I finally had the opportunity the other day to head out to the range in order to do the long awaited test of the 10/22's as shown below.

On top: Kidd Ultra Lightweight Barrel, Kidd Single Stage Trigger set to 1.5lbs, Boyd's Rimfire Thumbhole finished in Forest Camo Green, and a dedicated 22LR Nikon Prostaff scope with BDC 150 reticle.

On the bottom: Timney Trigger, 18", 1:16 twist, 0.920 Shaw Bull Barrel, Boyd's Tacticool stock in Forest Camo Green, and a Burris Droptine 3-9x40 22lr Ballistic Plex scope.

Both kit have Burris XTR Rings 1" Low, 15moa Tactical Solutions Base. Both triggers have the extended magazine release. Kidd calls their release the "speed" and Timney extended. Also, Timney refers to the actual trigger as a shoe whereas Kidd, a blade.

On the way to the range, I could not help but feel my car being pushed about by cross-winds. Thus, I held out little hope of any meaningful comparison of brand new barrels. I continued on as I would prefer to do a 22lr barrel comparison after a break in of about a thousand rounds. If nothing else, even a windy day would get me closer to that goal.

So I decided to review the triggers. As a disclaimer, I do have a new Timney 10/22 trigger for sale on this site. Also, when it comes to 700's I am a Timney guy. With that said, having both Timney and Kidd, I really have no affinity to either when it comes to the 10/22. To be honest, I will probably flog the lot to put a Voltsquartsen up against a Power Custom!

Below are the triggers tested.

Concisely, for me, the determining factor comes down to price and adjustability.

If you are a dedicated benchrest shooter, never hunt, or otherwise demand a very low, adjustable trigger, the Kidd is the best choice.

If you are like me, more budget conscious, and do more field work with bunnies, but enjoy a day at the range, the Timney is the best choice.

Both the Timney and the Kidd offer extremely clean, crisp, trigger breaks with no creep or issues at all. When set at the same weight, I could not choose one over the other. Both break like glass.

The Kidd's adjustable trigger has a very light break at 1.5lbs. A bit too light for field work, but essential for competition, I am told.

The Timney's 2.75lb break is not light nor heavy. It is what I have referred to as purposefully light. It is about the lightest you can have a trigger yet still consciously have to pull.

I would not hesitate to go in to competition with the Timney and plan to do so after the barrel is broken in. I would be more worried about an unintended trigger pull from the low weight settings than a draw off target due to a heavier pull.

Both installed easily, no problems, special tools, or issues. Both fit snug.

I prefer the shape of the Timney trigger shoe/blade as shown below.

Both Timney and Kidd offer a nice but not too wide shoe/blade on which the finger rests. However, the angle of the Kidd shoe was not as comfortable as the Timney. It is not a big deal, but something you may wish to consider. To be honest, I probably would not have noticed unless I had them both here, side by side. With gloves on, the Timney offered a more comfortable finger seat.

Aesthetically, the Timney has a cleaner finish. If you look in the above image, you may notice tooling marks around the magazine release. Also, in the same area, you may see concentric circles that Interpol may attempt to run as my fingerprints :cool:. They are not! They are again, tooling marks.

So what, who cares, the marks are mostly hidden by the stock. However, considering the prices paid for these triggers, I do not think it is too much to ask for a better finish, free of tool marks. Again, it is superficial and personally, it is not a deal breaker or buying point for me.

Kidd is the clear winner when it comes to trigger weight adjustability. The Kidd's trigger is adjustable from 1.5 to 5.0lb. The Timney is not. If you demand an adjustable trigger weight, the Kidd is your choice.

Adjustability comes with two costs. First, is money and second is mechanical. With adjustability comes a more complex trigger design with more bits and pieces. That is, more stuff to break down, fail, or wear. When it comes to machines, to me, simplicity is elegant.

In the cocked position, the extra internals are apparent in the Kidd (right hand side).

When fired (not dry!), even more internals are exposed. For those that are recocking the Kidd, ensure that you seat the metal enclosed by the spring properly.

The extra internals are a small price to pay if you want adjustability. For my needs, I prefer the more simple Timney design. With all of this said, I have no data or feedback to say that either design is better in the long run.

Releasing the magazine is simple, fast, and intuitive with the use of one finger. Both levers are easy to find and require no conscious effort. Both drop magazines literally free and fast. Timney may have a slight advantage with the slight loop on the release when wearing thicker winter gloves. With gloves on, it was easier to find the Timney release, but not by much. Without gloves, I really had no preference. If I did have a preference, it would be based on looks alone.

Not much to add on the topic of safety switches. Neither engage on a fired pin. Both are simple to use and effective.

Lastly, I prefer the design of the Timney ejector. The Kidd uses another punch pin to hold in their ejector whereas the Timney uses an existing pin.

In the end, the Kidd wins on adjustability whereas Timney wins on simplicity and price.

As for price, I will leave that up to ye. The triggers' American prices are close enough, depending on options, to be considered the same. However, in Ireland, that's another story. Personally, I would not pay 50% more for the adjustability of the Kidd. But, if you are in to competition...

I hope I did not bore anyone with superficial or minute differences. However, the two triggers are that close.

Feel free to ask any questions or request more images.

Thanks for reading, I will post the range report probably this summer and keep an eye out for the 700 SPS vs Howa 1500 223 shoot-off!