Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Earth wire on eircom drop

  • 06-05-2015 1:00am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭


    This post has been deleted.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,072 ✭✭✭mass_debater


    yuloni wrote: »
    My question... is it safe to connect DSL without an earth. I guess a bolt of lightning somewhere and I'll be down a good Billion modem. From reading around, opinion is mixed. Some say an earth is needed, others say earths are no longer needed. I know one of my most recent DSL installs, the engineer simply connected the active pair to the NTU without earth, similar to what I've done here

    There should be a lightning breaker on the dropwire on the pole. The dropwire now goes straight to the NTU from the breaker


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    Do you have a legacy NTU or one of the new filtered ones? If its the latter just unscrew the faceplate and expose the RJ45 socket in the middle, plonk your DSL cable in there and leave it sit for 24-48hrs to test. If the PCB on the internal filter is borked that'll stabilize the line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭65535


    beside the NTU where there was an old Ericson terminal box where the two pairs arrived from the pole and an earth ran to ground.

    Hi,
    One line is one pair.
    No earth is involved - unless there was shared service/separate metering on that line before?
    An earth if present would only be used for a center pin on a gas discharge tube to earth in case of a large surge on the line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭65535


    If you have any overhead spans on those lines then you should use the earthing box.
    The white yokes with the blue writing on them are gas discharge tubes which will (hopefully) send any surge to earth.
    If the cables are underground you probably do not need them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,072 ✭✭✭mass_debater


    yuloni wrote: »
    The line is all overhead from the exchange until it reaches the last pole where it drops underground into the house. While I'm not keen leaving it unearthed, earthing the line again is effecting the connection. Might I be able to visually establish if there is a lightning breaker on the line/pole as mentioned in post 2?

    It should be earthed every 3 poles


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    yuloni wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    That screams handset fault! The handset can still work but will short the line and cause enough disturbance that the filter doesnt protect the DSL.

    Try:
    Splitter* + Modem + NO PHONE
    Splitter* + Modem + Phone

    If the results are different, go f'ck that phone out the window.

    *By that I mean double microfilter


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,072 ✭✭✭mass_debater


    ED E wrote: »
    That screams handset fault! The handset can still work but will short the line and cause enough disturbance that the filter doesnt protect the DSL.

    Try:
    Splitter* + Modem + NO PHONE
    Splitter* + Modem + Phone

    If the results are different, go f'ck that phone out the window.

    *By that I mean double microfilter

    Lidl phones are nearly a short circuit, have seen this several times


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,169 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    A bad socket could short upon jack insertion but you have a new NTU.

    This line shouldn't have been viable from the start, attenuation has to be like 80dB plus. So anything could throw it off. I wonder if the line termination was gone if the handset or splitter would act as a pseudo termination and attenuate the signal further. Hmmm. Not sure.

    Let us know how those tests go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,040 ✭✭✭yuloni


    This post has been deleted.


Advertisement