Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

When 72-year-old Pearl met her grandson , little did she realise

2

Comments

  • #52
    The Aussie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,440 ✭✭✭The Aussie


    Mods. Can we ban Sugarhigh for staining my day with the worst mental image there could be, thats so f*cked up...


  • #53
    m@cc@
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,526 ✭✭✭m@cc@


    The only plus point from this is that the mother is dead. Can you imagine being alive to deal with that headf**k?


  • #54
    arybvtcw0eolkf
    Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    Another few years and the crack craic will be 90!.


  • #55
    m@cc@
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,526 ✭✭✭m@cc@


    Fiona Unimportant Registry wrote: »
    Another few years and the crack craic will be 90!.

    I'm certain that was done a few weeks ago.


  • #56
    henryporter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭henryporter


    Maybe they should set up a sub-category in the Darwin awards for this kind of thing?


  • #57
    Minstrel27
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,818 ✭✭✭Minstrel27


    That is all kinds of wrong.


  • #58
    Dunjohn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Dunjohn


    henryporter wrote: »
    Maybe they should set up a sub-category in the Darwin awards for this kind of thing?
    Only if both Phil and Pearl somehow explode during love-making. Darwins are for people who have politely removed themselves from the gene pool.

    Unfortunately, this is the exact opposite of that :(


  • #59
    Pompey Magnus
    Registered Users Posts: 5,406 ✭✭✭Pompey Magnus


    Deleted User wrote: »
    She's old enough to be his Grandmother..

    Brilliant, this actually made me laugh out loud. Very well played sir.


  • #60
    Kasabian
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,689 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    She's no GILF


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    Pretty_Pistol
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭Pretty_Pistol


    That's vile! I couldn't read the whole article. Something seriously mentally wrong with them.


  • #62
    DevilsBreath
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 533 ✭✭✭DevilsBreath


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7x1ETPkZsk


  • #63
    ItsAWindUp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,325 ✭✭✭ItsAWindUp


    Is this not in some way illegal?


  • #64
    pickarooney
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,489 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    greetings wrote: »
    I'd buck her

    Crap joke, but a pity thanks for the literature reference.


  • #65
    phill106
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,821 ✭✭✭phill106


    Tell me its april fools day, please!
    I dont believe it.

    If it is true, he is screwed up over losing his mom, and she is just sick.


  • #66
    --LOS--
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,028 ✭✭✭✭--LOS--


    kiffer wrote: »
    she's the grand mother of the father of the child... so she's the great-grandmother of the baby...

    I meant great grandmother but she's not the mother genealogically or not.


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    IvyTheTerrible
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,949 ✭✭✭✭IvyTheTerrible


    That's just gross.

    What's doubly sad is that they've just paid thousands for a surrogate mother, and the chances of the baby dying or having serious problems is very high.


  • #68
    --LOS--
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,028 ✭✭✭✭--LOS--


    IvyTheTerrible wrote: »
    That's just gross.

    What's doubly sad is that they've just paid thousands for a surrogate mother, and the chances of the baby dying or having serious problems is very high.

    why? It's a donor egg. I just can't believe he paid that much to not have sex with someone else to have a baby!


  • #69
    IvyTheTerrible
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,949 ✭✭✭✭IvyTheTerrible


    --LOS-- wrote: »
    why? It's a donor egg. I just can't believe he paid that much to not have sex with someone else to have a baby!
    Oops I missed the donor egg part. Sure why didn't he just have a relationship with the surrogate then? Ughhh


  • #70
    Carroller16
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭Carroller16


    Pearl is Blue Waffle


  • #71
    RolandIRL
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11,924 ✭✭✭✭RolandIRL


    that's just wrong. he's a grand-motherf*cker alright.

    that family's going to have serious trouble remembering what to put on birthday cards.

    their child "happy birthday, mother, who's also my great-grandma"
    pearl's other children "happy birthday, half-sibling, who's also my grandson"

    gonna be seriously confusing :confused:

    :D


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    ScumLord
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Granny" wrote:
    Confused, Pearl talked to a friend, who told her about an article she'd read on Genetic Sexual Attraction (GSA), which occurs when close relatives meet as adults and are attracted to each other.

    'I could now understand my feelings and realise they weren't wrong,' Pearl says.
    Phil wrote:
    Pearl then explained to Phil what she'd discovered about GSA.

    'I was thrilled and excited,' Phil says. 'I could be with Pearl and it was OK because she'd never raised me or been in my life.'
    No, no, no, that's not what it means damnit! GSA is just a description of some sick ****. It's not in anyway supposed to mean it's ok to ride your relatives.


  • #73
    smellslikeshoes
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭smellslikeshoes


    That's gonna be some messed up kid.


  • #74
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    jd007 wrote: »
    Is this not illegal? I feel sorry for the child they're bringing into the world tbh.

    It is legal in Ireland, I don't know about over there though.


  • #75
    PeterIanStaker
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭PeterIanStaker


    This kid's family tree is going to be fúcking circular!!!


  • #76
    InReality
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭InReality


    Is Granny wearing some fake tan in the second pic ?


  • #77
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    IvySlayer wrote: »
    *vomits all over keyboard*

    For the proper effect,mix quickly chug some Pepsodent.


  • #78
    jimmycrackcorm
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,345 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    I finally have a reason to use GUBU in a post


  • #79
    aDeener
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    had to laugh at the vast majority of replies here - i thought boards was the bastion of whatever two consensual adults get up to is their own business. double standards eh?:rolleyes:


  • #80
    aDeener
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    The Aussie wrote: »
    Mods. Can we ban Sugarhigh for staining my day with the worst mental image there could be, thats so f*cked up...

    now imagine if someone applied the above to seeing say - two men in love. there would be outrage here


  • #81
    Dublin_Gunner
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,692 ✭✭✭Dublin_Gunner


    PeterIanStaker wrote: »
    This kid's family tree is going to be fúcking circular!!!


    So that would be like, a family bush??


    I wonder does she take her teeth out when er.... ugh *shudder* think I'm gonna puke...


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    ScumLord
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    aDeener wrote: »
    had to laugh at the vast majority of replies here - i thought boards was the bastion of whatever two consensual adults get up to is their own business. double standards eh?:rolleyes:
    Nobodies standing in their way, or anywhere near them for that matter. It's just something most people would find personally repulsive, your supposed to find it repulsive, incest is very bad for a community on a genetic level.


  • #83
    stovelid
    Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    The article missed a golden chance to mention Pearl getting a nice necklace for their anniversary, surely.


  • #84
    General Zod
    Registered Users Posts: 2,661 ✭✭✭General Zod


    It's worth rememberiung that there will be no genetic link between her and the child directly (only that as the great grandmother of the child), as it's from a donor egg carried by a surrogate.

    Say what you want about the relationship between them (and it's all kinds of freaky imo) but it's not as if she's giving birth to her own great grandchild.


  • #85
    aDeener
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Nobodies standing in their way, or anywhere near them for that matter. It's just something most people would find personally repulsive, your supposed to find it repulsive, incest is very bad for a community on a genetic level.

    why be repulsed though? they are not harming anyone in the community.

    its double standards and you may as well just say so


  • #86
    --LOS--
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,028 ✭✭✭✭--LOS--


    aDeener wrote: »
    had to laugh at the vast majority of replies here - i thought boards was the bastion of whatever two consensual adults get up to is their own business. double standards eh?:rolleyes:

    Forgive me for not being PC enough to support incest :rolleyes:
    aDeener wrote: »
    why be repulsed though? they are not harming anyone in the community.

    its double standards and you may as well just say so

    Maybe not in this particular case but they have the potential to fuck up the gene pool for generations to come.


  • #87
    SugarHigh
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,265 ✭✭✭SugarHigh


    --LOS-- wrote: »
    Forgive me for not being PC enough to support incest :rolleyes:
    :D


  • #88
    uncle-mofo
    Registered Users Posts: 262 ✭✭uncle-mofo


    General Zod wrote: »
    It's worth rememberiung that there will be no genetic link between her and the child directly (only that as the great grandmother of the child), as it's from a donor egg carried by a surrogate.

    Say what you want about the relationship between them (and it's all kinds of freaky imo) but it's not as if she's giving birth to her own great grandchild.

    It's the idea that creeps me out more than the technicalities of it tbh.


  • #89
    thehomeofDob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭thehomeofDob


    I'M MY OWN GRANDPA!

    Hee hee hee, almost right for this lad.


  • #90
    Concorde
    Registered Users Posts: 51 ✭✭Concorde


    OMG:eek:!

    Though it takes my mind off Gerry Ryan...


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    orourkeda
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    Did he actually ride her?

    Is it IVF?

    Will the baby turn out to be a mutant?

    so many questions


  • #92
    Amalgam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,026 ✭✭✭Amalgam


    The baby will.. have the son's mum as a sister and..

    Oh dear.. I need to lie down for a bit.


  • #93
    aDeener
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    --LOS-- wrote: »
    Forgive me for not being PC enough to support incest :rolleyes:



    Maybe not in this particular case but they have the potential to fuck up the gene pool for generations to come.

    so you admit to it being hypocritical?

    are we not all products of incest in some form or another down through the ages


  • #94
    sam34
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,073 ✭✭✭sam34


    orourkeda wrote: »
    Did he actually ride her?

    yep
    orourkeda wrote: »
    Will the baby turn out to be a mutant?

    no, because there is no consanguinity. the baby is the genetic offspring of him and the surrogate mother, not the grandmother


  • #95
    --LOS--
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,028 ✭✭✭✭--LOS--


    aDeener wrote: »
    so you admit to it being hypocritical?

    are we not all products of incest in some form or another down through the ages

    clutching at straws springs to mind.


  • #96
    herisson
    Closed Accounts Posts: 15,676 ✭✭✭✭herisson


    :eek: thats just WRONG!!!!!!!! Bleurgh!!


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    aDeener
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    --LOS-- wrote: »
    clutching at straws springs to mind.

    good man, sure dont answer...

    cant see how a granny and grandson fcuking in their bedroom, affect you!
    i bet you would be out on your high horse if i, or someone else came out and said two gay men fcuking in their bedroom was disgusting


  • #98
    RolandIRL
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11,924 ✭✭✭✭RolandIRL


    aDeener wrote: »
    if i, or someone else came out and said two gay men fcuking in their bedroom was disgusting
    only if the two men were related by the fact that one's the other's grandfather...

    you're presuming that we're so homophobic that we think gay sex is wrong. it's not. whatever floats your boat, but sleeping with relatives is wrong...it's a bit disturbing IMO.


  • #99
    aDeener
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭aDeener


    whiteman19 wrote: »
    only if the two men were related by the fact that one's the other's grandfather...

    you're presuming that we're so homophobic that we think gay sex is wrong. it's not. whatever floats your boat, but sleeping with relatives is wrong...it's a bit disturbing IMO.

    exactly, in your opinion.

    in these peoples opinion, incest is not wrong.

    im presuming the opposite. the vast majority of boards is anything but homophob ic and if someone said they found two men having sex "disturbing" they would be lynched!


  • #100
    ChocolateSauce
    Registered Users Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭ChocolateSauce


    Giggidy. :pac:


  • #101
    alwaysadub
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,554 ✭✭✭✭alwaysadub


    Already done...

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055898365


  • Advertisement
Advertisement