Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Car Bomb at Pentagon on 9/11

Options
12345679»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 25,226 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    weisses wrote: »
    Do you finally agree there are no photos of building 7 fully engulfed in flames
    No. Because the photos showing the smoke pouring out of the building indicate that it was fully engulfed in flames.
    There is no other explanation for this.
    weisses wrote: »
    all the video's and photos showing most of the northside unaffected by fire
    Except for the bit that are affected by fire.
    And the fact that it's windows were mostly intact while the south side's were heavily in intact, hence why we don't see smoke pouring out of that side as well.
    weisses wrote: »
    ...why are you insisting it was fully engulfed in flames
    Because it's the only explanation for the smoke we see and it's confirmed by the testimony of fire fighters on the site.
    You're response to this is to suggest that firefighters are incapable of looking up...


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    No. Because the photos showing the smoke pouring out of the building indicate that it was fully engulfed in flames.
    There is no other explanation for this.

    Smoke pouring out of a building does not equal Fully engulfed in flames

    By that standard when they bombed the wtc in 93 the building was also fully engulfed in flames and it wasnt
    King Mob wrote: »
    Except for the bit that are affected by fire.
    And the fact that it's windows were mostly intact while the south side's were heavily in intact, hence why we don't see smoke pouring out of that side as well.

    Debris ignited fires on at least 10 floors in the building at its south and west faces. However, only the fires on some of the lower floors-7 through 9 and 11 through 13-burned out of control.

    That leaves 34 story's of floors largely unaffected by fire (which is clearly visible looking at the north face of the building)

    How do you come to the conclusion that building 7 was fully engulfed in flames ??
    King Mob wrote: »
    Because it's the only explanation for the smoke we see and it's confirmed by the testimony of fire fighters on the site.
    You're response to this is to suggest that firefighters are incapable of looking up...

    No i only suggest that you are incapable of understanding the phrase fully engulfed in flames

    Seeing smoke equals something fully engulfed in flames according to you .... terrific job buddy


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,226 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    weisses wrote: »
    Smoke pouring out of a building does not equal Fully engulfed in flames

    By that standard when they bombed the wtc in 93 the building was also fully engulfed in flames and it wasnt
    Smoke pouring out of every floor = engulfed in flames.
    weisses wrote: »
    That leaves 34 story's of floors largely unaffected by fire (which is clearly visible looking at the north face of the building)
    You are basing this solely on the lack of smoke on the north side which is due to it's mostly intact windows.
    On the south side we see smoke coming out of nearly every floor.
    weisses wrote: »
    How do you come to the conclusion that building 7 was fully engulfed in flames ??
    Again because 1. the photos show smoke coming out of every floor. The only explanation for this is that there was a lot of fire and 2. firefighters confirm this.
    weisses wrote: »
    No i only suggest that you are incapable of understanding the phrase fully engulfed in flames
    No you said that the firefighters were wrong because they did not see the north side of the building. I showed a picture of firefighters on the not side of the building. The only way they could have not seen the north side of the building is by not looking up.
    You are suggesting exactly that to maintain your pedantry.
    weisses wrote: »
    Seeing smoke equals something fully engulfed in flames according to you .... terrific job buddy
    Not what I said. Your desperate strawman is transparent and pathetic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭weisses


    Fine example

    Just when you thought it was over, you're walking by this building and you're hearing this building creak and fully involved in flames


    How can you claim that when you don't have the full view of the building ??



    Or this one

    When the building came down it was completely involved in fire, all forty-seven stories"

    Wrong statement as well ... video footage of the collapse clearly shows that



    Another one

    12. So yeah then we just stayed on Vesey until building Seven came down. There was nothing we could do. The flames were coming out of every window of that building


    Not possible either ... roughly 33 floors on the northside had all windows in place up untill collapse




    Another one

    14. Well, they said that's (7) fully involved at this time. This was a fully involved building. I said, all right, they're not coming for us for a while. Now you're trapped in this rubble, and you're trying to get a grasp of an idea of what's going on there. I heard on the handy talky that we are now fighting a 40-story building fully involved.

    Large parts of the North side of that building remained unaffected up until collapse as is clearly evident in all the video's


    This one makes more sense

    19. I walked around the building to get back to the command post and that's when they were waiting for 7 World Trade Center to come down. ...They had three floors of fire on three separate floors, probably 10, 11 and 15 it looked like, just burning merrily. It was pretty amazing, you know, it's the afternoon in lower Manhattan, a major high-rise is burning, and they said 'we know.' –FDNY Chief Thomas McCarthy


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,226 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    weisses wrote: »
    Not possible either ... roughly 33 floors on the northside had all windows in place up untill collapse


    Large parts of the North side of that building remained unaffected up until collapse as is clearly evident in all the video's
    Lol. How do you know that "Large parts of the North side of that building remained unaffected"? A lack of smoke coming out of the windows on that side perhaps?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    Smoke pouring out of every floor = engulfed in flames.

    What floors above floor 13 on the north side do you see smoke pouring out of the building ???

    King Mob wrote: »
    You are basing this solely on the lack of smoke on the north side which is due to it's mostly intact windows.
    On the south side we see smoke coming out of nearly every floor.

    Yes south-side ... How can you reach that conclusion about fire fully engulfing the building when there is a lack of smoke and fire on at least one side of the building.
    King Mob wrote: »
    Again because 1. the photos show smoke coming out of every floor. The only explanation for this is that there was a lot of fire and 2. firefighters confirm this.

    Yes but only on one side of the building ... that makes your claim it was fully engulfed in fire mute

    Like i said

    Debris ignited fires on at least 10 floors in the building at its south and west faces. However, only the fires on some of the lower floors-7 through 9 and 11 through 13-burned out of control.

    King Mob wrote: »
    No you said that the firefighters were wrong because they did not see the north side of the building. I showed a picture of firefighters on the not side of the building. The only way they could have not seen the north side of the building is by not looking up.
    You are suggesting exactly that to maintain your pedantry.

    You showed a picture of firefighters looking down ..... laughable
    King Mob wrote: »
    Not what I said. Your desperate strawman is transparent and pathetic.

    No but your picture doesn't show it ....


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    Lol. How do you know that "Large parts of the North side of that building remained unaffected"? A lack of smoke coming out of the windows on that side perhaps?

    And a lack of fire .... oops there goes your fully engulfed in flames theory

    You yourself stated that windows where intact

    Is that firefighter who said The flames were coming out of every window of that building lying ??


    Ooh and nice cherry picking of my post

    Do me a favor and verify every quote i gave about the statements of those firefighters Because as you try to show here ... They cannot be wrong


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,226 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    weisses wrote: »
    What floors above floor 13 on the north side do you see smoke pouring out of the building ???

    Yes south-side ... How can you reach that conclusion about fire fully engulfing the building when there is a lack of smoke and fire on at least one side of the building.

    Yes but only on one side of the building ... that makes your claim it was fully engulfed in fire mute
    Again, look at the pictures you have been repeatedly provided. They show smoke coming out of nearly every floor.

    You don't see smoke coming out of the north side because the windows were intact.

    Again smoke pouring out of every floor in a building indicates a lot of fire.
    You are just being painful pedantic to avoid points.
    weisses wrote: »
    You showed a picture of firefighters looking down ..... laughable
    So then you are indeed suggesting that the firefighters only ever looked down, never up and never once tried to fully assess the situation.
    This is clearly silly, and show how nonsensical your argument is.
    weisses wrote: »
    No but your picture doesn't show it ....
    It does, you are just pretending it doesn't because you don't want to budge from your predisposed conclusion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,226 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    weisses wrote: »
    And a lack of fire .... oops there goes your fully engulfed in flames theory
    And how do you know there is a lack of fire? because you can't see it?
    But you can't see any fire on the south side, as you are quick to point out, yet we know there was fire there...

    It's almost as if you have no basis for assuming your claim.
    weisses wrote: »
    You yourself stated that windows where intact
    Which prevents smoke from pouring out. The window on the south side were mostly gone, hence all of the smoke escaped that way.
    weisses wrote: »
    Is that firefighter who said The flames were coming out of every window of that building lying ??
    No he is not. it is clear from his context that he meant that all of the windows on the south side were pouring out smoke.

    Again all of your quotes you are addressing are you simply being ignorant and pedantic.
    Cause that's all you have to support your argument.
    There's literally nothing anyone can do that would convince you, or admit you're wrong even when it is clear to any sensible person.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    Again, look at the pictures you have been repeatedly provided. They show smoke coming out of nearly every floor.

    You don't see smoke coming out of the north side because the windows were intact.

    Again smoke pouring out of every floor in a building indicates a lot of fire.
    You are just being painful pedantic to avoid points.

    Smoke covering the whole south side of the building yes and a lot of smoke doesn't always indicate a lot of fire that's is untrue. I am not saying that it is the case with building 7 ... But claiming a lot of smoke equals a lot of fire is false
    King Mob wrote: »
    So then you are indeed suggesting that the firefighters only ever looked down, never up and never once tried to fully assess the situation.
    This is clearly silly, and show how nonsensical your argument is.

    It does, you are just pretending it doesn't because you don't want to budge from your predisposed conclusion.

    Nope you showed a picture with firefighters looking down ... But claiming eventually they had to look up .......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    And how do you know there is a lack of fire? because you can't see it?
    But you can't see any fire on the south side, as you are quick to point out, yet we know there was fire there...

    But .... but .. where does the fully engulfed in fire claim goes when no one can see it ??
    King Mob wrote: »
    It's almost as if you have no basis for assuming your claim.

    You sure your not looking in a mirror when typing reply's ??
    King Mob wrote: »
    Which prevents smoke from pouring out. The window on the south side were mostly gone, hence all of the smoke escaped that way.

    How do you know there was smoke affecting the north side when it wasn't visible ? and why according to your own theory of lots of smoke means lots of fire didn't the windows burst on the northside ?
    King Mob wrote: »
    No he is not. it is clear from his context that he meant that all of the windows on the south side were pouring out smoke.

    Then why did he claim ALL the windows where gone ?? is he wrong .. is he lying ??

    So we need to see things in context now that your argumentation contradicts itself ..... terrific
    King Mob wrote: »
    Again all of your quotes you are addressing are you simply being ignorant and pedantic.
    Cause that's all you have to support your argument.
    There's literally nothing anyone can do that would convince you, or admit you're wrong even when it is clear to any sensible person.

    Of course you wont address them because it would shoot holes in your silly explanations

    I just wish we could discuss things without you having to make your point with half baked insults when cornered


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,226 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    weisses wrote: »
    Nope you showed a picture with firefighters looking down ... But claiming eventually they had to look up .......
    Again, this is the level of pedantry and silliness you are willing to plumb to avoid difficult points.
    There is no arguing with logic like this.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 291 ✭✭Sixtus


    King Mob wrote: »
    Again, this is the level of pedantry and silliness you are willing to plumb to avoid difficult points.
    There is no arguing with logic like this.
    1. We walked over by number Seven World Trade Center as it was burning and saw this 40-plus story building with fire on nearly all floors. –FDNY Lieutenant Robert Larocco

    2. ...Just when you thought it was over, you're walking by this building and you're hearing this building creak and fully involved in flames. It's like, is it coming down next? Sure enough, about a half an hour later it came down. –FDNY Lieutenant James McGlynn

    3. I walked out and I got to Vesey and West, where I reported to Frank [Cruthers]. He said, we’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down. At this point, the fire was going virtually on every floor, heavy fire and smoke that really wasn’t bothering us when we were searching because it was being pushed southeast and we were a little bit west of that. I remember standing just where West and Vesey start to rise toward the entrance we were using in the World Financial Center. There were a couple of guys standing with me and a couple of guys right at the intersection, and we were trying to back them up – and here goes 7. It started to come down and now people were starting to run. –FDNY Deputy Chief Nick Visconti http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/visconti.html

    4. All morning I was watching 7 World Trade burn, which we couldn't do anything about because it was so much chaos looking for missing members. –Firefighter Marcel Klaes

    5. When the building came down it was completely involved in fire, all forty-seven stories.
    –FDNY Assistant Chief Harry Myers (Smith, Dennis, 2002. Report From Ground Zero: The Heroic Story of the Rescuers at the World Trade Center. New York: Penguin Putnam. p. 160)

    6. The concern there again, it was later in the afternoon, 2, 2:30, like I said. The fear then was Seven. Seven was free burning. Search had been made of 7 already from what they said so they had us back up to that point where we were waiting for 7 to come down to operate from the north back down. –Captain Robert Sohmer http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110472.PDF

    7. Then we had to move because the Duane Reade, they said, wasn't safe because building 7 was really roaring. –FDNY Chief Medical Officer Kerry Kelly.

    8. At this point Seven World Trade was going heavy, and they weren't letting anybody get too close. Everybody was expecting that to come down. –Firefighter Vincent Massa

    9. Chief Cruthers told me that they had formed another command post up on Chambers Street. At this point there were a couple of floors burning on Seven World Trade Center. Chief McNally wanted to try and put that fire out, and he was trying to coordinate with the command post up on Chambers Street. This is after searching for a while. He had me running back and forth trying to get companies to go into Seven World Trade Center. His radio didn't seem to be working right either because he had me relaying information back and forth and Chief Cruthers had me --

    Q. So everything was face-to-face? Nothing was by radio?

    A. Yeah, and it was really in disarray. It really was in complete disarray. We never really got an operation going at Seven World Trade Center. –FDNY Captain Michael Donovan

    10. Building #7 was still actively burning and at that time we were advised by a NYFD Chief that building #7 was burning out of control and imminent collapse was probable. –PAPD P.O. Edward McQuade http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/pa-transcripts/pa-police-reports02.pdf page 48.
    11. At Vesey St. and West St., I could see that 7 WTC was ablaze and damaged, along with other buildings. –M. DeFilippis, PAPD P.O. http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/pa-transcripts/pa-police-reports03.pdf page 49

    [Note: the fires in 7 were probably not mainly due to damage from the south tower, but from the north.]
    12. So yeah then we just stayed on Vesey until building Seven came down. There was nothing we could do. The flames were coming out of every window of that building from the explosion of the south tower. So then building Seven came down. When that started coming down you heard that pancaking sound again everyone jumped up and starts.

    Q: Why was building Seven on fire? Was that flaming debris from tower two, from tower two that fell onto that building and lit it on fire?

    A: Correct. Because it really got going, that building Seven, saw it late in the day and like the first Seven floors were on fire. It looked like heavy fire on seven floors. It was fully engulfed, that whole building. There were pieces of tower two [sic: he probably means tower one] in building Seven and the corners of the building missing and what-not. But just looking up at it from ground level however many stories -- it was 40 some odd -- you could see the flames going straight through from one side of the building to the other, that’s an entire block. –Firefighter Tiernach Cassidy

    13. "We were down about a block from the base of the World Trade Center towers about an hour ago. And there was a great deal of concern at that time, the firemen said building number 7 was going to collapse, building number five was in danger of collapsing. And there's so little they can do to try to fight the fires in these buildings, because the fires are so massive. And so much of the buildings continues to fall into the street. When you're down there, Dan, you hear smaller secondary explosions going off every 15 or 20 minutes, and so it's an extremely dangerous place to be."
    –CBS-TV News Reporter Vince DeMentri http://terrorize.dk/911/witnesses/911.wtc.secondary.explosions.wmv

    14. Well, they said that's (7) fully involved at this time. This was a fully involved building. I said, all right, they're not coming for us for a while. Now you're trapped in this rubble, and you're trying to get a grasp of an idea of what's going on there. I heard on the handy talky that we are now fighting a 40-story building fully involved.

    Now you're trapped in the rubble and the guys who are there are fighting the worst high-rise fire in the history of New York or history of the world, probably, I don't know, 40, story building fully involved, I guess that was probably the worst.

    I was, needless to say, scared to death that something else was going to fall on us, that this building was going to come down and we were all going to die, after surviving the worst of it. [Note: I deleted the link this account, and searching the net for the text doesn’t turn up anything. This sounds like an account from north tower stairwell B survivor. Anyone who knows for sure, let me know.]

    15. And 7 World Trade was burning up at the time. We could see it. ... the fire at 7 World Trade was working its way from the front of the building northbound to the back of the building. There was no way there could be water put on it, because there was no water in the area. –Firefighter Eugene Kelty Jr.

    16. The time was approximately 11a.m. Both of the WTC towers were collapsed and the streets were covered with debris. Building #7 was still standing but burning. ...We spoke to with a FDNY Chief who has his men holed up in the US Post Office building. He informed us that the fires in building 7 were uncontrollable and that its collapse was imminent. There were no fires inside the loading dock (of 7) at this time but we could hear explosions deep inside. –PAPD P.O. William Connors http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/pa-transcripts/pa-police-reports04.pdf page 69

    17. "There's number Seven World Trade. That's the OEM bunker." We had a snicker about that. We looked over, and it's engulfed in flames and starting to collapse.

    We're kind of caught in traffic and people and things, and everything's going on. We hear over the fire portable, "Everybody evacuate the site. It's going to collapse." Mark Steffens starts yelling, "Get out of here! Get out of here! Get out of here! We've got to go! We've got to go! It's going to collapse." I turned around, and I piped up real loud and said, "Stay in the frigging car. Roll the windows up. It's pancake collapsing. We'll be fine. The debris will quit and the cloud will come through. Just stay in the car." We pulled the car over, turned around and just watched it pancake. We had a dust cloud but nothing like it was before. –Paramedic Louis Cook
    (Building 7 fire makes rescuer of NT stairwell victim’s route impassable, just before collapse):
    I remember it was bad and I'm going to get to a point where we came back that way on the way up. We couldn't even go that way, that's how bad the fire was, but by the time I was coming back it was rolling, more than a couple of floors, just fully involved, rolling.

    ...So now it's us 4 and we are walking towards it and I remember it would have at one point been an easier path to go towards our right, but being building 7 -- that must have been building 7 I'm guessing with that fire, we decided to stay away from that because things were just crackling, falling and whatnot. So as I’m going back, that fire that was on my right is now on my left. I’m backtracking and that fire is really going and on the hike towards there, we put down our masks, which at this point started to realize maybe it would have been good thing if we had this mask on the way back, but then again between the fire and about halfway when I was on the way back, I got a radio call from the guys that we left and it was Johnny Colon the chauffeur of 43, who was effecting a different rescue. He was carrying somebody out.
    He had called me and said “Hey Jerry don’t try and get back out the way you went in which was big heads up move because he said that building was rolling on top of the building that we were passing. That building was on fire and likely to collapse more too.
    Between Picciotto asking me are you sure we can get out this way because it really didn’t look good with that fire and my guy telling me that you better not because of the area we crawled in was unattainable now too. ...we started going back the other way.
    Q: Would that be towards West Street?
    A: That would have been back towards what I know is the Winter Garden....[west]
    –Firefighter Gerard Suden

    18. I remember Chief Hayden saying to me, "We have a six-story building over there, a seven-story building, fully involved." At that time he said, "7 has got fire on several floors." He said, "We've got a ten-story over there, another ten-story over there, a six-story over there, a 13-story over there." He just looked at me and said, "**** 'em all. Let 'em burn." He said, "Just tell the guys to keep looking for guys. Just keep looking for the brothers. We've got people trapped. We've got to get them out." –Lieutenant William Ryan

    19. I walked around the building to get back to the command post and that's when they were waiting for 7 World Trade Center to come down. ...They had three floors of fire on three separate floors, probably 10, 11 and 15 it looked like, just burning merrily. It was pretty amazing, you know, it's the afternoon in lower Manhattan, a major high-rise is burning, and they said 'we know.' –FDNY Chief Thomas McCarthy

    20. We were champing at the bit," says WCBS-TV reporter Vince DeMentri of his decision to sneak behind police barricades and report from 7 World Trade Center a half-hour before it collapsed. "I knew the story was in there." But after he and his cameraman slipped past officers, they lost all sense of direction. "From outside this zone, you could figure out where everything was," he says. "But inside, it was all destruction and blown-out buildings, and we had no clue. I walked into one building, but I had no idea where I was. The windows were all blown out. Computers, desks, furniture, and people's possessions were strewn all over." He found a picture of a little girl lying in the rubble. Then he realized that No. 7, aflame, was about fifteen to twenty feet ahead of him. "I looked up Barclay Street," he says. "There was nobody out. No bodies, no injured. Nobody. There were mounds of burning debris. It was like opening a broiler." http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/sept11/features/5183/index.html

    21. They are worried that number 7 is burning and they are talking about not ceasing operations.
    –Deputy Commissioner Frank Gribbon

    22. There were hundreds of firefighters waiting to -- they were waiting for 7 World Trade Center to come down as it was on fire. It was too dangerous to go in and fight the fire. –Assistant Commissioner James Drury

    23. We assisted some FDNY personnel who were beginning to attempt to fight the fire at 7 WTC. We assisted in dragging hose they needed to bring water into the building. –Kenneth Kohlmann PAPD P.O. http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/pa-transcripts/pa-police-reports04.pdf page 26

    24. My first thoughts when I came down a little further into the site, south of Chambers Street, was, "Where am I?" I didn't recognize it. Obviously, the towers were gone. The only thing that remained standing was a section of the Vista Hotel. Building 7 was on fire. That was ready to come down. –Charlie Vitchers, Ground Zero Superintendent http://www.pbs.org/americarebuilds/profiles/profiles_vitchers_t.html

    25. The whole south side of Seven World Trade had been hit by the collapse of the second Tower, and there was fire on every floor." – Fire Captain Brenda Berkman (Susan Hagen and Mary Carouba, Women at Ground Zero, 2002, p. 213)
    26. At that point, Seven World Trade had 12 stories of fire in it. They were afraid it was going to collapse on us, so they pulled everybody out. We couldn't do anything. – Firefighter Maureen McArdle-Schulman (Susan Hagen and Mary Carouba, Women at Ground Zero, 2002, p. 17)
    27. The 7 World Trade Center was roaring. All we could think is we were an Engine Company, we have got to get them some water. We need some water you know. With that, we positioned the rig, I don't know, 3 quarters of a block away maybe. A fire boat was going to relay water to us. I don't know if I have things in the right order, whatever, if we were getting water out of a hydrant first. Jesus Christ --
    Q. Captain said you were getting water. You were draining a vacuum?
    A. It was draining away from us. Right. We had to be augmented. I think that's when the fire boat came. I think the fire boats supplied us. Of course you don't see that. You just see the (inaudible) way and you know, we are hooking up and we wound up supplying the Tower Ladder there. I just remember feeling like helpless, like everybody there was doomed and there is -- I just felt like there was absolutely nothing we could do. I want to just go back a little bit.–Firefighter Kevin Howe

    28. "When I got out and onto a clear pile, I see that 7 World Trade Center and the customs house have serious fire. Almost every window has fire. It is an amazing site. –Captain Jay Jonas, Ladder 6. (Dennis Smith. Report From Ground Zero. New York: Viking Penguin, 2002. P. 103)

    29. Firefighter TJ Mundy: "The other building, #7, was fully involved, and he was worried about the next collapse."
    (Dennis Smith. Report From Ground Zero. New York: Viking Penguin, 2002.)
    30. 7 World Trade was burning from the ground to the ceiling fully involved. It was unbelievable. –Firefighter Steve Modica http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/modica.html
    31. So I attempted to get in through the Barkley Street ramp which is on Barkley (sic) and West Broadway, but I was being held back by the fire department, because 7 World Trade, which is above the ramp, was now fully engulfed.
    –PAPD K-9 Sergeant David Lim http://www.911report.com/media/davidlim.pdf

    32. We could hear fires crackling. We didn’t know it at the time, but No. 7 World Trade Center and No. 5 World Trade Center were immediately adjacent to us and they were roaring, they were on fire. Those were the sounds that we were hearing. ...At the same time, No. 5 World Trade Center, No. 6 World Trade Center and No. 7 World Trade Center were roaring. They were on fire. And they were right next to us. So we have all that smoke that we’re dealing with.
    –FDNY Capt. Jay Jonas http://archive.recordonline.com/adayinseptember/jonas.htm
    1. The major concern at that time was number Seven, building number Seven, which had taken a big hit from the north tower. When it fell, it ripped steel out from between the third and sixth floors across the facade on Vesey Street. We were concerned that the fires on several floors and the missing steel would result in the building collapsing. –FDNY Chief Frank Fellini

    2. At that time, other firefighters started showing up, Deputy Battalion Chief Paul Ferran of the 41 Battalion, and James Savastano of the First Division assigned to the Second Battalion showed up and we attempted to search and extinguish, at the time which was small pockets of fire in 7 World Trade Center. We were unaware of the damage in the front of 7, because we were entering from the northeast entrance. We weren't aware of the magnitude of the damage in the front of the building. – FDNY Captain Anthony Varriale http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110313.PDF

    3. [Shortly after the tower collapses] I don’t know how long this was going on, but I remember standing there looking over at building 7 and realizing that a big chunk of the lower floors had been taken out on the Vesey Street side. I looked up at the building and I saw smoke in it, but I really didn't see any fire at that time. Deputy ––Chief Nick Visconti http://tinyurl.com/paqux

    4. A few minutes after that a police officer came up to me and told me that the façade in front of Seven World Trade Center was gone and they thought there was an imminent collapse of Seven World Trade Center. –FDNY Lieutenant William Melarango http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110045.PDF

    5. I think they said they had seven to ten floors that were freestanding and they weren't going to send anyone in. –FDNY Chief Thomas McCarthy http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110055.PDF

    6. So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. But they had a hose line operating. Like I said, it was hitting the sidewalk across the street, but eventually they pulled back too.

    Then we received an order from Fellini, we’re going to make a move on 7. That was the first time really my stomach tightened up because the building didn’t look good. I was figuring probably the standpipe systems were shot. There was no hydrant pressure. I wasn’t really keen on the idea. Then this other officer I’m standing next to said, that building doesn’t look straight. So I’m standing there. I’m looking at the building. It didn’t look right, but, well, we’ll go in, we’ll see.

    So we gathered up rollups and most of us had masks at that time. We headed toward 7. And just around we were about a hundred yards away and Butch Brandeis came running up. He said forget it, nobody’s going into 7, there’s creaking, there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped. And probably about 10 minutes after that, Visconti, he was on West Street, and I guess he had another report of further damage either in some basements and things like that, so Visconti said nobody goes into 7, so that was the final thing and that was abandoned.
    Firehouse Magazine: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?
    Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.
    Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?
    Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered through there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. – Capt. Chris Boyle http://tinyurl.com/e7bzp

    7. After the initial blast, Housing Authority worker Barry Jennings, 46, reported to a command center on the 23rd floor of 7 World Trade Center. He was with Michael Hess, the city's corporation counsel, when they felt and heard another explosion [the collapse of the north tower]. First calling for help, they scrambled downstairs to the lobby, or what was left of it. "I looked around, the lobby was gone. It looked like hell," Jennings said. http://www.record-eagle.com/2001/sep/11scene.htm

    8. Anyway, I was looking at WTC7 and I noticed that it wasn’t looking like it was straight. It was really weird. The closest corner to me (the SE corner) was kind of out of whack with the SW corner. It was impossible to tell whether that corner (the SW) was leaning over more or even if it was leaning the other way. With all of the smoke and the debris pile, I couldn’t exactly tell what was going on, but I sure could see the building was leaning over in a way it certainly should not be. I asked another guy looking with me and he said “That building is going to come down, we better get out of here.” So we did. –M.J., Employed at 45 Broadway, in a letter to me.

    9. So we left 7 World Trade Center, back down to the street, where I ran into Chief Coloe from the 1st Division, Captain Varriale, Engine 24, and Captain Varriale told Chief Coloe and myself that 7 World Trade Center was badly damaged on the south side and definitely in danger of collapse. Chief Coloe said we were going to evacuate the collapse zone around 7 World Trade Center, which we did. – FDNY Lieutenant Rudolph Weindler http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110462.PDF

    10. Just moments before the south tower collapsed and, you know, when it happened we didn't know it was the south tower. We thought it was the north tower. There was a reporter of some sort, female with blond hair and her cameraman, an oriental fellow. They were setting up outside 7 World Trade Center, just east of the pedestrian bridge. I told them it would probably be better off to be set up under the bridge. At least it was protected. I was just about to enter a dialogue with her when I heard a sound I never heard before. I looked up and saw this huge cloud. I told him run. I grabbed the female, I threw her through the revolving doors of number 7.

    We were proceeding inside. She fell to the ground. I helped her out, I pushed her towards the direction of where we were all in the south corner and there was a little doorway behind that desk which led into the loading bays. Everybody started to run through that. Never made it to that door. The next thing that I remember was that I was covered in some glass and some debris. Everything came crashing through the front of number 7. It was totally pitch black.

    Q. Were you injured?

    A. Yes, I saw some stuff had fallen on me. I didn't believe that I was injured at that time. I discovered later on I was injured. I had some shards of glass impaled in my head, but once I was able to get all this debris and rubble off of me and cover my face with my jacket so that I could breathe, it was very thick dust, you couldn't see. We heard some sounds. We reached out and felt our way around. I managed to find some other people in this lower lobby. We crawled over towards the direction where we thought the door was and as we approached it the door cracked open a little, so we had the lights from the loading bay. We made our way over there. The loading bay doors were 3-fourths of the way shut when this happened, so they took a lot of dust in there, but everyone in those bays was safe and secure. We had face to face contact with Chief Maggio and Captain Nahmod. They told me – I said do whatever you need to do, get these people out of here. Go, go towards the water. –EMS Division Chief Jon Peruggia
    http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110160.PDF

    11. You could see the damage at 7 World Trade Center, the damage into the AT&T building.
    –FDNY Firefighter Vincent Palmieri http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110258.PDF

    12. At this point, 7, which is right there on Vesey, the whole corner of the building was missing. I was thinking to myself we are in a bad place, because it was the corner facing us. –Fred Marsilla, FDNY
    http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110399.PDF

    13. The way we got into the loading dock [of WTC 7] was not the way we were getting out. It was obstructed.

    Q. The door was blocked?

    A. Yeah, and we found our way -- we walked across the loading dock area, and we found there was another door. We went in that door, and from there we were directed to -- I really guess it was like a basement area of the building, but we were directed to an opposite door. –Dr. Michael Guttenberg , NYC Office of Medical Affairs http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110005.PDF

    14. We eventually ended up meeting after the second explosion, three of us met up here, but I didn't see a lot of the people that were with me until two, three days later. I got word that they were okay. For instance, Dr. Guttenberg and Dr. Asaeda, who were at 7 World Trade Center, they got trapped in there and had to like climb in and out and get out because that building also became very damaged supposedly and they were there. We thought they were dead. I guess he was in an area where Commissioner Tierney might have been, I believe. I think she was in 7 also. –Paramedic Manuel Delgado http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110004.PDF

    (After collapse of south tower)
    15. The decision was either to go left or right and we ended up going right, between the two buildings, in the alleyway on the north, which turned out to be the right direction because apparently there was a lot of debris and part of 7 down already. Also, I did notice as I was making my exit the sound of the firefighters' alarms indicating that they were down. I did remember that as well but just could not see anything. –Dr. Glenn Asaeda http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_national/sept11_fdny_transcripts/9110062.PDF

    16. I saw the firefighter. There were people screaming out of one of these two buildings over here saying they couldn't get out, and my partner took one straggler fireman, the one that we had with us, and was trying to break the door because the door obviously had shifted or something. They couldn't get the door open.

    Q: That was 7 World Trade Center?

    A: I believe it was 7. Maybe it was 5. It was at the back end of it because I do remember the telephone company [which is next to building 7]. So I think it was the back end of 7, I think right over here at that point, and they couldn't get out. Then I had ran down the block and I flagged a ladder company and they brought the ladder, which they had like a vestibule that you couldn't like really reach the people because the ladder wouldn't reach. So they went and got other resources, they went inside the building, and I told my partner that it wasn't safe and that we need to go because everything around us was like falling apart. –EMT Nicole Ferrell http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110304.PDF

    17. The whole south side of Seven World Trade had been hit by the collapse of the second Tower. – Fire Captain Brenda Berkman (Susan Hagen and Mary Carouba, Women at Ground Zero, 2002, p. 213)

    18. At that point, they said that Seven World Trade had no face and it was ready to collapse. – EMT Mercedes Rivera: (Susan Hagen and Mary Carouba, Women at Ground Zero, 2002, p. 29)

    19. You see the white smoke, you see the thing leaning like this? It's definitely going. There's no way to stop it. 'Cause you have to go up in there to put it out, and it's already, the structural integrity is not there. –Unidentified firefighter in this video.

    20. As far as I was concerned, we were still trapped. I was hopeful. things were looking a whole lot better now than they were just a few minutes earlier, but we were a long way from safe and sound. Five World Trade Center was fully involved, Six World Trade Center was roaring pretty good, and behind them Seven World Trade Center was teetering on collapse.
    The buildings just behind him and to his left were looking like they too might collapse at any time, and there were whole chunks of concrete falling to both sides. Flames dancing everywhere. The small-arms detonations were kicking up a notch or two, and it sounded like this poor guy was being fired at, by snipers or unseen terrorists, at close range. (Last Man Down by Richard Picciotto, FDNY Battalion Commander Penguin Books, 2002. page 191)

    plenty of FDNY accounts of the collapse of WTC7 showing that members were on all sides of the building. This is just getting desperate Weisses.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    Again, this is the level of pedantry and silliness you are willing to plumb to avoid difficult points.
    There is no arguing with logic like this.

    Yeah sherrypicking posts definately looks good in argumenting your stance ... i Thought you where the mature and adult one

    But just to entertain you

    What would those fire fighters testify when they looked up

    Because not all firefighters were stating it was fully engulfed

    Maybe you could try replying to my other points as well this time


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭weisses


    Sixtus wrote: »
    plenty of FDNY accounts of the collapse of WTC7 showing that members were on all sides of the building. This is just getting desperate Weisses.

    I put up a few statements of firefigters in another post

    Maybe you should try to come up with a reply on those staments instead of copy pasting that wall of text

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=83592462&postcount=245

    Here is my post ...

    Good luck


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,226 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    weisses wrote: »
    Maybe you could try replying to my other points as well this time
    Why? it's all just more of the same nonsensical and pig headed pedantry that lead you to suggest that the fire-fighters never bother to look up.

    Any points I do make you'll just ignore and latch on to some even sillier pedantic point to yammer on about to avoid them.
    Any questions I ask, you just ignore outright.

    I really don't see why I should expend the energy to explain stuff like why it's silly to suggest that the firefighters never looked up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭weisses


    King Mob wrote: »
    Why? it's all just more of the same nonsensical and pig headed pedantry that lead you to suggest that the fire-fighters never bother to look up..

    And what do you suggest they saw ?? A building fully engulfed in flames ? as was stated

    Or That there were a couple of floors burning on Seven World Trade Center. Chief McNally wanted to try and put that fire out as was stated

    The one thing that i didn't see on that picture is a building fully engulfed in flames ... would also be very dangerous to walk underneath a building fully engulfed in flames

    King Mob wrote: »
    Any points I do make you'll just ignore and latch on to some even sillier pedantic point to yammer on about to avoid them.
    Any questions I ask, you just ignore outright..

    I did not

    Only thing what is clearly pointed out to you in this thread is that you seem to be incapable of understanding the meaning of the term fully engulfed in flames

    So if you have any points you want adressed put them here and i will try to anwswer them
    King Mob wrote: »
    I really don't see why I should expend the energy to explain stuff like why it's silly to suggest that the firefighters never looked up.

    No i said your picture is not showing they were looking up .. .That is correct is it ?

    I know by now you cannot defend what is stated by the firefighters .. Thats why you need to show your feigned upset over that picture so you can sneak/weasel your way out of this thread ... Your getting predictable


Advertisement