this thread tbh.. and ignored some logical arguments put to you.


  • #33
    NickNolte
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭NickNolte


    ocallagh wrote: »
    You've made some fairly pointless comments... and ignored some logical arguments put to you.

    M'eh. This isn't After Hours. Best of luck in your Web dev career.


  • #34
    Tim M-U
    Closed Accounts Posts: 417 ✭✭Tim M-U


    Croga wrote: »
    Hi, i've a few years experience with Wordpress and Joomla but im still relatively new to web designing (studying software programming in college). I want to get into the web designing business and make a few bucks out of it. Today i checked out the websites of other web designers who advertised in my local paper, to get a feel for the competition. Surprisingly i found all of them just use wordpress or joomla and slap on a free template with its original source removed. Some of these guys are charging 300+ for their services - to do something which only takes a half an hour. Is this normal? Are there any real web designers/coders out there who write their own code and make a website design from scratch?

    The reason why I was put off setting up a website business for so long was because of my lack of skills in photoshop. I dont want to let a client down with a site that doesnt look good. Im just shocked to see that people are doing this and getting away with those kind of prices! If thats the case i could have been doing this a long time ago.

    I would also like to hear what you guys make out of this? Is it right or wrong? Is this the norm these days? cheers


    hi

    no thats not normal to use joomla and ask for €300,

    the freebees: joomla and wordpress, weebly ext.. are wysiwyg editors (what you see is what you get). Do not use a free host, because its not owned by you then, others might reconise it and give the business a bad review. the free software is not owned by you (joomla, wordpress), so why download it.

    I use coffeecup site designer, (coffeecup.com ). Its great! theres a ftp loader too built in!.

    most web designers (like me!) use coffeecup or adobe dreamweaver. dreamweaver is very expensive! (€300). coffeecup is like €30 quid. Or you can go and learn HTML and use notepad (free). I dont use HTML code from scratch for websites because I find it confusing, but I know loads of HTML!.

    have a look at the website I made with coffeecup visiual site designer: www.kilfenoraclare.com .


    -
    The way I look at those who use joomla is: cheap skates!. and from that I know they know NO html coding. there not web designers. and yes there are web designers that make websites from scratch.

    -

    if you have any more questions to do with website making ect.. PM me!.

    Tim.


  • #35
    Webmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,579 ✭✭✭Webmonkey


    Tim M-U wrote: »
    the free software is not owned by you (joomla, wordpress), so why download it.

    I don't understand this. As a softare developer and web programmer, you are encouraged not to reinvent the wheel so using such software is advisible at times.

    Tim M-U wrote:
    Or you can go and learn HTML and use notepad (free). I dont use HTML code from scratch for websites because I find it confusing, but I know loads of HTML!.

    If you know HTML, it shouldn't confuse you to be honest. I think it is much easier to develop from a text editor such as dreamweaver code view or another syntax highlighting editor as you have complete control and you don't end up with unneccessary getting embedded and such things as auto generated CSS that ends up as random names. That turns into a nightmare. Always use an external CSS file.
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    have a look at the website I made with coffeecup visiual site designer: www.kilfenoraclare.com .

    It looks like one of those parking pages. Did you look at the source of that? - the CSS is all over the place, and it isn't HTML complient either.

    To be honest, if you call yourself a web designer you shouldn't really even need to be using a wysiwyg designer.

    A good text editor, good knowledge of HTML, good knowledge of CSS and Javascript and graphics using Photoshop and optimization with Image Ready and way you go :)


  • #36
    Scotty #
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    Tim M-U wrote: »
    The way I look at those who use joomla is: cheap skates!. and from that I know they know NO html coding. there not web designers. and yes there are web designers that make websites from scratch.
    The very same could be said of someone who uses a $30 WYSIWYG editor!

    I have a good knowledge of HTML, CSS, and PHP and I still prefer using Joomla. And no, I'm not a cheapskate. Further more, anyone I know who uses Joomla (as web designers, and I know many!) has a very good knowledge of HTML.

    There is absolutly nothing wrong with using a WYSIWYG editor and it makes no difference if that editor was free, $30, or $300. What's important is that the site looks good and works well (in all aspects) and your customer is happy. Joomla is a lot more than just a WYSIWYG editor by the way.

    If a customer comes to you and says I want a forum on my site are you going to write it from scratch or are you going to install a system thats already available? Are you going to choose vBulletin over phpBB just because VB is not free?

    If someone asks you to edit a photo, should you charge less because you edited it in Gimp rather than Photoshop?

    People can make websites with Joomla and not be a designers. But designers can use Joomla and still be designers.

    Joomla is a cheaper faster way of achieving the same end result. That does not make it wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    Tim M-U
    Closed Accounts Posts: 417 ✭✭Tim M-U


    Scotty # wrote: »
    The very same could be said of someone who uses a $30 WYSIWYG editor!

    I have a good knowledge of HTML, CSS, and PHP and I still prefer using Joomla. And no, I'm not a cheapskate. Further more, anyone I know who uses Joomla (as web designers, and I know many!) has a very good knowledge of HTML.

    There is absolutly nothing wrong with using a WYSIWYG editor and it makes no difference if that editor was free, $30, or $300. What's important is that the site looks good and works well (in all aspects) and your customer is happy. Joomla is a lot more than just a WYSIWYG editor by the way.

    If a customer comes to you and says I want a forum on my site are you going to write it from scratch or are you going to install a system thats already available? Are you going to choose vBulletin over phpBB just because VB is not free?

    If someone asks you to edit a photo, should you charge less because you edited it in Gimp rather than Photoshop?

    People can make websites with Joomla and not be a designers. But designers can use Joomla and still be designers.

    Joomla is a cheaper faster way of achieving the same end result. That does not make it wrong.

    Im just afraid that if a customer finds out im using a free joomla software, they might think of createing a website by themselves.

    I can make a picture gallery with the software or just use flickr, the customer could upload it to their account and I would copy the embed code from their account.

    when editing photos, I would use windows vista photo editor.

    Its just my way of creating websites. plus, sometimes, sites created with joomla, have the joomla logo beside the address bar, and then people might think it was created with free joomla, and think the business like a cheapskate. (no affence)


  • #38
    Webmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,579 ✭✭✭Webmonkey


    Tim M-U wrote: »
    Im just afraid that if a customer finds out im using a free joomla software, they might think of createing a website by themselves.
    Joomla is there to provide the customers with a content management system. It's them that will be using it.

    Obviously if I develop my own custom CMS for the customer, I am going to charge a great deal more. However, if I include Joomla, then the cost is dramatically cheaper. You don't charge for Joomla so I don't see where the problem is.

    No customer should be concerned with this if the cost of the web site is for the design and integration of joomla and what ever neccessary adjustments and administrative costs.


  • #39
    lucideer
    Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    NickNolte wrote: »
    I don't like .NET myself. All I'm saying is that I know some s**t hot developers who happen to develop with .NET. For most intents and purposes, .NET's pretty good. I prefer Rails myself but each to their own. Silly argument.
    It's not a subjective matter of "liking" or "disliking" .NET. .NET produces sub-standard code. If you, as a developer, choose to use a tool that develops sub-standard code, that's a sure a sign as I can think that you're just not a very good developer. If you can't tell bad code when you see it, you ain't "s**t hot", sorry.

    If you disagree with me on this, I invite you to show me an example of any decent app produced by .NET - I've never seen one personally.
    ocallagh wrote: »
    I never said it was. You've made some fairly pointless comments in this thread tbh.. and ignored some logical arguments put to you.
    Attack the argument, not the arguer.
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    most web designers (like me!) use coffeecup or adobe dreamweaver.
    No. No most webdesigners don't. Honestly, they really really don't.
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    I dont use HTML code from scratch for websites because I find it confusing, but I know loads of HTML!.
    Contradiction of terms?
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    have a look at the website I made with coffeecup visiual site designer: www.kilfenoraclare.com
    The page is written in XHTML (XML empty elements), but has a HTML4 doctype.
    It really bizarrely uses class attributes to unsuccessfully specify inline styles - (a) you really shouldn't use inline styles in the first place - (b) they won't work in class attributes.
    Any class attributes that are used "properly" are done so with completely un-semantic consecutively numbered classnames. You should have a look at POSH.
    It repeats style definition superflously, without any attempt to use cascading.
    It ridiculously uses loads of tiny little tables for layout (I imagine). http://shouldiusetablesforlayout.com
    Most significantly, it has 8.65kb of markup for 507 bytes of content. That's over 16 times the markup!

    WYSIWYG programs like Dreamweaver and Coffeecup produce AWFUL code. Don't use them.
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    The way I look at those who use joomla is: cheap skates!. and from that I know they know NO html coding. there not web designers. and yes there are web designers that make websites from scratch.
    As someone who makes websites from scratch, I recommend people use Drupal or a similar online CMS like Wordpress/Joomla (Drupal I'd recommend though). The reason I recommend these is that while people who USE them might not know HTML coding, the developers who WRITE Drupal DO know proper HTML coding and what they create will be a lot better than anything that will ever come out of a computer program like Coffeecup/Dreamweaver. If you know HTML, write from scratch. If you don't know HTML, use Drupal.
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    Im just afraid that if a customer finds out im using a free joomla software, they might think of createing a website by themselves.
    Which is why you need to offer customers something "more" as a developer. If a customer can use free joomla/drupal software themselves, then they should and shouldn't be hiring me. If they hire me, they do so because they want something they can't do themselves - i.e. something more than joomla/drupal offers out of the box.
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    sometimes, sites created with joomla, have the joomla logo beside the address bar, and then people might think it was created with free joomla, and think the business like a cheapskate. (no affence)
    You can remove the logo if you like. Even better would be to leave the logo and explain to your client exactly what you did for them beyond downloading and installing the CMS. Transparency with clients can occasionally get you places.


  • #40
    NickNolte
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭NickNolte


    lucideer wrote: »
    It's not a subjective matter of "liking" or "disliking" .NET. .NET produces sub-standard code. If you, as a developer, choose to use a tool that develops sub-standard code, that's a sure a sign as I can think that you're just not a very good developer. If you can't tell bad code when you see it, you ain't "s**t hot", sorry.

    The way .NET butchers CSS can be easily remedied. Other than that it's a pretty solid framework. You're rabitting on like someone who really doesn't have the first clue what they're talking about. Have you ever even developed anything using .NET?
    lucideer wrote: »
    I invite you to show me an example of any decent app produced by .NET - I've never seen one personally.

    You want the source code as well? :rolleyes:

    noob


  • #41
    lucideer
    Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭lucideer


    @NickNolte
    I've never developed a .NET, nor would the source-code be of use to me. What I have done is helped people developing .NET apps to debug .NET OUTPUT. It is the quality of outputted code I was referring to, not the ease of use of the framework server-side, which is why supplying me with a source code example would be irrelevant. I am talking about client-side code quality, which is abominable. CSS is only one aspect of it.

    You still haven't provided me with an example of a well made .NET app (client-side example), so I can only assume one does not exist.

    As for calling me a "noob", I'm not sure where I personally attempted at insulting you.. actually, now that I think about it, I didn't. Do you have any motivation for the attack?


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    NickNolte
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭NickNolte


    I'm not even going to bother. You're talking through your hat. I'm embarassed to even be involved in this debate.


  • #43
    bSlick
    Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭bSlick


    lucideer wrote: »
    It's not a subjective matter of "liking" or "disliking" .NET. .NET produces sub-standard code. If you, as a developer, choose to use a tool that develops sub-standard code, that's a sure a sign as I can think that you're just not a very good developer. If you can't tell bad code when you see it, you ain't "s**t hot", sorry.

    Maybe the reason they use it is because it is their job and they make money using it.


  • #44
    tomED
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭tomED


    Tim M-U wrote: »
    no thats not normal to use joomla and ask for €300

    What defines normal? I've seen plenty of people do this.
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    the freebees: joomla and wordpress, weebly ext.. are wysiwyg editors (what you see is what you get).

    Not they are not.... They are web publishing tools.
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    the free software is not owned by you (joomla, wordpress), so why download it.

    It's open source - free to use and free to change.
    Unlike your coffee cup software which needs a license to use - you never own it.

    Reasons for downloading and using are quite simple - you don't have to go and revelop a system for your clients that is freely available. It would take you months/years to build a system that is as robust and developed as these systems.

    Tim M-U wrote: »
    most web designers (like me!) use coffeecup or adobe dreamweaver.

    No they most certainly don't.....
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    have a look at the website I made with coffeecup visiual site designer: www.kilfenoraclare.com .

    But your website is only a few pages with HTML - what about functionality?? You haven't got any!
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    The way I look at those who use joomla is: cheap skates!. and from that I know they know NO html coding. there not web designers. and yes there are web designers that make websites from scratch.

    What a ridiculous comment to make - you obviously don't know much about how Joomla or other similar systems work.
    Tim M-U wrote: »
    if you have any more questions to do with website making ect.. PM me!

    No offence Tim - but you don't even know how free open source CMS's work so how can you possible offer anyone advice as to what their best route is when developing a website??


  • #45
    Ronan_
    Closed Accounts Posts: 48 ✭Ronan_


    lucideer wrote: »
    @NickNolte
    I've never developed a .NET, nor would the source-code be of use to me. What I have done is helped people developing .NET apps to debug .NET OUTPUT. It is the quality of outputted code I was referring to, not the ease of use of the framework server-side, which is why supplying me with a source code example would be irrelevant. I am talking about client-side code quality, which is abominable. CSS is only one aspect of it.

    You still haven't provided me with an example of a well made .NET app (client-side example), so I can only assume one does not exist.

    As for calling me a "noob", I'm not sure where I personally attempted at insulting you.. actually, now that I think about it, I didn't. Do you have any motivation for the attack?


    I have read through your posts in this thread. You haven't a clue what you're talking about.


  • #46
    DeadParrot
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,764 ✭✭✭DeadParrot


    Tim M-U wrote: »
    Im just afraid that if a customer finds out im using a free joomla software, they might think of createing a website by themselves.

    I can make a picture gallery with the software or just use flickr, the customer could upload it to their account and I would copy the embed code from their account.

    when editing photos, I would use windows vista photo editor.

    Its just my way of creating websites. plus, sometimes, sites created with joomla, have the joomla logo beside the address bar, and then people might think it was created with free joomla, and think the business like a cheapskate. (no affence)


    I've only started using Joomla in the last 2 weeks (check my retarded post history :) ) and even I know that the above is idiotic. If you cant change the favicon.ico, well, web development might not be for you.

    Enjoying this thread, it shows me how much I have to learn, just finishing off my 1st Joomla site and I thought I was sh1t hot :D


  • #47
    ocallagh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,140 ✭✭✭ocallagh


    This forum needs either a beginners forum or an advanced forum. The two types of developer cannot contribute to the one thread without it turning into a mess. If we had an intermediate/advanced forum it might encourage users with some good experience to actually post more often


  • #48
    Scotty #
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭Scotty #


    I agree. Or a prefix system like...
    • [Beginner] Thread title here
    • [Advanced] Thread title here
    • [Solved] Thread title here
    There are a few available for VB. Or should they just write their own? :D


  • #49
    Ronan_
    Closed Accounts Posts: 48 ✭Ronan_


    Yes but there will always be a misguided beginner who will post in the wrong forum and it will all just start again..


  • #50
    Fr Martin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 50 ✭✭Fr Martin


    Ronan_ wrote: »
    Yes but there will always be a misguided beginner who will post in the wrong forum and it will all just start again..

    Beginner in what though, web devolpment covers a broad area - I'm a **** hot Actionscript coder (I really am :pac:) - but my knowledge in other area's may be limited - it also covers graphic design too which I think people sometimes ignore.

    I think if you can make a site that looks good and functions no matter by what means your ok - theres a lot of bias though on what you use but its mainly amongst other developers as opposed to the clients, who in my experience don't give a **** how its made as long as the above points are true.

    I'v used wordpress and charged clients €400 for the the job, But that covers the overall design, and the content and usually some flash, I never really use templates(themes) and If I do, its edited enough so it looks nothing much like the original (maybe keep just the menu bar or such). And I am satisfied that if I had to I could make the finished product from scratch if I had to, but now I have a stable backend which allows me to edit anything convientely.

    Installing wordpress, selecting a theme and putting in some text is not worth that though because you havnt really designed anything, in answear to the the long forgotten OP.


  • #51
    charybdis
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭charybdis


    Looking through the last five pages or so of threads I can't see anything I wouldn't class as "Beginner", with the possible exception of the thread about the decision to abandon XHTML 2 which has no replies.

    A better way to divide the forum would probably be "Beginner" and "Inane".

    I'm genuinely having trouble identifying any sort of discussion that isn't a product of groupthink or help vampires. The only recent thread that contained any sort of meaningful discussion relevant to the field was locked without resolution or agreement at the request of one of the arguing parties. If people who actually have information worth imparting and are generous enough with their time to do so, only to have their efforts truncated because someone of differing opinion decides they've had enough of an argument and doesn't feel like letting it continue without them, they're not going to be encouraged to offer assistance to others.
    NickNolte wrote: »
    The way .NET butchers CSS can be easily remedied. Other than that it's a pretty solid framework. You're rabitting on like someone who really doesn't have the first clue what they're talking about. Have you ever even developed anything using .NET?



    You want the source code as well? :rolleyes:

    noob
    NickNolte wrote: »
    I'm not even going to bother. You're talking through your hat. I'm embarassed to even be involved in this debate.
    Ronan_ wrote: »
    I have read through your posts in this thread. You haven't a clue what you're talking about.

    Furthermore, this "I'm going to post purely to flatly dismiss what someone else has said without expounding my reasons for doing so" is pretty damn retarded. Apart from being disrespectful to others, it demonstrates your own deficits in argument and understanding.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement