Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

electric field equals zero

  • 15-01-2007 8:12pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 183 ✭✭


    if you have two +ve charges Q1 and Q2 seperatdd by s then when is then at what distance from the charge Q1 is the total electric field from the two charges zero.
    . How can this be expressed. If your looking for the variable x then can you say that this distance is Sqrt 2s or something. does anyone know?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    If the charges are of equal magnitude, then the field is zero halfway between them.

    A +ve charge emits a radial field, so if you are situated between the two charges, then you'll experience two fields coming at you from opposite directions. The point at which the net field is zero is where the two fields are equal and opposite.

    If the distance between them is d, and the zero-point is at a distance s from Q1, then it's d-s from Q2.

    Put these distances into the expressions for electric fields for each charge and then place them equal to each other and solve for s.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 183 ✭✭TX123


    does s then equal to 2d or sqrt2d


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    The standard formula is Q/(4*PI*epsilon*r^2), where r is the distance from the charge.

    If d is the separation between the charges, then the zero-point will be s away from one point and (d-s) away from the other. Set r = s for one and r=(d-s) for the other and put them equal.

    Q1/(4*PI*epsilon*s^2) = Q2/(4*PI*epsilon*(d-s)^2)

    Now solve for s.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 183 ✭✭TX123


    you end up with something like this.


    sqrt Q1/(SqrtQ1 +SqrtQ2) *s

    does that sound right ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    If we assume that we're at a distance s from Q1 and a distance (d-s) from Q2, then we get

    s = (d*a)/(1+a) where a = SQRT(Q1/Q2)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 183 ✭✭TX123


    i think your wrong there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    I don't have access to software at the moment in which I can write the derivation, but if you throw up yours here, I'll look at it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭planck2


    If you have a positive charge Q1 and another positive charge Q2 both of which have a non zero E field. how do the E-fields of the charges seperated by a distance s' vanish at every point in space. The new field En = E1 + E2, but E2 is simply cE1, c= Q2/Q1. So the new field En can never vanish.

    Also the only components of the fields that vanish are those along the line joining the charges, but this only happens if Q1=Q2. And remember that like charges repel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    planck2 wrote:
    If you have a positive charge Q1 and another positive charge Q2 both of which have a non zero E field. how do the E-fields of the charges seperated by a distance s' vanish at every point in space. The new field En = E1 + E2, but E2 is simply cE1, c= Q2/Q1. So the new field En can never vanish.

    Don't forget that it's not just a matter of scaling the charges, but the distances as well.
    Also the only components of the fields that vanish are those along the line joining the charges
    I think that there are an infinite number of places where the electric field is zero, but the easiest one to work out is on the line joing the charges. Otherwise, it's more complicated vectors.
    but this only happens if Q1=Q2

    Not necessarily, when they're unequal is just means that the zeropoint won't be equidistant from both.

    And of course, the electric field is always zero at infinity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 242 ✭✭planck2


    but think about it, if Q1 =Q2 then for En to vanish everywhere we must have E1 +E2 = 0 everywhere. then we have E1 = - E2, but this is a contradiction because the charges Q1 and Q2 are identical. the only point where the field En vanishes is the midpoint of the line joing the centre of the charges and nowhere else. And if Q1 = cQ2, c not equal to 1, the distance along the line joing them is only modified by a constant.

    And yes the field is zero at infinity


  • Advertisement
Advertisement