Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

University changing exam marking scheme suddenly

  • 27-02-2012 3:18pm
    #1
    maki
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 772 ✭✭✭maki


    My university has just informed me that due to an omission in the marks and standards document that was distributed to all students at the beginning of the year, and which has been available on their website all year, the marking scheme for one particular subject has been massively altered.

    Originally the subject had a marks breakdown of 70% exam and 30% practicals, but we've just been informed that the actual numbers are 40% exam and 60% practical.

    This is a huge development and leaves many students in the position where they might fail the year unless they achieve very well in the exam, since the practicals were never well attended.

    Is an NUI university legally required to abide by their own exam regulations, or are they allowed to change things just before the exams and say tough luck?


Comments

  • #2
    Tom Young
    Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    The case of Tansey v College of Occupational Therapists Ltd [1995] 2 ILRM 601 almost immediately springs to mind. Of course, it is slightly different to the scenario you mention.

    You can't seek legal advice here unfortunately, but it does sound like it's a little bit unreasonable.

    Tom


  • #3
    Robbo
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    Get onto your class reps and the education officer in the SU. A similar thing cropped up with (I presume it's UCG we're talking about here) the B.Comm Internationals last year.


  • #4
    castie
    Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,807 ✭✭✭castie


    Had similar happen before.

    "Answer at least 3 questions" on the paper.

    But exam was marked out of all 5.

    Education officer at the SU helped me file an appeal to the marking of the exam and represented me at the hearing. All exams were regraded out of 3 questions due to the vague nature of the statement.

    Im sure you could do similar and the Education Officer at the SU will know best.


  • #5
    Avatargh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 191 ✭✭Avatargh


    maki wrote: »
    My university has just informed me that due to an omission in the marks and standards document that was distributed to all students at the beginning of the year, and which has been available on their website all year, the marking scheme for one particular subject has been massively altered.

    Originally the subject had a marks breakdown of 70% exam and 30% practicals, but we've just been informed that the actual numbers are 40% exam and 60% practical.

    This is a huge development and leaves many students in the position where they might fail the year unless they achieve very well in the exam, since the practicals were never well attended.

    Is an NUI university legally required to abide by their own exam regulations, or are they allowed to change things just before the exams and say tough luck?

    Legal advice would be sensible here...and quick. There are comparable (ish) situations which have "gone to law" in the past.


Advertisement