Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mhvr units- t system or semi flexible ducts

Options
  • 01-06-2016 3:15pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 61 ✭✭


    Im currently researching Mhvr units. A lot of different options available. Locally supplier fits a teed off system with rigid plastic ducts. 2 other suppliers I've priced fit system with manifold and individual semi flexible ducts to all rooms. Both claim their system is the best. Anyone any experience of both systems. What have people installed in their new builds? What has been your main criteria for choosing which system to go for


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 12,324 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    What follows is just my opinion, I don't have either, I have just read bit here and there along the way so it may be all B.S

    Leaving aside the obvious differences in ease of fitting and such like, the key design consideration, IMO, is to keep the velocity to a minimum as it's velocity that creates the noise.
    I am talking about normal design flows at 3 am in bedrooms.

    So depending on room sizes, you may find that the semi-flexible ducting has a more limited through-put at a specific velocity than its rigid counterpart.
    This may require you to have two flexible drops to a room as opposed to a single rigid, or an increased velocity.

    The rigid will have less resistance and will be relatively easier to clean should the need arise.

    Then you have the issue of silencers, an item often dropped in Irish designs due to cost: " Sur you will never hear it missus"

    My limited understanding is that silencers work better on larger, rigid ducts than on the smaller flexies.

    On the layout issues, its is patently easier to thread the flexies than the rigid and this often reflects the MHVR design as being somewhat of an afterthought.
    This is also manifestly obvious when I go into attic spaces and see the ducting fitted with 4 by 90 degrees angles because someone forgot about that big timber joist that we can't bore through.

    In some cases, these, Lock Ness monster lookalikes are never insulated, giving rise to condensation in the ducting.

    Final point, keep it all inside the conditioned air space.

    If I were doing it, I would go rigid as far as possible
    Hopefully the experts will join in at some point.

    The following might help:


    http://www.greenbuildingstore.co.uk/...t-maintenance/
    Full report attached
    Blog summary
    "...There are a lot of really interesting points raised in the study, which we hope to cover in future blogs, but to start off we wanted to look at its findings regarding operation of MVHR systems, where two major issues were raised:

    The first was that, due to a lack of communication with the occupants there was a misconception that the fans in the MVHR systems were expensive to run. This lead to half the occupants in the study disabling the system; the most common reason was out of concern for the operating cost of the MVHR.
    The second issue was related to delays with filter replacement. A study of Passive houses in Wimbish development looked at the effect that a poor maintenance programme had on the MVHR system. The systems used the PAUL Focus unit which has constant volume flow fans, meaning that when dirty filters partly block the duct (increasing the resistance to the air flow), the fans push harder to ensure a constant air flow. However this means that the fans consume more energy and also get noisier. Also, at some point, if the filters are very dirty, the fans reach their limit and less air is supplied, reducing air quality and putting the system out of balance, which then also reduces thermal efficiency. Replacing filters at correct intervals is therefore important for the energy use, noise and air quality.
    In the study data from the Wimbish Passivhaus project’s MVHR systems, the fan power was almost doubling before filters were being changed, with the fans reaching their limit and supplying less air...."

    Could be useful for some of the guys over the wall who want to do MHVR with a nilfisk

    From page 85
    "Common MVHR Shortcomings

    Specification
    Wrong type of fan installed
    Poor manufacturing of components
    Lack of summer by-pass function
    Poor control interface/ occupant inadequate control

    Installation
    Inadequate adjustment of control settings Failure to insulate ductwork
    Failure to securely affix fan.
    Deviations from design
    Failure to connect ductwork to outside terminal Supply/extract ducts installed wrong way around
    Supply/extract vents too close (short circuiting)
    Outside supply/extract vents too close together- recirculation of exhausted air
    Pollutant sources within 2m of supply grill
    Poor sound installation/ silencers not installed properly
    Over-use of flexible ducting (bends in ductwork) Contamination of ductwork during construction
    Leaky joints
    Air supply and/or extract vents not locked in place/ marked; wrong vents used
    Insufficient gradient on condensate drains
    Lack of traps (condensate tubes)

    Commissioning
    Insufficient and/or inaccurate commissioning

    Maintenance
    Inadequate access for cleaning Insufficient changing of filters
    Lack of dedicated trade body/ accredited training for servicing/installation

    Occupant Knowledge/Use
    Inadequate occupant knowledge of ventilation system
    Occupant(s) turning system off altogether or at certain times of the year
    Tightening/blocking of supply/extract vents Inadequate use of ‘boost’ mode
    MVHR system operated in lowest setting

    Performance
    Problems with noise, particularly in bedrooms Thermal comfort, perceived draughts, overheating"

    The installation issues list is scary

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,013 ✭✭✭Curious Geroge


    qaz123 wrote: »
    Im currently researching Mhvr units. A lot of different options available. Locally supplier fits a teed off system with rigid plastic ducts. 2 other suppliers I've priced fit system with manifold and individual semi flexible ducts to all rooms. Both claim their system is the best. Anyone any experience of both systems. What have people installed in their new builds? What has been your main criteria for choosing which system to go for

    Having a flexi system installed, I recommend anyone to go for a rigid system, ensure that its insulated (even within the envelope) and ensure that the system is functioning before you put up the ceilings - do not allow or pay the installer if he will not do this as its the only way and the only time you can check the noise levels and add silencers / baffling if needed. AND GET A PROFESSIONAL, not a plumber or someone else that does DIY to save a grand or two as your just wasting your 4 or 5 grand on a system that will not work.


Advertisement