Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Prime Time Lisbon special debate

Options
  • 10-06-2008 10:17pm
    #1
    sink
    Registered Users Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭


    I thought this was the best program on the Lisbon treaty so far. Very clear arguments on the yes and no side, far better than Q&A last night. What did you think of it?


Comments

  • Options
    #2
    The_Minister
    Registered Users Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    I only saw the second part, but it was very, very good.
    Pat Cox was easily the best of them, but given his past position, you would expect it.


  • Options
    #3
    ircoha
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,290 ✭✭✭ircoha


    can be found here
    http://www.rte.ie/news/primetime/index.html


  • Options
    #4
    ateam
    Closed Accounts Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ateam


    Patricia McKenna is a dreadfully sour woman unhappy with everything, constantly opposing everything. Don't trust anything she says because it's always sour and negative. The Green Party even want rid of her.


  • Options
    #5
    johnnyq
    Closed Accounts Posts: 641 ✭✭✭johnnyq


    I actually thought the Q&A debate was better, some of the audiance's questions were very probing.

    http://www.rte.ie/news/qanda/index.html


  • Options
    #6
    gordon_gekko
    Closed Accounts Posts: 412 ✭✭gordon_gekko


    pat cox may have tilted the result in the yes camps favour

    even though mark little couldnt keep his mouth shut ( this happens when you love the sound of your voice as much as he does ) when cox was talking , he put it like this to the public , think of yourselves as a jury who have seen the witnesses on both the yes and the no side , which were the most credible witnesses

    why wasnt this man brought out earlier , articulate , urbane and not in the least bit dogmatic unlike poor BIFFO


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    ateam
    Closed Accounts Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ateam


    gordon_gekko wrote: »
    pat cox may have tilted the result in the yes camps favour

    even though mark little couldnt keep his mouth shut ( this happens when you love the sound of your voice as much as he does ) when cox was talking , he put it like this to the public , think of yourselves as a jury who have seen the witnesses on both the yes and the no side , which were the most credible witnesses

    why wasnt this man brought out earlier , articulate , urbane and not in the least bit dogmatic unlike poor BIFFO


    I think Pat Cox is a PD member.


  • Options
    #8
    zig
    Registered Users Posts: 1,206 ✭✭✭zig


    I thought Q&A was a shambles and didnt help either side,


  • Options
    #9
    The_Minister
    Registered Users Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    ateam wrote: »
    I think Pat Cox is a PD member.
    :eek:OMG don't mention the war:eek:


  • Options
    #10
    lostexpectation
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,082 ✭✭✭lostexpectation


    gordon_gekko wrote: »
    pat cox may have tilted the result in the yes camps favour

    even though mark little couldnt keep his mouth shut ( this happens when you love the sound of your voice as much as he does ) when cox was talking , he put it like this to the public , think of yourselves as a jury who have seen the witnesses on both the yes and the no side , which were the most credible witnesses

    why wasnt this man brought out earlier , articulate , urbane and not in the least bit dogmatic unlike poor BIFFO

    ff credible witnesses hehehehhe


Advertisement