Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine on the brink of civil war. Mod Warning in OP.

Options
24567134

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Boskowski


    This could get ugly yet
    The EU/USA egged on the protests with obvious intention of destabilizing the region (Russia). But their bedfellows are strange some even fascist?
    Now a civil war between Ukrainian and Russian part of the Ukrainian population does not look impossible. Russia in stand by to protect Russian part of population and of course their own interest. Putin ordered Army readiness excercise yesterday and Russian airforce is on alert as of today.
    What do the EU/USA fools think they're playing at? This how sh1t happens. These guys are playing a dangerous game.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26 Doncor


    About east ukraine and west , im originally from ukraine and i have never met someone from east who wants live separatly, my cousins live in east (one in Kharkiv, atother in Crimea, which is originally Tatar and Russian), and they support united Ukraine with new goverment. I havent been there for a long time, but i keep eye on a situation there


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    Boskowski wrote: »
    This could get ugly yet
    The EU/USA egged on the protests with obvious intention of destabilizing the region (Russia). But their bedfellows are strange some even fascist?
    Now a civil war between Ukrainian and Russian part of the Ukrainian population does not look impossible. Russia in stand by to protect Russian part of population and of course their own interest. Putin ordered Army readiness excercise yesterday and Russian airforce is on alert as of today.
    What do the EU/USA fools think they're playing at? This how sh1t happens. These guys are playing a dangerous game.

    The Ukrainians should be free to do trade with whom they wish, not be bullied into it by a particular country and held hostage by that country if they don't

    It's akin to the UK punishing Ireland for doing trade with the US

    As an aside, they had a very corrupt leader, who is now a fugitive and wanted for possible charges of mass murder


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,447 ✭✭✭weisses


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    As an aside, they had a very corrupt leader, who is now a fugitive and wanted for possible charges of mass murder

    Isn't it rumored he found refuge in a sanatorium near the Kremlin ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    Boskowski wrote: »
    This could get ugly yet
    The EU/USA egged on the protests with obvious intention of destabilizing the region (Russia). But their bedfellows are strange some even fascist?
    Now a civil war between Ukrainian and Russian part of the Ukrainian population does not look impossible. Russia in stand by to protect Russian part of population and of course their own interest. Putin ordered Army readiness excercise yesterday and Russian airforce is on alert as of today.
    What do the EU/USA fools think they're playing at? This how sh1t happens. These guys are playing a dangerous game.

    At minimum, I expect Russia will annex Crimea.
    They are probably trying to organise a breakaway East Ukraine however.
    I expect this to proceed via negotiation.
    Russia may posture with it's army, but they nowhere near as confident as they like to portray.

    I don't support the Bad West narrative.
    This would have happened without any Western intervention.
    Yanukovich only came to power on a compromise that he would form alliances and trade agreements with the West.
    And his first visit as President was to Brussels - NOT Moscow.

    Much more likely in fact, is that this revolution would potentially have started sooner, only that Yanukovich had used the EU treaty as leverage to pacify West Ukraine.
    Trying to take it away after it had been essentially given, was guaranteed to provoke popular opposition.
    The imbecile should have understood that - it's hard to conceive how he could have been so incredibly out of touch, regardless of good the Russian offer was or how terrible the Russian pressure was.

    But then again, trying to use violence and terrorism to end the protests was guaranteed to force an escalation to a violent reaction. And he did that also.


    Russia made a huge blunder by trying to assert their regional power to achieve an absolute result, instead of accepting a tacit compromise... even with EU membership, it's going to take generations for things to change in Ukraine and Russia would have been able to achieve all their aims and maintain a headlock on the Ukraine, with ease.

    Now Russia will have to violate international law if it wishes to achieve it's original objectives. That may result in sanctions - and the entire Russian economy depends on Oil & Gas to survive.

    No Oil revenue = no Russia.

    Of course, this crisis may be used to achieve the desired outcome n Syria, blocked by the Russian UN Veto.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,692 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    ...
    - and the entire Russian economy depends on Oil & Gas to survive.

    No Oil revenue = no Russia.

    Will Angela be turning the reactors back on soon?


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,223 ✭✭✭✭biko


    I'm sure both EU and Putin would be delighted at a chance to gain control in Ukraine, aka "the breadbasket of Russia", later "the breadbasket of Europe"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Boskowski


    Not really on a 'bad West' narrative here myself. Just saying people are playing dangerous games there, don't like it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    Boskowski wrote: »
    Not really on a 'bad West' narrative here myself. Just saying people are playing dangerous games there, don't like it.

    You're certainly not alone:
    http://traffic.libsyn.com/dancarlin/cswdcc70.mp3

    I definitely observe that concern, however, I also recognise the 'policy of appeasement' concern.

    I see both paths as risky.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,678 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    Personally, as like all here, that this is as bad as it gets and no military action results. If any country deserves a break from conflict it is Ukraine, given the history of it over the past century.
    However, domestic pressure in Russia might force Putin to embrace his hard-man persona that he has developed, both cold-war warriors and the progressive left might tacitically unite in the US to poise a more confrontation position, and the EU - well that is a mystery left up to God to solve.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,098 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    Given the economic importance of Ukraine to both the EU and Russians what with the gas pipe line running through the country would either allow a civil war to break out and in the case that it does what could either one do to end it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    josip wrote: »
    Will Angela be turning the reactors back on soon?

    Depends on how the 'Fracking' in North America goes
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/oil/10476647/Fracking-boom-frees-the-US-from-old-oil-alliances.html
    The US will soon overtake Saudi Arabia as the world's largest producer of crude oil, liberating its foreign policy from dependency on a handful of oil-rich Arab allies

    and how long Russia could sustain economic sanctions.
    Historically, when oil prices have collapsed, so has Russia/CCCP.

    fsu-oil-production-and-price.png

    If you recall when Medvedev was in power, he stressed the need to move away from commodities and develop services/manufacturing, but it never really happened.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medvedev_modernisation_programme
    http://rt.com/business/putin-russia-oil-labor-632/
    The current abyss between consumption and productivity is dangerous, Putin said. “Living off rent from natural resources, at the expense of future generations, unearned wealth cannot be stable or long term," he added.
    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323936404578579530810890780
    MOSCOW--Russia President Vladimir Putin Monday urged natural gas exporting countries to join forces and defend traditional long-term oil-linked gas contracts in the face of the growing popularity of spot pricing.


    Of course, Ukraine are estimated to be less than a decade from complete energy indepedence due to the developments of their shale gas industry.
    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/abe8802a-4d0c-11e3-9f40-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2uXonQeS1


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    weisses wrote: »
    Isn't it rumored he found refuge in a sanatorium near the Kremlin ?

    Close, he'll be giving a press conference from Rostov-on-Don in Russia tomorrow


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    Given the economic importance of Ukraine to both the EU and Russians what with the gas pipe line running through the country would either allow a civil war to break out and in the case that it does what could either one do to end it?

    Gazprom had already started construction on the South Stream to circumvent Ukraine, before the revolution.

    south-stream_20131129140115441.jpg
    http://rt.com/business/gazprom-bulgaria-south-stream-064/
    The South Stream pipeline will stretch 2400 km and by 2019 could have a 64 billion cubic meter annual capacity, delivering natural gas to Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary, Slovenia, and Austria and Italy in one direction and Croatia, Macedonia, Greece and Turkey in a second.

    The undersea portion that runs the Black Sea will be able to transport 15.8 billion cubic meters of Russian gas to Eastern Europe.

    Gazprom pumps 17.8 billion cubic meters of gas annually to Bulgaria through Ukraine and Romania, Bloomberg News reports. Bulgaria spends as much as 1.4 billion euros annually on gas imports

    Most recently, Gazprom demanded Ukraine urgently pay a $1 billion overdue gas bill, raising fears of a new "gas war".
    Pricing disputes over advance payments in have caused major supply disruptions, both in 2006 and 2009, when Russia shut off gas to Ukraine, leaving many customers without heat.

    The first effort to circumvent Ukraine was the Nord Stream project, which connects Russia and Germany under the Baltic Sea. It is estimated to have cost $7.4 billion and opened in November 2011.

    0,,5791275_4,00.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,615 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Boskowski wrote: »
    Not really on a 'bad West' narrative here myself. Just saying people are playing dangerous games there, don't like it.

    Yeah I've got a dirty feeling in the bottom of my stomach that the US & EU don't really believe (nor do they want) Ukraine to fall into European hands- yet. My feeling is that the EU and US are playing a long game here and while they do see a friendly Ukraine as a strategic objective they both know well it is at least a decade away. But to move things along its in EU and US interests to have a bit of rioting every few years, just so the population are reminded about how much greener the grass is on the other side.

    I'd think we'll see Turkey join the EU long before we'll see Ukraine- at least Turkey is a pretty stable democracy and a key NATO participant in the region. Plus their population of 75 odd million will be attractive to expanding the trading union.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    Allegations starting to surface of tens of billions missing from the state coffers


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,615 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    Allegations starting to surface of tens of billions missing from the state coffers

    Not surprising at all. I think I read that they need a €17bn bailout pretty sharpish, that's just the official figure, it's likely far worse than that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    In a dollar value apparently 37 billion is gone - but now reports surfacing and accusations that a further 70 billion may be either partially or fully compromised, absolutely mind-blowing stuff


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,601 ✭✭✭cerastes


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    In a dollar value apparently 37 billion is gone - but now reports surfacing and accusations that a further 70 billion may be either partially or fully compromised, absolutely mind-blowing stuff

    How the fcuk can you siphon off billions, I suppose this isn't the thread for it, they have some experience of siphoning stuff off though :o

    Still, they dont owe as much as we do, least they got some tanks and shhit for it


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    cerastes wrote: »
    How the fcuk can you siphon off billions, I suppose this isn't the thread for it, they have some experience of siphoning stuff off though :o

    Still, they dont owe as much as we do, least they got some tanks and shhit for it

    Gadaffi and his family managed up to squirrel away up to $200 billion

    I don't trust the figures on Ukraine yet. Bribes, corruption, slush funds, sleaze, etc aside - a huge amount of money could simply be gone through lax controls, mismanagement and bad investments


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,601 ✭✭✭cerastes


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    Gadaffi and his family managed up to squirrel away up to $200 billion

    I don't trust the figures on Ukraine yet. Bribes, corruption, slush funds, sleaze, etc aside - a huge amount of money could simply be gone through lax controls, mismanagement and bad investments

    Yes, but over a much longer time, this guy has been in power how long??
    Its still a huge amount of money to squander/lose/steal when ordinary Ukrainians are in poverty. They could have given out state wide subsidies to their citizens and not lost so much (speculative, not based on facts or research).
    It makes this country look efficient, although I still think we might owe more. Least they went out and blew it on hookers and drugs, instead of just partying like we did.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    Yanukovich Live Interview on RT Now
    http://rt.com/on-air/


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Eggy Baby!


    https://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukr...pe-332965.html

    In its 2013 Corruption Perceptions Index released today, Transparancy International slammed Ukraine, calling the country the most corrupt nation in Europe and the fifth most corrupt in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).

    Ukraine tied for 144th place in the ranking with Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Iran, Nigeria, and Papua New Guinea. That ranking placed it ahead of several Central Asian post-Soviet states, including Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.

    Ukraine’s position remains unchanged from 2012, though Ukraine’s score fell, indicating a marginally higher level of corruption over the previous year.

    The Corruption Perceptions Index? Are you joking?
    Russia won't send the military into Western Ukraine.
    The Russian military are already in Eastern Ukraine.

    Conspiracy theory stuff. Any Russians who have occupied border posts are likely ethnic militias.

    Russian forces who ARE in Ukraine, however, are playing a defensive role in and around Sevastopol (adjacent to the Russian military base there). The Russians are "in" Eastern Ukraine no more than the Americans are "in" Eastern Cuba.
    Why did Russia (& Belarus) ban the importation of Ukranian Choclate?

    My assumption is because the chocolate was found to be containing harmful chemicals. It even says so in the article you linked. Plus, it was a ban on chocolate from one chocolate maker, not an absolute ban on Ukrainian chocolate.
    Americans pay $70 for 1000 cubic meters of gas when Ukraine pays $550 to Russia for the same amount.
    Mykola Azarov, Ukraine Prime Minister

    What you conveniently forgot to mention is that Ukrainians were paying only 50 dollars per 1000 cm of Russian gas in 2005 which is a truly staggering discount. Its prices have been steadily brought into line with the price EU nations pay for 1000 cm of Russian gas over the last few years.

    Secondly, you are comparing apples and oranges here. America is more or less sufficient in natural gas. Ukraine is not, and imports over 80% of its natural gas from abroad. Domestic gas would obviously be cheaper in the USA because of the abundant supply. Americans pay far less because they import most of their own gas. Then of course we have to factor in other economic factors with differ between the US and Ukraine, such as inflation, charges etc.
    Why did Russia ban the importation of Moldovan Wine?

    My assumption is that they were exercising their sovereign right to decide who to trade with. Boo hoo.

    In this respect, they are no better than the USA or the EU, both of which have politically charged embargoes currently active, I believe.

    Welcome to the modern world, where there is no separation between economics and politics.
    Again, that's hardly isolated to the Ukraine.
    http://www.spiegel.de/international/...-a-479809.html

    We tore down or blew up our monuments post-revolutionary struggle
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson's_Pillar

    (Something the Russians might know a bit about themselves?)

    Just because we or the Estonians did it, doesn't make it acceptable (Estonia isn't relevant here because they only moved the monument, they didn't destroy it).

    I won't even consider what you are trying to suggest with that unusual comment at the end of the quote.
    There is no denying that Ukraine did that, but you deny that Russia has used Gazprom as a political weapon against Ukraine, Moldova etc?

    I didn't deny it. Russia has obviously used Gazprom as a political weapon, but the gas disputes are far more nuanced situations than: the evil Soviet revanchist Russians oppress the poor, underdog Ukrainians. Its not like Russia turns off the gas willy-nilly. It has an interest in keeping them open, you know.
    That legal change occurred after I had made my post, so unless I you believe I have a crystal ball...

    I personally don't approve of it, but this particular regressive measure is hardly isolated to the Ukraine.

    A similar situation has existed in the other former Warsaw Pact countries for years, and it is hardly targeted solely at Russians.

    Apologies, I didn't realise that you had made your post before the law was introduced.

    I didn't say that the Ukraine was the only country that introduced this. Such measures have been introduced in Estonia, for example. But the Ukrainian law is an obvious attempt to sate the baying Banderists who roam Kiev, to keep them happy at the expense of the huge Russian (etc.) population within Ukraine.
    You made that distinction.

    It was implicit, borderline explicit, by your wording.
    Their past is with the Russian Federation certainly.
    Evidently, they want their future to be with Europe.

    So....let me get this straight. You are suggesting from these figures that because a majority of young Ukrainians support EU integration, Ukrainians have vested their future in the EU? Maybe the elderly or middle age want to have a say in Ukraine's future? Their opinions are as relevant to the future of Ukraine as those of the youth. How on earth did you extrapolate those opinions from these figures....unbelievable.
    I - personally - do not want the Ukraine to be admitted to the EU until there is some serious reform, lest we risk another Bulgarian situation.

    Glad we can agree on something :)

    I wish that we can just let Ukraine be in the extended economic area. I don't understand why the EU gets into these conflicts with Russia (and vice versa, of course).
    Political sovereignty?
    They don't care so much about it.
    Why do you think they do?

    The destruction of Russian symbols and statues and the removing of the Russian language's protected status are obviously political statements against imaginary "Russian Imperialism" or some such crap that you mentioned in your first post.

    The protests, as with 99% percent of all protests and revolutions, were sparked by economic conditions, I agree with you there. The difference between Poland and Ukraine is glaring in terms of individual wealth as well as GDP growth. But Ukraine has a completely different society to that of Poland.

    Poland weathered shock therapy very well, and their economy recovered fast after the fall of the USSR. Ukraine didn't, possibly because it was so dependent on Russia (which also tanked). For reference, see how both the Ukrainian and Russian economies shrank during the Great Recession. Russia had huge currency reserves, Ukraine didn't. Russia took a huge hit, Ukraine took a bigger hit.

    Whether or not Poland's economy did so well as a result of the EU is another thing which is unclear.

    Again its very unlikely, given current factors, that Ukraine will benefit from the EU. Its also very unlikely that Ukraine will even join the EU anytime soon (an EU trade agreement does not equate to EU membership and never will).

    Regarding the EU, I can say with confidence as a student of EU Law that if the Ukrainians seek to assert their popular sovereignty by joining the EU they are asserting in the wrong place. Its like trying to assert your bravery by jumping off a cliff.

    Even then, there are huge divisions in Ukrainian society which assures that joining the EU with be a very divisive issue.
    What I actually wrote is that ethnic Russians (such as my partner) as vehemently patriotic

    And the Banderists roaming Kiev aren't? I know many Irish people who are "vehemently patriotic", who would reject anything English out of sheer principle, because of our historical relations with England/the UK.
    In a dollar value apparently 37 billion is gone - but now reports surfacing and accusations that a further 70 billion may be either partially or fully compromised, absolutely mind-blowing stuff

    Its no surprise that there is such incredible corruption among Yanukovych and his band of "good old boy" crooks.


    Anyway; the Russians should encourage a plebiscite in the Crimea and eastern Ukraine. Thats how they will gain from this. Secondly, the EU and Russia should fund a joint bailout for Ukraine, methinks, although with all the instability I'd imagine a **** load would be stolen by the state et al. Hell, even if the state wasn't unstable a good portion of it would be stolen.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,518 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Ukraine should sell Crimea lock, stock and barrel to Russia for ... oooh... hundreds of billions of dollars, plus gas at a contract price of 50 dollars per 1000 cubic meters for the next 100 years. Ukraine gets rid of a population that seems desperate to regress to a Stalinist past and clears their bankruptcy issue and then some. Russia gets to feel big and important. Everyone wins.

    The Russian "invasion" of Ukraine over the past 24 hours (those military helicopters weren't a local militia) is exactly why Russia's neighbours seek to join organisations like the EU and NATO. They don't want to exist merely as satellites of a Russian empire.

    EDIT - It is interesting to see what this Russian aggression will do to NATO/European military spending. There's been an "End of History" view of European military's that has presumed all conflict in the next 50 years will be wars of choice, fought by a few thousand men in faraway hot and sandy places against people with nothing more complicated than pickup trucks and small arms, where tanks will apparently be a pointless luxury. Perhaps Russian adventures in Ukraine will remind NATO members that not all wars are chosen or far from home.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Eggy Baby!


    Aye, we should invade Russia. Perhaps we can also liberate their oil fields people in the process?
    There's been an "End of History" view

    In time, this "End of history" mentality will be viewed as a transient chauvinistic madness that once gripped the world in unenlightened times. In a hundred years, we will all be viewed as naive and narrowminded obscurantists.
    The Russian "invasion" of Ukraine over the past 24 hours (those military helicopters weren't a local militia)

    They weren't indeed, but they were part of the local Sevastopol garrison.

    Is it just me, or is the politics forum filled with unreasonable Russophobic ("the Russians are coming! Quick, everybody join the EU!") types lately?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,892 ✭✭✭spank_inferno


    No one here is 'Russophobic'.

    The mods would kick ass if people became that out of line anyway.

    Many of us gave a healthy scepticism of the Russian perma-president & what he might do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,543 ✭✭✭Conmaicne Mara


    Eggy Baby! wrote: »
    unreasonable Russophobic ("the Russians are coming! Quick, everybody join the EU!") types lately?

    So Russia changing it's laws this week to make it easier to allow parts of "foreign countries" to join the Russian Federation is just a coincidence.

    Can't see a good outcome to this. Either Yanukovych (spelling) will be returned to power, or Russia will acquire large tracts of Ukrainian territory.

    As someone on boards put it before, one side has Putin in their corner, the other side has the EU imposing sunflower oil (or whatever) sanctions.

    Russia can and apparently have put boots on the ground, anyone expect the EU or US to do the same if called for? I won't be betting the farm on it.

    Let Ukraine decide what it wants to do, most if not all countries have had their period of internal strife to work out who they are.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,892 ✭✭✭spank_inferno


    Exactly.... This struggle is the Ukrainians alone.

    Besides, if a new Ukrainian government are happy to have a small Russian fleet on their territory in return for a nice rent, Putin would probably have no issue.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,518 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Eggy Baby! wrote: »
    Is it just me, or is the politics forum filled with unreasonable Russophobic ("the Russians are coming! Quick, everybody join the EU!") types lately?

    I think its just you.

    Honestly, you seem to arise infused with righteous and patriotic fury to defend the honour of Mother Russia with your keyboard everytime there is a topic that even indirectly involves Russia. Just did a quick search of your Politics posts: Russia, Russia, Syria (Russia), Syria again, (Russia again), North Korea, Hugo Chavez (angry at the "American Empire"), various Israel threads (old enemy of the USSR/Russia back Arab client states). Long gaps in between the topics of months at a time.

    That's not a criticism, just an observation. It really is likely just you who have the biased view when it comes to Russia.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement