Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Long Exposure Traffic

Options
  • 21-01-2012 11:26pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 37,297 ✭✭✭✭


    On the way back from the Boards.ie Motor Meetup, I got a puncture, fixed it, jumped into the car to find that my battery had died. Whilst I was waiting for someone to come to jumpstart my car, I took a few long exposure shots. These three are my best, IIMO.

    Into the traffic, on the top of my car:
    E449C8BA5B994ADD92B72CD06DBAA254-0000324027-0002712723-00800L-DD9350BE7FDA44B58752C490B266018C.jpg
    (didn't really look as nice if I cropped my car boot out, so I left it in)

    I took a few shots away from the traffic, but they looked a bit blurred (car would shake as cars went by), so I put the camera on the road in front of my car, and got these:

    Cars:

    8F1B1C473FE64BE6B965EE9C611C94F6-0000324027-0002712725-00800L-BA397DCF3BB2477A8C84AB7C5D6031EB.jpg

    Trucks:

    3D99759F14AA478CBC726DB06909D669-0000324027-0002712724-00800L-2D6ABC84A6924CC1B8F8DC2F53607ED9.jpg


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,798 ✭✭✭MiskyBoyy


    The trucks one looks really cool in my opinion!
    What shutter speed did you use?


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,297 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    DaLad wrote: »
    The trucks one looks really cool in my opinion!
    What shutter speed did you use?
    30 seconds for the above three.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 9,047 CMod ✭✭✭✭CabanSail


    Seems to be fairly noisy. What ISO did you use?


    Just had a peek at the Exif. Seems a lot of noise for ISO200.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,760 ✭✭✭Effects


    Don't you often get noise on long exposures regardless of the iso?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,569 ✭✭✭✭Tallon


    Jerry, buy a damn tripod :D

    Very nice shots


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    Effects wrote: »
    Don't you often get noise on long exposures regardless of the iso?

    Yep, noise can be caused by Long Exposures, especially on cropped sensors.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,762 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Like the trucks one myself :cool:

    Maybe the 30 second exposure caused all the noise, would like to see a similar shot with maybe 5 seconds exposure give or take and dont press the shutter button until you see the car/truck coming.

    would that help with the noise?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,589 ✭✭✭✭Necronomicon


    I really like the last shot, great point of view. You should be able to achieve similar results using slightly shorter exposures, maybe around 15-20 seconds, which might reduce the noise. Try turning on mirror lock up too.

    It's a fun shot to do though, I have a couple in this set here if you want to see my own attempts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,297 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Tallon wrote: »
    Jerry, buy a damn tripod :D

    Very nice shots
    I have a tripod, but as I wasn't planning on breaking down on a motorway in the middle of nowhere and take long exposure shots, thus I didn't think to bring it :pac:

    =-=

    I did a few other shots, but the focus was off, and thus they weren't as clear. I turned off the auto-focus on the lens, and then manually focussed on cars in the distance, and left it at that.

    I did 30 second shots as there wasn't much traffic on the road, and thus 30 seconds would get two or three cars. Also so I could but my hands back into my pocket :D
    Try turning on mirror lock up too.
    I'll look into it. Nice shots, btw.

    Here's an 8 second shot which was out of focus:

    AAB7607B7E2B4C6882B63CDD6B2E797B-0000324027-0002713232-00800L-C50EE7502DA841098023C7D722C9EB3C.jpg

    And a 25 second shot at f/25:

    FBEE4707C5DD41B3923BA563415867C4-0000324027-0002713233-00800L-25579319EDBF403A8A64DBF9B91E6CB2.jpg
    The lines on the road being blurred were mainly caused by the car shaking when a car went fairly fast by.


    If I do more of this sort of shots again, but I'll probably use a remote trigger to press the button the next time.

    This was probably one of the most unplanned shots I've done :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 708 ✭✭✭dave66


    When I tried my hand at light trails I was surprised that the exposure didn't have to be very long, this one was 10 seconds at f22, it was early in the evening before all the light had gone from the sky, so that might have helped:

    9D01E1E6F12A4361BFCE7D8F70E65D3A-0000336212-0002142131-00800L-0C5B28F23A1546738C782F642E8F6A39.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 37,297 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    dave66 wrote: »
    When I tried my hand at light trails I was surprised that the exposure didn't have to be very long, this one was 10 seconds at f22, it was early in the evening before all the light had gone from the sky, so that might have helped
    That's pretty good. I'll have a go at my local motorway shortly, before the days get too long.


  • Registered Users Posts: 559 ✭✭✭sebphoto


    Way too dark in my opinion.
    Try with gray filter + iso 50 or 100.:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,633 ✭✭✭✭OldGoat


    Try the long exposure noise reduction setting in the custom function settings (Canon).
    If you are going to have the shutter open for 30 seconds then drop your ISO to 100 (or 50 if you have it). It's seems a bit redundant to set it any higher for light trails.

    I'm older than Minecraft goats.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Snowie


    dave66 wrote: »
    When I tried my hand at light trails I was surprised that the exposure didn't have to be very long, this one was 10 seconds at f22, it was early in the evening before all the light had gone from the sky, so that might have helped:



    The problem with that is while its a great shot i would say middle the appiture out to say f 11 and drop it 5 seconds an play around there not being smart or anything but the longer you leave the exposer, the more jagged the light lines will look. The less time the sharper the light lines will look ultimately creating a better shot (just my 2 cents)

    But i love the gradients in booth yours and The Syco's shots. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,116 ✭✭✭dinneenp


    Here's a few of mine, with wall or car instead of tripod (only ever tried long exposure less than 1/2 dozen times)

    Taken at Claregalway traffic lights, 10 second exposure, f 16

    6675612313_c2884022a0_z.jpg
    Galway Nighttime Long Exposure by Photoblog.ie (Patrick Dinneen), on Flickr


    f10, 13 seconds

    4844691522_a25ded7274_z.jpg
    Night driving by Photoblog.ie (Patrick Dinneen), on Flickr

    from my car window, more abstract but I like it

    f8, .5 seconds

    3291378512_924065a774_z.jpg?zz=1
    flying by by Photoblog.ie (Patrick Dinneen), on Flickr


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 brooksamanda89


    All these are just awesome… I’m spell-bound!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 67 ✭✭zootshooter


    nice thread, some really cool shots on display, thought I'd stick up one of my own favourite long exposures of traffic.

    henry-street41-e1318247322677.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Those aren't light trails....THIS is a light trail :D:D;)
    3261821680_00c8a8b2da_z.jpg
    Taken in Laois one cold cold February night in 2009, 5 weeks after I got my first DLSR. Stcstc printed it for me and I still love it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 301 ✭✭the_tractor


    The Big Broadway Balls Belfast.

    Lorry/Bus lights are what you want. :-)
    42CEA0523FCB48E6BF038FC2825DD620-0000329804-0002618201-00800L-853FC6BBBA2549518A763D30375F77E5.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,987 ✭✭✭cena


    I really like them photos guys. The truck on is the best as is the one the other user posted. They would look good hanging up on a wall in a house


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 779 ✭✭✭DK32


    Inner city night;

    BF01C943E7BB4ED29CE2AF68E34941BE-800.jpg

    Last shot of the night;

    61EAFDFE7A9345F9B72A2FB03271BCB2-800.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    Anybody remember the POTW of a plane taking off lightrail? It was shot from a Spanish beach?


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,633 ✭✭✭✭OldGoat


    Was just thinking of that image. Might try to recreate it this weekend.

    I'm older than Minecraft goats.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,116 ✭✭✭dinneenp


    Night driving, above image not showing:

    4844691522_1bca2abec2_z.jpg
    Night driving by Photoblog.ie (Patrick Dinneen), on Flickr


  • Registered Users Posts: 956 ✭✭✭steve_


    Im curious as to how you work out the length of time you should expose for. Is a trial and error thing? Are people just using their light meters and adjusting accordingly or is there something else?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭pegasus1


    steve_ wrote: »
    Im curious as to how you work out the length of time you should expose for. Is a trial and error thing? Are people just using their light meters and adjusting accordingly or is there something else?

    I just did iso at 100, F11 and 20 sec. Exposure..

    6448113487_c0de1bd40d_z.jpg
    Motorway at dusk by niall.hirsch, on Flickr

    Iso100, F11 and 30 sec Exposure..

    6515015177_c372ee47ab_z.jpg
    Motorway at dusk 2 by niall.hirsch, on Flickr


  • Registered Users Posts: 956 ✭✭✭steve_


    Interesting. So generally would you always use low ISO settings? Im assuming your apeture choice is much the same as they would be in other photos depending on whether you want everything in focus or not. As for the light meter readings, is that any use to you when doing long exposures? Do you use any specific metering mode when taking long exposures?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭pegasus1


    steve_ wrote: »
    Interesting. So generally would you always use low ISO settings? Im assuming your apeture choice is much the same as they would be in other photos depending on whether you want everything in focus or not. As for the light meter readings, is that any use to you when doing long exposures? Do you use any specific metering mode when taking long exposures?

    The lower the iso the better, and you're correct on the aperture.
    With the camera's light/exposure meter, you still need to meter it correctly on manual exposure..;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 956 ✭✭✭steve_


    ok so based off the pictures above. You set up the shot, stop down to f-11 and set your ISO to 100. You light meter will obviously be showing your greatly underexposed so do you just adjust the exposure time until your light meter shows that your correctly exposed? I guess you can just use your light meters reading as a starting point and adjust your exposure time accordingly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭pegasus1


    You can do it in aperture priority mode with iso100 and F11 and get your shutter speed from that as a start...don't forget you need to use a tripod...


Advertisement