28 days later, much later

spooky donkey · 11-06-2007 10:48am #1

Well after watching 28 weeks later with out seeing 28 days I thought the first film would be a disapointment. It was most certianaly not. Im know im a bit late posting about this as every one had seen this apart from me. But it does prove one thing ya dont need a big budget to make a great movie. But it helps. I think the 2nd one is the slightly better movie but theres not a lot in it. So heres to 28 months later, a movie ill look forward to if they ever make it.

qwertplaywert · 15-06-2007 4:03pm

i doubt it will get made, days later made twice as much as weeks later on a budget much smaller,and on a smaller release

Average-Ro · 17-06-2007 5:30pm

Wasn't there a lot of talk about a third one being made though?

Timans · 17-06-2007 5:36pm

Nah, the first one was much better. Dealt with the effects of the Virus much better I thougt. The second one was too much action for me.

Ending of bother films were very disappointing.

spooky donkey · 04-07-2007 8:10pm

you dont like action Timans? watch soap operas or chick flicks.

qwertplaywert · 04-07-2007 8:13pm

ive heard reports now that fox atomic are not that interested in horror movies anymore, and that 28 weeks later will have to do really well on dvd for even a slight chance of months

spooky donkey · 25-07-2007 1:07pm

ah mores the pity. But I do think it will do well on DVD, just how well remains to be seen.

bryan philips · 12-08-2007 2:20pm

Must say I enjoyed the second film a lot more. A definite dvd purchase!

qwertplaywert · 12-08-2007 6:19pm

Although it is early days, and much depends on the dvd, Danny Boyle has said he intererested in directing a third installment, and has the story in his mind atm.

Leonitos · 17-08-2007 10:18am

spooky donkey wrote:

Well after watching 28 weeks later with out seeing 28 days I thought the first film would be a disapointment. It was most certianaly not. Im know im a bit late posting about this as every one had seen this apart from me. But it does prove one thing ya dont need a big budget to make a great movie. But it helps. I think the 2nd one is the slightly better movie but theres not a lot in it. So heres to 28 months later, a movie ill look forward to if they ever make it.

28 days later was a good movie however 28 weeks later was total crap.

senordingdong · 12-09-2007 10:37am

3rd one has already gotten the green light.
That's the only information that has been released about it, that and the fact that it will be set in Paris.

Not thrilled with the idea of what they can do with the story from there...I'd much prefer to see 28 Hours Later tbh.

Thundercracker · 08-10-2007 3:08pm

Timans wrote:

The second one was too much action for me.

Ending of both films were very disappointing.

Agreed

28 days later, much later

Comments