Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ukraines PM - "We still remember well the Soviet invasion of Ukraine and Germany. "

1235713

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,148 ✭✭✭✭Lemming


    Are you denying the existence of Asov Battalion and the other dozen or so unofficial far right military battalions? These openly fight alongside and on behalf of the regular military.

    Convenient how you just ignored the next paragraph of Putin's quote when responding. Nobody has denied the existence of Asov. It's kind of hard not to, given it's been all over the news for one reason or the other for the last year.

    What is - however - batsh*t crazy propoganda is accusations of a NATO foreign legion. And none of your links show anything other than Ukranians signing up to Asov.

    So, what bit of peddaled obfuscation next?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,185 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    The similarities with the Nazi campaign in Russia/Soviet Union during WW2 and the Kiev "government" campaign in eastern Ukraine are striking.
    On one hand you have the ideological warriors, Waffen SS / Azov Brigade and then of course you have the unfortunate conscripts who are basically fodder and eventually end up fending for themselves.
    At Stalingrad the conscripts were abandoned and left to starve and die while the elite SS were evacuated and something similar appears to be happening right now. The Azov and their well funded (by who?) ilk will not end up like this lot!
    http://rt.com/news/177956-kiev-abandons-ukrainian-soldiers/
    Of course this will be dismissed as RT propaganda but these troops are symbolic of a country that has fallen apart.


  • Registered Users Posts: 118 ✭✭Hibernosaur


    Gatling wrote: »
    can You post verified links

    Which part do you want verified by links?

    That the Maidan protesters were taking over buildings? it was in the news for months.

    Or that there were counter protests in Odessa and other locations with a large Russian-Ukrainian population? Also in the news.

    Do you doubt the burning of the people who were barricaded in by maiden thugs?

    News articles upon news articles exist. One just has to 'google'.

    Thing is, I was there during the crises, and have many family members in Ukraine and Russia (And Crimea) so I probably have a better idea than most what went down than people who get there news from Sky and Twitter hysteria.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,148 ✭✭✭✭Lemming


    Which part do you want verified by links?

    I think it was obvious which bit he was wanting links to .... painfully so.
    Do you doubt the burning of the people who were barricaded in by maiden thugs?

    News articles upon news articles exist. One just has to 'google'.

    We're not here to do your searching for you. You made the claim; it's up to you to show proof; not fob everyone else off with the wave of a hand in the direction of google. And since there's apparently article after article, it shouldn't be too hard to gather your proof of statement, now should it?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Lemming wrote: »
    What is - however - batsh*t crazy propoganda is accusations of a NATO foreign legion. And none of your links show anything other than Ukranians signing up to Asov.
    https://thedailyledeblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/26/english-speaking-mercenary-in-mariupol-idd-as-brit-leon-swampy-from-london-england/

    proof?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    poggyone wrote: »

    Clearly not the same person

    The lad pictured is in the video is clearly younger and has a light colored beard .
    The supposed images calm before the storm clearly shows a man in his 30 ' s with a prominently dark beard


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2nd_SS_Panzer_Division_Das_Reich
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion

    Compare AZOV's emblem with the emblem of the Nazi 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich

    Lets be honest here, you would have to be delusional not to think they knew what they where doing when they picked the emblem.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Gatling wrote: »
    Clearly not the same person

    But it is a foreign national fighting for Azov, something which has been denied here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    poggyone wrote: »
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2nd_SS_Panzer_Division_Das_Reich
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion

    Compare AZOV's emblem with the emblem of the Nazi 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich

    Lets be honest here, you would have to be delusional not to think they knew what they where doing when they picked the emblem.

    So the far right are at war with the far right.

    Not sure why anyone wants to trump.one over the other?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    The similarities with the Nazi campaign in Russia/Soviet Union during WW2 and the Kiev "government" campaign in eastern Ukraine are striking.

    Conversely the similarities between the Nazi's annexation of the Sudetenland (Crimea) and then the false flag operation where Poland was carved up with the Russians (Eastern Ukraine) is also quite striking.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudetenland#Sudeten_Crisis
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Himmler
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Poland
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact

    The one I see here emulating the Nazi's more is Putins Russia. Yes there are far right actors on the Ukrainian side but tbh looking at the makeup of the so called "Rebels" I would say they are balanced by the unsavoury mercenary types who are driving Moscows proxy war.

    The Russians have form doing deals with Nazi's as well and their society today is certainly exhibiting the "freedoms" of Nazi Germany as well ;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    German ZDF shows Azov Battalion soldiers with Nazi symbols
    http://youtu.be/Mf0vbGj9cO4

    Everyone know the meaning of these symbols, you don't wear them without being a Nazi, it is becoming more and more apparent that NATO has backed the wrong horse in this conflict.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    So the far right are at war with the far right.

    Not sure why anyone wants to trump.one over the other?

    A lot of denial here in this forum, they are not the good guys, so why all the support for them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    poggyone wrote: »
    A lot of denial here in this forum, they are not the good guys, so why all the support for them?

    I couldn't give a poop about some neo-fascist bunch of hooligans marching to certain defeat.

    I only take issue with nations attacking & annexing the territory of their neighbours.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    I couldn't give a poop about some neo-fascist bunch of hooligans marching to certain defeat.

    I only take issue with nations attacking & annexing the territory of their neighbours.

    So you are good with the illegal overthrow of a elected government?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    poggyone wrote: »
    But it is a foreign national fighting for Azov, something which has been denied here.

    According to reports he was an American officer ,
    Then a Nato officer

    Now apparently a civilian mine clearance expert,

    Show where exactly he's fighing ,

    I've no issues with people going to fight on behalf of the Ukrainians ,
    As long as russian military units are fighting in Ukraine why can't the same happen for Ukraine


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    It is 100% clear what AZOV commander, Andriy Biletsky, and his Azov group stands for. Also it's important to note that Biletsky has been commended and awarded medals by Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko.

    Its equally clear that NATO is backing neo Nazis and white supremists in a bit of madness “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”.
    How can you support that?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Gatling wrote: »
    According to reports he was an American officer ,
    Then a Nato officer

    Now apparently a civilian mine clearance expert,

    Show where exactly he's fighing ,

    I've no issues with people going to fight on behalf of the Ukrainians ,
    As long as russian military units are fighting in Ukraine why can't the same happen for Ukraine

    So now you accept there are foreign nationals fighting for Azov?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Gatling wrote: »
    According to reports he was an American officer ,
    Then a Nato officer

    There is video of a USA general giving out medals in a Ukraine hospital to wounded soldiers, so we know for a fact American officers are in the Ukraine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,148 ✭✭✭✭Lemming


    poggyone, you seem to be throwing NAZI!!NAZI!!NAZI!!! around with gay abandon in the hope that somehow it distracts everyone from the reason why the likes of the Asov battalion formed in the first place .... foreign invasion & subterfuge aimed at annexing parts of the Ukraine by Russia.

    That Azov have far right leanings - indeed racist ones at that - is without dispute. Their flag - bedecked in red & black - and the alteration fo the Ukranian flag to include a swastika-like symbol is obvious. But again; what has any of that to do with the fact that the Russians are expending considerable effort, money, and men in trying to annex parts of another country?

    Are there foreign nationals fighting for Azov? Yes I'm sure there are. Show me any war in history where foreign nationals did not fight on one side or the other, or both. Again, and again, and again I shall point out the convenient ignoring of Putin's full statement; which was not that a single foreigner fought for the Ukranians, but that there was a legion assembled by, or led by proxy, at the behest of NATO. In any case; Putin has some neck to try and swing that lie given he's sending thousands of Russian soldiers into the Ukraine under orders, "on holiday" of course.

    I'm sure you'll just keep shouting "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE NAZIS" in response as if that answers anything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,148 ✭✭✭✭Lemming


    poggyone wrote: »
    There is video of a USA general giving out medals in a Ukraine hospital to wounded soldiers, so we know for a fact American officers are in the Ukraine.

    Source?

    edit: in any case; that a US general would be giving out medals in a Ukrainian hospital to non-US soldiers makes absolutely no sense, from both a view of geo-politics and military protocol.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    poggyone wrote: »
    So you are good with the illegal overthrow of a elected government?

    All coups are illegal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    poggyone wrote: »
    There is video of a USA general giving out medals in a Ukraine hospital to wounded soldiers, so we know for a fact American officers are in the Ukraine.

    There are, we know that.

    No match for the 8-10,000 troops the Kremlin sent over though.

    What was the name of the general btw?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,148 ✭✭✭✭Lemming


    There are, we know that.

    No match for the 8-10,000 troops the Kremlin sent over though.

    What was the name of the general btw?

    Or a link to this video. I'm sure it comes with credible watermarks & other copyright information attached, and isn't being hosted by RT ...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Lemming wrote: »

    We're not here to do your searching for you. You made the claim; it's up to you to show proof; not fob everyone else off with the wave of a hand in the direction of google. And since there's apparently article after article, it shouldn't be too hard to gather your proof of statement, now should it?
    Lemming wrote: »
    In any case; Putin has some neck to try and swing that lie given he's sending thousands of Russian soldiers into the Ukraine under orders, "on holiday" of course.

    Not a shred of proof?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,185 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    gandalf wrote: »
    Conversely the similarities between the Nazi's annexation of the Sudetenland (Crimea) and then the false flag operation where Poland was carved up with the Russians (Eastern Ukraine) is also quite striking.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudetenland#Sudeten_Crisis
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Himmler
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Poland
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact

    The one I see here emulating the Nazi's more is Putins Russia. Yes there are far right actors on the Ukrainian side but tbh looking at the makeup of the so called "Rebels" I would say they are balanced by the unsavoury mercenary types who are driving Moscows proxy war.

    The Russians have form doing deals with Nazi's as well and their society today is certainly exhibiting the "freedoms" of Nazi Germany as well ;)
    http://www.polishgreatness.com/curzonline.html
    The Russians never did any deals with Nazi Germany- Stalin's Soviet Union did. The Poles took huge chunks off the Soviet Union in 1920 as shown in the turquoise area on the map (enlarge it). Stalin saw his opportunity to take back this land in 1939, thats not a justification for Stalinism, its a historic fact! The Poles took this land after the Polish-Soviet War in 1920. As they say there was a bit of history between the Poles and Russians/Soviets.
    The areas later known as Sudetenland never formed a single historical region, which makes it difficult to distinguish the history of the Sudetenland apart from that of Bohemia, until the advent of nationalism in the 19th century.
    From your Sudetenland link: As it says the Sudetenland wasn't really a region, was never part of Germany, it was just a stepping stone for Hitler's eventual annexation of Czechoslovakia a few months later. Crimea became a historical part of Russia in 1783. You are very critical of the Soviet regime and rightly so, it was repressive but how you see the undemocratic decision to transfer Crimea from Russia to Ukraine in 1954 by this very regime as "legitimate" is puzzling?

    There wouldn't be any "rebels" in eastern Ukraine if it wasn't for the western orchestrated coup.

    Ironic that you mention "freedoms" in Russia in a week where leaders of the "free democratic" west were queueing up to pay tributes to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia!
    "Freedom" seems to be an issue in some countries and not in others. I guess Uncle Sam decides what is and what isn't "freedom"

    PS. The British Government did a deal with Nazis when they agreed that Hitler annex Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia. It's called the Munich Agreement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    poggyone wrote: »
    Not a shred of proof?

    It's you who has made petty unsubstantiated accusations minus any proof or at least Varified links to back up your wild statements


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Lemming wrote: »
    Source?

    edit: in any case; that a US general would be giving out medals in a Ukrainian hospital to non-US soldiers makes absolutely no sense, from both a view of geo-politics and military protocol.
    http://youtu.be/ZxNa4wpgWL8?t=1m2s
    Well here it is "Thank you for your service"

    Service to the USA?

    This video is provided by the Ukraine side.
    It has nothing to do with RT news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    poggyone wrote: »
    So now you accept there are foreign nationals fighting for Azov?

    I haven't seen any foreign fighters now I've been watching the situation since the the orange revolution ,so over a decade of course you will get people travelling to fight especially unjustified illegal invasions of sovereign countries that's a fact.
    The person supposed identified in the video which is doctored with an American military accent (what ever that exactly means ) now the person supposedly is from London , then the Isle of Man , and he has Swedish friends according to a russian blog ,
    Which must mean sweden had unlawfully invaded Ukraine .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone



    No match for the 8-10,000 troops the Kremlin sent over though.

    Bold statement backed up with no proof.
    can you show some proof?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Gatling wrote: »
    It's you who has made petty unsubstantiated accusations minus any proof or at least Varified links to back up your wild statements

    Links provided, i eagerly await your reply.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Ukrainian Deputy: US to stage a civil war in Ukraine! This was 20.11.2013!! BEFORE Maidan
    http://youtu.be/y9hOl8TuBUM
    The gist of it
    Deputy Oleg Tsarov

    In my role as a representative of the Ukrainian people…
    …activists of the public organisation "Volya" turned to me…
    …providing clear evidence…
    …that within our territory…
    …with support and direct participation
    …of the US Embassy in Kiev…
    …the "TechCamp" project is realised…
    …under which preparations are being made for a civil war in Ukraine.

    The "TechCamp" project prepares specialists for information warfare…
    …and the discrediting of state institutions using modern media…
    …potential revolutionaries…
    …for organising protests…
    … and the toppling of the State Order.

    The project is currently overseen and under the responsibility…
    …of the US ambassador to Ukraine…
    …Geoffrey R. Pyatt.

    American instructors explained how social networks and Internet technologies…
    …can be used for targeted manipulation of public opinion…
    …as well as to activate protest potential…
    …to provoke violent unrest on the territory of Ukraine…
    …Radicalisation of the population and triggering of infighting.

    American instructors show examples of successful use of social networks…
    …used to organise protests
    …in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya.

    "TechCamp" representatives currently hold conferences throughout Ukraine.

    A total of five events have been held so far.

    About 300 people were trained as operatives, which are now active throughout Ukraine.

    The last conference "TechCamp" took place on 14 and 15 November 2013…
    …in the Heart of Kiev on the territory of the US Embassy!

    You tell me which country in the world would allow…
    …a NGO to operate out of the ​ US Embassy?

    This is disrespectful to the Ukrainian government, and against the Ukrainian People!

    I appeal to the Constitutional Authorities of Ukraine with the following question:

    Is it conceivable that representatives of the US Embassy…
    …which organise the "TechCamp" Conferences…
    …misuse their diplomatic mission?

    UN Resolution of 21 December 1965 regulates…
    …inadmissibility of interference in the internal affairs of a state…
    …to protect its independence and its sovereignty…
    …in accordance with paragraphs one, two and five.

    I ask you to consider this as an official beseech…
    …to pursue an investigation of this case

    Thank You!

    Not looking too good for Nato now is it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    poggyone wrote: »
    Bold statement backed up with no proof.
    can you show some proof?

    I'm not there mind

    However when the following say that Russian troops are in ukraine , it gets compelling!

    - Ukrainian government
    - the separatists themselves
    - Russian soldiers
    - Russian soldiers families.
    - the OECD.

    Its just you & Elmer & president shirtless who say otherwise!
    Tis grand company to keep!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    http://www.polishgreatness.com/curzonline.html
    The Russians never did any deals with Nazi Germany- Stalin's Soviet Union did. The Poles took huge chunks off the Soviet Union in 1920 as shown in the turquoise area on the map (enlarge it). Stalin saw his opportunity to take back this land in 1939, thats not a justification for Stalinism, its a historic fact! The Poles took this land after the Polish-Soviet War in 1920. As they say there was a bit of history between the Poles and Russians/Soviets.


    From your Sudetenland link: As it says the Sudetenland wasn't really a region, was never part of Germany, it was just a stepping stone for Hitler's eventual annexation of Czechoslovakia a few months later. Crimea became a historical part of Russia in 1783. You are very critical of the Soviet regime and rightly so, it was repressive but how you see the undemocratic decision to transfer Crimea from Russia to Ukraine in 1954 by this very regime as "legitimate" is puzzling?

    There wouldn't be any "rebels" in eastern Ukraine if it wasn't for the western orchestrated coup.

    Ironic that you mention "freedoms" in Russia in a week where leaders of the "free democratic" west were queueing up to pay tributes to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia!
    "Freedom" seems to be an issue in some countries and not in others. I guess Uncle Sam decides what is and what isn't "freedom"

    PS. The British Government did a deal with Nazis when they agreed that Hitler annex Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia. It's called the Munich Agreement.

    LOL Elmer I can't believe you just acted as an apologist for the Russians deal with Hitler to carve up Poland. Just when I thought the Putin fan club couldn't stoop any lower you deliver :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    http://www.polishgreatness.com/curzonline.html
    The Russians never did any deals with Nazi Germany- Stalin's Soviet Union did. The Poles took huge chunks off the Soviet Union in 1920 as shown in the turquoise area on the map (enlarge it). Stalin saw his opportunity to take back this land in 1939, thats not a justification for Stalinism, its a historic fact! The Poles took this land after the Polish-Soviet War in 1920. As they say there was a bit of history between the Poles and Russians/Soviets.
    Someone needs a history lesson. Here's a map of Europe in the year 1700 before the various partitions of Poland.

    1700.jpg

    And here's a map of Europe after.

    1800.jpg

    Also note Russia still hasn't returned the city of Kalingrad to Germany and has used it as a stage to threaten Europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    poggyone wrote: »
    http://youtu.be/ZxNa4wpgWL8?t=1m2s
    Well here it is "Thank you for your service"

    Service to the USA?

    This video is provided by the Ukraine side.
    It has nothing to do with RT news.


    It's certainly not a medal the us visitor is handing out us army europe flashes ,
    It's given out in the hundreds across the whole of Europe .

    Thank you for your service is a common military gesture much like a verbal salute. ie thank you for your service to your country. Thank you for your service to your military

    If you want I can sell you one or two flashes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    poggyone wrote: »
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2nd_SS_Panzer_Division_Das_Reich
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion

    Compare AZOV's emblem with the emblem of the Nazi 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich

    Lets be honest here, you would have to be delusional not to think they knew what they where doing when they picked the emblem.
    Could be worse, could be a red star.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,185 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    gandalf wrote: »
    LOL Elmer I can't believe you just acted as an apologist for the Russians deal with Hitler to carve up Poland. Just when I thought the Putin fan club couldn't stoop any lower you deliver :)
    Pathetic! I take this insult post as a compliment.
    You either have nothing constructive to say or didn't bother to read my post.
    I said the Soviet decision to annex Poland in 1939 was "not a justification for Stalinism"
    Someone needs a history lesson. Here's a map of Europe in the year 1700 before the various partitions of Poland.
    I've no idea what point you're trying to make by posting maps from an era when Germany didn't even exist!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    I've no idea what point you're trying to make by posting maps from an era when Germany didn't even exist!
    Germany existed, just not as a unified state. The point I'm making is that Poland in 1920 was trying to take back land that was rightfully theirs. Their invasion was a response to earlier Russian aggression.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,966 ✭✭✭laoch na mona


    i think western history is perfectly clear, western governments and institutions will prop up any dodgy regime (they even overthrow one's that don't) that suits their interests, so standing by neo nazi's is not a shock.

    the problem with the situation in Ukraine is their is no clear good or at least not bad option, the choice is pro westerners with nazi tendencies or pro russians (russia's not a shining light of democracy)

    to act like their is an objectively progressive side is to be either so pro western soft imperialism that you ignore the dangerous right wing element in the Ukraine or so anti western imperialism (and probably a raging tankie) that you ignore Russia's imperialist aims and right wing elements


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Pathetic! I take this insult post as a compliment.
    You either have nothing constructive to say or didn't bother to read my post.
    I said the Soviet decision to annex Poland in 1939 was "not a justification for Stalinism"

    No I am just pointing out your blantent deflection attempts by changing the subject of the discussion and trying to equate the British agreement on Czechoslovakia with the blatant carve up of Poland that the Russians perpetrated in agreement with the Nazi's.

    If you want to rant about Saudi Arabia then please start a new discussion about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    i think western history is perfectly clear, western governments and institutions will prop up any dodgy regime (they even overthrow one's that don't) that suits their interests, so standing by neo nazi's is not a shock.

    the problem with the situation in Ukraine is their is no clear good or at least not bad option, the choice is pro westerners with nazi tendencies or pro russians (russia's not a shining light of democracy)

    to act like their is an objectively progressive side is to be either so pro western soft imperialism that you ignore the dangerous right wing element in the Ukraine or so anti western imperialism (and probably a raging tankie) that you ignore Russia's imperialist aims and right wing elements

    Right wing parties make up less than 4% of the political parties there hardly running the country now are they ,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,966 ✭✭✭laoch na mona


    Gatling wrote: »
    Right wing parties make up less than 4% of the political parties there hardly running the country now are they ,

    the PM presented Nazi germany as a victim of Russian aggression, he's pretty right wing


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    I'm not there mind

    However when the following say that Russian troops are in ukraine , it gets compelling!

    - Ukrainian government
    - the separatists themselves
    - Russian soldiers
    - Russian soldiers families.
    - the OECD.

    Its just you & Elmer & president shirtless who say otherwise!
    Tis grand company to keep!

    So in a nut shell zero proof.
    I see a pattern here, any post that is positive towards Kiev and negative Russia needs no proof or links.The man in the pub is a valid source.
    On the other hand any post that is negative Kiev and positive Russia requires multiple sources and links.
    As we have seen in just todays posts,photos and video proof that the Azov group are Nazis and American Generals are on the ground in Ukraine.
    Now can you or can you not show any proof that there are 10,000 Russian soldiers in Ukraine as has been claimed here?
    One photo of Regular Russian soldiers in the Ukraine is all that is requested, i have yet to see one,can you show us one? Yes or no?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    Also note Russia still hasn't returned the city of Kalingrad to Germany /URL].
    So would you expect Poland to return Danzig and Prussia to Germany?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    poggyone wrote: »
    One photo of Regular Russian soldiers in the Ukraine is all that is requested, i have yet to see one,can you show us one? Yes or no?

    http://www.ibtimes.com/east-ukraine-war-russian-state-tv-purportedly-shows-russian-troops-inside-donetsk-1788520
    Video footage has emerged from Russian state-controlled television, reportedly shot inside the Donetsk airport in eastern Ukraine, showing soldiers with the insignia of the Russian Naval Infantry, or Russian Marines, on their uniforms

    maxresdefault.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,185 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    I can't see this new Greek Government lasting very long. I think a Victoria Nuland phone call is in order! ;)

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/greece/11373136/Greece-objects-to-EU-call-for-more-Russia-sanctions.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    I see the US loaned the Ukrainians 2bn today for near term social spending for continuing down the anti corruption road ,

    Once they completed the exorcism of russian influence id say they could well be a shinning example to other states fearing czar putin

    http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSL6N0V71BQ20150128?irpc=932


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    The point I'm making is that Poland in 1920 was trying to take back land that was rightfully theirs. Their invasion was a response to earlier Russian aggression.

    Whats the difference between Russia taking back the crimea and donbass? Land that is historicallyRussian?
    You could say tThe Russian move was only a response to NATO aggression


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 81 ✭✭poggyone


    gandalf wrote: »

    By your own standards you will have to do better than that.
    If Russia today is not accepted as a valid source how can we accept Ukraine Today as a valid source?

    So where is the proof?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    poggyone wrote: »
    Whats the difference between Russia taking back the crimea and donbass? Land that is historicallyRussian?
    You could say tThe Russian move was only a response to NATO aggression
    Crimea is historically Russian? Hmm, don't think so pal Crimea was Turkish for a long time before it was Russian.

    But how about we stop all this invading nonsense and just let the people who live in regions decide what country they want to live in?

    That would mean holding fair referendums in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine to give people a chance to join Russia or stay with Ukraine.

    And while we're at it, Russia can do the same for Crimea and Dagestan. Sound fair?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement