Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Clermont vs Munster buildup thread **read post one

191012141522

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 30,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Clermont by 1-10
    Grimebox wrote: »
    Ireland has a large pool of senior rugby players in comparison to other countries if I remember correctly. I'll see if I can find the infograph. I seem to remember we are on par with NZ and England in terms of player pool size.

    Those numbers include tag players apparently.

    Also, we're way off England who have about 1,000,000 senior males.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭Lelantos


    Grimebox wrote: »
    Ireland has a large pool of senior rugby players in comparison to other countries if I remember correctly. I'll see if I can find the infograph. I seem to remember we are on par with NZ and England in terms of player pool size.

    http://www.rugbydump.com/2011/09/2103/rugby-world-cup-daily-player-numbers-around-the-world


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,997 ✭✭✭Grimebox


    Clermont by 1-10
    Tag players :eek: Technically I am a senior player available to be selected if thats the case


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Clermont by 1-10
    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Those numbers include tag players apparently.

    Also, we're way off England who have about 1,000,000 senior males.

    The Irish numbers do, some of the other unions don't

    Each union is done on their own set of criteria.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 30,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Clermont by 1-10
    The Irish numbers do, some of the other unions don't

    Each union is done on their own set of criteria.

    Yeah I know, I didn't explain that clearly. For that reason the numbers just aren't comparable though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,997 ✭✭✭Grimebox


    Clermont by 1-10
    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Yeah I know, I didn't explain that clearly. For that reason the numbers just aren't comparable though.

    However England are counting "Total players" is clearly vastly different to everyone else


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭Lelantos


    Grimebox wrote: »
    However England are counting "Total players" is clearly vastly different to everyone else

    I do remember in one set of figures I was given for Ireland that rugby playing secondary schools were counted also,,this included all pupils in the school, whether they actually played the game or not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Munster by more than 10
    backgreen wrote: »
    the french have increased their salary cap to 10 million for next season,the national championship is the priority for all french clubs,but i think a lot more H cups will go there in future

    What's the English budget ?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,664 ✭✭✭opinionatedfan


    Clermont by 1-10
    Rightwing wrote: »
    What's the English budget ?

    The Ligue Nationale de Rugby (LNR), the umbrella body representing France's leading clubs, has announced that the Top 14 salary cap will rise to €10m (£8.6m) as of next season.

    The new figure is a €500,000 increase on the present limit but crucially youth players will no longer be included in the salary cap unless they earn in excess of €50,000 (£43,000) a year in a move designed to encourage the development of fresh talent. The latter ceiling will be reviewed on an annual basis but the actual salary cap, that was raised from €8.7m to €9.5m this season, will be remain in place for the next three campaigns.

    That trend look likely to continue with the English Premiership salary cap currently set at £4.26m rising to a maximum of £4.5m with the continuation of the 'Academy Credits' that reward clubs for bring through their own talent. In addition, they are allowed to nominate one 'Excluded Player' whose salary can be discounted.

    Welsh rugby has suffered the most as a result of French rugby's financial dominance with centre Jamie Roberts just the latest of a long line of internationals to opt for a cross-Channel switch with Racing Metro his expected destination. The cash-strapped four Welsh regions introduced a £3.5m salary cap this season to cover players registered for European squads with development and academy costs falling outside of this remit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,997 ✭✭✭Grimebox


    Clermont by 1-10
    Stupid question, what exactly is the salary cap? €10m maximum budget a club can spend on players' salary in total?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Munster by more than 10
    Grimebox wrote: »
    Stupid question, what exactly is the salary cap? €10m maximum budget a club can spend on players' salary in total?

    Ya, that's my understanding of it. It's a little bit worrying that the French are getting so powerful with their sugar daddys


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,788 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Clermont by 1-10
    Fofana was quiet against Ireland. Didn't get much ball. Munster will somehow have to reproduce those conditions to have a chance. But the Clermont forwards are kinda formidable too. It's hard even to find a fantasy route to victory.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Munster by more than 10
    Ardillaun wrote: »
    Fofana was quiet against Ireland. Didn't get much ball. Munster will somehow have to reproduce those conditions to have a chance. But the Clermont forwards are kinda formidable too. It's hard even to find a fantasy route to victory.

    But they have a history of blowing up and choking, hence they have so little silverware.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,768 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Munster by 1-10
    Ardillaun wrote: »
    Fofana was quiet against Ireland. Didn't get much ball. Munster will somehow have to reproduce those conditions to have a chance. But the Clermont forwards are kinda formidable too. It's hard even to find a fantasy route to victory.

    How much of that was Ireland keeping him quiet and how much was the crazy coaching selections and decisions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭backgreen


    Clermont by 1-10
    Ardillaun wrote: »
    Fofana was quiet against Ireland. Didn't get much ball. Munster will somehow have to reproduce those conditions to have a chance. But the Clermont forwards are kinda formidable too. It's hard even to find a fantasy route to victory.
    Fofana was played out of position on the wing by that crazy french coach..
    12/13 and he's dynamite


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Squad Update: http://www.munsterrugby.ie/news/11862.php

    Archer out while DOC, POM, Downey, Earls and Howlett are doubts. Sherry didn't train today because of tonsilitis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭budhabob


    Munster by more than 10
    Squad Update: http://www.munsterrugby.ie/news/11862.php

    Archer out while DOC, POM, Downey, Earls and Howlett are doubts. Sherry didn't train today because of tonsilitis.

    Jesus, the impossible gets harder!!!! POM would be the HUGE loss to us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Munster by more than 10
    That's disastrous news. We'll still probably have some bemoaning Clermont's luck if James is out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Rightwing wrote: »
    That's disastrous news. We'll still probably have some bemoaning Clermont's luck if James is out.

    James out would be a huge positive for Munster, not Clermont. He's a brilliant player. People just keep judging him on a few very poor performances which isn't right. The RDS Quarter-Final was three seasons ago, it's not really relevant.

    Apparently Clermont are in negotiations with the ERC to get Mike Delany registered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭budhabob


    Munster by more than 10
    James out would be a huge positive for Munster, not Clermont. He's a brilliant player. People just keep judging him on a few very poor performances which isn't right. The RDS Quarter-Final was three seasons ago, it's not really relevant.

    Apparently Clermont are in negotiations with the ERC to get Mike Delany registered.

    How does that work? What would the basis of the argument be? (I know we'd just be speculating but just curious).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Munster by more than 10
    James out would be a huge positive for Munster, not Clermont. He's a brilliant player. People just keep judging him on a few very poor performances which isn't right. The RDS Quarter-Final was three seasons ago, it's not really relevant.

    Apparently Clermont are in negotiations with the ERC to get Mike Delany registered.

    Well if that list of injuries turns out to be accurate our chances are gone :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    budhabob wrote: »
    How does that work? What would the basis of the argument be? (I know we'd just be speculating but just curious).

    The only argument I can think of is two outhalfs are injured: James and Skrela. IMO only for the frontrow would that argument hold sway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    Munster by 1-10
    Our two leagues are a million miles apart.

    It's a wonder French clubs don't win the HC more often. I don't buy into they don't want to.

    We've 2 French HEC and 2 Amlin semi-finalists in Europe this year, they clearly do want to win it. Even in the Amlin you saw Stade and Biarritz really going for it to win their SFs.

    Has to be said that after the Clermont/Toulouse game things are looking fairly ominous for Munster. If Munster managed to win it would be, imo, their best ever win in Europe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Munster by more than 10
    I'd like Clermont to be at full strength, but only provided that we are as well. Like last year, the winner of this tie will go on to win it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    The only argument I can think of is two outhalfs are injured: James and Skrela. IMO only for the frontrow would that argument hold sway.

    Given Rado started the quarter final, I don't think they've a leg to stand on. Parra has also played outhalf for club and country. I think they might start with Rado and have James on the bench if he's 80%.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭trouttrout


    Rightwing wrote: »
    I'd like Clermont to be at full strength, but only provided that we are as well. Like last year, the winner of this tie will go on to win it.

    Toulon v Clermont in Dublin will be more or less a 50/50 game

    Saracens v Munster in Dublin would be a very close call

    Toulon v Munster the same

    Saracens v Clermont in Dublin and you would favor Clermont

    So I don't know how you can say that the winner of this semi will go on to win it in such a matter of fact way


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    Munster by 1-10
    Squad Update: http://www.munsterrugby.ie/news/11862.php

    Archer out while DOC, POM, Downey, Earls and Howlett are doubts. Sherry didn't train today because of tonsilitis.

    I'd imagine there's a fair attempt at so-called mind games here, would expect most of those to play.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    Munster by more than 10
    trouttrout wrote: »
    Toulon v Clermont in Dublin will be more or less a 50/50 game

    Saracens v Munster in Dublin would be a very close call

    Toulon v Munster the same

    Saracens v Clermont in Dublin and you would favor Clermont

    So I don't know how you can say that the winner of this semi will go on to win it in such a matter of fact way

    I know where you are coming from, Sarries/Toulon will be a much tougher nut to crack than Ulster, I'd still back the winner of our semi, we'd have home advantage, and Clermont are good enough to beat the pick of the other 2.


  • Administrators Posts: 55,251 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Clermont by 1-10
    Rightwing wrote: »
    I know where you are coming from, Sarries/Toulon will be a much tougher nut to crack than Ulster, I'd still back the winner of our semi, we'd have home advantage, and Clermont are good enough to beat the pick of the other 2.
    Not so sure about that.

    If we'd have turned up we'd have beaten Saracens IMO.

    Unfortunately we bottled it on the day.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,178 ✭✭✭Quint2010


    Clermont by 1-10
    Squad Update: http://www.munsterrugby.ie/news/11862.php

    Archer out while DOC, POM, Downey, Earls and Howlett are doubts. Sherry didn't train today because of tonsilitis.

    All smoke and mirrors I reckon. They'll all be fit (bar Archer) come Saturday.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement