Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
14-04-2012, 13:11   #1
MathsArthur
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 9
Complex variable problem.

I have an equation.

closed line integral ( dx/(a + b*cos(x)) ) between 0 and 2pi

using the change of variable z=r*exp(i*x), we get

closed line integral ( -i*dz/(z-r*m1)(z-r*m2) ) between 0 and 2pi

where m1 and m2 are functions of a and b only

the residuals are then (-i/r)*(m1-m2) and (i/r)*(m1-m2) and their sum is zero

the resolution is that you only include the pole nearest the origin to calculate the integral. Why is this?

Also, the residuals are a function of r, so the integral has a different value depending on the size of the circle you integrate around contradicting the residue theorem that says that the integral is independent of the path.
MathsArthur is offline  
Advertisement
14-04-2012, 20:20   #2
Michael Collins
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,703
Welcome to the Maths forum MathsArthur! I've added comments below which hopefully you will find useful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MathsArthur View Post
I have an equation.

closed line integral ( dx/(a + b*cos(x)) ) between 0 and 2pi
Just a small point here, this isn't a "closed" line integral yet - it is just a real integral over the real interval 0 to



It changes to a closed line integral only after you make the change of variable substitution below. Then you start tackling the problem using residue methods in the complex plane.

Quote:
using the change of variable z=r*exp(i*x), we get

closed line integral ( -i*dz/(z-r*m1)(z-r*m2) ) between 0 and 2pi

where m1 and m2 are functions of a and b only
Just out of curiousity, why do you bother to include the 'r' in your change of variable expression at all? It's much easier if you just integrate around the unit circle. . Maybe you have some other reason though?

I think this step is also where your problem lies. You have assumed that the polynomial you get on the bottom is monic, and you've just written the expression as



when actually it should be



where is some constant. This won't affect the value of the roots, but it will affect the value of the residues.

Quote:
the residuals are then (-i/r)*(m1-m2) and (i/r)*(m1-m2) and their sum is zero

the resolution is that you only include the pole nearest the origin to calculate the integral. Why is this?
Those 's should not be present. This is a result of assuming the monic polynomial as explained above.

You only include the residues inside the closed curve you are integrating over in the complex plane. This is a result of the Resiude Theorem.

Quote:
Also, the residuals are a function of r, so the integral has a different value depending on the size of the circle you integrate around contradicting the residue theorem that says that the integral is independent of the path.
Again, this is a result of assuming a monic polynomial above.
Michael Collins is offline  
15-04-2012, 16:01   #3
MathsArthur
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 9
Thanks for the bail out with the integral problem. It's sorted now. I still don't get why only one pole is included in the solution. I looked up the residue theorem on Wikipedia, but didn't have any joy.
MathsArthur is offline  
15-04-2012, 16:49   #4
Michael Collins
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,703
Is your question that you don't understand why, in general, you only include the residues inside the closed curve you are integrating around, or is it, in this specific problem why does it appear only one residue is ever included?
Michael Collins is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Share Tweet