Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Eircom to roll out 1Gb/s FTTH to 66 towns

13567…42

Comments

  • #102
    murphaph
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    MBSnr wrote: »
    I will tell you ;-)

    You're overlooking the way small holdings (West of the Shannon) differed in Ireland compared to Britain. Historically there are more small farms in Ireland and therein lies the answer. People ended up living where they do in rural areas as they owned a number of fields leading to clusters of farm houses near their land. They couldn't afford to move to a town to manage it remotely back then - both from a time factor (Donkey/cart travelling and monetary). They aren't going to do that now.

    In England farmers tended to have larger fields and had more money. They hired hands (from towns) to do the work and those hands lived on the farmland when there was work. There was not the 'farm family' as here. Years ago those farmers also bought other farmers land and expanded, therefore owning more land and as such there are less properties per sq mile as people did not have land to tend - no ribbon development.

    This all happened in England many years ago, whereas in Ireland it was in the last 20-30 yrs leading to ribbon development as family of farmers settled and farmers sold land to builders in the boom time....
    Your last paragraph is the actual explanation. The overwhelming majority of one off properties are not occupied by people who actually work the land. It's all down to a lack of planning control. Even within Ireland you have differences between say north county Dublin and Cavan because planning was and is no problem in Cavan whereas Fingal are very strict on whole thing.

    We can blame the English for lots of things but McMansion development in Celtic Tiger Ireland is absolutely not one of them.


  • #103
    Hackery
    Closed Accounts Posts: 72 ✭✭Hackery


    Manc Red wrote: »
    where did you hear this?

    It's in the eircom Wholesale Product Roadmap. Can't link to it but a google search will find it.


  • #104
    lucernarian
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,235 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    I would find the planning of Fingal to be very substandard, just look at the road and estate layout of their county town and the water issues that have plagued non-coastal parts of north Co. Dublin. In fairness to Cavan Co Co, many new housing over the last 10 years have been in housing estates within villages and towns. Like in Shercock. Though that one was also built on low-lying marshy ground and could be a flood plain for all I know! But in general, village development is far superior to simply scattering houses across the countryside as I've seen more so in Louth and Meath.


  • #105
    PeadarB
    Registered Users Posts: 364 ✭✭PeadarB


    Hackery wrote: »
    It's in the eircom Wholesale Product Roadmap. Can't link to it but a google search will find it.

    From the November 2014 version of the above -
    "A new FTTH variant is proposed that will provide higher Broadband speed to customers. The proposed FTTH speeds are 150M, 300M and 1G. The FTTH footprint will also increase from Wexford and Sandyford to 66 other towns around Ireland".

    No sign of it or ESB/Vodafone FTTH rollout in Letterkenny yet.


  • #106
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    In a newspaper article a few days ago, the Eircom CEO said this will be a premium product with a premium price.

    It sounds like they only plan on rolling it out on demand and it sounds like it will be significantly more expensive then Eircoms existing broadband products and also probably ESB's FTTH.


  • #107
    PeadarB
    Registered Users Posts: 364 ✭✭PeadarB


    bk wrote: »
    In a newspaper article a few days ago, the Eircom CEO said this will be a premium product with a premium price.

    It sounds like they only plan on rolling it out on demand and it sounds like it will be significantly more expensive then Eircoms existing broadband products and also probably ESB's FTTH.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/eircom-to-offer-extra-fast-fibre-broadband-1.1978690

    If this is the case they are shooting themselves in the foot. In my case the present connecton to the cab runs 170 metres underground to a distribution pole about 15 metres from the house. I would wonder how genuine eircom are with this FTTH add-on. To my mind it would make far more sense if they took the "Sky" route with this and waited 'till ESB/Vodafone did their roll-out and just piggy-backed off that.

    Whatever happens we will have to play the usual wait and see game. My initial 18 month efibre contract runs out in April. Despite some problems recently it has proven reliable and fast enough for my needs.


  • #108
    ElNino
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭ElNino


    I really can't see anyone paying a premium to go from 100MB to 150MB or 300MB as would be the case for myself. I can see how charging a premium for 1GB might make sense for now but only until the ESB fibre is available.

    I would have paid a premium to go from 8MB to 100MB like I did with VDSL but an upgrade from 100MB to 300MB is not really going to make much difference to the average user.


  • #109
    murphaph
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    bk wrote: »
    In a newspaper article a few days ago, the Eircom CEO said this will be a premium product with a premium price.

    It sounds like they only plan on rolling it out on demand and it sounds like it will be significantly more expensive then Eircoms existing broadband products and also probably ESB's FTTH.
    Not for long. They will soon be forced by commercial pressure to charge around the same as UPC (who can easily go to 500Mbps) or ESB. They won't have any choice. VDSL was not really their choice either, UPC forced their hand, and they will force it again. Great stuff for the consumer.


  • #110
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    ^^^

    I agree with what everyone is saying above. I'm just relaying what I read.

    I agree that in time competition will force them to price it reasonably. However I do believe this initial FTTH rollout is actually an incredibly limited "me too" rollout and not a true widespread FTTH rollout like the current FTTC rollout has been.

    I think the issue is that they want to sweat the FTTC assets for a few years before they get involved in a serious FTTH rollout.

    I hope I'm wrong on this.


  • #111
    KOR101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,898 ✭✭✭KOR101


    Eircom are just following the BT playbook for the UK - FTTH is a premium product. What's so unusual is their bullishness about it for the NBP. No UK equivalent for that.


  • Advertisement
  • #112
    dalta5billion
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭dalta5billion


    KOR101 wrote: »
    Eircom are just following the BT playbook for the UK - FTTH is a premium product. What's so unusual is their bullishness about it for the NBP. No UK equivalent for that.

    That's because they could get 500mill subsidising it plus assurance of a rural monopoly (albeit an open access one) for the next 20 or more years.

    Regardless of who gets the rural FTTH contract, the sale of the physical network should be banned. Have we learned nothing from the past? Eircom's CEO wanting to keep a rural FTTH network in private hands is a massive red flag.


  • #113
    csd
    Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭csd


    Speedtest from the eircom FTTH trial in Belcarra, Co Mayo, taken today.

    4124257639.png

    The setup is configured for a theoretical max of 950Mb/s, so getting pretty close.


  • #114
    Nolars
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Nolars


    csd wrote: »
    Speedtest from the eircom FTTH trial in Belcarra, Co Mayo, taken today.

    4124257639.png

    The setup is configured for a theoretical max of 950Mb/s, so getting pretty close.

    All ye Mayo and Cavan lads can fe*k off :P


  • #115
    yuloni
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • #116
    csd
    Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭csd


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    Sorry, no. However, the router is the standard Zyxel one used for VDSL, which connects to a Huawei ONT about the size of a paperback book. The latter bridges the fibre GPON connection to a standard RJ45 Gigabit Ethernet port.

    /csd


  • #117
    rob808
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,319 ✭✭✭rob808


    dalta5billion wrote: »
    That's because they could get 500mill subsidising it plus assurance of a rural monopoly (albeit an open access one) for the next 20 or more years.

    Regardless of who gets the rural FTTH contract, the sale of the physical network should be banned. Have we learned nothing from the past? Eircom's CEO wanting to keep a rural FTTH network in private hands is a massive red flag.
    The government won't keep it more likely open access and I say who build it would own it but other operators can use it.It like the EBS and Vodafone deal the EBS own the network and Vodafone look after it.I don't think government would want to own it because they would have to fix faults and use tax payers money.


  • #118
    Manc Red
    Registered Users Posts: 293 ✭✭Manc Red


    Shouldn't FTTH have a ping from 1 - 5ms at most?

    If it's pure fibre then shouldn't there be almost no delay?


  • #119
    shruikan2553
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    Manc Red wrote: »
    Shouldn't FTTH have a ping from 1 - 5ms at most?

    If it's pure fibre then shouldn't there be almost no delay?

    I was wondering this myself. The ping seems a bit high.


  • #120
    ED E
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Manc Red wrote: »
    Shouldn't FTTH have a ping from 1 - 5ms at most?

    If it's pure fibre then shouldn't there be almost no delay?

    Edge routers, internal core switching and distance. He's bouncing off Dublin from Cavan so there'll be at least 6 hops in between.


  • Advertisement
  • #121
    godskitchen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,827 ✭✭✭godskitchen


    csd wrote: »
    Speedtest from the eircom FTTH trial in Belcarra, Co Mayo, taken today.

    4124257639.png

    The setup is configured for a theoretical max of 950Mb/s, so getting pretty close.

    Is this your connection?

    Have many signed up for the trial?


  • #122
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    rob808 wrote: »
    The government won't keep it more likely open access and I say who build it would own it but other operators can use it.It like the EBS and Vodafone deal the EBS own the network and Vodafone look after it.I don't think government would want to own it because they would have to fix faults and use tax payers money.

    It could be owned by a semi state company to manage network, who sub-contract out to the likes of KN Networks to do repairs etc.

    KN Networks do most of this sort of thing for Eircom, ESB and UPC anyway.

    It could be similar to how the Luas is run, owned and managed by the RPA (a government agency) and operated day to day by a private company contracted to do so.


  • #123
    Gonzo
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 16,966 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gonzo


    godskitchen wrote: »
    Is this your connection?

    Have many signed up for the trial?

    that connection speed is the stuff dreams are made of, but have to agree totally unnecessary for any one user. I struggle on 9meg and can just about get by with it, 50 meg to me would be perfect for quite a while.

    I would imagine if Eircom do win the rural FTTH contract, that they are not gonna provide everybody with those sort of speeds. They will probably start off on 50-100 meg and through the year's upgrade peoples speed profiles as time go's on. Rural business perhaps will pay the extra for those sort of speeds tho.

    I wish the contract for this could be awarded right now so they can start work on this straight away. Any idea when contract will be awarded and could work on this new rural network start this year switching on the first batch of people before the end of this year?


  • #124
    jay93
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,323 ✭✭✭jay93


    csd wrote: »
    Speedtest from the eircom FTTH trial in Belcarra, Co Mayo, taken today.

    4124257639.png

    The setup is configured for a theoretical max of 950Mb/s, so getting pretty close.

    Wouldn't mind having that speed every day!!


  • #125
    OneEightSeven
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,344 ✭✭✭OneEightSeven


    Gonzo wrote: »
    that connection speed is the stuff dreams are made of, but have to agree totally unnecessary for any one user. I struggle on 9meg and can just about get by with it, 50 meg to me would be perfect for quite a while.

    Wow, Gonzo, I never knew you had the ability the envision the lives of every person on the planet. I guess this Boardsie doesn't exist: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=88962978

    Uploading large files to servers is a pain in the ass because if the connection breaks, you have to start over again.

    If that poster had the upload speed above (238Mb), it would take him 20 hours upload it.


  • #126
    MyPeopleDrankTheSoup
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭MyPeopleDrankTheSoup


    OneEightSeven wrote: »
    Wow, Gonzo, I never knew you had the ability the envision the lives of every person on the planet. I guess this Boardsie doesn't exist: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=88962978

    Uploading large files to servers is a pain in the ass because if the connection breaks, you have to start over again.

    If that poster had the upload speed above (238Mb), it would take him 20 hours upload it.

    lol people get so tetchy on this forum when someone mentions that not everyone might need superfast ridiculous broadband. you just made your argument with a complete edge case. i'd say he's a one in a million problem per year.


  • Advertisement
  • #127
    Nolars
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Nolars


    georgiecasey wrote: »
    lol people get so tetchy on this forum when someone mentions that not everyone might need superfast ridiculous broadband. you just made your argument with a complete edge case. i'd say he's a one in a million problem per year.

    Thats not the argument, people need those kinda connections so when they are uploading stuff for work etc it takes seconds rather then an hour to upload a 100mb file.


  • #128
    KOR101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,898 ✭✭✭KOR101


    georgiecasey wrote: »
    lol people get so tetchy on this forum when someone mentions that not everyone might need superfast ridiculous broadband. you just made your argument with a complete edge case. i'd say he's a one in a million problem per year.
    No, you're wrong.

    I just bought a new Dell (2TB HD), and it keeps prompting me to backup the contents of the computer to the cloud. Google drive prices are only $10/TB/Month. It's getting close to the point where it should be standard for EVERYONE to have their machine continually backing up to the cloud.


  • #129
    dam099
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,120 ✭✭✭dam099


    bk wrote: »
    It could be owned by a semi state company to manage network, who sub-contract out to the likes of KN Networks to do repairs etc.

    KN Networks do most of this sort of thing for Eircom, ESB and UPC anyway.

    It could be similar to how the Luas is run, owned and managed by the RPA (a government agency) and operated day to day by a private company contracted to do so.

    As it seems the winning bid will have to contribute 50% of the cost one option might be to have a company that is 50% + 1 share owned by the state with the other 50% owned by that company.


  • #130
    AlanS181824
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭AlanS181824


    Those are some amazing speeds!

    I wonder how much Eircom will charge for this, probably €50~€60 or thereabouts.


  • #131
    KOR101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,898 ✭✭✭KOR101


    AlanS181824 wrote: »
    Those are some amazing speeds!

    I wonder how much Eircom will charge for this, probably €50~€60 or thereabouts.
    Only if they have to because of UPC and ESB. In the UK, BT charge £1,188.00 (ex VAT) annual rent.


  • Advertisement
  • #132
    AlanS181824
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭AlanS181824


    KOR101 wrote: »
    Only if they have to because of UPC and ESB. In the UK, BT charge £1,188.00 (ex VAT) annual rent.

    That's their FTTPoD service then?

    Crazy prices.


  • #133
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    dam099 wrote: »
    As it seems the winning bid will have to contribute 50% of the cost one option might be to have a company that is 50% + 1 share owned by the state with the other 50% owned by that company.

    That would seem very sensible and fair.

    As for the speed thing, please remember, the primary reason to use FTTH in rural areas is not the incredibly high speeds, that is a nice side benefit of it.

    The primary reason to use FTTH, is because it is the only broadband technology that doesn't degrade over long distance. xDSL, DOCSIS (cable), 3G/4G, etc. all degrade over long distance, which makes them unsuited to rural deployments.

    Even 100Mb/s (in particular symmetric) would be a massive revolution for rural Ireland. And it will be easy for them to upgrade as needs increase.

    BTW if Eircom was made to use DWDM FTTH, where 4 companies each get their own optical frequency on the cable, then the 4 companies could offer different speeds and different products and thus you would have real competition and Eircom couldn't do anything to stop their competitors from offering higher speeds.


  • #134
    ED E
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    This is gonna be GPON. For cost reasons. From my understanding that likely prevents frequency division to multiple operators.

    The problem I foresee is it'll still be eircom field staff in an eircom rural monopoly. There will be no competition on repairs and SLAs and while fibre is less fault prone than copper wrapped in aging poly, its still going to have the usual idiot with a JCB and fallen poles problems that the current POTS network has.

    If COMREG/DECNR are to do the NBP (which will end up being similar to this threads topic) right they need to have staunch fines in place for SLA breaches so that whoever operates the wholesale end can't sit on their proverbials.


  • #135
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    ED E wrote: »
    This is gonna be GPON. For cost reasons. From my understanding that likely prevents frequency division to multiple operators.

    You can do GPON over DWDM, see DWDM-PON


  • #136
    markmurphy
    Registered Users Posts: 152 ✭✭markmurphy


    csd wrote: »
    Speedtest from the eircom FTTH trial in Belcarra, Co Mayo, taken today.

    4124257639.png

    The setup is configured for a theoretical max of 950Mb/s, so getting pretty close.

    mother of F*ck ! Well I'm happy with 44!


  • #137
    yuloni
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • #138
    Johnboy1951
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,031 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    KOR101 wrote: »
    No, you're wrong.

    I just bought a new Dell (2TB HD), and it keeps prompting me to backup the contents of the computer to the cloud. Google drive prices are only $10/TB/Month. It's getting close to the point where it should be standard for EVERYONE to have their machine continually backing up to the cloud.

    This is so wrong I find it difficult to express my feelings about it.

    Let me just say ..... there is NO WAY I will be told to where I back up what I wish to back up .... or even if I backup anything at all.

    A recommendation is one thing ..... but 'should be' is far beyond that.

    I do agree that it 'should be possible' for everyone to do so ..... and hopefully that is what was meant ;)


  • #139
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    csd wrote: »
    Speedtest from the eircom FTTH trial in Belcarra, Co Mayo, taken today.

    4124257639.png

    The setup is configured for a theoretical max of 950Mb/s, so getting pretty close.

    Looked up this place on Google surely this can't be right only 150 people live there?

    Why would Eircom be trialling a service here the village is tiny?

    http://www.mayo-ireland.ie/en/towns-villages/belcarra/belcarra.html


  • #140
    rob808
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,319 ✭✭✭rob808


    Cheerful SI pring wrote: »
    Looked up this place on Google surely this can't be right only 150 people live there?

    Why would Eircom be trialling a service here the village is tiny?

    http://www.mayo-ireland.ie/en/towns-villages/belcarra/belcarra.html
    That easy to see how much it would cost to roll out FTTH to small village and rural locations.


  • #141
    GIMickey
    Registered Users Posts: 175 ✭✭GIMickey


    Any sign of this in letterkenny, i see csd is getting to test in mayo (looks amazing too), any word of testing in letterkenny???


  • Advertisement
  • #142
    Nollog
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,509 ✭✭✭Nollog


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    Looked up this place on Google surely this can't be right only 150 people live there?

    Why would Eircom be trialling a service here the village is tiny?

    http://www.mayo-ireland.ie/en/towns-villages/belcarra/belcarra.html

    you do things on a small scale during a trial, to ready yourself for the much larger rollout when the trainers know what to teach and the hardware is tested and matured.


  • #143
    swoofer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,569 ✭✭✭swoofer


    How can I find a list of locations that are earmarked for Eircoms Fibre to the Home(FTTH) my mind has gone blank and I dont know whether its only the Vodafone one that has been published.

    Its all gone quiet as well.

    Mind you there is a report on silicon republic that ireland is SECOND in the world for mobile data speeds!! so that may put a spanner in the works!

    http://www.siliconrepublic.com/comms/item/40658-ireland-s-average-mobile/


  • #144
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    swoofer wrote: »
    Mind you there is a report on silicon republic that ireland is SECOND in the world for mobile data speeds!! so that may put a spanner in the works!

    http://www.siliconrepublic.com/comms/item/40658-ireland-s-average-mobile/

    Not really, the only reason we are so high, is because the caps on mobile services are so low, that few people really use mobile data that much!

    This news is actually generally bad news. It clearly shows that people in other developed countries have far better caps and use mobile data much more.


  • #145
    SpaceTime
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    Looked up this place on Google surely this can't be right only 150 people live there?

    Why would Eircom be trialling a service here the village is tiny?

    http://www.mayo-ireland.ie/en/towns-villages/belcarra/belcarra.html

    In a totally unrelated matter : isn't Enda Kenny from Mayo?


  • #146
    ED E
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    bk wrote: »
    You can do GPON over DWDM, see DWDM-PON

    Had a look at the IEEE doc on this. If they want to unbundle with WDM it means wdm filters vs regular splitters be fitted, so it'll only happen realistically if done from the get go.

    Have you got a cost comparison of direct fibre vs GPON? If we could get glass direct from CO to premises now it would leave maximum upgradeability thinking long term.


  • #147
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    ED E wrote: »
    Have you got a cost comparison of direct fibre vs GPON? If we could get glass direct from CO to premises now it would leave maximum upgradeability thinking long term.

    There seems to be a really interesting and very detailed doc about different FTTH technologies, the cost differences and unbundling scenarios here:

    http://www.vodafone.com/content/dam/vodafone/about/public_policy/position_papers/vodafone_report_final_wkconsult.pdf

    I've only taken a quick look, I need to read it in detail later.

    But the summary says that GPON is only 10% cheaper then P2P !!

    And yes your are correct P2P would be more future proof and easy to do LLU with.

    And that is why I think Eircom is using GPON. Not the slightly cheaper cost, but that fact that it makes it impossible to do LLU on GPON. Bitstream wholesale access only.


  • #148
    ED E
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Must have a read of that during the week. Thanks BK.

    You can understand how eircom wants to hold onto its access network, UPC would be slow to allow other providers onto their HFC! If it was all their own deal I'd say thats totally fair, cant invest to have others reap the rewards. But if the NBP becomes part of this then we taxpayers should insist on P2P for the segments we fund.


  • #149
    loyatemu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,109 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Pricing - pretty cheap (these are wholesale prices obviously - for comparison wholesale xDSL is currently 17.50)


    Standalone FTTH Product (Mb/s) Monthly rental
    150/30 €20.50
    300/50 €25.50
    1000/100 €35.50


    POTS based FTTH Product (Mb/s) Monthly rental
    150/30 €6.98
    300/50 €11.98
    1000/100 €21.98


  • #150
    bk
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,986 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    WOW, more massive news today. Eircom Wholesale have released the specification details and wholesale pricing of their FTTH products:

    http://www.eircomwholesale.ie/news/FTTH_Pricing/

    Standalone FTTH Product (Mb/s) - Monthly rental
    150/30 €20.50
    300/50 €25.50
    1000/100 €35.50


    POTS based FTTH Product (Mb/s) - Monthly rental
    150/30 €6.98
    300/50 €11.98
    1000/100 €21.98

    Note these are the wholesale charges, excluding VAT, etc.

    As a comparison VDSL is currently priced at €17.50 and currently increasing to €19.50 (thus the recent Vodafone/Eircom/Sky price increases).

    The €19.50 charge leads to a retail price of between, €38 (vodafone VDSL only) to €55 (Eircom including calls etc.).

    So 150/30 FTTH should only be about €2 more expensive then their VDSL counterparts, while 1000/100 will have at least a €20 premium.

    Also note, that there is a €150 install charge for the ONT, so expect a big up front install fee.

    Eircom have said they are already started working on rolling it out to the first 16 of 66 towns and that it should go live around August. More here:

    http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/eircom-to-launch-new-pure-broadband-with-speeds-of-up-to-1000mbs-31027344.html

    EDIT: loyatemu beat me too it ;)

    Note POTS based FTTH, means where you also have a copper pair telephone line running in parallel to your home. So add the normal €25 line rental charge to those prices, plus the other usual overheads.


  • Advertisement
  • #151
    ED E
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    As the POTS option is cheaper and requires a double drop I think we can assume they're separate charges. That means its 2x the cost to maintain PSTN services, roll on VOIP!


Advertisement